Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research article

Extensions to Regret-based Decision Curve Analysis: An application to hospice referral for terminal patients

Authors: Athanasios Tsalatsanis, Laura E Barnes, Iztok Hozo, Benjamin Djulbegovic

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite the well documented advantages of hospice care, most terminally ill patients do not reap the maximum benefit from hospice services, with the majority of them receiving hospice care either prematurely or delayed. Decision systems to improve the hospice referral process are sorely needed.

Methods

We present a novel theoretical framework that is based on well-established methodologies of prognostication and decision analysis to assist with the hospice referral process for terminally ill patients. We linked the SUPPORT statistical model, widely regarded as one of the most accurate models for prognostication of terminally ill patients, with the recently developed regret based decision curve analysis (regret DCA). We extend the regret DCA methodology to consider harms associated with the prognostication test as well as harms and effects of the management strategies. In order to enable patients and physicians in making these complex decisions in real-time, we developed an easily accessible web-based decision support system available at the point of care.

Results

The web-based decision support system facilitates the hospice referral process in three steps. First, the patient or surrogate is interviewed to elicit his/her personal preferences regarding the continuation of life-sustaining treatment vs. palliative care. Then, regret DCA is employed to identify the best strategy for the particular patient in terms of threshold probability at which he/she is indifferent between continuation of treatment and of hospice referral. Finally, if necessary, the probabilities of survival and death for the particular patient are computed based on the SUPPORT prognostication model and contrasted with the patient's threshold probability. The web-based design of the CDSS enables patients, physicians, and family members to participate in the decision process from anywhere internet access is available.

