Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2011

Open Access 01-10-2011 | Original Article

Explorative study on the aftercare of pediatric brain tumor survivors: a parents’ perspective

Authors: Eline J. Aukema, Bob F. Last, A. Y. Netteke Schouten-van Meeteren, Martha A. Grootenhuis

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 10/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Whilst the need for aftercare for long-term sequelae of brain tumor survivors is well known and evident, information from a parent’s perspective is lacking on whether the need for aftercare is detected in time, and whether the aftercare is timely initiated and meets the needs for aftercare.

Methods

A survey regarding aftercare in five domains of long-term sequelae (neurocognitive, physical, emotional, social and parenting problems) was sent to 57 parents of survivors treated for a brain tumor in our center.

Results

Forty-two (74%) parents participated in this study. With a mean period of 8.1 years (SD = 3.9) since start of treatment, the majority of the survivors (mean age = 14.7 years, SD = 3.8) needed aftercare in several domains of functioning. This need was highest and most met for physical sequelae (N = 34), and lowest but still substantial and least met for parental difficulties (N = 11). Parents of survivors with surgery only as treatment reported a similar need for aftercare as those of survivors with adjuvant therapy. Most of the survivors received aftercare; however, substantial delay of aftercare and self-referral for aftercare were frequently reported. Furthermore, parents showed a lack of knowledge about and use of aftercare services.

