Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 4/2017

Open Access 01-08-2017 | Original Article

Extending the theoretical framework for curriculum integration in pre-clinical medical education

Authors: John Vergel, Diana Stentoft, Juny Montoya

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Curriculum integration is widely discussed in medical education but remains ill defined. Although there is plenty of information on logistical aspects of curriculum integration, little attention has been paid to the contextual issues that emerge from its practice and may complicate students’ knowledge integration. Therefore, we aimed to uncover how curriculum integration is manifested through context.

Methods

We collected data from the official curriculum and interviewed ten participants (including curriculum designers, facilitators, and students) in the bachelor’s medical program at Aalborg University. We observed various learning activities focused on pre-clinical education. Inspired by grounded theory, we analyzed the information we gathered.

Results

The following theoretical constructs emerged after the inductive analysis: 1) curriculum integration complexity is embedded in the institutional learning perspectives; 2) curriculum integration is used to harmonize conflicting learning perspectives in curriculum practice; 3) curriculum integration creates tensions that self-organize its structure; and 4) curriculum integration becomes visible in collaborative learning spaces.

Discussion

These constructs provide a framework for analyzing curriculum integration in the context in which it is meant to appear, which may assist educationalists to gain a more specific understanding of the term. This may enable effective curriculum integration since contextual issues are addressed in addition to the goals specified in the official curriculum.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Palha JA, Almeida A, Correia-Pinto J, Costa MJ, Ferreira MA, Sousa N. Longitudinal evaluation, acceptability and long-term retention of knowledge on a horizontally integrated organic and functional systems course. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:191–5.CrossRef Palha JA, Almeida A, Correia-Pinto J, Costa MJ, Ferreira MA, Sousa N. Longitudinal evaluation, acceptability and long-term retention of knowledge on a horizontally integrated organic and functional systems course. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:191–5.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ayuob N, Eldeek B, Alshawa L, Alsaba A. Interdisciplinary integration of the CVS module and its effect on faculty and student satisfaction as well as student performance. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:50.CrossRef Ayuob N, Eldeek B, Alshawa L, Alsaba A. Interdisciplinary integration of the CVS module and its effect on faculty and student satisfaction as well as student performance. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:50.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fulford L, Gunn V, Davies G, Evans C, Raza T, Vassallo M. Near peer integrated teaching for final year medical students. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5:129–32.CrossRef Fulford L, Gunn V, Davies G, Evans C, Raza T, Vassallo M. Near peer integrated teaching for final year medical students. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5:129–32.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jippes M, Majoor GD. Influence of national culture on the adoption of integrated medical curricula. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2011;16:5–16.CrossRef Jippes M, Majoor GD. Influence of national culture on the adoption of integrated medical curricula. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2011;16:5–16.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Goldman E, Schroth W. Perspective: deconstructing integration: a framework for the rational application of integration as a guiding curricular strategy. Acad Med. 2012;87:729–34.CrossRef Goldman E, Schroth W. Perspective: deconstructing integration: a framework for the rational application of integration as a guiding curricular strategy. Acad Med. 2012;87:729–34.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lisk K, Agur AM, Woods NN. Exploring cognitive integration of basic science and its effect on diagnostic reasoning in novices. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5:147–53.CrossRef Lisk K, Agur AM, Woods NN. Exploring cognitive integration of basic science and its effect on diagnostic reasoning in novices. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5:147–53.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Whitehead C, Hodges B, Austin Z. Captive on a carousel: discourses of ‘new’ in medical education 1910–2010. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2012;18:755–68.CrossRef Whitehead C, Hodges B, Austin Z. Captive on a carousel: discourses of ‘new’ in medical education 1910–2010. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2012;18:755–68.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brauer D, Ferguson K. The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE guide no. 96. Med Teach. 2015;37:312–22.CrossRef Brauer D, Ferguson K. The integrated curriculum in medical education: AMEE guide no. 96. Med Teach. 2015;37:312–22.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bolender D, Ettarh R, Jerrett D, Laherty R. Curriculum integration = course disintegration: what does this mean for anatomy? Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6:205–8.CrossRef Bolender D, Ettarh R, Jerrett D, Laherty R. Curriculum integration = course disintegration: what does this mean for anatomy? Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6:205–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Schmidt HG, Machiels-Bongaerts M, Hermans H, ten-Cate TJ, Venekamp R, Boshuizen HPA. The development of diagnostic competence: comparison of a problem-based, an integrated, and a conventional medical curriculum. Acad Med. 1996;71:658–64.CrossRef Schmidt HG, Machiels-Bongaerts M, Hermans H, ten-Cate TJ, Venekamp R, Boshuizen HPA. The development of diagnostic competence: comparison of a problem-based, an integrated, and a conventional medical curriculum. Acad Med. 1996;71:658–64.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Eichbaum QG. Thinking about thinking and emotion: the metacognitive approach to the medical humanities that integrates the humanities with the basic and clinical sciences. Perm J. 2014;18:64–75. Eichbaum QG. Thinking about thinking and emotion: the metacognitive approach to the medical humanities that integrates the humanities with the basic and clinical sciences. Perm J. 2014;18:64–75.
12.
go back to reference Irby DM, Cooke M, O’Brien BC. Calls for reform of medical education by the carnegie foundation for the advancement of teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad Med. 2010;85:220–7.CrossRef Irby DM, Cooke M, O’Brien BC. Calls for reform of medical education by the carnegie foundation for the advancement of teaching: 1910 and 2010. Acad Med. 2010;85:220–7.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Eisenstein A, Vaisman L, Johnston-Cox H, et al. Integration of basic science and clinical medicine: the innovative approach of the cadaver biopsy project at the Boston University School of Medicine. Acad Med. 2014;89:50–3.CrossRef Eisenstein A, Vaisman L, Johnston-Cox H, et al. Integration of basic science and clinical medicine: the innovative approach of the cadaver biopsy project at the Boston University School of Medicine. Acad Med. 2014;89:50–3.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kulasegaram K, Martimianakis M, Mylopoulos M, Whitehead C, Woods N. Cognition before curriculum. Acad Med. 2013;88:1578–85.CrossRef Kulasegaram K, Martimianakis M, Mylopoulos M, Whitehead C, Woods N. Cognition before curriculum. Acad Med. 2013;88:1578–85.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mennin S. Self-organisation, integration and curriculum in the complex world of medical education. Med Educ. 2010;44:20–30.CrossRef Mennin S. Self-organisation, integration and curriculum in the complex world of medical education. Med Educ. 2010;44:20–30.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference O’Neill PA, Morris J, Baxter CM. Evaluation of an integrated curriculum using problem-based learning in a clinical environment: the Manchester experience. Med Educ. 2000;34:222–30.CrossRef O’Neill PA, Morris J, Baxter CM. Evaluation of an integrated curriculum using problem-based learning in a clinical environment: the Manchester experience. Med Educ. 2000;34:222–30.CrossRef
17.
18.
go back to reference Harden RM, Crosby J, Davis MH, Howie PW, Struthers AD. Task-based learning: the answer to integration and problem-based learning in the clinical years. Med Educ. 2000;34:391–7.CrossRef Harden RM, Crosby J, Davis MH, Howie PW, Struthers AD. Task-based learning: the answer to integration and problem-based learning in the clinical years. Med Educ. 2000;34:391–7.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kemahli S, Dokmeci F, Palaoglu O, et al. How we derived a core curriculum: from institutional to national – Ankara University experience. Med Teach. 2004;26:295–8.CrossRef Kemahli S, Dokmeci F, Palaoglu O, et al. How we derived a core curriculum: from institutional to national – Ankara University experience. Med Teach. 2004;26:295–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference McNeil H, Hughes C, Toohey S, Dowton S. An innovative outcomes-based medical education program built on adult learning principles. Med Teach. 2006;28:527–34.CrossRef McNeil H, Hughes C, Toohey S, Dowton S. An innovative outcomes-based medical education program built on adult learning principles. Med Teach. 2006;28:527–34.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hopkins R, Pratt D, Bowen J, Regehr G. Integrating basic science without integrating basic scientists. Acad Med. 2015;90:149–53.CrossRef Hopkins R, Pratt D, Bowen J, Regehr G. Integrating basic science without integrating basic scientists. Acad Med. 2015;90:149–53.CrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Hooper B, Greene D, Sample P. Exploring features of integrative teaching through a microanalysis of connection-making processes in a health sciences curriculum. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2014;19:469–95.CrossRef Hooper B, Greene D, Sample P. Exploring features of integrative teaching through a microanalysis of connection-making processes in a health sciences curriculum. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2014;19:469–95.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Posner G. Analyzing the curriculum, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004, pp 43–5. Posner G. Analyzing the curriculum, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004, pp 43–5.
25.
go back to reference Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education, 7th ed. London: Routledge Falmer; 2007, pp 113–6. Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. Research methods in education, 7th ed. London: Routledge Falmer; 2007, pp 113–6.
26.
go back to reference Stentoft D, Duroux M, Fink T, Emmersen J. From cases to projects in problem-based medical education. J Prob Based Lear High Educ. 2014;2:45–62. Stentoft D, Duroux M, Fink T, Emmersen J. From cases to projects in problem-based medical education. J Prob Based Lear High Educ. 2014;2:45–62.
