Top

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy

Published in:

01-05-2013 | Knee

Factors predicting hamstring tendon autograft diameters and resulting failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Authors: Soo Yeon Park, Hoon Oh, Sua Park, Jung Hwan Lee, Sang Hak Lee, Kyoung Ho Yoon

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 5/2013

Abstract

Purpose

The purposes of this study are to confirm factors that affect the diameter of hamstring tendon autograft and to compare failure rates between the factors after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Methods

A total of 296 patients that underwent reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft at our clinics for ACL injury between September 2005 and June 2008 were enrolled for this study. The diameters of gracilis and semitendinosus tendons (harvested from the affected knee) and four-strand graft tendon made by folding the gracilis and semitendinosus tendons in two layers were measured. Before operating, we recorded the age, height, weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), gender and athlete versus non-athlete identity of the subjects and checked their correlations with graft diameters. Patients that recorded a grade C or D on the International Knee Documentation Committee Knee Examination Form, as well as patients that underwent revision, were defined as failures and analysed by related factors.

Results

The mean diameter was 1.5 mm ± 0.2 for gracilis tendon, 2.2 mm ± 0.3 for semitendinosus tendon and 7.2 mm ± 0.7 for graft tendon. Except for age, factors including height, weight, BMI, gender and athlete versus non-athlete identity were found to be significantly related to graft diameter. Correlation was strongest with height (p < 0.001). With respect to failure rates after ACL reconstruction, patients with a graft diameter of 8.0 mm or more demonstrated statistically better results than patients with a diameter of below 8.0 mm (p = 0.043). However, failure rates did not differ significantly with respect to other factors.

Conclusions

The diameter of hamstring tendon autograft may be different depending on height, weight, BMI and gender of the patient, as well as whether or not the patient is an athlete. Although we did not find statistically significant differences in failure rates after ACL reconstruction, this study demonstrated relatively better results in patients with a graft diameter of 8.0 mm or more.

Level of evidence

Case series, Level IV.

Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Menchetti PPM, Giron F (1996) Arthroscopically assisted semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft in reconstruction for acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes. Am J Sports Med 24(6):726–731PubMedCrossRef

Barber FA, Elrod BF, McGuire DA, Paulos LE (1996) Is an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcome age dependent? Arthroscopy 12(6):720–725PubMedCrossRef

Barrett AM, Craft JA, Replogle WH, Hydrick JM, Barrett GR (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament graft failure. Am J Sports Med 39(10):2194–2198PubMedCrossRef

Barrett G, Stokes D, White M (2005) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients older than 40 years. Am J Sports Med 33(10):1505–1512PubMedCrossRef

Bickel BA, Fowler TT, Mowbray JG, Adler B, Klingele K, Phillips G (2008) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging cross-sectional area for the measurement of hamstring autograft diameter for reconstruction of the adolescent anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 24(12):1336–1341PubMedCrossRef

Borchers JR, Pedroza A, Kaeding C (2009) Activity level and graft type as risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament graft failure. Am J Sports Med 37(12):2362–2367PubMedCrossRef

Brandsson S, Kartus J, Larsson J, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (2000) A comparison of results in middle-aged and young patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 16(2):178–182PubMedCrossRef

Charlton WPH, Randolph DA, Lemos S, Shields CL (2003) Clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon graft and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation. Am J Sports Med 31(4):518–521PubMed

Corry IS, Webb JM, Clingeleffer AJ, Pinczewski LA (1999) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 27(4):444–454PubMed

10.

Ejerhed L, Kartus J, Sernert N, Kohler K, Karlsson J (2003) Patellar tendon or semitendinosus tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Am J Sports Med 31(1):19–25PubMed

11.

Feller JA, Webster KE (2003) A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 31(4):564–573PubMed

12.

Freedman KB, D’ Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR (2003) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 31(1):2–11PubMed

13.

George MS, Dunn WR, Spindler KP (2006) Current concepts review: revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 34(12):2026–2037PubMedCrossRef

14.

Gobbi A, Domzalski M, Pascual J (2004) Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in male and female athletes using the patellar tendon and hamstring autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12(6):534–539PubMedCrossRef

15.

Grood ES, Walz-Hasselfeld KA, Holden JP, Noyes FR, Levy MS, Butler DL, Jackson DW, Drez DJ (1992) The correlation between anterior-posterior translation and cross-sectional area of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Orthop Res 10(6):878–885PubMedCrossRef

16.