Conclusions

We present a theoretical framework to facilitate the hospice referral process. Further rigorous clinical evaluation including testing in a prospective randomized controlled trial is required and planned.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Christakis NA: Death foretold. Prophecy and prognosis in medical care. 2001, The University of Chicago Press Christakis NA: Death foretold. Prophecy and prognosis in medical care. 2001, The University of Chicago Press
2.
go back to reference Bulkin W, Lukashok H: Rx for dying: the case for hospice. N Engl J Med. 1988, 318 (6): 376-378. 10.1056/NEJM198802113180609.CrossRefPubMed Bulkin W, Lukashok H: Rx for dying: the case for hospice. N Engl J Med. 1988, 318 (6): 376-378. 10.1056/NEJM198802113180609.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Christakis NA, Iwashyna TJ: Spousal illness burden is associated with delayed use of hospice care in terminally ill patients. J Palliat Med. 1998, 1 (1): 3-10. 10.1089/jpm.1998.1.3.CrossRefPubMed Christakis NA, Iwashyna TJ: Spousal illness burden is associated with delayed use of hospice care in terminally ill patients. J Palliat Med. 1998, 1 (1): 3-10. 10.1089/jpm.1998.1.3.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Goldberg RJ, Mor V, Wiemann M, Greer DS, Hiris J: Analgesic use in terminal cancer patients: report from the National Hospice Study. J Chronic Dis. 1986, 39 (1): 37-45. 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90105-0.CrossRefPubMed Goldberg RJ, Mor V, Wiemann M, Greer DS, Hiris J: Analgesic use in terminal cancer patients: report from the National Hospice Study. J Chronic Dis. 1986, 39 (1): 37-45. 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90105-0.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Greer DS, Mor V: An overview of National Hospice Study findings. J Chronic Dis. 1986, 39 (1): 5-7. 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90102-5.CrossRefPubMed Greer DS, Mor V: An overview of National Hospice Study findings. J Chronic Dis. 1986, 39 (1): 5-7. 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90102-5.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Moinpour CM, Polissar L: Factors affecting place of death of hospice and non-hospice cancer patients. Am J Public Health. 1989, 79 (11): 1549-1551. 10.2105/AJPH.79.11.1549.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moinpour CM, Polissar L: Factors affecting place of death of hospice and non-hospice cancer patients. Am J Public Health. 1989, 79 (11): 1549-1551. 10.2105/AJPH.79.11.1549.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Kane RL, Klein SJ, Bernstein L, Rothernberg R, Wales J: Hospice role in alleviating the emotional stress of terminal patients and their families. Med Care. 1985, 23 (3): 189-197. 10.1097/00005650-198503000-00001.CrossRefPubMed Kane RL, Klein SJ, Bernstein L, Rothernberg R, Wales J: Hospice role in alleviating the emotional stress of terminal patients and their families. Med Care. 1985, 23 (3): 189-197. 10.1097/00005650-198503000-00001.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Dawson NJ: Need satisfaction in terminal care settings. Soc Sci Med. 1991, 32 (1): 83-87. 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90131-U.CrossRefPubMed Dawson NJ: Need satisfaction in terminal care settings. Soc Sci Med. 1991, 32 (1): 83-87. 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90131-U.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mor V, Kidder D: Cost savings in hospice: final results of the National Hospice Study. Health Serv Res. 1985, 20 (4): 407-422.PubMedPubMedCentral Mor V, Kidder D: Cost savings in hospice: final results of the National Hospice Study. Health Serv Res. 1985, 20 (4): 407-422.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, Gallagher ER, Admane S, Jackson VA, Dahlin CM, Blinderman CD, Jacobsen J, Pirl WF: Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010, 363 (8): 733-742. 10.1056/NEJMoa1000678.CrossRefPubMed Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, Gallagher ER, Admane S, Jackson VA, Dahlin CM, Blinderman CD, Jacobsen J, Pirl WF: Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010, 363 (8): 733-742. 10.1056/NEJMoa1000678.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Christakis NA: Timing of referral of terminally ill patients to an outpatient hospice. J Gen Intern Med. 1994, 9 (6): 314-320. 10.1007/BF02599178.CrossRefPubMed Christakis NA: Timing of referral of terminally ill patients to an outpatient hospice. J Gen Intern Med. 1994, 9 (6): 314-320. 10.1007/BF02599178.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Christakis NA, Escarce JJ: Survival of Medicare patients after enrolment in hospice programs. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1996, 335 (3): 172-178. 10.1056/NEJM199607183350306.CrossRefPubMed Christakis NA, Escarce JJ: Survival of Medicare patients after enrolment in hospice programs. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1996, 335 (3): 172-178. 10.1056/NEJM199607183350306.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Dawes RM, Faust D, Meehl PE: Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science. 1989, 243 (4899): 1668-1674. 10.1126/science.2648573.CrossRefPubMed Dawes RM, Faust D, Meehl PE: Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science. 1989, 243 (4899): 1668-1674. 10.1126/science.2648573.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hastie R, Dawes RM: Rational choice in an uncertain world. 2001, London: Sage Publications Inc Hastie R, Dawes RM: Rational choice in an uncertain world. 2001, London: Sage Publications Inc
