Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Exploring the strategies that midwives in British Columbia use to promote normal birth

Author: Michelle M. Butler

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Rates of normal birth have been declining steadily over the past 20 years, despite the evidence of the benefits to mother and baby. This is most obvious in steadily increasing caesarean section rates across countries and studies of the factors involved suggest it may be more to do with the organization of maternity care and the preferences of healthcare providers than changes in maternal or demographic conditions. The proportion of women in British Columbia (BC) receiving care from a midwife continues to grow and there is a particular focus on promoting and supporting normal pregnancy and birth in the midwifery philosophy of care. In BC, women receiving care from a midwife are less likely to have a caesarean section and other birth interventions.

Methods

An interpretive approach, based on interpretive phenomenology was used to explore the experiences of midwives in BC of normal birth and the strategies that they use to keep birth normal. Fourteen experienced midwives were purposively selected from across the range of practice, geographical, and rural/urban contexts to participate in depth interviews. Data were analyzed using Thematic Network Analysis.

Results

Seven key themes were identified in the data: working with women from the early pregnancy, informing choice, the birth environment, careful watching and waiting, managing early labour, helping the woman to cope with labour, and tools in the tool kit.

Conclusions

Midwives in BC work closely with women from early pregnancy to prepare them for a normal birth, and as “instruments of care” they adopt a range of approaches to support women to achieve this. The emphasis on continuity of care in the BC model of midwifery care plays a vital role in this.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference SOGC. Joint policy statement on normal childbirth. JOGC. 2008;30(12):1163–5. SOGC. Joint policy statement on normal childbirth. JOGC. 2008;30(12):1163–5.
2.
go back to reference Hendrix E. Routine interventions during normal labor and birth … are they really necessary? In: Donna S, editor. Promoting Normal Birth: research, reflections and guidelines. La Vergne: Fresh Heart Publishing; 2011. p. 6–20. Hendrix E. Routine interventions during normal labor and birth … are they really necessary? In: Donna S, editor. Promoting Normal Birth: research, reflections and guidelines. La Vergne: Fresh Heart Publishing; 2011. p. 6–20.
3.
go back to reference Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in Caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in Caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Marshall JL, Spiby H, McCormick F. Evaluating the “Focus on Normal Birth and Reducing Caesarean section Rates Rapid Improvement Programme”, A mixed method study in England. Midwifery. 2015;31(2):332–40.CrossRefPubMed Marshall JL, Spiby H, McCormick F. Evaluating the “Focus on Normal Birth and Reducing Caesarean section Rates Rapid Improvement Programme”, A mixed method study in England. Midwifery. 2015;31(2):332–40.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Boutin RCT, Finlay BB. Microbiota-mediated immunomodulation and asthma: current and future perspectives. Curr Treat Options Allergy. 2016;3(3):292–309.CrossRef Boutin RCT, Finlay BB. Microbiota-mediated immunomodulation and asthma: current and future perspectives. Curr Treat Options Allergy. 2016;3(3):292–309.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Almgren M, Schlinzig T, Gomez-Cabrero D, et al. Cesarean delivery and hematopoietic stem cell epigenetics in the newborn infant: implications for future health? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:502.e1–8.CrossRef Almgren M, Schlinzig T, Gomez-Cabrero D, et al. Cesarean delivery and hematopoietic stem cell epigenetics in the newborn infant: implications for future health? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:502.e1–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdo M, Althabe F. The Global Numbers and Costs of Additionally Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Performed per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. Geneva: WHO; 2010. Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, Betrán AP, Merialdo M, Althabe F. The Global Numbers and Costs of Additionally Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Performed per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. Geneva: WHO; 2010.
11.
go back to reference British Columbia Perinatal Health Program. Caesarean Birth Task Force Report 2008. Vancouver: British Columbia Perinatal Birth Program; 2008. British Columbia Perinatal Health Program. Caesarean Birth Task Force Report 2008. Vancouver: British Columbia Perinatal Birth Program; 2008.
12.
