Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Palliative Care
Published in: BMC Palliative Care 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Exploring end of life priorities in Saudi males: usefulness of Q-methodology

Authors: Muhammad M. Hammami, Eman Al Gaai, Safa Hammami, Sahar Attala

Published in: BMC Palliative Care | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Quality end-of-life care depends on understanding patients’ end-of-life choices. Individuals and cultures may hold end-of-life priorities at different hierarchy. Forced ranking rather than independent rating, and by-person factor analysis rather than averaging may reveal otherwise masked typologies.

Methods

We explored Saudi males’ forced-ranked, end-of-life priorities and dis-priorities. Respondents (n = 120) rank-ordered 47 opinion statements on end-of-life care following a 9-category symmetrical distribution. Statements’ scores were analyzed by averaging analysis and factor analysis (Q-methodology).

Results

Respondents’ mean age was 32.1 years (range, 18–65); 52 % reported average religiosity, 88 and 83 % ≥ very good health and life-quality, respectively, and 100 % ≥ high school education. Averaging analysis revealed that the extreme five end-of-life priorities were to, be at peace with God, be able to say the statement of faith, maintain dignity, resolve conflicts, and have religious death rituals respected, respectively. The extreme five dis-priorities were to, die in the hospital, not receive intensive care if in coma, die at peak of life, be informed about impending death by family/friends rather than doctor, and keep medical status confidential from family/friends, respectively. Q-methodology classified 67 % of respondents into five highly transcendent opinion types. Type-I (rituals-averse, family-caring, monitoring-coping, life-quality-concerned) and Type-V (rituals-apt, family-centered, neutral-coping, life-quantity-concerned) reported the lowest and highest religiosity, respectively. Type-II (rituals-apt, family-dependent, monitoring-coping, life-quantity-concerned) and Type-III (rituals-silent, self/family-neutral, avoidance-coping, life-quality & quantity-concerned) reported the best and worst life-quality, respectively. Type-I respondents were the oldest with the lowest general health, in contrast to Type-IV (rituals-apt, self-centered, monitoring-coping, life-quality/quantity-neutral). Of the extreme 14 priorities/dis-priorities for the five types, 29, 14, 14, 50, and 36 %, respectively, were not among the extreme 20 priorities/dis-priorities identified by averaging analysis for the entire cohort.

Conclusions

1) Transcendence was the extreme end-of-life priority, and dying in the hospital was the extreme dis-priority. 2) Quality of life was conceptualized differently with less emphasize on its physiological aspects. 3) Disclosure of terminal illness to family/close friends was preferred as long it is through the patient. 4) Q-methodology identified five types of constellations of end-of-life priorities and dis-priorities that may be related to respondents’ demographics and are partially masked by averaging analysis.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Rao JK, Alongi J, Anderson LA, Jenkins L, Stokes GA, Kane M. Development of public health priorities for end-of-life initiatives. Am J Prev Med. 2005;29(5):453–60.CrossRefPubMed
3.
The SUPPORT Principle Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatment (SUPPORT). JAMA. 1995;274(20):1591–8.CrossRef
4.
Field MJ, Cassel CK, editors. Approaching death: Improving care at the end of life. Washington: National Academy Press, Institute of Medicine; 1997.
5.
Heyland DK, Cook DJ, Rocker GM, Dodek PM, Kutsogiannis DJ, Skrobik Y, et al. Defining priorities for improving end-of-life care in Canada. CMAJ. 2010;182(16):E747–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Stajduhar KI, Allan DE, Cohen SR, Heyland DK. Preferences for location of death of seriously ill patients: perspectives from Canadian patients and their family caregivers. Palliative Med. 2008;22:85–8.CrossRef
7.
Heyland DK, Dodek P, Rocker G, Groll D, Gafni A, Pichora D, et al. What matters most in end-of-life care: Perceptions of seriously ill patients and their family members. CMAJ. 2006;174:627–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, McIntyre L, Tulsky JA. Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians and other care providers. JAMA. 2000;284:2476–82.CrossRefPubMed
9.
True G, Phipps EJ, Braitman LE, Harralson T, Harris D, Tester W. Treatment preferences and advanced care planning at end of life: the role of ethnicity and spiritual coping on cancer patients. Ann Behav Med. 2005;30(2):174–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Vig EK, Pearlman RA. Good and bad dying from the perspective of terminally ill men. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:977e981.CrossRef
11.
Pierson CM, Curtis JR, Patrick DL. A good death: a qualitative study of patients with advanced AIDS. AIDS Care. 2002;14:587e598.CrossRef
12.
Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, Christakis NA, McIntyre LM, Tulsky JA. In search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(10):825–32.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, Grambow S, Parker J, et al. Preparing for the End of life: Prefernces of patients, families, physicians, and other care providers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22:727–37.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Downey L, Engelberg RA, Curtis R, Lafferty WE, Patrick DL. Shared priorities for the end-of-life period. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;37:175–88.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Engelberg RA, Patrick DL, Curtis JR. Correspondence between patients’ preferences and surrogates’ understandings for dying and death. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005;30:498e509.CrossRef
16.
Miccinesi G, Bianchi E, Brunelli C, Borreani C. End-of-life preferences in advanced cancer patients willing to discuss issues surrounding their terminal condition. European J Cancer Care. 2012;21:623–33.CrossRef
17.
MacIver J, Rao V, Delgado DH, Desai N, Ivanov J, Abbey S, et al. Choices: A study of preferences for end-of-life treatments in patients with advanced heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008;27:1002–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
O’Brien L, Grisso J, Maislin G, LaPann K, Krotki KP, Greco PJ, et al. Nursing home residents’ preferences for life-sustaining treatments. JAMA. 1995;274:1775–9.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Sahm S, Will R, Hommel G. What are cancer patients’ preferences about treatment at the end of life, and who should start talking about it? A comparison with healthy people and medical staff. Support Care Cancer. 2005;13(4):206–14. Epub 2005 Jan 19.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Heyland DK, Tranmer J, O’Callaghan CJ, Gafni A. The seriously ill hospitalized patient: preferred role in end-of-life decision making? J Crit Care. 2003;18(1):3–10.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Emanuel EJ, Fairclough DL, Emanuel LL. Attitudes and desires related to euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide among terminally ill patients and their caregivers. JAMA. 2000;284:2460–8.CrossRefPubMed
22.
23.
Vig EK, Davenport NA, Pearlman RA. Good deaths, bad deaths, and preferences for the end of life: a qualitative study of geriatric outpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50:1541–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Song M-K, Hanson LC. Relationships between psychosocial-spiritual well-being and end-of-life preferences and values in African American dialysis patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38:372–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Kelner M. Activists and delegators: elderly patients’ preferences about control at the end of life. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41(4):537–45.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Fried T, van Doorn C, O’Leary J, Tinetti M, Drickamer M. Older persons’ preference for site of terminal care. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131:109–12.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Engelberg RA, Norris K, Asp C, Byock I. A measure of the quality of dying and death: initial validation using after-death interviews with family members. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;24:17–31.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Mularski RA, Heine CE, Osborne ML, Ganzinin L, Curtis JR. Quality of dying in the ICU. Ratings by family members. Chest. 2005;128:280–7.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Mularski R, Curtis JR, Osborne M, Engelberg RA, Ganzinin L. Agreement among family members in their assessment of the quality of dying and death. J Pain Symptom manage. 2004;28:306–15.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Rebagliato M, Cuttini M, Broggin L, Berbik I, de Vonderweid U, Hansen G, et al. Neonatal end-of-life decision making: Physicians’ attitudes and relationship with self-reported practices in 10 European countries. JAMA. 2000;284(19):2451–9.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Coffey A, McCarthy G, Weathers E, Friedman MI, Gallo K, Ehrenfeld M, et al. Nurses’ preferred end-of-life treatment choices in five countries. Int Nurs Revi. 2013;60(3):313–9.CrossRef
32.
Gomes B, Higginson IJ, Calanzani N, Cohem J, Delians L, Daveson BA, et al. Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: a population survey in England, Flanders, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal and Spain. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(8):2006–15.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Harding R, Simms V, Calanzani N, Higginson IJ, Hall S, Gysels M, et al. If you had less than a year to live, would you want to know? A seven-country European population survey of public preferences for disclosure of poor prognosis. Psychooncology. 2013;22(10):2298–305.PubMed
34.
Daveson BA, Bausewein C, Murtagh FEM, Calanzani N, Higginson IJ, Harding R, et al. To be involved or not to be involved: a survey of public preferences for self-involvement in decision-making involving mental capacity (competency) within Europe. Palliat Med. 2013;27:418–27.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Higginson IJ, Gomes B, Calanzani N, Gao W, Bausewein C, Daveson BA, et al. Priorities for treatment, care and information if faced with serious illness: a comparative population-based survey in seven European countries. Palliat Med. 2014;28(2):101–10. doi:10.​1177/​0269216313488989​.CrossRefPubMed
36.
37.
38.
Tang ST, Liu TW, Lai MS, Liu LN, Chen CH. Concordance of preferences for end-of-life care between terminally ill cancer patients and their family caregivers in Taiwan. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005;30(6):510–8.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Patrick DL, Engelberg RA, Curtis JR. Evaluating the quality of dying and death. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001;22:717–26.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Downey L, Curtis JR, Lafferty WE, Herting JR, Engelberg RA. The quality of dying and death (QODD) questionnaire: empirical domains and theoretical perspectives. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39(1):9–22.CrossRefPubMed
41.
McKeown Band Thomas D. Q methodology. Newbury Park: Sage publications; 1988.CrossRef
42.
Thomas DM, Watson RT. Q-sorting and MIS research: a primer. Comm Assoc Info Syst. 2002;8:141–56.
43.
Lee HJ, Jo KH, Chee KH, Lee YJ. The perception of good death among human services students in South Korea: a Q-methodological approach. Death Stud. 2008;32(9):870–90.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Hall ET. Beyond culture. New York: Anchor Books/Doubleday; 1976.
45.
Kue BCH. Culture’s consequences on coping: theories, evidences, and dimensionalities. J Cross-Cultural Psychol. 2011;42(6):1084–100.CrossRef
46.
Del Pozo PR, Fins JJ. Islam and informed consent: notes from Doha. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2008;17(3):273–9.PubMed
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4(1):23–30.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, Tulsky JA. Evolution in measuring the quality of dying. J Palliat Med. 2002;5(3):407–14.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Fowler FJ, Coppola KM, Teno JM. Methodological challenges for measuring quality of care at the end of life. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999;17:114e119.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Exploring end of life priorities in Saudi males: usefulness of Q-methodology
Authors
Muhammad M. Hammami
Eman Al Gaai
Safa Hammami
Sahar Attala
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Palliative Care / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-015-0064-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Palliative Care 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Evaluating the systematic implementation of the ‘Let Me Decide’ advance care planning programme in long term care through focus groups: staff perspectives

Research article

Delivering and participating in a psycho-educational intervention for family caregivers during palliative home care: a qualitative study from the perspectives of health professionals and family caregivers

Research article

Comparison of terminally ill cancer- vs. non-cancer patients in specialized palliative home care in Germany – a single service analysis

Research article

Opioid rotation versus combination for cancer patients with chronic uncontrolled pain: a randomized study

Study protocol

INSPIRE (INvestigating Social and PractIcal suppoRts at the End of life): Pilot randomised trial of a community social and practical support intervention for adults with life-limiting illness

Research article

Case management in primary palliative care is associated more strongly with organisational than with patient characteristics: results from a cross-sectional prospective study