Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Exploring patient perspectives on the secondary use of their personal health information: an interview study

Authors: Rosie Dobson, Helen Wihongi, Robyn Whittaker

Published in: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The increased digitalisation of health records has resulted in increased opportunities for the secondary use of health information for advancing healthcare. Understanding how patients want their health information used is vital to ensure health services use it in an appropriate and patient-informed manner. The aim of this study was to explore patient perceptions of the use of their health information beyond their immediate care.

Methods

Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with current users of health services in Aotearoa New Zealand. Different scenarios formed the basis of the discussions in the interviews covering different types of information use (current practice, artificial intelligence and machine learning, clinical calculators, research, registries, and public health surveillance). Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results

Twelve interviews were conducted with individual’s representative of key ethnicity groups and rural/urban populations, and at the time of recruitment, had been accessing a diverse range of health services. Participants ranged from high users of health care (e.g., weekly dialysis) through to low users (e.g., one-off presentation to the emergency department). Four interrelated overarching themes were identified from the transcripts describing the main issues for participants: helping others, sharing of data is important, trust, and respect.

Conclusions

People currently engaging with health services are supportive of their health information being used to help others, advance science, and contribute to the greater good but their support is conditional. People need to be able to trust the health service to protect, care for, and respect their health information and ensure no harm comes from its use. This study has identified key considerations for services and researchers to reflect on when using patient health information for secondary purposes to ensure they use it in a patient-informed way.