go back to reference Hartmann KE, Andrews JC, Jerome RN, Lewis RM, Likis FE, Nikki McKoy J, et al. Strategies to reduce Cesarean birth in low-risk women. Comparative Effectiveness Review. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012. Hartmann KE, Andrews JC, Jerome RN, Lewis RM, Likis FE, Nikki McKoy J, et al. Strategies to reduce Cesarean birth in low-risk women. Comparative Effectiveness Review. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2012.
13.
go back to reference Khunpradit S, Tavender E, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Wasiak J, Cruen RL. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev, 2011, doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD005528. Khunpradit S, Tavender E, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Wasiak J, Cruen RL. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev, 2011, doi: 10.​1002/​14651858. CD005528.
14.
go back to reference Perinatal Services BC. Midwifery Report. Vancouver: Perinatal Services BC; 2016. Perinatal Services BC. Midwifery Report. Vancouver: Perinatal Services BC; 2016.
17.
go back to reference Janssen PA, Lee SK, Ryan EM, Etches DJ, Farquharson DF, Peacock D, et al. Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia. CMAJ. 2002;166(3):315–23.PubMedPubMedCentral Janssen PA, Lee SK, Ryan EM, Etches DJ, Farquharson DF, Peacock D, et al. Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia. CMAJ. 2002;166(3):315–23.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA, Klein MC, Liston RM, Lee SK. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. CMAJ. 2009;181(6-7):377–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA, Klein MC, Liston RM, Lee SK. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. CMAJ. 2009;181(6-7):377–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Janssen PA, Ryan EM, Etches DJ, Klein MC, Reime B. Outcomes of planned hospital birth attended by midwives compared with physicians in British Columbia. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007;62(11):701–2.CrossRef Janssen PA, Ryan EM, Etches DJ, Klein MC, Reime B. Outcomes of planned hospital birth attended by midwives compared with physicians in British Columbia. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007;62(11):701–2.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Benner P. The tradition and skill of interpretive phenomenology in studying health, illness, and caring practices. In: Benner P, editor. Interpretive Phenomenology: Embodiment, Caring, and Ethics in Health and Illness. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. p. 99–128.CrossRef Benner P. The tradition and skill of interpretive phenomenology in studying health, illness, and caring practices. In: Benner P, editor. Interpretive Phenomenology: Embodiment, Caring, and Ethics in Health and Illness. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. p. 99–128.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Attride-Stirling J. Thematic Networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Res. 2001;1(3):385–405.CrossRef Attride-Stirling J. Thematic Networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Res. 2001;1(3):385–405.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Berger R. Now I, see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Res. 2015;15(2):219–34.CrossRef Berger R. Now I, see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Res. 2015;15(2):219–34.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Peredaryenko MS, Krauss SE. Calibrating the human instrument: understanding the interviewing experience of novice qualitative researchers. Qualitative Rep. 2013;18(43):1–17. Peredaryenko MS, Krauss SE. Calibrating the human instrument: understanding the interviewing experience of novice qualitative researchers. Qualitative Rep. 2013;18(43):1–17.
26.
go back to reference Mann S. Chapter 1: Interviews as Reflective Practice. In: The research interview: reflective practice and reflexivity in research processes, Edited by Mann S. UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016. p. 1–29.CrossRef Mann S. Chapter 1: Interviews as Reflective Practice. In: The research interview: reflective practice and reflexivity in research processes, Edited by Mann S. UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016. p. 1–29.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lee G. The concept of ‘continuity’ – what does it mean? In: Kirkham MJ, Perkins ER, editors. Reflections on Midwifery. London: Bailliere Tindall; 1997. p. 1–26. Lee G. The concept of ‘continuity’ – what does it mean? In: Kirkham MJ, Perkins ER, editors. Reflections on Midwifery. London: Bailliere Tindall; 1997. p. 1–26.
28.
go back to reference Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004667. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5. Sandall J, Soltani H, Gates S, Shennan A, Devane D. Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004667. DOI: 10.​1002/​14651858.​CD004667.​pub5.
