Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2015

01-02-2015 | Endocrine Tumors

False-Positive Rate of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Presumed Solitary Metastatic Adrenal Disease in Patients with Known Malignancy

Authors: Benjamin Kuritzkes, MD, Manish Parikh, MD, Jonathan Melamed, MD, Nicole Hindman, MD, H. L. Pachter, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) in cancer patients undergoing adrenalectomy for presumed metastatic disease, utilizing the gold standard of histopathology.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all adrenalectomies for metastatic disease performed at our institution over the last 12 years. Preoperative PET scans were compared with final pathology reports. Statistical analyses were performed with Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Student’s t test for continuous variables.

Results

Forty-nine adrenalectomies were performed for metastatic disease. Thirty had preoperative PET imaging and were included in this analysis. Mean age was 65.5 ± 13.6 years (29–91) and 54 % were male. Mean size was 3.8 cm (0.4–7.1). Primary tumor distribution was 61 % (n = 17) pulmonary; 11 % (n = 3) breast; 7 % (n = 2) gastric; 7 % (n = 2) renal; and 4 % (n = 1) each of brain, lymphoma, melanoma, and uterine. Mean standardized uptake value (SUV) was 11 ± 7.3 (3.2–30.0). Final pathology revealed that 80 % (25/30) were positive for metastatic disease and 20 % (5/30) were negative. The positive predictive value of PET in correctly identifying adrenal metastatic disease was 83 % (24 true-positive cases and 5 false-positive cases); there was one false-negative PET. False-positive PET results were not correlated with sex (p = 0.35), age (p = 0.24), or maximum SUV units (p = 0.26).

Conclusions

The 20 % false-positive rate for PET-positive adrenalectomies performed for metastatic disease should warrant its inclusion in preoperative counseling to the patient and interaction with the treating oncologist.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Moreno P, De la Quintana B, Musholt T, et al. Adrenalectomy for solid tumor metises: results of a multicenter European study. Surgery 2013;154:1215–22.PubMedCrossRef Moreno P, De la Quintana B, Musholt T, et al. Adrenalectomy for solid tumor metises: results of a multicenter European study. Surgery 2013;154:1215–22.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sarela A, Murphy I, Coit D, Conlon K. Metastasis to the adrenal gland: the emerging role of laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:1191–6.PubMedCrossRef Sarela A, Murphy I, Coit D, Conlon K. Metastasis to the adrenal gland: the emerging role of laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:1191–6.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Strong V, D’Angelica M, Tang L, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for isolated adrenal metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3392–400.PubMedCrossRef Strong V, D’Angelica M, Tang L, et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for isolated adrenal metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:3392–400.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hirayama T, Fujita T, Koguchi D et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for metastatic adrenal tumor. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014;7:43–7.PubMedCrossRef Hirayama T, Fujita T, Koguchi D et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for metastatic adrenal tumor. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014;7:43–7.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Boland G, Dwamena B, Jagtiani M, et al. Characterization of adrenal masses by using FDG PET: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. Radiology. 2011;259:117–26.PubMedCrossRef Boland G, Dwamena B, Jagtiani M, et al. Characterization of adrenal masses by using FDG PET: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. Radiology. 2011;259:117–26.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Harrison J, Ali A, Bonomi P, Prinz R. The role of positron emission tomography in selecting patients with metastatic cancer for adrenalectomy. Am Surg. 2000;66:432–7.PubMed Harrison J, Ali A, Bonomi P, Prinz R. The role of positron emission tomography in selecting patients with metastatic cancer for adrenalectomy. Am Surg. 2000;66:432–7.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Erasmus JJ, Patz EF Jr, McAdams HP, et al. Evaluation of adrenal masses in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1357–60.PubMedCrossRef Erasmus JJ, Patz EF Jr, McAdams HP, et al. Evaluation of adrenal masses in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1357–60.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Metser U, Miller E, Lerman H, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of adrenal masses. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:32–7.PubMed Metser U, Miller E, Lerman H, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of adrenal masses. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:32–7.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Okada M, Shimono T, Komeya Y, et al. Adrenal masses: the value of additional FDG-PET/CT in differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. Ann Nucl Med. 2009;23:349–54.PubMedCrossRef Okada M, Shimono T, Komeya Y, et al. Adrenal masses: the value of additional FDG-PET/CT in differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. Ann Nucl Med. 2009;23:349–54.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mody M, Kazerooni E, Korobkin M. Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of adrenal masses: immediate and delayed complications. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995;19:434–439.PubMedCrossRef Mody M, Kazerooni E, Korobkin M. Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy of adrenal masses: immediate and delayed complications. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995;19:434–439.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
False-Positive Rate of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Presumed Solitary Metastatic Adrenal Disease in Patients with Known Malignancy
Authors
Benjamin Kuritzkes, MD
Manish Parikh, MD
Jonathan Melamed, MD
Nicole Hindman, MD
H. L. Pachter, MD
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4031-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 2/2015 Go to the issue