Top

BMC Health Services Research

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Research

Exploring the motivation of health professionals to engage with research at various career stages

Authors: Louisa M. D’Arrietta, Venkat N. Vangaveti, Melissa J. Crowe, Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2024

Abstract

Background

Research is crucial for improved healthcare and better patient outcomes, but there is a current shortage of clinician-researchers who can connect research and practice in the health professions field. This study aimed to investigate the effect of career stage, previous training and involvement in research on health professionals' (HPs) motivations to engage in research while in public hospital clinical roles. HPs' perceived motivation concerning the importance, value, and barriers attributed to research during different career stages were examined.

Methods

A mixed methods study design was adopted for this research. An online survey developed based on the Expectancy-Value-Cost (EVC) theory was distributed to HPs (doctors, nurses, midwives, and allied health professionals) in three North Queensland Public Hospitals. Data analysis included descriptive and inferential statistics for the quantitative data and content analysis for the qualitative text responses.

Results

Three hundred and fifty-five responses were received. Prior research training and involvement in research influenced respondents' perceptions about the importance, attitude, motivators, and barriers to research. Attainment value was the overarching motivation for involvement in research and research training for all career stages and all professional HP groups. Positive attitude to research was significantly higher (P = 0.003) for the allied health group (27.45 ± 4.05), followed by the medical (26.30 ± 4.12) and then the nursing and midwifery group (25.62 ± 4.21). Perceived importance and attitude attributed to research were significantly higher (P < 0.05) for those who had research training (26.66 ± 3.26 and 28.21 ± 3.73) compared to those who did not have research training (25.77 ± 3.77 and 23.97 ± 3.53). Significantly higher (P < 0.05) perceptions of organisational and individual barriers were reported among early career (50.52 ± 7.30) respondents compared to their mid-career (48.49 ± 8.14) and late career (47.71 ± 8.36) counterparts.

Conclusion

The findings from this study provide valuable insights into the factors that influence HPs' motivation for research. The results underscore the importance of professional group, involvement in research, exposure to research training, career stage, gender, and organisational support in shaping HPs' attitudes, values, and perceived barriers to research. Understanding these factors can inform the development of targeted strategies to enhance research engagement among HPs and promote evidence-based practice in healthcare.

Available only for authorised users

Cron WL, Dubinsky AJ, Michaels RE. The influence of career stages on components of salesperson motivation. J Mark. 1988;52(1):78–92.CrossRef

Goštautaitė B, Bučiūnienė I, Dalla Rosa A, Duffy R, Kim HJ. Healthcare professionals with calling are less likely to be burned out: the role of social worth and career stage. Career Dev Int. 2020;25(6):649–70 PubMed PMID: edsemr.10.1108.CDI.10.2018.0255.CrossRef

Vilela NGS, Casado T. Career stages in management studies: a systematic review of scientific production from 2011 to 2020. Revista de gestão. 2021;30(1):62–77. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Australian Government Department of Health. Next generation clinical researchers. 2019. Available from: https://beta.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/next-generation-clinical-researchers. [Cited 2019 29 June].

Yano EM, Resnick A, Gluck M, Kwon H, Mistry KB. Accelerating learning healthcare system development through embedded research: Career trajectories, training needs, and strategies for managing and supporting embedded researchers. Healthcare. 2021;8(Supplement 1):100479.CrossRefPubMed

D’Arrietta LM, Vangaveti VN, Crowe MJ, Malau-Aduli BS. Impact of research training on newly graduated health professionals’ motivation to undertake research. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022;15:2223–40.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Australian Government Department of Health. Clinician researchers initiative. 2022. Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/clinician-researchers-initiative. [Cited 2022 14 October].

