Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal 5/2010

01-09-2010

Exploring Knowledge and Attitudes Related to Pregnancy and Preconception Health in Women with Chronic Medical Conditions

Authors: Cynthia H. Chuang, Diana L. Velott, Carol S. Weisman

Published in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Women with chronic medical conditions are at increased risk for pregnancy-related complications, yet little research has addressed how women with diabetes, hypertension, and obesity perceive their pregnancy-associated risks or make reproductive health decisions. Focus groups were conducted with 72 non-pregnant women stratified by chronic condition (diabetes, hypertension, obesity) and by previous live birth. Participants discussed their intention for future pregnancy, preconception health optimization, perceived risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes, and contraceptive beliefs. Four major themes were identified, with some variation across medical conditions and parity: (1) Knowledge about pregnancy risks related to chronic medical conditions was limited; (2) Pregnancy intentions were affected by diabetes and hypertension, (3) Knowledge about optimizing preconception health was limited; and (4) Lack of control over ability to avoid unintended pregnancy, including limited knowledge about how medical conditions might affect contraceptive choices. Women with diabetes and hypertension, but not obesity, were generally aware of increased risk for pregnancy complications, and often expressed less intention for future pregnancy as a result. However, diabetic and hypertensive women had little knowledge about the specific complications they were at risk for, even among those who had previously experienced pregnancy complications. Neither chronic condition nor perceived risk ensured intent to engage in preconception health promotion. We observed knowledge deficits about pregnancy-related risks in women with diabetes, hypertension, and obesity, as well as lack of intent to engage in preconception health promotion and pregnancy planning. These findings have important implications for the development of preconception care for women with chronic medical conditions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. (1995). In S. Brown & L. Eisenberg (eds.), The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Institute of Medicine. (1995). In S. Brown & L. Eisenberg (eds.), The best intentions: Unintended pregnancy and the well-being of children and families. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
2.
go back to reference Dunlop, A. L., Jack, B. W., Bottalico, J. N., Lu, M. C., James, A., Shellhaas, C. S., et al. (2008). The clinical content of preconception care: Women with chronic medical conditions. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 199, S310–S327.CrossRefPubMed Dunlop, A. L., Jack, B. W., Bottalico, J. N., Lu, M. C., James, A., Shellhaas, C. S., et al. (2008). The clinical content of preconception care: Women with chronic medical conditions. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 199, S310–S327.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bitto, A., Gray, R. H., Simpson, J. L., Queenan, J. T., Kambic, R. T., Perez, A., et al. (1997). Adverse outcomes of planned and unplanned pregnancies among users of natural family planning: A prospective study. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 338–343.CrossRefPubMed Bitto, A., Gray, R. H., Simpson, J. L., Queenan, J. T., Kambic, R. T., Perez, A., et al. (1997). Adverse outcomes of planned and unplanned pregnancies among users of natural family planning: A prospective study. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 338–343.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Holing, E. V., Beyer, C. S., Brown, Z. A., & Connell, F. A. (1998). Why don’t women with diabetes plan their pregnancies? Diabetes Care, 21, 889–895.CrossRefPubMed Holing, E. V., Beyer, C. S., Brown, Z. A., & Connell, F. A. (1998). Why don’t women with diabetes plan their pregnancies? Diabetes Care, 21, 889–895.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference James, P. J., Younger, M. D., Hamilton, B. D., & Waisbren, S. E. (1993). Unplanned pregnancies in young women with diabetes. An analysis of psychosocial factors. Diabetes Care, 16, 1572–1578.CrossRef James, P. J., Younger, M. D., Hamilton, B. D., & Waisbren, S. E. (1993). Unplanned pregnancies in young women with diabetes. An analysis of psychosocial factors. Diabetes Care, 16, 1572–1578.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Chuang, C. H., Chase, G. A., Bensyl, D. M., & Weisman, C. S. (2005). Contraceptive use by diabetic and obese women. Womens Health Issues, 15, 167–173.CrossRefPubMed Chuang, C. H., Chase, G. A., Bensyl, D. M., & Weisman, C. S. (2005). Contraceptive use by diabetic and obese women. Womens Health Issues, 15, 167–173.