Trial registration

NA.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Khatatbeh M, Gharaibeh LF, Khabour OF, Abu-Farha RK, Alzoubi KH. Jordanian views regarding sharing of medical data for research: A cross-sectional study during COVID-19 pandemic. Plos one. 2022 Mar 21;17(3):e0265695. Khatatbeh M, Gharaibeh LF, Khabour OF, Abu-Farha RK, Alzoubi KH. Jordanian views regarding sharing of medical data for research: A cross-sectional study during COVID-19 pandemic. Plos one. 2022 Mar 21;17(3):e0265695.
4.
go back to reference Romero RA, Young SD. Ethical perspectives in sharing digital data for public health surveillance before and shortly after the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic. Ethics & behavior. 2022 Jan;2(1):22–31. Romero RA, Young SD. Ethical perspectives in sharing digital data for public health surveillance before and shortly after the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic. Ethics & behavior. 2022 Jan;2(1):22–31.
5.
go back to reference Aitken M, Jorre JD, Pagliari C, Jepson R, Cunningham-Burley S. Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Dec;17(1):1–24. Aitken M, Jorre JD, Pagliari C, Jepson R, Cunningham-Burley S. Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Dec;17(1):1–24.
6.
go back to reference Dobson R, Whittaker R, Wihongi H, Andrew P, Armstrong D, Bartholomew K, Sporle A, Wells. S. Patient perspectives on the use of health information.New Zealand Medical Journal(2021):134(1547). Dobson R, Whittaker R, Wihongi H, Andrew P, Armstrong D, Bartholomew K, Sporle A, Wells. S. Patient perspectives on the use of health information.New Zealand Medical Journal(2021):134(1547).
8.
go back to reference Patil S, Lu H, Saunders CL, Potoglou D, Robinson N. Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing—evidence from a pan-european survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23(6):1096–106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Patil S, Lu H, Saunders CL, Potoglou D, Robinson N. Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing—evidence from a pan-european survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23(6):1096–106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Stockdale J, Cassell J, Ford E. Giving something back”: a systematic review and ethical enquiry into public views on the use of patient data for research in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland [version 2]. Wellcome Open Res. 2019;3:6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stockdale J, Cassell J, Ford E. Giving something back”: a systematic review and ethical enquiry into public views on the use of patient data for research in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland [version 2]. Wellcome Open Res. 2019;3:6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Hill EM, Turner EL, Martin RM, Donovan JL. Let’s get the best quality research we can”: public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: a systematic review and qualitative study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):1–10.CrossRef Hill EM, Turner EL, Martin RM, Donovan JL. Let’s get the best quality research we can”: public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: a systematic review and qualitative study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):1–10.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Paprica PA, McGrail KM, Schull MJ. Notches on the dial: a call to action to develop plain language communication with the public about users and uses of health data.International Journal of Population Data Science. 2019;4(1). Paprica PA, McGrail KM, Schull MJ. Notches on the dial: a call to action to develop plain language communication with the public about users and uses of health data.International Journal of Population Data Science. 2019;4(1).
14.
go back to reference Sanderson SC, Brothers KB, Mercaldo ND, Clayton EW, Antommaria AHM, Aufox SA, Brilliant MH, Campos D, Carrell DS, Connolly J, Conway P. Public attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobank research: a large multi-site experimental survey in the US. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;100(3):414–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sanderson SC, Brothers KB, Mercaldo ND, Clayton EW, Antommaria AHM, Aufox SA, Brilliant MH, Campos D, Carrell DS, Connolly J, Conway P. Public attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobank research: a large multi-site experimental survey in the US. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;100(3):414–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J evaluation. 2006 Jun;27(2):237–46. Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J evaluation. 2006 Jun;27(2):237–46.
17.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International journal for quality in health care. 2007 Dec 1;19(6):349 – 57. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International journal for quality in health care. 2007 Dec 1;19(6):349 – 57.
20.
go back to reference Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753–60. Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753–60.
21.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Thematic Analysis. 2021:1 – 00. Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Thematic Analysis. 2021:1 – 00.
23.
go back to reference Chalmers J, Muir R. Patient privacy and confidentiality: the debate goes on; the issues are complex, but a consensus is emerging. BMJ. 2003 Apr;5(7392):725–6. Chalmers J, Muir R. Patient privacy and confidentiality: the debate goes on; the issues are complex, but a consensus is emerging. BMJ. 2003 Apr;5(7392):725–6.
24.
go back to reference Damschroder LJ, Pritts JL, Neblo MA, Kalarickal RJ, Creswell JW, Hayward RA. Patients, privacy and trust: patients’ willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records. Social science & medicine. 2007 Jan 1;64(1):223 – 35. Damschroder LJ, Pritts JL, Neblo MA, Kalarickal RJ, Creswell JW, Hayward RA. Patients, privacy and trust: patients’ willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records. Social science & medicine. 2007 Jan 1;64(1):223 – 35.
25.
go back to reference Hutton JL, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM. Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent. Implement Sci. 2008 Dec;3(1):1–8. Hutton JL, Eccles MP, Grimshaw JM. Ethical issues in implementation research: a discussion of the problems in achieving informed consent. Implement Sci. 2008 Dec;3(1):1–8.
26.
go back to reference Porsdam Mann S, Savulescu J, Sahakian BJ. Facilitating the ethical use of health data for the benefit of society: electronic health records, consent and the duty of easy rescue. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2016 Dec 28;374(2083):20160130. Porsdam Mann S, Savulescu J, Sahakian BJ. Facilitating the ethical use of health data for the benefit of society: electronic health records, consent and the duty of easy rescue. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2016 Dec 28;374(2083):20160130.
27.
go back to reference Verity C, Manning D, Nicoll A. Consent, confidentiality, and the threat to public health surveillance. Commentary: don’t waive consent lightly—involve the public. BMJ. 2002 May;18(7347):1210–3. Verity C, Manning D, Nicoll A. Consent, confidentiality, and the threat to public health surveillance. Commentary: don’t waive consent lightly—involve the public. BMJ. 2002 May;18(7347):1210–3.
29.
go back to reference Tu JV, Willison DJ, Silver FL, Fang J, Richards JA, Laupacis A, Kapral MK. Impracticability of informed consent in the Registry of the canadian Stroke Network. New Engl J Med 1April. 2004;350(14):1414–21.CrossRef Tu JV, Willison DJ, Silver FL, Fang J, Richards JA, Laupacis A, Kapral MK. Impracticability of informed consent in the Registry of the canadian Stroke Network. New Engl J Med 1April. 2004;350(14):1414–21.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Stone MA, Redsell SA, Ling JT, Hay AD. Sharing patient data: competing demands of privacy, trust and research in primary care. British journal of general practice. 2005 Oct 1;55(519):783-9. Stone MA, Redsell SA, Ling JT, Hay AD. Sharing patient data: competing demands of privacy, trust and research in primary care. British journal of general practice. 2005 Oct 1;55(519):783-9.
Metadata
Title
Exploring patient perspectives on the secondary use of their personal health information: an interview study
Authors
Rosie Dobson
Helen Wihongi
Robyn Whittaker
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6947
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02143-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 1/2023 Go to the issue