Ranieri V, Barratt H, Fulop N, Rees G. Factors that influence career progression among postdoctoral clinical academics: a scoping review of the literature. BMJ Open. 2016;6(10):e013523. PubMed PMID: 27798036. English.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

Wyngaarden JB. The clinical investigator as an endangered species. N Engl J Med. 1979;301(23):1254–9. PubMed PMID: 503128.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Ommering BWC, van Blankenstein FM, Wijnen-Meijer M, van Diepen M, Dekker FW. Fostering the physician-scientist workforce: a prospective cohort study to investigate the effect of undergraduate medical students’ motivation for research on actual research involvement. BMJ OPEN. 2019;9(7):e028034.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

11.

Paget SP, Lilischkis KJ, Morrow AM, Caldwell PH. Embedding research in clinical practice: differences in attitudes to research participation among clinicians in a tertiary teaching hospital. Intern Med J. 2014;44(1):86–9. PubMed PMID: 24450523. English.CrossRefPubMed

12.

D’Arrietta LM, Vangaveti VN, Crowe MJ, Malau-Aduli BS. Rethinking health professionals’ motivation to do research: a systematic review. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022;15:185–216. PubMed PMID: edsdoj.06ab7462d6fb41e5a9cc121049b39fc0.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

13.

Ministry of Business and Innovation and Employmen Ministry of Health. New Zealand Health research strategy 2017–2027 Wellington: Ministry of Business and Innovation and Employmen Ministry of Health. 2017. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/new-zealand-health-research-strategy-2017-2027. [Cited 2022 17 July].

14.

Association of Australian Medical Research Institutes. AAMRI calls attention to critical need for research-led healthcare. 2019. Available from: https://aamri.org.au/news-events/aamri-news/aamri-calls-attention-to-critical-need-for-research-led-healthcare/. [Cited 2019 8 June].

15.

Edelman A, Brown A, Pain T, Larkins S, Harvey G. Evaluating research investment and impact at a regional Australian hospital and health service: a programme theory and conceptual framework. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):1–15. PubMed PMID: 142104490.CrossRef

16.

Duarte H, Lopes D. Career stages and occupations impacts on workers motivations. Int J Manpow. 2018;39(5):746–63. PubMed PMID: edsemr.10.1108.IJM.02.2017.0026.CrossRef

17.

Duffy RD, Dik BJ, Douglass RP, England JW, Velez BL. Work as a calling: a theoretical model. J Couns Psychol. 2018;65(4):423–39. PubMed PMID: 2018-33326-003.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Li M, Jameel A, Ma Z, Sun H, Hussain A, Mubeen S. Prism of employee performance through the means of internal support: a study of perceived organizational support. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022;15:965–76. PubMed PMID: edsdoj.294af2edfdab4197acf752812767bb40.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

19.

West S, Visentin DC, Cleary M. Motivation for a successful health career. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2020;41(11):1051–3. PubMed PMID: 33000976.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Stewart A, Sambuco D, DeCastro R, Ubel PA. Gender differences in salary in a recent cohort of early-career physician-researchers. Acad Med. 2013;88(11):1689–99. PubMed PMID: 24072109. Pubmed Central PMCID: NIHMS519606. English.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Jolly S, Griffith KA, DeCastro R, Stewart A, Ubel P, Jagsi R. Gender differences in time spent on parenting and domestic responsibilities by high-achieving young physician-researchers. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(5):344–53. PubMed PMID: 24737273. Pubmed Central PMCID: NIHMS619836. English.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

22.

National Institutes of Health. Physician-scientist workforce working group report. 2014. Available from: https://acd.od.nih.gov/documents/reports/PSW_Report_ACD_06042014.pdf. [Cited 2019 15 January].

23.

Campbell N, McAllister L, Eley D. The influence of motivation in recruitment and retention of rural and remote allied health professionals: a literature review. Rural Remote Health. 2012;12:1900. PubMed PMID: 22845190.PubMed

24.

