Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 9/2013

01-09-2013 | 2012 SSAT Plenary Presentation

Extent of Lymphadenectomy Does Not Predict Survival in Patients Treated with Primary Esophagectomy

Authors: Joyce Wong, Jill Weber, Khaldoun Almhanna, Sarah Hoffe, Ravi Shridhar, Richard Karl, Kenneth L. Meredith

Published in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Issue 9/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The number of lymph nodes resected and its impact on survival for patients with esophageal cancer remains undefined. Current guidelines recommend extended lymphadenectomy in patients not receiving neoadjuvant therapy. We reviewed our single institutional experience with nodal harvest for esophageal cancer in a non-neoadjuvant therapy setting.

Methods

Patients who underwent esophagectomy as primary therapy were indentified from a prospectively maintained database consisting of 704 patients who underwent esophagectomy. Patients were stratified by number of lymph nodes (LN) resected: >5, 10, 12, 15, or 20. Survival, clinical, and pathologic parameters were analyzed with Kaplan–Meier curves, chi-square, or Fisher’s exact tests where appropriate.

Results

We identified 246 patients who underwent esophagectomy as initial treatment. The mean age was 65 ±10 years. The majority of patients were male (87 %). Ivor–Lewis esophagectomy was performed for 71 %, minimally invasive esophagectomy for 15 %, transhiatal esophagectomy for 12 %, and three-field esophagectomy for 2 %. At 60 months follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with < vs. >5 LN resected (p = 0.74 and p = 0.67, respectively) or in the < vs. >10 (p = 0.33, p = 0.11), 12 (p = 0.82, p = 0.90), 15 (p = 0.45, p = 0.79), or 20 (p = 0.72, p = 0.86) resected LN groups. Patients were then subdivided into node-positive and node-negative cohorts and stratified by nodal harvest. In the subgroups of patients with node-negative and node-positive disease, OS and DFS also did not significantly differ between groups with respect to number of nodes resected (p > 0.05). A total of 49 (20 %) patients developed recurrent disease; however, recurrence was not statistically associated with number of LN resected (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