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Vahratian, A., Barber, J. S., Lawrence, J. M., & Kim, C. (2009). Family-planning practices among women with diabetes and overweight and obese women in the 2002 National Survey for Family Growth. Diabetes Care, 32, 1026–1031.CrossRefPubMed Vahratian, A., Barber, J. S., Lawrence, J. M., & Kim, C. (2009). Family-planning practices among women with diabetes and overweight and obese women in the 2002 National Survey for Family Growth. Diabetes Care, 32, 1026–1031.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kitzmiller, J. L., Buchanan, T. A., Kjos, S., Combs, C. A., & Ratner, R. E. (1996). Pre-conception care of diabetes, congenital malformations, and spontaneous abortions. Diabetes Care, 19, 514–541.PubMed Kitzmiller, J. L., Buchanan, T. A., Kjos, S., Combs, C. A., & Ratner, R. E. (1996). Pre-conception care of diabetes, congenital malformations, and spontaneous abortions. Diabetes Care, 19, 514–541.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Casson, I. F., Clarke, C. A., Howard, C. V., McKendrick, O., Pennycook, S., Pharoah, P. O., et al. (1997). Outcomes of pregnancy in insulin dependent diabetic women: Results of a five year population cohort study. BMJ, 315, 275–278.PubMed Casson, I. F., Clarke, C. A., Howard, C. V., McKendrick, O., Pennycook, S., Pharoah, P. O., et al. (1997). Outcomes of pregnancy in insulin dependent diabetic women: Results of a five year population cohort study. BMJ, 315, 275–278.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Roberts, J. M., Pearson, G., Cutler, J., & Lindheimer, M. (2003). Summary of the NHLBI Working Group on research on hypertension during pregnancy. Hypertension, 41, 437–445.CrossRefPubMed Roberts, J. M., Pearson, G., Cutler, J., & Lindheimer, M. (2003). Summary of the NHLBI Working Group on research on hypertension during pregnancy. Hypertension, 41, 437–445.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Stothard, K. J., Tennant, P. W., Bell, R., & Rankin, J. (2009). Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 301, 636–650.CrossRefPubMed Stothard, K. J., Tennant, P. W., Bell, R., & Rankin, J. (2009). Maternal overweight and obesity and the risk of congenital anomalies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA, 301, 636–650.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jensen, D. M., Damm, P., Sorensen, B., Molsted-Pedersen, L., Westergaard, J. G., Ovesen, P., et al. (2003). Pregnancy outcome and prepregnancy body mass index in 2459 glucose-tolerant Danish women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 189, 239–244.CrossRefPubMed Jensen, D. M., Damm, P., Sorensen, B., Molsted-Pedersen, L., Westergaard, J. G., Ovesen, P., et al. (2003). Pregnancy outcome and prepregnancy body mass index in 2459 glucose-tolerant Danish women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 189, 239–244.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Weiss, J. L., Malone, F. D., Emig, D., Ball, R. H., Nyberg, D. A., Comstock, C. H., et al. (2004). Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate—A population-based screening study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 190, 1091–1097.CrossRefPubMed Weiss, J. L., Malone, F. D., Emig, D., Ball, R. H., Nyberg, D. A., Comstock, C. H., et al. (2004). Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate—A population-based screening study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 190, 1091–1097.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21.CrossRef Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control, Prevention. (2006). Recommendations to improve preconceptional health and health care—United States: A report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care. MMWR, 55, 1–22. Centers for Disease Control, Prevention. (2006). Recommendations to improve preconceptional health and health care—United States: A report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care. MMWR, 55, 1–22.
16.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2006). Use of hormonal contraception in women with coexisting medical conditions. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2006). Use of hormonal contraception in women with coexisting medical conditions. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG).
Metadata
Title
Exploring Knowledge and Attitudes Related to Pregnancy and Preconception Health in Women with Chronic Medical Conditions
Authors
Cynthia H. Chuang
Diana L. Velott
Carol S. Weisman
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Maternal and Child Health Journal / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0518-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Maternal and Child Health Journal 5/2010 Go to the issue