Gardner A, Smyth W, Renison B, Cann T, Vicary M. Supporting rural and remote area nurses to utilise and conduct research: an intervention study. Collegian. 2012;19(2):97–105. PubMed PMID: S1322769611000527.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Cosgrave C. The whole-of-person retention improvement framework: a guide for addressing health workforce challenges in the rural context. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(8):2698. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082698. PubMed PMID.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

26.

Eccles JS, Adler TF, Futterman R, Goff SB, Kaczala CM, Meece JL, et al. Expectancies values and academic behaviors. In: Spence J, editor., et al., Achievement and achievement motives. San Francisco, CA: W H Freeman; 1983. p. 74–146.

27.

Eccles JS, Wigfield A. Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53(1):109–32.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Van Maele L, Devos C, Guisset S, Leconte S, Macq J. Expectancy-value-cost motivational theory to explore final year medical students’ research intentions and past research experience: a multicentre cross-sectional questionnaire study. medRxiv. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.04.20244038.

29.

Deci EL, Olafsen AH, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory in work organizations: the state of a science. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2017;4:19–43.CrossRef

30.

Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78. PubMed PMID: 2000-13324-007.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Creswell JW. Advanced mixed methods research designs. In: Tahkkori B, Teddlie C, editors. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. London: Sage; 2003. p. 223–40.

32.

Liamputtong P, Liamputtong P. Research methods and evidence-based practice. 4th ed. Docklands, Victoria: Oxford University Press; 2022.

33.

O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13(2):92–8.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Noel H, Huang AR. The effect of varying incentive amounts on physician survey response. Eval Health Prof. 2019;42(1):71–81. PubMed PMID: 30384767. English.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Singer E, Ye C. The use and effects of incentives in surveys. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2013;645(1):112–41.CrossRef

36.

Amabile TM, Hil KG, Hennessey BA, Tighe EM. The work preference inventory: assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations: [with Correction]. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;66(5):950–67. PubMed PMID: 1995-23827-001.CrossRef

37.

Jones RD, Griffith KA, Ubel PA, Stewart A, Jagsi R. A mixed-methods investigation of the motivations, goals, and aspirations of male and female academic medical faculty. Acad Med. 2016;91(8):1089–97. PubMed PMID: 27254012. English.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

38.

Mills JMZ, Januszewski AS, Robinson BG, Traill CL, Jenkins AJ, Keech AC. Attractions and barriers to Australian physician-researcher careers: Physician-researcher influences. Intern Med J. 2019;49(2):171–81. PubMed PMID: 30152020. English.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Robinson GF, Switzer GE, Cohen ED, Primack BA, Kapoor WN, Seltzer DL, et al. Shortening the work preference inventory for use with physician scientists: WPI-10. Clin Transl Sci. 2014;7(4):324–8. PubMed PMID: 24405561. Pubmed Central PMCID: NIHMS544727. English.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

40.

Sultana K, Al Jeraisy M, Al Ammari M, Patel R, Zaidi STR. Attitude, barriers and facilitators to practice-based research: cross-sectional survey of hospital pharmacists in Saudi Arabia. J pharm policy pract. 2016;9(1):4.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

41.

Norman G. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “Laws” of Statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2010;15(5):625–32. PubMed PMID: EJ907373.CrossRef

42.

Sullivan GM, Artino AR Jr. Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ. 2013;5(4):541–2. PubMed PMID: 24454995.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

43.

Alele F, Malau-Aduli B. An introduction to research methods for undergraduate health profession students. Townsville, Qld: James Cook University; 2023.

44.

Bengtsson M. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus open. 2016;2:8–14.CrossRef

45.

