Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 6/2006

01-06-2006 | Original Article

F-18 FDG-PET imaging and correlation with CT in staging and follow-up of pediatric lymphomas

Authors: Miguel Hernandez-Pampaloni, Amol Takalkar, Jian Q. Yu, Hongming Zhuang, Abass Alavi

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 6/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We hypothesized that F-18 FDG-PET could be a useful, functional imaging modality for assessing the initial staging, response to therapy and follow-up of children diagnosed with lymphoma.

Objective

To assess the role of whole-body F-18 FDG-PET imaging in patients with lymphoma as an initial staging modality and to measure its predictive value for monitoring the response to therapy and disease recurrence compared to CT and clinical follow-up studies.

Materials and methods

As part of their routine clinical care, 24 patients with histologically proven lymphoma (18 Hodgkin disease and 6 non-Hodgkin lymphoma) underwent an F-18 FDG-PET and a CT scan. A total of 28 studies were performed and the entire set of scans retrospectively reviewed. Seven studies were performed for initial staging, 12 for monitoring therapy response and 9 for detecting recurrence. Initial diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology while the gold standard at follow-up was established by clinical follow-up, additional imaging modalities and/or biopsy. F-18 FDG-PET was visually compared to CT on a lesion-by-lesion basis. Fifteen anatomic regions (seven nodal and eight extranodal) were analyzed.

Results

Of the 414 regions analyzed, PET and CT were concordant in 366 (positive in 16 and negative in 350). Discordance was found in 48 regions. Overall sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values were 78%, 98%, 94% and 90% for F-18 FDG-PET and 79%, 88%, 90% and 46% for CT, respectively.

