Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Commentary

Expensive lifesaving treatments: allocating resources and maximizing access

Authors: Rachel Nissanholtz-Gannot, David Chinitz

Published in: Israel Journal of Health Policy Research | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Avisar et al. present an exemplary model for outreach aimed at ensuring that a maximum of patients eligible for expensive Hepatitis C (HPC) drugs receive treatment. We enlarge the picture to put their model in the political, economic and regulatory framework for financing and providing these drugs in Israel and a number of other countries. We then return to delivery system level and consider issues such as cost of outreach, the need for health care coordinators and dealing with Hepatitis C patients not yet entitled to receive the drugs under national health coverage determinations.
Regarding national coverage decisions, we find that countries such as Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and Israel all extended coverage for Hepatitis C drugs, given the clear high effectiveness of the latter. However, to limit budget impact, all these countries target coverage to patients based on disease genotype and stage.
The model presented by Avisar et al., while impressive, leaves some items to address. These include: whether all resources allocated to HPC drugs are actually used for this purpose, the roles of outreach to HPC patients who do not meet the guidelines for treatment, and a comparison of the effectiveness of the model vs. a variety of costs associated with it.
Footnotes
1
DAAs are molecules that target specific nonstructural proteins of the virus and this results in disruption of viral replication and infection. All the names of the different medications in the paper were taken from the references. The authors are not physicians, therefore, we do not refer to the mechanism of specifics drugs.
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference Calebresi G, Bobbitt P. Tragic choices. New York: Norton & Co; 1978. Calebresi G, Bobbitt P. Tragic choices. New York: Norton & Co; 1978.
3.
go back to reference Aaron H, Schwartz W. The painful prescription. Washington D.C: The Brookings Institution; 1980. Aaron H, Schwartz W. The painful prescription. Washington D.C: The Brookings Institution; 1980.
4.
go back to reference Schreyögg J, Stargardt T, Velasco-Garrido M, Busse R. Defining the “health benefit basket”. In: Nine European countries: evidence from the European Union health BASKET project. Eur J Publ Health. 2005. p. 2–10. Schreyögg J, Stargardt T, Velasco-Garrido M, Busse R. Defining the “health benefit basket”. In: Nine European countries: evidence from the European Union health BASKET project. Eur J Publ Health. 2005. p. 2–10.
5.
go back to reference Golan O, Hansen P. What health technologies should be funded: a prioritization framework based explicitly on value for money. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012;1:44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Golan O, Hansen P. What health technologies should be funded: a prioritization framework based explicitly on value for money. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2012;1:44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Nissanholtz-Gannot R, Chinitz D, Rosenbaum S. What should health insurance cover? A comparison of Israeli and U.S. approaches to benefit design under National Health Reform. HEPL (forthcoming). 2018; Nissanholtz-Gannot R, Chinitz D, Rosenbaum S. What should health insurance cover? A comparison of Israeli and U.S. approaches to benefit design under National Health Reform. HEPL (forthcoming). 2018;
7.
go back to reference Chinitz D, Meislin R, Grau I. Values, institutions and shifting policy paradigms. Health Policy. 2009;90:37–44. 1.550; 47/83; 33/67; 6; 2CrossRefPubMed Chinitz D, Meislin R, Grau I. Values, institutions and shifting policy paradigms. Health Policy. 2009;90:37–44. 1.550; 47/83; 33/67; 6; 2CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kaplan G, Baron-Epel O. Personal needs vs National Needs: public attitudes regarding health care priorities at the personal and National Level. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2015;4:15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kaplan G, Baron-Epel O. Personal needs vs National Needs: public attitudes regarding health care priorities at the personal and National Level. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2015;4:15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Monas L, Uziely B, Toren O, Chinitz D. Oncology nurse coordinators: perceived roles, issues and policy. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017. (accepted for publication). Monas L, Uziely B, Toren O, Chinitz D. Oncology nurse coordinators: perceived roles, issues and policy. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017. (accepted for publication).
16.
go back to reference Nissanholtz-Gannot R, Rosen B, Hirschfeld M. The changing role of community nurses. Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute RR-756-17. Jerusalem; 2017. Nissanholtz-Gannot R, Rosen B, Hirschfeld M. The changing role of community nurses. Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute RR-756-17. Jerusalem; 2017.
Metadata
Title
Expensive lifesaving treatments: allocating resources and maximizing access
Authors
Rachel Nissanholtz-Gannot
David Chinitz
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 2045-4015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-017-0195-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research 1/2018 Go to the issue