Gill SD, Gwini SM, Otmar R, Lane SE, Quirk F, Fuscaldo G. Assessing research capacity in Victoria’s south-west health service providers. Aust J Rural Health. 2019;27(6):505–13.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Scala E, Patterson BJ, Stavarski DH, Mackay P. Engagement in research: a clinical nurse profile and motivating factors. J Nurses Prof Dev. 2019;35(3):137–43.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Avery M, Westwood G, Richardson A. Enablers and barriers to progressing a clinical academic career in nursing, midwifery and allied health professions: a cross-sectional survey. J Clin Nurs. 2022;31(3/4):406–16.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Brown A, Edelman A, Pain T, Larkins S, Harvey G. “We’re not providing the best care if we are not on the cutting edge of research”: a research impact evaluation at a regional Australian hospital and health service. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(6):3000–11.

49.

Hart J, Hakim J, Kaur R, Jeremy R, Coorey G, Kalman E, et al. Research supervisors’ views of barriers and enablers for research projects undertaken by medical students; a mixed methods evaluation of a post-graduate medical degree research project program. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):370. PubMed PMID: 35562832.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

50.

King O, West E, Lee S, Glenister K, Quilliam C, Wong Shee A, et al. Research education and training for nurses and allied health professionals: a systematic scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):385. PubMed PMID: 35590359.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

51.

Association of Australian Medical Research Institutes. Research is the foundation for building a world-class health system. 2019. [Cited 2019 8 June 2019].

52.

Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. Early to mid-career researchers initiative. 2022. Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/early-to-mid-career-researchers-initiative. [Cited 2022 10th October].

53.

Lingard L, Zhang P, Strong M, Steele M, Yoo J, Lewis J. Strategies for supporting physician-scientists in faculty roles: a narrative review with key informant consultations. Acad Med. 2017;92(10):1421–8. PubMed PMID: 28795977.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Orwoll E. Passing the baton - harnessing the full value of older scientists. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(26):2514–7.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Kristensen N, Nymann C, Konradsen H. Implementing research results in clinical practice- the experiences of healthcare professionals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:48. PubMed PMID: 26860594.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

56.

Dickson KS, Glass JE, Barnett ML, Graham AK, Powell BJ, Stadnick NA. Value of peer mentoring for early career professional, research, and personal development: a case study of implementation scientists. J Clin Transl Sci. 2021;5(1):e112. PubMed PMID: 34221454.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

57.

Merga MK, Mason S. Mentor and peer support for early career researchers sharing research with academia and beyond. Heliyon. 2021;7(2):e06172.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

58.

Hosseini M, Sharifzad S. Gender disparity in publication records: a qualitative study of women researchers in computing and engineering. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2021;6(1):1–14.CrossRef

59.

Harding K, Lynch L, Porter J, Taylor NF. Organisational benefits of a strong research culture in a health service: a systematic review. Aust Health Rev. 2017;41(1):45–53. PubMed PMID: 27074113.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Morténius H, Baigi A, Palm L, Fridlund B, Björkelund C, Hedberg B. Impact of the organisational culture on primary care staff members’ intention to engage in research and development. J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(2):234–51. PubMed PMID: 25800335.CrossRefPubMed

61.

Nederhof AJ. Methods of coping with social desirability bias: a review. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1985;15(3):263–80. PubMed PMID: 12124152.CrossRef

Title: Exploring the motivation of health professionals to engage with research at various career stages
Authors: Louisa M. D’Arrietta
Venkat N. Vangaveti
Melissa J. Crowe
Bunmi S. Malau-Aduli
Publication date: 01-12-2024
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-10772-z

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Exploring the motivation of health professionals to engage with research at various career stages

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Disentangling organizational levers and economic benefits in transitional care programs: a systematic review and configurational analysis

Exploring health care providers’ engagement in prevention and management of multidrug resistant Tuberculosis and its factors in Hadiya Zone health care facilities: qualitative study

Gap analysis of diabetes-related foot disease management systems in Pacific Islands Countries and Territories

Understanding the value of a doctorate for allied health professionals in practice in the UK: a survey

“These are just finishing our medicines”: older persons’ perceptions and experiences of access to healthcare in public and private health facilities in Uganda

First experiences of a hospital-based 3D printing facility – an analytical observational study