Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 4/2016

01-07-2016 | Original Article

Experimental investigation of the fracture torque of orthodontic anchorage screws

Authors: Susanne Reimann, Mustafa Ayubi, Fraser McDonald, Christoph Bourauel

Published in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

In contrast to dental implants that remain in the bone, orthodontic anchorage screws serve as temporary anchorage for orthodontic tooth movement and are removed after completion of treatment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stability of various commercially available orthodontic anchorage screws against torsion.

Materials and methods

The torsional deflection of ten different orthodontic anchorage screws from different manufacturers [Ortho Easy Pin (Forestadent), Benefit, quattro (both PSM Medical Solutions), Vector TAS (Ormco), AbsoAnchor® (DENTOS Inc.), OrthoLox, Dual-Top JA (both Promedia Medizintechnik), TAD (3M Unitek), INFINITAS (ODS) and tomas® (Dentaurum)] was tested in vitro in relation to the rotation angle using a self-developed set-up. The screws were positioned in a resin model with bone-like material properties. Shear tests were performed using the manufacturers’ own screwdrivers. Ten screws each were turned manually until a sudden drop in the measured torque occurred. At this point, the screw head was twisted off. Fracture torque and the torque at which the screws deformed plastically were evaluated. Mean values and standard deviations were calculated.

Results

According to the German industrial standard, the torque of orthodontic anchorage screws should reach at least 20 Ncm. The majority of the screws reached this nominal torque; however, a few screws fractured before reaching this value. Five screw types displayed plastic deformation below the threshold, at approximately 16 Ncm.

