Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 3/2017

01-06-2017 | Original Article

Expertise of German paramedics concerning the prehospital treatment of patients with spinal trauma

Authors: M. Kreinest, S. Goller, B. Gliwitzky, P. A. Grützner, M. Küffer, D. Häske, V. Papathanassiou, M. Münzberg

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Spinal immobilization is a standard procedure in emergency medicine. Increasing awareness of complications associated with immobilization of trauma patients leads to controversial discussions in the literature. Current guidelines require to include considerations of accident mechanism, an assessment of the patient’s condition and an examination of the spine in the decision-making process if immobilization of the spine should be performed. This requires sound knowledge of assessing these parameters. The aim of the current study is to analyze German paramedics’ subjective uncertainty in terms of their prehospital assessment and treatment of patients suffering from spine injuries.

Methods

Over a period of 17 months participants in a trauma course were asked to complete a standardized anonymous questionnaire about subjective uncertainty of prehospital assessment and management of spinal trauma before participation in that course. Questions about the frequency of application of different immobilization tools and skills training on spinal immobilization were also asked.

Results

A total of 465 paramedics were surveyed. The participants did not indicate any uncertainty about the prehospital diagnosis and treatment of spinal injuries. The feeling of confidence was significantly greater in participants who had already attended another course on structured trauma care before. The participants agreed with the statements that standardized algorithms facilitate teamwork and that there is a need for a protocol for the prehospital treatment of spinal injuries.