Conclusion

F-18 FDG-PET imaging is a useful technique for the staging and follow-up of pediatric patients with lymphoma.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Magnani C, Gatta G, Coriazzari I, et al (2001) Childhood malignancies in the EUROCARE study: the database and the methods of survival analysis. Eur J Cancer 37:678–686PubMedCrossRef Magnani C, Gatta G, Coriazzari I, et al (2001) Childhood malignancies in the EUROCARE study: the database and the methods of survival analysis. Eur J Cancer 37:678–686PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sandlund JT, Downing JR, Crist WM (1996) Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in childhood. N Engl J Med 334:1238–1248PubMedCrossRef Sandlund JT, Downing JR, Crist WM (1996) Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in childhood. N Engl J Med 334:1238–1248PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Edwards BK, Brown ML, Wingo PA, et al (2005) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1407–1427PubMedCrossRef Edwards BK, Brown ML, Wingo PA, et al (2005) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1407–1427PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Thomson AB, Wallace WH (2002) Treatment of paediatric Hodgkin’s disease: a balance of risks. Eur J Cancer 38:468–477PubMedCrossRef Thomson AB, Wallace WH (2002) Treatment of paediatric Hodgkin’s disease: a balance of risks. Eur J Cancer 38:468–477PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pinkerton CR (1999) The continuing challenge of treatment for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in children. Br J Haematol 107:220–234PubMedCrossRef Pinkerton CR (1999) The continuing challenge of treatment for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in children. Br J Haematol 107:220–234PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Reske SN (2003) PET and restaging of malignant lymphoma including residual masses and relapse. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:S89–S96PubMed Reske SN (2003) PET and restaging of malignant lymphoma including residual masses and relapse. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:S89–S96PubMed
9.
go back to reference Schiepers C, Filmont FE, Czernin J (2003) PET for staging of Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:S82–S88PubMed Schiepers C, Filmont FE, Czernin J (2003) PET for staging of Hodgkin’s disease and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:S82–S88PubMed
10.
go back to reference Schoder H, Larson SM, Yeung HW (2004) PET/CT in oncology: integration into clinical management of lymphoma, melanoma, and gastrointestinal malignancies. J Nucl Med 45:72S–81SPubMed Schoder H, Larson SM, Yeung HW (2004) PET/CT in oncology: integration into clinical management of lymphoma, melanoma, and gastrointestinal malignancies. J Nucl Med 45:72S–81SPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kumar R, Xiu Y, Potenta S, et al (2004) 18F-FDG PET for evaluation of the treatment response in patients with gastrointestinal tract lymphomas. J Nucl Med 45:1796–1803PubMed Kumar R, Xiu Y, Potenta S, et al (2004) 18F-FDG PET for evaluation of the treatment response in patients with gastrointestinal tract lymphomas. J Nucl Med 45:1796–1803PubMed
12.
go back to reference Elstrom R, Guan L, Baker G, et al (2003) Utility of FDG-PET scanning in lymphoma by WHO classification. Blood 101:3875–3876PubMedCrossRef Elstrom R, Guan L, Baker G, et al (2003) Utility of FDG-PET scanning in lymphoma by WHO classification. Blood 101:3875–3876PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Depas G, De Barsy C, Jerusalem G, et al (2005) 18F-FDG PET in children with lymphomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32:31–38PubMedCrossRef Depas G, De Barsy C, Jerusalem G, et al (2005) 18F-FDG PET in children with lymphomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 32:31–38PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hermann S, Wormanns D, Pixberg M, et al (2005) Staging in childhood lymphoma: differences between FDG-PET and CT. Nuklearmedizin 44:1–7PubMed Hermann S, Wormanns D, Pixberg M, et al (2005) Staging in childhood lymphoma: differences between FDG-PET and CT. Nuklearmedizin 44:1–7PubMed
15.
go back to reference Munker R, Glass J, Griffeth LK, et al (2004) Contribution of PET imaging to the initial staging and prognosis of patients with Hodgkin’s disease. Ann Oncol 15:1699–1704PubMedCrossRef Munker R, Glass J, Griffeth LK, et al (2004) Contribution of PET imaging to the initial staging and prognosis of patients with Hodgkin’s disease. Ann Oncol 15:1699–1704PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zinzani PL, Fanti S, Battista G, et al (2004) Predictive role of positron emission tomography (PET) in the outcome of lymphoma patients. Br J Cancer 91:850–854PubMed Zinzani PL, Fanti S, Battista G, et al (2004) Predictive role of positron emission tomography (PET) in the outcome of lymphoma patients. Br J Cancer 91:850–854PubMed
17.
go back to reference Brenot-Rossi I, Bouabdallah R, Di Stefano D, et al (2001) Hodgkin’s disease: prognostic role of gallium scintigraphy after chemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med 28:1482–1488PubMedCrossRef Brenot-Rossi I, Bouabdallah R, Di Stefano D, et al (2001) Hodgkin’s disease: prognostic role of gallium scintigraphy after chemotherapy. Eur J Nucl Med 28:1482–1488PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Front D, Bar-Shalom R, Mor M, et al (2000) Aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: early prediction of outcome with 67Ga scintigraphy. Radiology 214:253–257PubMed Front D, Bar-Shalom R, Mor M, et al (2000) Aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: early prediction of outcome with 67Ga scintigraphy. Radiology 214:253–257PubMed