17.
go back to reference The Support Investigators: A Controlled Trial to Improve Care for Seriously III Hospitalized Patients: The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1995, 247 (20): 1591-1598. The Support Investigators: A Controlled Trial to Improve Care for Seriously III Hospitalized Patients: The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1995, 247 (20): 1591-1598.
18.
go back to reference Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R, Reeve J, Spanier A, King D, Molloy DW, Willan A, Streiner DL, Canadian Critical Care, Trials G: Determinants in Canadian Health Care Workers of the Decision to Withdraw Life Support From the Critically Ill. JAMA. 1995, 273 (9): 703-708. 10.1001/jama.1995.03520330033033.CrossRefPubMed Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R, Reeve J, Spanier A, King D, Molloy DW, Willan A, Streiner DL, Canadian Critical Care, Trials G: Determinants in Canadian Health Care Workers of the Decision to Withdraw Life Support From the Critically Ill. JAMA. 1995, 273 (9): 703-708. 10.1001/jama.1995.03520330033033.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hamel MB, Goldman L, Teno J, Lynn J, Davis RB, Harrell FE, Connors AF, Califf R, Kussin P, Bellamy P: Identification of Comatose Patients at High Risk for Death or Severe Disability. JAMA. 1995, 273 (23): 1842-1848. 10.1001/jama.1995.03520470050031.CrossRefPubMed Hamel MB, Goldman L, Teno J, Lynn J, Davis RB, Harrell FE, Connors AF, Califf R, Kussin P, Bellamy P: Identification of Comatose Patients at High Risk for Death or Severe Disability. JAMA. 1995, 273 (23): 1842-1848. 10.1001/jama.1995.03520470050031.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Teno J, Lynn J, Connors A, Wenger N, Phillips RS, Alzola C, Murphy DP, Desbiens N, WA K: The illusion of end-of-life resource savings with advance directives. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997, 45 (4): 519-520.CrossRef Teno J, Lynn J, Connors A, Wenger N, Phillips RS, Alzola C, Murphy DP, Desbiens N, WA K: The illusion of end-of-life resource savings with advance directives. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997, 45 (4): 519-520.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Teno JM, Lynn J, Phillips RS, Murphy D, Youngner SJ, Bellamy P, Connors AFJ, Desbiens NA, Fulkerson W, Knaus WA: Do formal advance directives affect resuscitation decisions and the use of resources for seriously ill patients? SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Clin Ethics. 1994, 5 (1): 23-30.PubMed Teno JM, Lynn J, Phillips RS, Murphy D, Youngner SJ, Bellamy P, Connors AFJ, Desbiens NA, Fulkerson W, Knaus WA: Do formal advance directives affect resuscitation decisions and the use of resources for seriously ill patients? SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. J Clin Ethics. 1994, 5 (1): 23-30.PubMed
22.
go back to reference Knaus WA, Harrell FE, Lynn J, Goldman L, Phillips RS, Connors AF, Dawson NV, Fulkerson WJ, Califf RM, Desbiens N: The SUPPORT Prognostic Model: Objective Estimates of Survival for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Adults. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1995, 122 (3): 191-203.CrossRefPubMed Knaus WA, Harrell FE, Lynn J, Goldman L, Phillips RS, Connors AF, Dawson NV, Fulkerson WJ, Califf RM, Desbiens N: The SUPPORT Prognostic Model: Objective Estimates of Survival for Seriously Ill Hospitalized Adults. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1995, 122 (3): 191-203.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Lynn J, Knaus WA: Background for SUPPORT. J Clin Epidimiol. 1990, 43 (Suppl): 1S-4S.CrossRef Lynn J, Knaus WA: Background for SUPPORT. J Clin Epidimiol. 1990, 43 (Suppl): 1S-4S.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tsalatsanis A, Hozo I, Vickers A, Djulbegovic B: A regret theory approach to decision curve analysis: a novel method for eliciting decision makers' preferences and decision-making. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010, 10: 51-10.1186/1472-6947-10-51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tsalatsanis A, Hozo I, Vickers A, Djulbegovic B: A regret theory approach to decision curve analysis: a novel method for eliciting decision makers' preferences and decision-making. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010, 10: 51-10.1186/1472-6947-10-51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Vickers A, Elkin E: Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Dec Making. 2006, 26 (6): 565-574. 10.1177/0272989X06295361.CrossRef Vickers A, Elkin E: Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Dec Making. 2006, 26 (6): 565-574. 10.1177/0272989X06295361.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Djulbegovic B, Hozo I: When Should Potentially False Research Findings Be Considered Acceptable?. PLoS Med. 2007, 4 (2): e26-10.1371/journal.pmed.0040026.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Djulbegovic B, Hozo I: When Should Potentially False Research Findings Be Considered Acceptable?. PLoS Med. 2007, 4 (2): e26-10.1371/journal.pmed.0040026.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Djulbegovic B, Hozo I, Schwartz A, McMasters KM: Acceptable regret in medical decision making. Med Hypotheses. 1999, 53 (3): 253-259. 10.1054/mehy.1998.0020.CrossRefPubMed Djulbegovic B, Hozo I, Schwartz A, McMasters KM: Acceptable regret in medical decision making. Med Hypotheses. 