Conclusions

Paramedics do not feel uncertain about the prehospital assessment and treatment of spinal injuries. The feeling of confidence in participants who had already attended a course on the treatment of trauma patients before was significantly higher.
Literature
1.
Abram S, Bulstrode C. Routine spinal immobilization in trauma patients: what are the advantages and disadvantages? Surg J R Coll Surg Edinb Irel. 2010;8:218–22.
2.
Ali J, Cohen R, Adam R, et al. Teaching effectiveness of the advanced trauma life support program as demonstrated by an objective structured clinical examination for practicing physicians. World journal of surgery. 1996;20:1121–5 (discussion 1125–1126).CrossRefPubMed
3.
Bauer D, Kowalski R. Effect of spinal immobilization devices on pulmonary function in the healthy, nonsmoking man. Ann Emerg Med. 1988;17:915–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Ben-Galim P, Dreiangel N, Mattox KL, et al. Extrication collars can result in abnormal separation between vertebrae in the presence of a dissociative injury. J Trauma. 2010;69:447–50.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Bortz J. Statistik: Für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Berlin: Springer; 2005.
6.
Bouland AJ, Jenkins JL, Levy MJ. Assessing attitudes toward spinal immobilization. J Emerg Med. 2013;45:e117–25.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Clarke A, James S, Ahuja S. Ankylosing spondylitis: inadvertent application of a rigid collar after cervical fracture, leading to neurological complications and death. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76:413–5.PubMed
8.
Craig GR, Nielsen MS. Rigid cervical collars and intracranial pressure. Intensive Care Med. 1991;17:504–5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Unfallchirurgie (Dgu); Sektion Intensiv- & Notfallmedizin SNa-aDUG (2014) TraumaRegister DGU—Jahresbericht 2014.
10.
Domeier RM, Evans RW, Swor RA, et al. The reliability of prehospital clinical evaluation for potential spinal injury is not affected by the mechanism of injury. Prehospital Emerg care Off J Natl Assoc EMS Phys Natl Assoc State EMS Dir. 1999;3:332–7.
11.
Frank CB, Wolfl CG, Hogan A, et al. PHTLS (R) (prehospital trauma life support) provider courses in Germany—who takes part and what do participants think about prehospital trauma care training? J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2014;8:7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Goutcher CM, Lochhead V. Reduction in mouth opening with semi-rigid cervical collars. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:344–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Häske D, Kreinest M, Wölfl CG et al. Bericht aus der Praxis:Strukturierte Fortbildung zur Verbesserung der Versorgungsqualität im Rettungsdienst. Einsatz-Supervision als neuer Ansatz im Bereich der Rettungsdienst-Fortbildung in Wiesbaden und im Rheingau-Taunus-Kreis? In: Zeitschrift fuer Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen. 2013; 107(7): 484–489.
14.
Hasler RM, Exadaktylos AK, Bouamra O, et al. Epidemiology and predictors of spinal injury in adult major trauma patients: European cohort study. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2011;20:2174–80.CrossRef
15.
Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, et al. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:94–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Konrad C, Schupfer G, Wietlisbach M, et al. Learning manual skills in anesthesiology: is there a recommended number of cases for anesthetic procedures? Anesth Analg. 1998;86:635–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Kreinest M, Goller S, Rauch G, et al. Application of cervical collars—an analysis of practical skills of professional emergency medical care providers. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0143409.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, et al. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:1229–36.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Mcdonald NE, Curran-Sills G, Thomas RE. Outcomes and characteristics of non-immobilised, spine-injured trauma patients: a systematic review of prehospital selective immobilisation protocols. Emerg Med J EMJ. 2015. doi:10.​1136/​emermed-2015-204693.
20.
Mobbs RJ, Stoodley MA, Fuller J. Effect of cervical hard collar on intracranial pressure after head injury. ANZ J Surg. 2002;72:389–91.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Mulcaster JT, Mills J, Hung OR, et al. Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:23–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Papadopoulos MC, Chakraborty A, Waldron G, et al. Lesson of the week: exacerbating cervical spine injury by applying a hard collar. BMJ Clin Res. 1999;319:171–2.CrossRef
23.
Stephan K, Huber S, Haberle S, et al. Spinal cord injury-incidence, prognosis, and outcome: an analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc. 2015;15:1994–2001CrossRef
24.
Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen KL, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 2001;286:1841–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Sundstrom T, Asbjornsen H, Habiba S, et al. Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review. J Neurotrauma. 2014;31:531–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Theodore N, Hadley MN, Aarabi B, et al. Prehospital cervical spinal immobilization after trauma. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(Suppl 2):22–34.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Totten VY, Sugarman DB. Respiratory effects of spinal immobilization. Prehospital Emerg Care Off J Natl Assoc EMS Phys Natl Assoc State EMS Dir. 1999;3:347–52.
28.
Unfallchirurgie DGF (2011) S3—Leitlinie Polytrauma/Schwerverletzten-Behandlung AWMF-Register Nr. 012/019.
29.
Vaillancourt C, Charette M, Kasaboski A, et al. Evaluation of the safety of C-spine clearance by paramedics: design and methodology. BMC Emerg Med. 2011;11:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Vaillancourt C, Stiell IG, Beaudoin T, et al. The out-of-hospital validation of the Canadian C-spine rule by paramedics. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(663–671):e661.
31.
Vandemark RM. Radiology of the cervical spine in trauma patients: practice pitfalls and recommendations for improving efficiency and communication. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155:465–72.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Woelfl CG, Guehring T, Moghaddam A, et al. PHTLS team course: a pilot project. Structured student education in prehospital care of severely injured patients. Unfallchirurg. 2012;115:243–9.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Wölfl CG, Bouillon B, Lackner CK, et al. Prehospital trauma life support® (PHTLS®). Unfallchirurg. 2008;111:688–94.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Expertise of German paramedics concerning the prehospital treatment of patients with spinal trauma
Authors
M. Kreinest
S. Goller
B. Gliwitzky
P. A. Grützner
M. Küffer
D. Häske
V. Papathanassiou
M. Münzberg
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-016-0682-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 3/2017 Go to the issue

Original Article

Temporal changes in hematologic markers after splenectomy, splenic embolization, and observation for trauma

Original Article

Frankfurt microsurgery course: the first 175 trainees

Original Article

Low serum albumin may predict the need for gastric resection in patients with perforated peptic ulcer

Original Article

Severe intimate partner violence affecting both young and elderly patients of both sexes

Original Article

Change in child mortality patterns after injuries in Sweden: a nationwide 14-year study

Original Article

The survival impact of plasma to red blood cell ratio in massively transfused non-trauma patients