19.
go back to reference Rini JN, Nunez R, Nichols R, et al (2005) Coincidence-detection FDG-PET versus gallium in children and young adults with newly diagnosed Hodgkin’s disease. Pediatr Radiol 35:169–178PubMedCrossRef Rini JN, Nunez R, Nichols R, et al (2005) Coincidence-detection FDG-PET versus gallium in children and young adults with newly diagnosed Hodgkin’s disease. Pediatr Radiol 35:169–178PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kaste SC, Howard SC, McCarville EB, et al (2005) 18F-FDG-avid sites mimicking active disease in pediatric Hodgkin’s. Pediatr Radiol 35:141–154PubMedCrossRef Kaste SC, Howard SC, McCarville EB, et al (2005) 18F-FDG-avid sites mimicking active disease in pediatric Hodgkin’s. Pediatr Radiol 35:141–154PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Weinblatt ME, Zanzi I, Belakhlef A, et al (1997) False-positive FDG-PET imaging of the thymus of a child with Hodgkin’s disease. J Nucl Med 38:888–890PubMed Weinblatt ME, Zanzi I, Belakhlef A, et al (1997) False-positive FDG-PET imaging of the thymus of a child with Hodgkin’s disease. J Nucl Med 38:888–890PubMed
22.
go back to reference Bangerter M, Moog F, Buchmann I, et al (1998) Whole-body 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for accurate staging of Hodgkin’s disease. Ann Oncol 9:1117–1122PubMedCrossRef Bangerter M, Moog F, Buchmann I, et al (1998) Whole-body 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for accurate staging of Hodgkin’s disease. Ann Oncol 9:1117–1122PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wickmann L, Luders H, Dorffel W (2003) 18-FDG-PET-findings in children and adolescents with Hodgkin’s disease: retrospective evaluation of the correlation to other imaging procedures in initial staging and to the predictive value of follow-up examinations. Klin Padiatr 215:146–150PubMedCrossRef Wickmann L, Luders H, Dorffel W (2003) 18-FDG-PET-findings in children and adolescents with Hodgkin’s disease: retrospective evaluation of the correlation to other imaging procedures in initial staging and to the predictive value of follow-up examinations. Klin Padiatr 215:146–150PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Pinkerton R (2005) Continuing challenges in childhood non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Br J Haematol 130:480–488PubMedCrossRef Pinkerton R (2005) Continuing challenges in childhood non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Br J Haematol 130:480–488PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Weihrauch MR, Re D, Scheidhauer K, et al (2001) Thoracic positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for the evaluation of residual mediastinal Hodgkin disease. Blood 98:2930–2934PubMedCrossRef Weihrauch MR, Re D, Scheidhauer K, et al (2001) Thoracic positron emission tomography using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose for the evaluation of residual mediastinal Hodgkin disease. Blood 98:2930–2934PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Montravers F, McNamara D, Landman-Parker J, et al (2002) [(18)F]FDG in childhood lymphoma: clinical utility and impact on management. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29:1155–1165PubMedCrossRef Montravers F, McNamara D, Landman-Parker J, et al (2002) [(18)F]FDG in childhood lymphoma: clinical utility and impact on management. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29:1155–1165PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kostakoglu L, Goldsmith SJ (2000) Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging and follow-up of lymphoma: is it time to shift gears? Eur J Nucl Med 27:1564–1578PubMedCrossRef Kostakoglu L, Goldsmith SJ (2000) Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging and follow-up of lymphoma: is it time to shift gears? Eur J Nucl Med 27:1564–1578PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Moog F, Bangerter M, Diederichs CG, et al (1998) Extranodal malignant lymphoma: detection with FDG PET versus CT. Radiology 206:475–481PubMed Moog F, Bangerter M, Diederichs CG, et al (1998) Extranodal malignant lymphoma: detection with FDG PET versus CT. Radiology 206:475–481PubMed
29.
go back to reference Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, et al (2001) Can positron emission tomography with [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose after first-line treatment distinguish Hodgkin’s disease patients who need additional therapy from others in whom additional therapy would mean avoidable toxicity? Br J Haematol 115:272–278PubMedCrossRef Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Dupont P, et al (2001) Can positron emission tomography with [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose after first-line treatment distinguish Hodgkin’s disease patients who need additional therapy from others in whom additional therapy would mean avoidable toxicity? Br J Haematol 115:272–278PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
F-18 FDG-PET imaging and correlation with CT in staging and follow-up of pediatric lymphomas
Authors
Miguel Hernandez-Pampaloni
Amol Takalkar
Jian Q. Yu
Hongming Zhuang
Abass Alavi
Publication date
01-06-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 6/2006
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0152-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2006

Pediatric Radiology 6/2006 Go to the issue

Hermes

Hermes