Conclusions

The results suggest that orthodontic anchorage screws generally meet the requirements of the standard and ensure safe clinical use. However, according to the present data, it may be assumed that a portion of the screws will be plastically deformed upon removal.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carano A, Lonardo P, Velo S et al (2005) Mechanical properties of three different commercially available miniscrews for skeletal anchorage. Prog Orthod 6:82–97PubMed Carano A, Lonardo P, Velo S et al (2005) Mechanical properties of three different commercially available miniscrews for skeletal anchorage. Prog Orthod 6:82–97PubMed
2.
go back to reference Chaddad K, Ferreira A, Geurs N et al (2008) Influence of surface characteristics on survival rates of mini-implants. Angle Orthod 78:107–113CrossRefPubMed Chaddad K, Ferreira A, Geurs N et al (2008) Influence of surface characteristics on survival rates of mini-implants. Angle Orthod 78:107–113CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chen CH, Chang CS, Hsieh Ch et al (2006) The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:1209–1213CrossRefPubMed Chen CH, Chang CS, Hsieh Ch et al (2006) The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:1209–1213CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Standard DIN 13997:2012-10 (D) Zahnheilkunde - Kieferorthopädische Minischrauben. Dentistry — Orthodontic miniscrews Standard DIN 13997:2012-10 (D) Zahnheilkunde - Kieferorthopädische Minischrauben. Dentistry — Orthodontic miniscrews
5.
go back to reference Favero L, Pisoni A, Paganelli C (2007) Removal torque of osseointegrated mini-implants: an in vivo evaluation. Eur J Orthod 29:443–448CrossRefPubMed Favero L, Pisoni A, Paganelli C (2007) Removal torque of osseointegrated mini-implants: an in vivo evaluation. Eur J Orthod 29:443–448CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Frost HM (2004) A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff‘s Law for clinicians. Angle Orthod 74:3–15PubMed Frost HM (2004) A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff‘s Law for clinicians. Angle Orthod 74:3–15PubMed
7.
go back to reference Frost HM (1990) Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff’s Law: the bone modeling problem. Anat Rec 226:403–413CrossRefPubMed Frost HM (1990) Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 1. Redefining Wolff’s Law: the bone modeling problem. Anat Rec 226:403–413CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jolley T, Chung C (2007) Peak torque values at fracture of orthodontic miniscrews. J Clin Orthod 41:326–328PubMed Jolley T, Chung C (2007) Peak torque values at fracture of orthodontic miniscrews. J Clin Orthod 41:326–328PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kim S, Cho J, Chung K et al (2008) Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134:36–43CrossRefPubMed Kim S, Cho J, Chung K et al (2008) Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 134:36–43CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kravitz N, Kusnoto B (2007) Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131:43–51CrossRef Kravitz N, Kusnoto B (2007) Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131:43–51CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lietz T (2008) Mini-screws: aspects of assessment and selection among different systems. In: Ludwig B, Baumgaertel S, Bowman J (eds) Mini-implants in orthodontics. Quintessence, London, pp 11–72 Lietz T (2008) Mini-screws: aspects of assessment and selection among different systems. In: Ludwig B, Baumgaertel S, Bowman J (eds) Mini-implants in orthodontics. Quintessence, London, pp 11–72
12.
go back to reference Lima G, Soares M, Penha S et al (2011) Comparison of the fracture torque of different Brazilian mini-implants. Br Oral Res 25:116–121CrossRef Lima G, Soares M, Penha S et al (2011) Comparison of the fracture torque of different Brazilian mini-implants. Br Oral Res 25:116–121CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Melsen B, Costa A (2000) Immediate loading of implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Orthod Res 3:23–28CrossRefPubMed Melsen B, Costa A (2000) Immediate loading of implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Orthod Res 3:23–28CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Melsen B, Verna C (2005) Miniscrew implants: the Aarhus anchorage system. Semin Orthod 11:24–31CrossRef Melsen B, Verna C (2005) Miniscrew implants: the Aarhus anchorage system. Semin Orthod 11:24–31CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Meursinge Reynders RA, Ronchi L, Ladu L et al (2012) Insertion torque and success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 142:596–614CrossRefPubMed Meursinge Reynders RA, Ronchi L, Ladu L et al (2012) Insertion torque and success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 142:596–614CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Okazaki J, Komasa Y, Sakai D et al (2008) A torque removal study on the primary stability of orthodontic titanium screw mini-implants in the cortical bone of dog femurs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:647–650CrossRefPubMed Okazaki J, Komasa Y, Sakai D et al (2008) A torque removal study on the primary stability of orthodontic titanium screw mini-implants in the cortical bone of dog femurs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:647–650CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Papadopoulos MA, Tarawneh F (2007) The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103:e6–e15CrossRefPubMed Papadopoulos MA, Tarawneh F (2007) The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103:e6–e15CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Reicheneder C, Rottner K, Bokan I et al (2008) Mechanical loading of orthodontic miniscrews-significance and problems: an experimental study. Biomed Tech (Berl) 53:242–245CrossRef Reicheneder C, Rottner K, Bokan I et al (2008) Mechanical loading of orthodontic miniscrews-significance and problems: an experimental study. Biomed Tech (Berl) 53:242–245CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schaffler MB, Radin EL (1985) Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage. J Biomech 18:189–200CrossRefPubMed Schaffler MB, Radin EL (1985) Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage. J Biomech 18:189–200CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Suzuki E, Suzuki B (2011) Placement and removal torque values of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:669–678CrossRefPubMed Suzuki E, Suzuki B (2011) Placement and removal torque values of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 139:669–678CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Vande Vannet B, Sabzevar M, Wehrbein H et al (2007) Osseointegration of miniscrews: a histomorphometric evaluation. Eur J Orthod 29:437–442CrossRefPubMed Vande Vannet B, Sabzevar M, Wehrbein H et al (2007) Osseointegration of miniscrews: a histomorphometric evaluation. Eur J Orthod 29:437–442CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wawrzinek C, Sommer T, Fischer-Brandies H (2008) Microdamage in cortical bone due to the over-tightening of orthodontic microscrews. J Orofac Orthop 69:121–134CrossRefPubMed Wawrzinek C, Sommer T, Fischer-Brandies H (2008) Microdamage in cortical bone due to the over-tightening of orthodontic microscrews. J Orofac Orthop 69:121–134CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Wehrbein H, Göllner P (2007) Skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: basics and clincal application. J Orofac Orthop 68:443–461CrossRefPubMed Wehrbein H, Göllner P (2007) Skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: basics and clincal application. J Orofac Orthop 68:443–461CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wilmes B, Panayotidis A, Drescher D (2011) Fracture resistance of orthodontic mini-implants: a biomechanical in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 33:396–401CrossRefPubMed Wilmes B, Panayotidis A, Drescher D (2011) Fracture resistance of orthodontic mini-implants: a biomechanical in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 33:396–401CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Experimental investigation of the fracture torque of orthodontic anchorage screws
Authors
Susanne Reimann
Mustafa Ayubi
Fraser McDonald
Christoph Bourauel
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Electronic ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-016-0032-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 4/2016 Go to the issue