Conclusions

Increased awareness for the need for psychosocial aftercare is required. Coaching, psycho-educative programs about coping with the long-term sequelae and information about available specialized aftercare services are required to meet the needs of brain tumor survivors and their parents more adequately.
Literature
1.
Butler RW, Sahler OJ, Askins AM (2008) Interventions to improve neuropsychological functioning in childhood cancer survivors. Dev Disabil Res Rev 14:251–258PubMedCrossRef
2.
Butler RW, Mulhern RK (2005) Neurocognitive interventions for children and adolescents surviving cancer. J Pediatr Psychol 30:65–78PubMedCrossRef
3.
Moore BD (2005) Neurocognitive outcomes in survivors of childhood cancer. J Pediatr Psychol 30:51–63PubMedCrossRef
4.
Mulhern RK, Palmer SL, Merchant TE et al (2005) Neurocognitive consequences of risk-adapted therapy for childhood medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol 23:5511–5519PubMedCrossRef
5.
Geenen MM, Cardoes MC, Kremer L et al (2007) Medical assessment of adverse health outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood cancer. JAMA 297:2705–2715PubMedCrossRef
6.
Oeffinger KC, Mertens AC, Sklar CA et al (2006) Chronic health conditions in adult survivors of childhood cancer. N Engl J Med 355:1572–1582PubMedCrossRef
7.
Patenaude AF, Kupst MJ (2005) Psychosocial functioning in pediatric cancer. J Pediatr Psychol 30:9–27PubMedCrossRef
8.
Bonner MJ, Hardy KK, Wilard VW (2008) Social functioning and facial expression recognition in survivors of pediatric brain tumors. J Pediatr Psychol 33:1142–1152PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zebrack BJ, Gurney JG, Oeffinger K et al (2004) Psychological outcomes in long-term survivors of childhood brain cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivors Study. J Clin Oncol 22:999–1006PubMedCrossRef
10.
Eiser C (2007) Beyond survival: quality of life and follow-up after childhood cancer. J Pediatr Psychol 32:1140–1150PubMedCrossRef
11.
Stam H, Grootenhuis MA, Last BF (2007) Course of life of survivors of childhood cancer is related to quality of life in young adulthood. J Psychosoc Oncol 25:43–58CrossRef
12.
Peterson CC, Drotar D (2006) Family impact of neurodevelopmental late effects in survivors of pediatric cancer: review of research, clinical evidence, and future directions. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 11:349–366PubMedCrossRef
13.
Lindahl Norberg A, Lindblad F, Boman KK (2006) Support seeking, perceived support, and anxiety in mothers and fathers after children’s cancer treatment. Psycho-Oncology 15:335–343CrossRef
14.
Hutchinson KC, Willard VW, Hardy KK, Bonner MJ (2009) Adjustment of caregivers of pediatric patients with brain tumors: a cross-sectional analysis. Psycho-Oncol 18:515–523CrossRef
15.
Ris MD, Beebe DW, Armstrong FD et al (2008) Cognitive and adaptive outcome in extracerebellar low-grade brain tumors in children: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 26:4765–4770PubMedCrossRef
16.
Aarsen FK, Paquier PF, Reddingius RE et al (2006) Functional outcome after low-grade astrocytoma treatment in childhood. Cancer 106:396–402PubMedCrossRef
17.
Childhood Cancer Survivorship (2003) Improving care and quality of life. National Cancer Policy Board, Washington
18.
Aziz NM, Oeffinger KC, Brooks S et al (2006) Comprehensive long-term follow-up programs for pediatric cancer survivors. Cancer 107:841–848PubMedCrossRef
19.
Nathan PC, Patel SK, Dilley K et al (2007) Guidelines for identification of, advocacy for, and intervention in neurocognitive problems in survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 161:798–806PubMedCrossRef
20.
Wallace WHB, Blacklay A, Eiser C et al (2001) Developing strategies for the long term follow up of survivors of childhood cancer. Br Med J 323:271–274CrossRef
21.
Bowers DC, Adhikari S, El-Khashab YM et al (2009) Survey of long-term follow-up programs in the United States for survivors of childhood brain tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 15:1295–1301CrossRef
22.
Butler RW, Copeland DR, Fairclough DL et al (2008) A multicenter, randomized clinical trial of a cognitive remediation program for childhood survivors of a pediatric malignancy. J Consult Clin Psychol 76:367–378PubMedCrossRef
23.
Van’t Hooft I, Anderson K, Bergman B et al (2007) Sustained favorable effects of cognitive training in children with acquired brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 22:109–116
24.
Thompson SJ, Leigh L, Christensen R et al (2001) Immediate neurocognitive effects of methylphenidate on learning-impaired survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:1802–1808PubMed
25.
Kazak AE (2005) Evidence based interventions for survivors of childhood cancer and their families. J Pediatr Psychol 30:29–39PubMedCrossRef
26.
Last BF, Stam H, Onland-van Nieuwenhuizen AM, Grootenhuis MA (2007) Positive effects of a psycho-educational group intervention for children with a chronic disease: first results. Patient Educ Couns 651:101–112CrossRef
27.
Barrera M, Schulte F (2009) A group social skills intervention program for survivors of childhood brain tumors. J Pediatr Psychol 34:1108–1118PubMedCrossRef
28.
Recklitis CJ, Lockwood RA, Rothewell MA et al (2006) Suicidal ideation and attempts in adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3852–3857PubMedCrossRef
29.
Baile WF, Aaron J (2005) Patient–physician communication in oncology: past, present, and future. Curr Opin Oncol 17:331–335PubMedCrossRef
30.
Lazarus RS (1983) The costs and benefits of denial. In: Breznitz S (ed) The denial of stress. International Universities Press, New York, pp 1–30
31.
Oeffinger KC, Wallace WH (2006) Barriers to follow-up care of survivors in the United States and the United Kingdom. Ped Blood Cancer 46:135–142CrossRef
32.
Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E (2005) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. The National Press, Washington
33.
Bredart A, Bouleuc C, Dolbeault S (2005) Doctor-patient communication and satisfaction with care in oncology. Curr Opin Oncol 17:351–354PubMedCrossRef
34.
Lindahl Norberg A, Steneby S (2009) Experiences of parents of children surviving brain tumour: a happy ending and a rough beginning. Eur J Cancer Care 18:371–380CrossRef
35.
Coletti CJM, Wolfe-Christensen C, Carpentier MY et al (2008) The relationship of parental overprotection, perceived vulnerability, and parenting stress to behavioral, emotional, and social adjustment in children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51:269–274CrossRef
36.
Stam H, Grootenhuis MA, Last BF (2005) The course of life of survivors of childhood cancer. Psycho-Oncology 14:227–238PubMedCrossRef
37.
McDowell ME, Occhipinti S, Ferguson M et al (2009) Predictors of change in unmet supportive care needs in cancer. Psycho-Oncology July 14th: Epub ahead of print
38.
Maurice-Stam H, Silberbusch LM, Last BF et al (2009) Evaluation of a psycho-educational group intervention for children treated for cancer: a descriptive pilot study. Psycho-Oncology 18:762–766PubMedCrossRef
39.
Majnemer A, Shevell M, Law M et al (2008) Reliability in the ratings of quality of life between parents and their children of school age with cerebral palsy. Qual Life Res 9:1163–1171CrossRef
40.
Langeveld (2003) Cured of cancer. From childhood to adulthood quality of survival. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam
Metadata
Title
Explorative study on the aftercare of pediatric brain tumor survivors: a parents’ perspective
Authors
Eline J. Aukema
Bob F. Last
A. Y. Netteke Schouten-van Meeteren
Martha A. Grootenhuis
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 10/2011
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-010-0995-6

Other articles of this Issue 10/2011

Supportive Care in Cancer 10/2011 Go to the issue

Original Article

Malnutrition in patients treated for oral or oropharyngeal cancer—prevalence and relationship with oral symptoms: an explorative study

Original Article

Development of the Psychosocial Distress Questionnaire—Breast Cancer (PDQ-BC): a breast cancer-specific screening instrument for psychosocial problems

Original Article

Medical cost analysis for antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: a systematic simulation analysis

Original Article

A prospective longitudinal study of chemotherapy-induced cognitive changes in breast cancer patients

Original Article

Single-dose palonosetron for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy containing steroids: results of a phase II study from the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dei Linfomi (GISL)

Letter to the Editor

Inaccuracy in the article “Managing chronic pain: results from an open-label study using MC5-A Calmare® device in Support Care Cancer”
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits