Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

Factors influencing water immersion during labour: qualitative case studies of six maternity units in the United Kingdom

Authors: Sarah Milosevic, Susan Channon, Jacqueline Hughes, Billie Hunter, Mary Nolan, Rebecca Milton, Julia Sanders

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Water immersion during labour can provide benefits including reduced need for regional analgesia and a shorter labour. However, in the United Kingdom a minority of women use a pool for labour or birth, with pool use particularly uncommon in obstetric-led settings. Maternity unit culture has been identified as an important influence on pool use, but this and other possible factors have not been explored in-depth. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify factors influencing pool use through qualitative case studies of three obstetric units and three midwifery units in the UK.

Methods

Case study units with a range of waterbirth rates and representing geographically diverse locations were selected. Data collection methods comprised semi-structured interviews, collation of service documentation and public-facing information, and observations of the unit environment. There were 111 interview participants, purposively sampled to include midwives, postnatal women, obstetricians, neonatologists, midwifery support workers and doulas. A framework approach was used to analyse all case study data.

Results

Obstetric unit culture was a key factor restricting pool use. We found substantial differences between obstetric and midwifery units in terms of equipment and resources, staff attitudes and confidence, senior staff support and women’s awareness of water immersion. Generic factors influencing use of pools across all units included limited access to waterbirth training, sociodemographic differences in desire for pool use and issues using waterproof fetal monitoring equipment.

Conclusions

Case study findings provide new insights into the influence of maternity unit culture on waterbirth rates. Access to pool use could be improved through midwives based in obstetric units having more experience of waterbirth, providing obstetricians and neonatologists with information on the practicalities of pool use and improving accessibility of antenatal information. In terms of resources, recommendations include increasing pool provision, ensuring birth room allocation maximises the use of unit resources, and providing pool room environments that are acceptable to midwives.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Eberhard J, Stein S, Geissbuehler V. Experience of pain and analgesia with water and land births. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;26(2):127–33.CrossRef Eberhard J, Stein S, Geissbuehler V. Experience of pain and analgesia with water and land births. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;26(2):127–33.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mollamahmutoğlu L, Moraloğlu Ӧ, Ӧzyer Ş, Su FA, Karayalçin R, Hançerlioğlu N, et al. The effects of immersion in water on labor, birth and newborn and comparison with epidural analgesia and conventional vaginal delivery. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2012;13(1):45–9.CrossRef Mollamahmutoğlu L, Moraloğlu Ӧ, Ӧzyer Ş, Su FA, Karayalçin R, Hançerlioğlu N, et al. The effects of immersion in water on labor, birth and newborn and comparison with epidural analgesia and conventional vaginal delivery. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2012;13(1):45–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thoeni A, Zech N, Moroder L, Ploner F. Review of 1600 water births. Does water birth increase the risk of neonatal infection? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;17(5):357–61.CrossRef Thoeni A, Zech N, Moroder L, Ploner F. Review of 1600 water births. Does water birth increase the risk of neonatal infection? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;17(5):357–61.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hodgson ZG, Comfort LR, Albert AAY. Water birth and perinatal outcomes in British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020;42(2):150–5.CrossRef Hodgson ZG, Comfort LR, Albert AAY. Water birth and perinatal outcomes in British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020;42(2):150–5.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Neiman E, Austin E, Tan A, Anderson CM, Chipps E. Outcomes of waterbirth in a US hospital-based midwifery practice: a retrospective cohort study of water immersion during labor and birth. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020;65(2):216–23.CrossRef Neiman E, Austin E, Tan A, Anderson CM, Chipps E. Outcomes of waterbirth in a US hospital-based midwifery practice: a retrospective cohort study of water immersion during labor and birth. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020;65(2):216–23.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lathrop A, Bonsack CF, Haas DM. Women’s experiences with water birth: a matched groups prospective study. Birth. 2018;45(4):416–23.CrossRef Lathrop A, Bonsack CF, Haas DM. Women’s experiences with water birth: a matched groups prospective study. Birth. 2018;45(4):416–23.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ulfsdottir H, Saltvedt S, Georgsson S. Women’s experiences of waterbirth compared with conventional uncomplicated births. Midwifery. 2019;79:102547.CrossRef Ulfsdottir H, Saltvedt S, Georgsson S. Women’s experiences of waterbirth compared with conventional uncomplicated births. Midwifery. 2019;79:102547.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cooper M, Warland J. What are the benefits? Are they concerned? Women’s experiences of water immersion for labor and birth. Midwifery. 2019;79:102541.CrossRef Cooper M, Warland J. What are the benefits? Are they concerned? Women’s experiences of water immersion for labor and birth. Midwifery. 2019;79:102541.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bailey JM, Zielinski RE, Emeis CL, Kane LL. A retrospective comparison of waterbirth outcomes in two United States hospital settings. Birth. 2020;47(1):98–104.CrossRef Bailey JM, Zielinski RE, Emeis CL, Kane LL. A retrospective comparison of waterbirth outcomes in two United States hospital settings. Birth. 2020;47(1):98–104.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nutter E, Meyer S, Shaw-Battista J, Marowitz A. Waterbirth: an integrative analysis of peer-reviewed literature. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59(3):286–319.CrossRef Nutter E, Meyer S, Shaw-Battista J, Marowitz A. Waterbirth: an integrative analysis of peer-reviewed literature. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59(3):286–319.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shaw-Battista J. Systematic review of hydrotherapy research. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2017;31(4):303–16.CrossRef Shaw-Battista J. Systematic review of hydrotherapy research. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2017;31(4):303–16.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Vanderlaan J, Hall PJ, Lewitt M. Neonatal outcomes with waterbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery. 2018;59:27–38.CrossRef Vanderlaan J, Hall PJ, Lewitt M. Neonatal outcomes with waterbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery. 2018;59:27–38.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Care Quality Commission. 2015 survey of women’s experiences of maternity care: statistical release. London: Care Quality Commission; 2015. Care Quality Commission. 2015 survey of women’s experiences of maternity care: statistical release. London: Care Quality Commission; 2015.
16.
go back to reference Care Quality Commission. 2019 survey of women’s experiences of maternity care: statistical release. London: Care Quality Commission; 2020. Care Quality Commission. 2019 survey of women’s experiences of maternity care: statistical release. London: Care Quality Commission; 2020.
18.
go back to reference Mercredi A. Water birth: the experiences and perceptions of childbirth health care professionals in Alberta hospitals [Master’s thesis]. Alberta: University of Calgary; 2020. Mercredi A. Water birth: the experiences and perceptions of childbirth health care professionals in Alberta hospitals [Master’s thesis]. Alberta: University of Calgary; 2020.
19.
go back to reference Plint E, Davis D. Sink or swim: water immersion for labor and birth in a tertiary maternity unit in Australia. Int J Childbirth. 2016;6(4):206–22.CrossRef Plint E, Davis D. Sink or swim: water immersion for labor and birth in a tertiary maternity unit in Australia. Int J Childbirth. 2016;6(4):206–22.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ulfsdottir H, Saltvedt S, Georgsson S. Testing the waters – a cross-sectional survey of views about waterbirth among Swedish health professionals. Women Birth. 2020;33(2):186–92. Ulfsdottir H, Saltvedt S, Georgsson S. Testing the waters – a cross-sectional survey of views about waterbirth among Swedish health professionals. Women Birth. 2020;33(2):186–92.
21.
go back to reference Cooper M, Warland J, McCutcheon H. Australian midwives views and experiences of practice and politics related to water immersion for labour and birth: a web based survey. Women Birth. 2018;31(3):184–93.CrossRef Cooper M, Warland J, McCutcheon H. Australian midwives views and experiences of practice and politics related to water immersion for labour and birth: a web based survey. Women Birth. 2018;31(3):184–93.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cooper M, McCutcheon H, Warland J. Water immersion policies and guidelines: how are they informed? Women Birth. 2019;32(3):246–54.CrossRef Cooper M, McCutcheon H, Warland J. Water immersion policies and guidelines: how are they informed? Women Birth. 2019;32(3):246–54.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cooper M, Warland J, McCutcheon H. Practitioner accreditation for the practice of water immersion during labour and birth: results from a mixed methods study. Women Birth. 2019;32(3):255–62.CrossRef Cooper M, Warland J, McCutcheon H. Practitioner accreditation for the practice of water immersion during labour and birth: results from a mixed methods study. Women Birth. 2019;32(3):255–62.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Reyhan F, Sayiner FD. What do pregnant women in Turkey think about water birth? IJCS. 2019;12(1):305–12. Reyhan F, Sayiner FD. What do pregnant women in Turkey think about water birth? IJCS. 2019;12(1):305–12.
25.
go back to reference Fair CD, Crawford A, Houpt B, Latham V. “After having a waterbirth, I feel like it’s the only way people should deliver babies”: the decision making process of women who plan a waterbirth. Midwifery. 2020;82:102622.CrossRef Fair CD, Crawford A, Houpt B, Latham V. “After having a waterbirth, I feel like it’s the only way people should deliver babies”: the decision making process of women who plan a waterbirth. Midwifery. 2020;82:102622.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Walsh D, Spiby H, Grigg CP, Dodwell M, McCourt C, Culley L, et al. Mapping midwifery and obstetric units in England. Midwifery. 2018;56:9–16.CrossRef Walsh D, Spiby H, Grigg CP, Dodwell M, McCourt C, Culley L, et al. Mapping midwifery and obstetric units in England. Midwifery. 2018;56:9–16.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hollowell J, Puddicombe D, Rowe R, Linsell L, Hardy P, Stewart M, et al. The birthplace national prospective cohort study: perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth. Birthplace in England research programme. (final report part 4). Southampton: HMSO; 2011. Hollowell J, Puddicombe D, Rowe R, Linsell L, Hardy P, Stewart M, et al. The birthplace national prospective cohort study: perinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth. Birthplace in England research programme. (final report part 4). Southampton: HMSO; 2011.
28.
go back to reference Russell K. Struggling to get into the pool room? A critical discourse analysis of labor ward midwives’ experiences of water birth. Int J Childbirth. 2011;1(1):52–60. Russell K. Struggling to get into the pool room? A critical discourse analysis of labor ward midwives’ experiences of water birth. Int J Childbirth. 2011;1(1):52–60.
29.
go back to reference Russell K. Changing the culture on labour ward to increase midwives promotion of birthing pools: an action research study [PhD thesis]. Nottingham: University of Nottingham; 2016. Russell K. Changing the culture on labour ward to increase midwives promotion of birthing pools: an action research study [PhD thesis]. Nottingham: University of Nottingham; 2016.
30.
go back to reference Milosevic S, Channon S, Hunter B, Nolan M, Hughes J, Barlow C, et al. Factors influencing the use of birth pools in the United Kingdom: perspectives of women, midwives and medical staff. Midwifery. 2019;79:102554.CrossRef Milosevic S, Channon S, Hunter B, Nolan M, Hughes J, Barlow C, et al. Factors influencing the use of birth pools in the United Kingdom: perspectives of women, midwives and medical staff. Midwifery. 2019;79:102554.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Yin RK. Case study research and applications: design and methods. 6th ed. California: SAGE Publications; 2017. Yin RK. Case study research and applications: design and methods. 6th ed. California: SAGE Publications; 2017.
32.
go back to reference Rowe R. Birthplace terms and definitions: consensus process Birthplace in England research programme (final report part 2). Southampton: HMSO; 2011. Rowe R. Birthplace terms and definitions: consensus process Birthplace in England research programme (final report part 2). Southampton: HMSO; 2011.
36.
go back to reference Aburas R, Pati D, Casanova R, Adams NG. The influence of nature stimulus in enhancing the birth experience. HERD. 2017;10(2):81–100.CrossRef Aburas R, Pati D, Casanova R, Adams NG. The influence of nature stimulus in enhancing the birth experience. HERD. 2017;10(2):81–100.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hodnett ED, Stremler R, Weston JA, McKeever P. Re-conceptualizing the hospital labor room: the PLACE (pregnant and laboring in an ambient clinical environment) pilot trial. Birth. 2009;36(2):159–66.CrossRef Hodnett ED, Stremler R, Weston JA, McKeever P. Re-conceptualizing the hospital labor room: the PLACE (pregnant and laboring in an ambient clinical environment) pilot trial. Birth. 2009;36(2):159–66.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Manesh MJ, Kalati M, Hosseini F. Snoezelen room and childbirth outcome: a randomized clinical trial. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17:5. Manesh MJ, Kalati M, Hosseini F. Snoezelen room and childbirth outcome: a randomized clinical trial. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17:5.
39.
go back to reference Nicholls S, Hauck Y, Bayes S, Butt J. Exploring midwives’ perception of confidence around facilitating water birth in Western Australia: a qualitative descriptive study. Midwifery. 2016;33:73–81.CrossRef Nicholls S, Hauck Y, Bayes S, Butt J. Exploring midwives’ perception of confidence around facilitating water birth in Western Australia: a qualitative descriptive study. Midwifery. 2016;33:73–81.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Glenister C, Burns E, Rowe R. Local guidelines for admission to UK midwifery units compared with national guidance: a national survey using the UK midwifery study system (UKMidSS). PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0239311. Glenister C, Burns E, Rowe R. Local guidelines for admission to UK midwifery units compared with national guidance: a national survey using the UK midwifery study system (UKMidSS). PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0239311.
42.
go back to reference Baxter L. What a difference a pool makes: making choice a reality. Br J Midwifery. 2006;14(6):368–72.CrossRef Baxter L. What a difference a pool makes: making choice a reality. Br J Midwifery. 2006;14(6):368–72.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Safer childbirth: minimum standards for the organisation and delivery of care in labour. London: RCOG Press; 2007. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Safer childbirth: minimum standards for the organisation and delivery of care in labour. London: RCOG Press; 2007.
44.
go back to reference Cooper M, McCutcheon H, Warland J. A critical analysis of Australian policies and guidelines for water immersion during labour and birth. Women Birth. 2017;30(5):431–41.CrossRef Cooper M, McCutcheon H, Warland J. A critical analysis of Australian policies and guidelines for water immersion during labour and birth. Women Birth. 2017;30(5):431–41.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Young K, Kruske S. How valid are the common concerns raised against water birth? A focused review of the literature. Women Birth. 2013;26(2):105–9.CrossRef Young K, Kruske S. How valid are the common concerns raised against water birth? A focused review of the literature. Women Birth. 2013;26(2):105–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factors influencing water immersion during labour: qualitative case studies of six maternity units in the United Kingdom
Authors
Sarah Milosevic
Susan Channon
Jacqueline Hughes
Billie Hunter
Mary Nolan
Rebecca Milton
Julia Sanders
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03416-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2020 Go to the issue