27.
go back to reference Flick U. Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2007, p 43.CrossRef Flick U. Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2007, p 43.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Silverstein L, Auerbach C, Levant R. Using qualitative research to strengthen clinical practice. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2006;37:351–8.CrossRef Silverstein L, Auerbach C, Levant R. Using qualitative research to strengthen clinical practice. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2006;37:351–8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Auerbach C, Silverstein L. Qualitative data. New York: New York University Press; 2003, pp 31–41. Auerbach C, Silverstein L. Qualitative data. New York: New York University Press; 2003, pp 31–41.
30.
go back to reference Rubin H, Rubin I. Qualitative interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1995. Rubin H, Rubin I. Qualitative interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1995.
31.
go back to reference Stake R. Qualitative research. New York: Guilford Press; 2010. Stake R. Qualitative research. New York: Guilford Press; 2010.
33.
go back to reference Sivapragasam M. Basic science in integrated curricula. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5:257–8.CrossRef Sivapragasam M. Basic science in integrated curricula. Perspect Med Educ. 2016;5:257–8.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Muller J, Jain S, Loeser H, Irby D. Lessons learned about integrating a medical school curriculum: perceptions of students, faculty and curriculum leaders. Med Educ. 2008;42:778–85.CrossRef Muller J, Jain S, Loeser H, Irby D. Lessons learned about integrating a medical school curriculum: perceptions of students, faculty and curriculum leaders. Med Educ. 2008;42:778–85.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Malau-Aduli B, Lee A, Cooling N, Catchpole M, Jose M, Turner R. Retention of knowledge and perceived relevance of basic sciences in an integrated case-based learning (CBL) curriculum. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:139.CrossRef Malau-Aduli B, Lee A, Cooling N, Catchpole M, Jose M, Turner R. Retention of knowledge and perceived relevance of basic sciences in an integrated case-based learning (CBL) curriculum. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:139.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Dahle L, Brynhildsen J, Fallsberg M, Rundquist I, Hammar M. Pros and cons of vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum: examples and experiences from Linköping, Sweden. Med Teach. 2002;24:280–5.CrossRef Dahle L, Brynhildsen J, Fallsberg M, Rundquist I, Hammar M. Pros and cons of vertical integration between clinical medicine and basic science within a problem-based undergraduate medical curriculum: examples and experiences from Linköping, Sweden. Med Teach. 2002;24:280–5.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Boudreau JD, Cassell EJ. Abraham Flexner’s ‘Mooted Question’ and the story of integration. Acad Med. 2010;85:378–83.CrossRef Boudreau JD, Cassell EJ. Abraham Flexner’s ‘Mooted Question’ and the story of integration. Acad Med. 2010;85:378–83.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Dennis A, Cleland J, Johnston P, Ker J, Lough M, Rees C. Exploring stakeholders’ views of medical education research priorities: a national survey. Med Educ. 2014;48:1078–91.CrossRef Dennis A, Cleland J, Johnston P, Ker J, Lough M, Rees C. Exploring stakeholders’ views of medical education research priorities: a national survey. Med Educ. 2014;48:1078–91.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Brooks W, Woodley K, Jackson J, Hoesley C. Integration of gross anatomy in an organ system-based medical curriculum: strategies and challenges. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;8:266–74.CrossRef Brooks W, Woodley K, Jackson J, Hoesley C. Integration of gross anatomy in an organ system-based medical curriculum: strategies and challenges. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;8:266–74.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Goldszmidt M, Minda J, Bordage G. Developing a unified list of physicians’ reasoning tasks during clinical encounters. Acad Med. 2013;88:390–4.CrossRef Goldszmidt M, Minda J, Bordage G. Developing a unified list of physicians’ reasoning tasks during clinical encounters. Acad Med. 2013;88:390–4.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Mennin S. Self-organisation, integration and curriculum in the complex world of medical education. Med Educ. 2010;44:20–30.CrossRef Mennin S. Self-organisation, integration and curriculum in the complex world of medical education. Med Educ. 2010;44:20–30.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Woods N. Science is fundamental: the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2007;41:1173–7.CrossRef Woods N. Science is fundamental: the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2007;41:1173–7.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Norman G. The essential role of basic science in medical education: the perspective from psychology. Clin Invest Med. 2000;23:47–51. Norman G. The essential role of basic science in medical education: the perspective from psychology. Clin Invest Med. 2000;23:47–51.
Metadata
Title
Extending the theoretical framework for curriculum integration in pre-clinical medical education
Authors
John Vergel
Diana Stentoft
Juny Montoya
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0348-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Perspectives on Medical Education 4/2017 Go to the issue

Statistical Points and Pitfalls

The bridge between design and analysis