Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Research

Explaining the effect on food selection of altering availability: two experimental studies on the role of relative preferences

Authors: Rachel Pechey, Gareth J. Hollands, Theresa M. Marteau

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Increasing the availability of healthier or plant-based foods increases their selection. The current studies aimed to examine the extent to which relative preferences account for food selections following availability interventions. In particular, (a) whether increasing the availability of lower-energy options increases the likelihood that individuals’ highest-ranked option is lower-energy, and (b) the extent to which selections reflect individuals’ highest-ranked option from the available range.

Methods

UK adults (Study 1: n = 1976; Study 2: n = 1078) took part in within-subjects online studies. In both studies, the order of preference between food options was established by participants choosing the option that they would prefer “to eat right now” from every possible pairing within a pool of eight options. Then, participants were shown either predominantly higher-energy options (three higher- and one lower-energy) or predominantly lower-energy options (vice versa), presented in a random order.

Results

When predominantly lower-energy options were presented, the odds of the highest-ranked option being a lower-energy option increased ten-fold (Study 1: odds ratio: 10.1; 95%CI: 8.9,11.4; Study 2: odds ratio: 10.4; 95%CI: 7.4,14.7), compared to when predominantly higher-energy options were available. In both studies, around 90% of selections reflected the highest-ranked option in the range offered in the studied availability conditions (range 88–92%).

Conclusions

These studies suggest that increased availability of lower-energy options increases the likelihood of an individual’s highest-ranked option being lower-energy, and that the highest-ranked option has the greatest likelihood of selection. As such, preferences may be a key contributor to the effects of altering availability on food selections.