29.
go back to reference Cheyne H, Terry R, Niven C, et al. “Should I Come In Now?” A study of women’s early labour experiences. Br J Midwifery. 2007;15(10):604–9.CrossRef Cheyne H, Terry R, Niven C, et al. “Should I Come In Now?” A study of women’s early labour experiences. Br J Midwifery. 2007;15(10):604–9.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Janssen PA, Still DK, Klein MC, Singer J, Carty EA, Liston RM, Zupancic JA. Early labor assessment and support at home versus telephone triage: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(6):1463–9.CrossRefPubMed Janssen PA, Still DK, Klein MC, Singer J, Carty EA, Liston RM, Zupancic JA. Early labor assessment and support at home versus telephone triage: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(6):1463–9.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Cheyne H, Hundley V. Has Labor Started? A judgment made in uncertainty. Birth. 2009;36(4):336–7. Cheyne H, Hundley V. Has Labor Started? A judgment made in uncertainty. Birth. 2009;36(4):336–7.
33.
go back to reference Shaw D, Guise J-M, Shah N, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Joseph KS, Levy B, et al. Drivers of maternity care in high-income countries: can health systems support woman-centred care? Lancet. 2016;388(10057):2282–95.CrossRefPubMed Shaw D, Guise J-M, Shah N, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Joseph KS, Levy B, et al. Drivers of maternity care in high-income countries: can health systems support woman-centred care? Lancet. 2016;388(10057):2282–95.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comandé D, et al. Beyond Too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet. 2016;388(10056):2176–92.CrossRefPubMed Miller S, Abalos E, Chamillard M, Ciapponi A, Colaci D, Comandé D, et al. Beyond Too little, too late and too much, too soon: a pathway towards evidence-based, respectful maternity care worldwide. Lancet. 2016;388(10056):2176–92.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Seibold C, Licqurish S, Rolls C, Hopkins F. “Lending the space”: midwives perceptions of birth space and clinical risk management. Midwifery. 2010;26(5):526–31.CrossRefPubMed Seibold C, Licqurish S, Rolls C, Hopkins F. “Lending the space”: midwives perceptions of birth space and clinical risk management. Midwifery. 2010;26(5):526–31.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Fahy KM, Parratt JA. Birth Territory: a theory for midwifery practice. Women Birth. 2006;19(2):45–50.CrossRefPubMed Fahy KM, Parratt JA. Birth Territory: a theory for midwifery practice. Women Birth. 2006;19(2):45–50.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Foureur M, Davis D, Fenwick J, Leap N, Iedema R, Forbes I, et al. The relationship between birth unit design and safe, satisfying birth: Developing a hypothetical model. Midwifery. 2010;26(5):520–5.CrossRefPubMed Foureur M, Davis D, Fenwick J, Leap N, Iedema R, Forbes I, et al. The relationship between birth unit design and safe, satisfying birth: Developing a hypothetical model. Midwifery. 2010;26(5):520–5.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Foureur M. Creating birth space to enable undisturbed birth. In: Fahy K, Foureur M, Hastie C, editors. Birth Territory and Midwifery Guardianship. Edinburgh: Butterworth Heinemann, Elsevier; 2008. p. 57–77. Foureur M. Creating birth space to enable undisturbed birth. In: Fahy K, Foureur M, Hastie C, editors. Birth Territory and Midwifery Guardianship. Edinburgh: Butterworth Heinemann, Elsevier; 2008. p. 57–77.
39.
go back to reference Nilsson C. The delivery room: is it a safe place? A hermeneutic analysis of women’s negative birth experiences. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2014;5(4):199–204.CrossRefPubMed Nilsson C. The delivery room: is it a safe place? A hermeneutic analysis of women’s negative birth experiences. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2014;5(4):199–204.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD003766.PubMedPubMedCentral Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD003766.PubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Kennedy HP, Shannon MT. Keeping birth normal: research findings on midwifery care during childbirth. JOGNN. 2004;33(5):554–60.CrossRefPubMed Kennedy HP, Shannon MT. Keeping birth normal: research findings on midwifery care during childbirth. JOGNN. 2004;33(5):554–60.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Seale C. The Quality of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications; 1999.CrossRef Seale C. The Quality of Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications; 1999.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Exploring the strategies that midwives in British Columbia use to promote normal birth
Author
Michelle M. Butler
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1323-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017 Go to the issue