Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Factors influencing the adoption of a healthy eating campaign by federal cross-sector partners: a qualitative study

Authors: Melissa Anne Fernandez, Sophie Desroches, Mylène Turcotte, Marie Marquis, Joëlle Dufour, Véronique Provencher

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Eat Well Campaign (EWC) was a social marketing campaign developed by Health Canada and disseminated to the public with the help of cross-sector partners. The purpose of this study was to describe factors that influenced cross-sector partners’ decision to adopt the EWC.

Methods

Thematic content analysis, based primarily on an a priori codebook of constructs from Roger’s diffusion of innovations decision process model, was conducted on hour-long semi-structured telephone interviews with Health Canada’s cross-sector partners (n = 18).

Results

Dominant themes influencing cross-sector partners’ decision to adopt the EWC were: high compatibility with the organization’s values; being associated with Health Canada; and low perceived complexity of activities. Several adopters indicated that social norms (e.g., knowing that other organizations in their network were involved in the collaboration) played a strong role in their decision to participate, particularly for food retailers and small organizations. The opportunity itself to work in partnership with Health Canada and other organizations was seen as a prominent relative advantage by many organizations. Adopters were characterized as having high social participation and positive attitudes towards health, new ideas and Health Canada. The lack of exposure to the mass media channels used to diffuse the campaign and reserved attitudes towards Health Canada were prominent obstacles identified by a minority of health organizations, which challenged the decision to adopt the EWC. Most other barriers were considered as minor challenges and did not appear to impede the adoption process.