Trial registration

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference van Kleef E, Otten K, van Trijp HCM. Healthy snacks at the checkout counter: A lab and field study on the impact of shelf arrangement and assortment structure on consumer choices. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1072.CrossRef van Kleef E, Otten K, van Trijp HCM. Healthy snacks at the checkout counter: A lab and field study on the impact of shelf arrangement and assortment structure on consumer choices. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1072.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pechey R, Cartwright E, Pilling M, Hollands GJ, Vasiljevic M, Jebb SA, et al. Impact of increasing the proportion of healthier foods available on energy purchased in worksite cafeterias: A stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial. Appetite. 2019;133:286–96.CrossRef Pechey R, Cartwright E, Pilling M, Hollands GJ, Vasiljevic M, Jebb SA, et al. Impact of increasing the proportion of healthier foods available on energy purchased in worksite cafeterias: A stepped wedge randomised controlled pilot trial. Appetite. 2019;133:286–96.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hollands GJ, Carter P, Anwer S, King SE, Jebb SA, Ogilvie D, et al. Altering the availability or proximity of food, alcohol, and tobacco products to change their selection and consumption. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;9:CD012573.PubMed Hollands GJ, Carter P, Anwer S, King SE, Jebb SA, Ogilvie D, et al. Altering the availability or proximity of food, alcohol, and tobacco products to change their selection and consumption. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;9:CD012573.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Pechey R, Hollands GJ, Carter P, Marteau TM. Altering the availability of products within physical micro-environments: A conceptual framework. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:986.CrossRef Pechey R, Hollands GJ, Carter P, Marteau TM. Altering the availability of products within physical micro-environments: A conceptual framework. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:986.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Levine A, Hann C. Taste and food preferences as predictors of dietary practices in young women. Public Health Nutr. 2007;2(4):513–9.CrossRef Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Levine A, Hann C. Taste and food preferences as predictors of dietary practices in young women. Public Health Nutr. 2007;2(4):513–9.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Drewnowski A. Taste preferences and food intake. Annu Rev Nutr. 1997;17(1):237–53. Drewnowski A. Taste preferences and food intake. Annu Rev Nutr. 1997;17(1):237–53.
8.
go back to reference Swaffield J, Roberts SC. Exposure to cues of harsh or safe environmental conditions alters food preferences. Evol Psychol Sci. 2015;1(2):69–76.CrossRef Swaffield J, Roberts SC. Exposure to cues of harsh or safe environmental conditions alters food preferences. Evol Psychol Sci. 2015;1(2):69–76.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pechey R, Clarke N, Pechey E, Ventsel M, Hollands GJ, Marteau TM. Impact of altering the available food options on selection: potential mediation by social norms. Appetite. 2021;164:105245.CrossRef Pechey R, Clarke N, Pechey E, Ventsel M, Hollands GJ, Marteau TM. Impact of altering the available food options on selection: potential mediation by social norms. Appetite. 2021;164:105245.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lozano DI, Crites SL, Aikman SN. Changes in Food Attitudes as a Function of Hunger. Appetite. 1999;32(2):207–18.CrossRef Lozano DI, Crites SL, Aikman SN. Changes in Food Attitudes as a Function of Hunger. Appetite. 1999;32(2):207–18.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Birch LL. Development of food preferences. Annu Rev Nutr. 1999;19(1):41–62. Birch LL. Development of food preferences. Annu Rev Nutr. 1999;19(1):41–62.
12.
go back to reference Maguire ER, Monsivais P. Socio-economic dietary inequalities in UK adults: an updated picture of key food groups and nutrients from national surveillance data. Br J Nutr. 2014;113(1):181–9.CrossRef Maguire ER, Monsivais P. Socio-economic dietary inequalities in UK adults: an updated picture of key food groups and nutrients from national surveillance data. Br J Nutr. 2014;113(1):181–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Pechey R, Jebb SA, Kelly MP, Almiron-Roig E, Conde S, Nakamura R, et al. Socioeconomic differences in purchases of more vs. less healthy foods and beverages: Analysis of over 25,000 British households in 2010. Soc Sci Med. 2013;92(100):22–6.CrossRef Pechey R, Jebb SA, Kelly MP, Almiron-Roig E, Conde S, Nakamura R, et al. Socioeconomic differences in purchases of more vs. less healthy foods and beverages: Analysis of over 25,000 British households in 2010. Soc Sci Med. 2013;92(100):22–6.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Turrell G. Socioeconomic differences in food preference and their influence on healthy food purchasing choices. J Hum Nutr Diet. 1998;11(2):135–49.CrossRef Turrell G. Socioeconomic differences in food preference and their influence on healthy food purchasing choices. J Hum Nutr Diet. 1998;11(2):135–49.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Pechey R, Monsivais P, Ng Y-L, Marteau TM. Why don’t poor men eat fruit? Socioeconomic differences in motivations for fruit consumption. Appetite. 2015;84:271–9.CrossRef Pechey R, Monsivais P, Ng Y-L, Marteau TM. Why don’t poor men eat fruit? Socioeconomic differences in motivations for fruit consumption. Appetite. 2015;84:271–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pechey R, Sexton O, Codling S, Marteau TM. Impact of increasing the availability of healthier vs. less healthy food on food selection: A laboratory experiment. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:132.CrossRef Pechey R, Sexton O, Codling S, Marteau TM. Impact of increasing the availability of healthier vs. less healthy food on food selection: A laboratory experiment. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:132.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Olvera Astivia OL, Gadermann A, Guhn M. The relationship between statistical power and predictor distribution in multilevel logistic regression: a simulation-based approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):97.CrossRef Olvera Astivia OL, Gadermann A, Guhn M. The relationship between statistical power and predictor distribution in multilevel logistic regression: a simulation-based approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):97.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Reynolds JP, Ventsel M, Kosite D, Rigby Dames B, Brocklebank L, Masterton S, et al. Impact of decreasing the proportion of higher energy foods and reducing portion sizes on food purchased in worksite cafeterias: a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial. PLOS Medicine. 2021;18(9):e1003743.CrossRef Reynolds JP, Ventsel M, Kosite D, Rigby Dames B, Brocklebank L, Masterton S, et al. Impact of decreasing the proportion of higher energy foods and reducing portion sizes on food purchased in worksite cafeterias: a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial. PLOS Medicine. 2021;18(9):e1003743.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators. Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):13–27.CrossRef GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators. Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):13–27.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Steel N, Ford JA, Newton JN, Davis ACJ, Vos T, Naghavi M, et al. Changes in health in the countries of the UK and 150 English Local Authority areas 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. 2018;392(10158):1647–61.CrossRef Steel N, Ford JA, Newton JN, Davis ACJ, Vos T, Naghavi M, et al. Changes in health in the countries of the UK and 150 English Local Authority areas 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. 2018;392(10158):1647–61.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pechey R, Marteau TM. Availability of healthier vs. less healthy food and food choice: an online experiment. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1296.CrossRef Pechey R, Marteau TM. Availability of healthier vs. less healthy food and food choice: an online experiment. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1296.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Raghunathan R, Naylor RW, Hoyer WD. The Unhealthy = Tasty Intuition and Its Effects on Taste Inferences, Enjoyment, and Choice of Food Products. J Mark. 2006;70(4):170–84.CrossRef Raghunathan R, Naylor RW, Hoyer WD. The Unhealthy = Tasty Intuition and Its Effects on Taste Inferences, Enjoyment, and Choice of Food Products. J Mark. 2006;70(4):170–84.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Martínez-Ruiz NR, López-Díaz JA, Wall-Medrano A, Jiménez-Castro JA, Angulo O. Oral fat perception is related with body mass index, preference and consumption of high-fat foods. Physiol Behav. 2014;129:36–42.CrossRef Martínez-Ruiz NR, López-Díaz JA, Wall-Medrano A, Jiménez-Castro JA, Angulo O. Oral fat perception is related with body mass index, preference and consumption of high-fat foods. Physiol Behav. 2014;129:36–42.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mela DJ. Why do we like what we like? J Sci Food Agric. 2001;81(1):10–6. Mela DJ. Why do we like what we like? J Sci Food Agric. 2001;81(1):10–6.
26.
go back to reference Dixon H, Niven P, Scully M, Wakefield M. Food marketing with movie character toys: Effects on young children’s preferences for unhealthy and healthier fast food meals. Appetite. 2017;117:342–50.CrossRef Dixon H, Niven P, Scully M, Wakefield M. Food marketing with movie character toys: Effects on young children’s preferences for unhealthy and healthier fast food meals. Appetite. 2017;117:342–50.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Pliner P. The Effects of Mere Exposure on Liking for Edible Substances. Appetite. 1982;3(3):283–90.CrossRef Pliner P. The Effects of Mere Exposure on Liking for Edible Substances. Appetite. 1982;3(3):283–90.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Explaining the effect on food selection of altering availability: two experimental studies on the role of relative preferences
Authors
Rachel Pechey
Gareth J. Hollands
Theresa M. Marteau
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13067-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Public Health 1/2022 Go to the issue