We found no impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on overall or disease-free survival in patients treated with esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. In addition, the number of nodes resected at esophagectomy did not affect recurrence rates. Current recommendations for increased nodal resection during esophagectomy in patients not receiving neoadjuvant therapy may not improve patient outcomes, and this phenomenon warrants further investigation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2012. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2012. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2012. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2012.
2.
go back to reference Boshier PR, Anderson O, and Hanna GB. Transthoracic Versus Transhiatal Esophagectomy for the Treatment of Esophagogastric Cancer. A meta-analysis. Annals of Surgery, 2011; 254: 894–906.PubMedCrossRef Boshier PR, Anderson O, and Hanna GB. Transthoracic Versus Transhiatal Esophagectomy for the Treatment of Esophagogastric Cancer. A meta-analysis. Annals of Surgery, 2011; 254: 894–906.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Omloo JMT, Law SYK, Launois B, et al. Short and long-term advantages of transhiatal and transthoracic oesophageal cancer resection. EJSO, 2009; 35: 793–797.PubMedCrossRef Omloo JMT, Law SYK, Launois B, et al. Short and long-term advantages of transhiatal and transthoracic oesophageal cancer resection. EJSO, 2009; 35: 793–797.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Eloubeidi MA, Desmond R, Arguedas MR, et al. Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status. Cancer, 2002; 95(7): 1434–43.PubMedCrossRef Eloubeidi MA, Desmond R, Arguedas MR, et al. Prognostic factors for the survival of patients with esophageal carcinoma in the U.S.: the importance of tumor length and lymph node status. Cancer, 2002; 95(7): 1434–43.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gertler R, Stein HJ, Langer R, et al. Long-term outcome of 2920 patients with canceres of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: evaluation of the New Union Internationale Contre le Cancer/American Joint Cancer Committee staging system. Annals of Surgery, 2011; 253(4): 689–98.PubMedCrossRef Gertler R, Stein HJ, Langer R, et al. Long-term outcome of 2920 patients with canceres of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: evaluation of the New Union Internationale Contre le Cancer/American Joint Cancer Committee staging system. Annals of Surgery, 2011; 253(4): 689–98.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference AJCC (2010) Esophagus and esophagogastric junction. In: Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. (eds). AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 7th edition. New York, NY: Springer, pp 103–11 AJCC (2010) Esophagus and esophagogastric junction. In: Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al. (eds). AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 7th edition. New York, NY: Springer, pp 103–11
7.
go back to reference Hu Y, Hu C, Zhang H, et al. How does the number of resected lymph nodes influence TNM staging and prognosis for esophageal carcinoma? Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2010; 17: 784–790.PubMedCrossRef Hu Y, Hu C, Zhang H, et al. How does the number of resected lymph nodes influence TNM staging and prognosis for esophageal carcinoma? Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2010; 17: 784–790.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yang HX, Xu Y, Fu JH, et al. An evaluation of the number of lymph nodes examined and survival for node-negative esophageal carcinoma: data from China. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2010; 17: 1901–1911.PubMedCrossRef Yang HX, Xu Y, Fu JH, et al. An evaluation of the number of lymph nodes examined and survival for node-negative esophageal carcinoma: data from China. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2010; 17: 1901–1911.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schwarz RE and Smith DD. Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable esophageal cancer. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2007; 11: 1384–1394.PubMedCrossRef Schwarz RE and Smith DD. Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable esophageal cancer. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2007; 11: 1384–1394.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Altorki NK, Zhou XK, Stiles B, et al. Total number of resected lymph nodes predicts survival in esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgery, 2008; 248(2): 221–226.PubMedCrossRef Altorki NK, Zhou XK, Stiles B, et al. Total number of resected lymph nodes predicts survival in esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgery, 2008; 248(2): 221–226.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Greenstein AJ, Litle VR, Swanson SJ, et al. Prognostic significance of the number of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2008; 206(2): 239–46.PubMedCrossRef Greenstein AJ, Litle VR, Swanson SJ, et al. Prognostic significance of the number of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2008; 206(2): 239–46.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mariette C, Piessen GP, Briez N, et al. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent. Annals of Surgery, 2008; 247(2): 365–371.PubMedCrossRef Mariette C, Piessen GP, Briez N, et al. The number of metastatic lymph nodes and the ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes are independent prognostic factors in esophageal cancer regardless of neoadjuvant chemoradiation or lymphadenectomy extent. Annals of Surgery, 2008; 247(2): 365–371.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kelty CJ, Kennedy CW, Falk GL. Ratio of metastatic lymph nodes to total number of nodes resected is prognostic for survival in esophageal carcinoma. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 2010; 5: 1467–1471.PubMedCrossRef Kelty CJ, Kennedy CW, Falk GL. Ratio of metastatic lymph nodes to total number of nodes resected is prognostic for survival in esophageal carcinoma. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 2010; 5: 1467–1471.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Groth SS, Virnig BA, Whitson BA, et al. Determination of the minimum number of lymph nodes to examine to maximize survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma: data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2010; 139: 612–20.PubMedCrossRef Groth SS, Virnig BA, Whitson BA, et al. Determination of the minimum number of lymph nodes to examine to maximize survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma: data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2010; 139: 612–20.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Greenstein AJ, Litle VR, Swanson SJ, et al. Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer. Cancer, 2008; 112: 1239–46.PubMedCrossRef Greenstein AJ, Litle VR, Swanson SJ, et al. Effect of the number of lymph nodes sampled on postoperative survival of lymph node-negative esophageal cancer. Cancer, 2008; 112: 1239–46.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Peyre CH, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, et al. The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Annals of Surgery, 2008; 248: 549–556.PubMedCrossRef Peyre CH, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR, et al. The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Annals of Surgery, 2008; 248: 549–556.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW, et al. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgery, 2010; 251: 46–50.PubMedCrossRef Rizk NP, Ishwaran H, Rice TW, et al. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgery, 2010; 251: 46–50.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rice TW, Rusch VW, Apperson-Hansen C, et al. Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration. Diseases of the Esophagus, 2009; 22(1): 1–8.PubMedCrossRef Rice TW, Rusch VW, Apperson-Hansen C, et al. Worldwide esophageal cancer collaboration. Diseases of the Esophagus, 2009; 22(1): 1–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hulscher JB, Van Sandick JW, De Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. New England Journal of Medicine, 2002; 347(21): 1662–9.PubMedCrossRef Hulscher JB, Van Sandick JW, De Boer AG, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. New England Journal of Medicine, 2002; 347(21): 1662–9.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Omloo JM, Lagarde SM, Hulscher JB, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Annals of Surgery, 2007; 246(6): 992–1000.PubMedCrossRef Omloo JM, Lagarde SM, Hulscher JB, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Annals of Surgery, 2007; 246(6): 992–1000.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bollschweiler E, Besch S, Drebber U, et al. Influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on the number and size of analyzed lymph nodes in esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2010; 17: 3187–3194.PubMedCrossRef Bollschweiler E, Besch S, Drebber U, et al. Influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on the number and size of analyzed lymph nodes in esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2010; 17: 3187–3194.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vallbohmer D, Holscher AH, DeMeester S, et al. A multicenter study of survival after neoadjuvant radiotherapy/chemotherapy and esophagectomy for ypT0N0M0R0 esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgery, 2010; 252: 744–749.PubMedCrossRef Vallbohmer D, Holscher AH, DeMeester S, et al. A multicenter study of survival after neoadjuvant radiotherapy/chemotherapy and esophagectomy for ypT0N0M0R0 esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgery, 2010; 252: 744–749.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Meredith KL, Weber JM, Turaga KK, et al. Pathologic response after neoadjuvant therapy is the major determinant of survival in patients with esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 21010; 17(4): 1159–67CrossRef Meredith KL, Weber JM, Turaga KK, et al. Pathologic response after neoadjuvant therapy is the major determinant of survival in patients with esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 21010; 17(4): 1159–67CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tanaka T, Matono S, Nagano T, et al. Esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for submucosal esophageal cancer: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2012; 19(3): 750–6.PubMedCrossRef Tanaka T, Matono S, Nagano T, et al. Esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for submucosal esophageal cancer: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2012; 19(3): 750–6.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bogoevski D, Bockhorn M, Koenig A, et al. How radical should surgery be for early esophageal cancer? World Journal of Surgery, 2011; 35(6): 1311–20.PubMedCrossRef Bogoevski D, Bockhorn M, Koenig A, et al. How radical should surgery be for early esophageal cancer? World Journal of Surgery, 2011; 35(6): 1311–20.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Grotenhuis BA, Van Heijl M, Zehetner J, et al. Surgical management of submucosal esophageal cancer: extended or regional lymphadenectomy? Annals of Surgery, 2010; 252(5): 823–30.PubMedCrossRef Grotenhuis BA, Van Heijl M, Zehetner J, et al. Surgical management of submucosal esophageal cancer: extended or regional lymphadenectomy? Annals of Surgery, 2010; 252(5): 823–30.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Extent of Lymphadenectomy Does Not Predict Survival in Patients Treated with Primary Esophagectomy
Authors
Joyce Wong
Jill Weber
Khaldoun Almhanna
Sarah Hoffe
Ravi Shridhar
Richard Karl
Kenneth L. Meredith
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Issue 9/2013
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Electronic ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2259-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2013

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 9/2013 Go to the issue

Evidence-Based Current Surgical Practice

Evidence-Based Management of Colorectal Trauma