1999, 53 (3): 253-259. 10.1054/mehy.1998.0020.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hozo I, Djulbegovic B: When is diagnostic testing inappropriate or irrational? Acceptable regret approach. Med Dec Making. 2008, 28 (4): 540-553. 10.1177/0272989X08315249.CrossRef Hozo I, Djulbegovic B: When is diagnostic testing inappropriate or irrational? Acceptable regret approach. Med Dec Making. 2008, 28 (4): 540-553. 10.1177/0272989X08315249.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Hozo I, Djulbegovic B: Will insistence on practicing medicine according to expected utility theory lead to an increase in diagnostic testing?. Med Dec Making. 2009, 29: 320-322. 10.1177/0272989X09334370.CrossRef Hozo I, Djulbegovic B: Will insistence on practicing medicine according to expected utility theory lead to an increase in diagnostic testing?. Med Dec Making. 2009, 29: 320-322. 10.1177/0272989X09334370.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bell DE: Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty. Operations Research. 1982, 30: 961-981. 10.1287/opre.30.5.961.CrossRef Bell DE: Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty. Operations Research. 1982, 30: 961-981. 10.1287/opre.30.5.961.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Loomes G, Sugden R: Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice. Economic J. 1982, 92: 805-824. 10.2307/2232669.CrossRef Loomes G, Sugden R: Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice. Economic J. 1982, 92: 805-824. 10.2307/2232669.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Zeelenberg M, Pieters R: A theory of regret regulation 1.1. J Consumer Psychol. 2007, 17: 29-35. 10.1207/s15327663jcp1701_6.CrossRef Zeelenberg M, Pieters R: A theory of regret regulation 1.1. J Consumer Psychol. 2007, 17: 29-35. 10.1207/s15327663jcp1701_6.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Olsen LA, Aisner D, McGinnis MJ: The learning healthcare system: Workshop summary (IOM roundtable on evidence based medicine). 2008, Washington: The National Academic Press Olsen LA, Aisner D, McGinnis MJ: The learning healthcare system: Workshop summary (IOM roundtable on evidence based medicine). 2008, Washington: The National Academic Press
34.
go back to reference Eden J, Wheatley B, McNeil B, Sox H: Knowing what works in health care: A roadmap for the Nation. 2008, Washington: The National Academies Press Eden J, Wheatley B, McNeil B, Sox H: Knowing what works in health care: A roadmap for the Nation. 2008, Washington: The National Academies Press
35.
go back to reference McCaffery M, Beebe A: Pain: Clinical manual for nursing practice. 1993, Baltimore: VV Mosby Company McCaffery M, Beebe A: Pain: Clinical manual for nursing practice. 1993, Baltimore: VV Mosby Company
36.
go back to reference Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, ABC-Research-Group: Simple heuristics that make us smart. 1999, New York: Oxford University Press Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, ABC-Research-Group: Simple heuristics that make us smart. 1999, New York: Oxford University Press
37.
go back to reference Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG: Using a Drug Facts Box to Communicate Drug Benefits and Harms. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009, 150 (8): 516-527.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG: Using a Drug Facts Box to Communicate Drug Benefits and Harms. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009, 150 (8): 516-527.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Kahneman D: Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review. 2003, 93: 1449-1475. 10.1257/000282803322655392.CrossRef Kahneman D: Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review. 2003, 93: 1449-1475. 10.1257/000282803322655392.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Krantz DH, Kunreuther HC: Goals and plans in decision making. Judgement and decision making. 2007, 52 (3): 137-168. Krantz DH, Kunreuther HC: Goals and plans in decision making. Judgement and decision making. 2007, 52 (3): 137-168.
40.
go back to reference Rawls J: A theory of justice. Revised edition. 1999, Cambridge: Harvard University Press Rawls J: A theory of justice. Revised edition. 1999, Cambridge: Harvard University Press
41.
go back to reference Astrow AB, Popp B: The Palliative Care Information Act in real life. N Engl J Med. 2011, 364 (20): 1885-1887. 10.1056/NEJMp1102392.CrossRefPubMed Astrow AB, Popp B: The Palliative Care Information Act in real life. N Engl J Med. 2011, 364 (20): 1885-1887. 10.1056/NEJMp1102392.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Mack JW, Weeks JC, Wright AA, Block SD, Prigerson HG: End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28 (7): 1203-1208. 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4672.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mack JW, Weeks JC, Wright AA, Block SD, Prigerson HG: End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences. J Clin Oncol. 2010, 28 (7): 1203-1208. 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4672.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Extensions to Regret-based Decision Curve Analysis: An application to hospice referral for terminal patients
Authors
Athanasios Tsalatsanis
Laura E Barnes
Iztok Hozo
Benjamin Djulbegovic
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-77

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2011 Go to the issue