Conclusions

Understanding factors that influence cross-sector adoption of nutrition initiatives can help decision makers target the most appropriate partners to advance public health objectives. Government health agencies are likely to find strong partners in organizations that share the same values as the initiative, have positive attitudes towards health, are extremely implicated in social causes and value the notion of partnership.
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: WHO; 2010. World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
2.
go back to reference Riley BL, Robinson KL, Gamble J, Finegood DT, Sheppard D, Penney TL, et al. Knowledge to action for solving complex problems: insights from a review of nine international cases. HPCDP J. 2015;35(3):47–53. Riley BL, Robinson KL, Gamble J, Finegood DT, Sheppard D, Penney TL, et al. Knowledge to action for solving complex problems: insights from a review of nine international cases. HPCDP J. 2015;35(3):47–53.
4.
go back to reference Pray L, Pillsbury L, Forum F, Institute of Medicine. Building public-private partnerships in food and nutrition: workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press; 2012. Pray L, Pillsbury L, Forum F, Institute of Medicine. Building public-private partnerships in food and nutrition: workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press; 2012.
6.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Geneva: WHO; 2014. World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014. Geneva: WHO; 2014.
7.
go back to reference Healthy People and Communities Steering Committee Members. Discussion paper: public-private partnerships with the food industry. Ottawa: Health Canada; 2013. Healthy People and Communities Steering Committee Members. Discussion paper: public-private partnerships with the food industry. Ottawa: Health Canada; 2013.
8.
go back to reference Kraak VI. Public health and food and beverages industry engagement: a tool to assess partnership opportunities and challenges. Ottawa: Health Canada; 2014. Kraak VI. Public health and food and beverages industry engagement: a tool to assess partnership opportunities and challenges. Ottawa: Health Canada; 2014.
9.
go back to reference Johnston LM, Finegood DT. Cross-sector partnerships and public health: challenges and opportunities for addressing obesity and noncommunicable diseases through engagement with the private sector. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;36:255–71.CrossRefPubMed Johnston LM, Finegood DT. Cross-sector partnerships and public health: challenges and opportunities for addressing obesity and noncommunicable diseases through engagement with the private sector. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;36:255–71.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CIHR Workshop: Ethics policy on CIHR partnerships with the for-profit private sector. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2007. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. CIHR Workshop: Ethics policy on CIHR partnerships with the for-profit private sector. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2007.
11.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Vogt TM. Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues. Health Educ Res. 2006;21(5):688–94.CrossRefPubMed Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Vogt TM. Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues. Health Educ Res. 2006;21(5):688–94.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Estabrook B, Zapka J, Lemon SC. Evaluating the implementation of a hospital work-site obesity prevention intervention: applying the RE-AIM framework. Health Promot Pract. 2012;13(2):190–7.CrossRefPubMed Estabrook B, Zapka J, Lemon SC. Evaluating the implementation of a hospital work-site obesity prevention intervention: applying the RE-AIM framework. Health Promot Pract. 2012;13(2):190–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Sweet SN, Ginis KA, Estabrooks PA, Latimer-Cheung AE. Operationalizing the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the impact of multi-sector partnerships. Implement Sci. 2014;9:74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sweet SN, Ginis KA, Estabrooks PA, Latimer-Cheung AE. Operationalizing the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the impact of multi-sector partnerships. Implement Sci. 2014;9:74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Virginia Tech. RE-AIM: A model for the planning, evaluation, reporting and review of translational research and practice. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 2014. http://www.re-aim.hnfe.vt.edu/. Accessed 29 July 2015. Virginia Tech. RE-AIM: A model for the planning, evaluation, reporting and review of translational research and practice. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 2014. http://​www.​re-aim.​hnfe.​vt.​edu/​. Accessed 29 July 2015.
15.
go back to reference Haider M, Kreps GL. Forty years of diffusion of innovations: utility and value in public health. J Health Commun. 2004;9 Suppl 1:3–11.CrossRefPubMed Haider M, Kreps GL. Forty years of diffusion of innovations: utility and value in public health. J Health Commun. 2004;9 Suppl 1:3–11.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Dearing JW. Improving the state of health programming by using diffusion theory. J Health Commun. 2004;9 Suppl 1:21–36.CrossRefPubMed Dearing JW. Improving the state of health programming by using diffusion theory. J Health Commun. 2004;9 Suppl 1:21–36.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Public Health Agency of Canada. Curbing childhood obesity: a federal, provincial and territorial framework for action to promote healthy weights. Ottawa: PHAC; 2010. Public Health Agency of Canada. Curbing childhood obesity: a federal, provincial and territorial framework for action to promote healthy weights. Ottawa: PHAC; 2010.
18.
go back to reference Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
19.
go back to reference Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2013. Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2013.
20.
go back to reference Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2003. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2003.
21.
go back to reference Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Jilcott S, Ammerman A, Sommers J, Glasgow RE. Applying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change. Ann Behav Med. 2007;34(2):105–14.CrossRefPubMed Jilcott S, Ammerman A, Sommers J, Glasgow RE. Applying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change. Ann Behav Med. 2007;34(2):105–14.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Gomez-Insausti R. Canada’s leading retailers: latest trends and strategies for their major chains. Can J Reg Sci. 2006;29:359–74. Gomez-Insausti R. Canada’s leading retailers: latest trends and strategies for their major chains. Can J Reg Sci. 2006;29:359–74.
24.
go back to reference Canada I. Consumer trends update: Canada’s changing retail market. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2013. Canada I. Consumer trends update: Canada’s changing retail market. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2013.
25.
go back to reference Olstad DL, Raine KD, McCargar LJ. Adopting and implementing nutrition guidelines in recreational facilities: tensions between public health and corporate profitability. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(5):815–23.CrossRefPubMed Olstad DL, Raine KD, McCargar LJ. Adopting and implementing nutrition guidelines in recreational facilities: tensions between public health and corporate profitability. Public Health Nutr. 2013;16(5):815–23.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Aubert BA, Hamel G. Adoption of smart cards in the medical sector: the Canadian experience. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(7):879–94.CrossRef Aubert BA, Hamel G. Adoption of smart cards in the medical sector: the Canadian experience. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53(7):879–94.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Slaughter JE, Zickar MJ, Highhouse S, Mohr DC. Personality trait inferences about organizations: development of a measure and assessment of construct validity. J App Psych. 2004;89(1):85–103.CrossRef Slaughter JE, Zickar MJ, Highhouse S, Mohr DC. Personality trait inferences about organizations: development of a measure and assessment of construct validity. J App Psych. 2004;89(1):85–103.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Ballew P, Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Heath GW, Kreuter MW. Dissemination of effective physical activity interventions: are we applying the evidence? Health Educ Res. 2010;25(2):185–98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ballew P, Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Heath GW, Kreuter MW. Dissemination of effective physical activity interventions: are we applying the evidence? Health Educ Res. 2010;25(2):185–98.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Olstad DL, Raine KD, McCargar LJ. Adopting and implementing nutrition guidelines in recreational facilities: public and private sector roles. A multiple case study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:376.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Olstad DL, Raine KD, McCargar LJ. Adopting and implementing nutrition guidelines in recreational facilities: public and private sector roles. A multiple case study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:376.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Greenhalgh T. Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations a systematic literature review. 2005.CrossRef Greenhalgh T. Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations a systematic literature review. 2005.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Tornatzky LG, Klein KJ. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 1982;29(1):28–45.CrossRef Tornatzky LG, Klein KJ. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 1982;29(1):28–45.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Denis JL, Hebert Y, Langley A, Lozeau D, Trottier LH. Explaining diffusion patterns for complex health care innovations. Health Care Manag Rev. 2002;27(3):60–73.CrossRef Denis JL, Hebert Y, Langley A, Lozeau D, Trottier LH. Explaining diffusion patterns for complex health care innovations. Health Care Manag Rev. 2002;27(3):60–73.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factors influencing the adoption of a healthy eating campaign by federal cross-sector partners: a qualitative study
Authors
Melissa Anne Fernandez
Sophie Desroches
Mylène Turcotte
Marie Marquis
Joëlle Dufour
Véronique Provencher
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3523-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Go to the issue