Hamada M, Shino K, Mitsuoka T, Abe N, Horibe S (1998) Cross-sectional area measurement of the semitendinosus tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 14(7):696–701PubMedCrossRef

17.

Laxdal G, Kartus J, Hansson L, Heidvall M, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J (2005) A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21(1):34–42PubMedCrossRef

18.

Lyman S, Koulouvaris P, Sherman S, Do H, Mandl LA, Marx RG (2009) Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Am 91:2321–2328CrossRef

19.

Noojin FK, Barrett GR, Hartzog CW, Nash CR (2000) Clinical comparison of intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons in men versus women. Am J Sports Med 28(6):783–789PubMed

20.

Noyes FR, Grood ES (1976) The strength of the anterior cruciate ligament in humans and rhesus monkeys. J Bone Jt Surg Am 58:1074–1082

21.

Pagnani MJ, Warner JJP, O’Brien SJ, Warren RF (1993) Anatomic considerations in harvesting the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and a technique of harvest. Am J Sports Med 21(4):565–571PubMedCrossRef

22.

Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Patras K, Vasiliadis HS, Giakas G, Georgoulis AD (2005) Excessive tibial rotation during high-demand activities is not restored by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21(11):1323–1329PubMedCrossRef

23.

Salmon L, Russell V, Musgrove T, Pinczewski L, Refshauge K (2005) Incidence and risk factors for graft rupture and contralateral rupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21(8):948–957PubMedCrossRef

24.

Salmon LJ, Refshauge KM, Russell VJ, Roe JP, Linklater J, Pinczewski LA (2006) Gender differences in outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 34(4):621–629PubMedCrossRef

25.

Schwartzberg R, Burkhart B, Lariviere C (2008) Prediction of hamstring tendon autograft diameter and length for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Orthop 37(3):157–159PubMed

26.

Shelbourne KD, Gray T, Haro M (2009) Incidence of Subsequent Injury to either knee within 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 37(2):246–251PubMedCrossRef

27.

Siegel MG, Barber-Westin SD (1998) Arthroscopic-assisted outpatient anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Arthroscopy 14(3):268–277PubMedCrossRef

28.

Sloane PA, Brazier H, Murphy AW, Collins T (2002) Evidence based medicine in clinical practice: how to advise patients on the influence of age on the outcome of surgical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a review of the literature. Br J Sports Med 36(3):200–203PubMedCrossRef

29.

Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, Matthews CE, Dittus RS, Harrell FE (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring. Am J Sports Med 32(8):1986–1995PubMedCrossRef

30.

Stein DA, Brown H, Bartolozzi AR (2006) Age and ACL reconstruction revisited. Orthopedics 29(6):533–536PubMed

31.

Tohyama H, Kondo E, Hayashi R, Kitamura N, Yasuda K (2011) Gender-based differences in outcome after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 39(9):1849–1857PubMedCrossRef

32.

Treme G, Diduch DR, Billante MJ, Miller MD, Hart JM (2008) Hamstring graft size prediction. Am J Sports Med 36(11):2204–2209PubMedCrossRef

33.

Tuman JM, Diduch DR, Rubino LJ, Baumfeld JA, Nguyen HS, Hart JM (2007) Predictors for hamstring graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35(11):1945–1949PubMedCrossRef

34.

Wernecke G, Harris IA, Houang MTW, Seeto BG, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ (2011) Using magnetic resonance imaging to predict adequate graft diameters for autologous hamstring double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27(8):1055–1059PubMedCrossRef

35.

Yasuda K, Tsujino J, Ohkoshi Y, Tanabe Y, Kaneda K (1995) Graft site morbidity with autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Am J Sports Med 23(6):706–714PubMedCrossRef

Title: Factors predicting hamstring tendon autograft diameters and resulting failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Authors: Soo Yeon Park
Hoon Oh
Sua Park
Jung Hwan Lee
Sang Hak Lee
Kyoung Ho Yoon
Publication date: 01-05-2013
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2085-4

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Factors predicting hamstring tendon autograft diameters and resulting failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of evidence

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of evidence

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Mid-term results following arthroscopic capsular release in patients with primary and secondary adhesive shoulder capsulitis

Scapular dyskinesis and SICK scapula syndrome following surgical treatment of type III acute acromioclavicular dislocations

Femoroacetabular impingement in a professional soccer player

The relationship between patellofemoral and tibiofemoral morphology and gait biomechanics following arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy

A historical perspective of PCL bracing

The isometry of two different paths for remnant-preserving posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction