Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Expectoration | Study protocol

Effectiveness of expiratory technique and induced sputum in obtaining good quality sputum from patients acutely hospitalized with suspected lower respiratory tract infection: a statistical analysis plan for a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Mariana Bichuette Cartuliares, Helene Skjøt-Arkil, Flemming Schønning Rosenvinge, Christian Backer Mogensen, Thor Aage Skovsted, Andreas Kristian Pedersen

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Targeted antimicrobial treatment is essential to avoid unnecessary use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance. Targeted treatment relies on a precise microbiological diagnosis — in pneumonia, this poses a challenge as the usefulness of Gram stains and cultures is highly dependent on the quality of the sputum sample.
This study aims to examine adverse effects and quality of sputum samples obtained by expiratory techniques (forced expiratory technique and sputum induction) compared with tracheal suction. The hypothesis is that expiratory techniques are non-inferior to tracheal suction in obtaining samples from the lower respiratory tract. This statistical analysis plan (SAP) describes the study design, method, and data analysis of the trial to increase transparency, avoid reporting bias or data-driven analysis and increase the study’s reproducibility.

Method

The design is a pragmatic, non-inferiority, parallel-arm randomized controlled trial including 280 patients admitted with suspected lower respiratory infection to two emergency departments. Patients are randomized to a usual care group, where sputum samples are collected by tracheal suction or to an intervention group where sputum samples are collected by forced expiratory technique and sputum induction. The statistical analysis will follow an intention-to-treat protocol. This SAP is developed and submitted before the end of recruitment, database closure, and statistical analyses.

Discussion

The results of this study will provide valuable knowledge to clinical practice by comparing adverse effects and sputum sample quality associated with different sample methods.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.​gov, NCT04595526. Submitted on October 19, 2020
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of lower respiratory tract infections in 195 countries: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Infect Dis, 2017. 17(11): p. 1133-1161, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30396-1. Estimates of the global, regional, and national morbidity, mortality, and aetiologies of lower respiratory tract infections in 195 countries: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Infect Dis, 2017. 17(11): p. 1133-1161, DOI: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1473-3099(17)30396-1.
9.
go back to reference Cartuliares MB, et al. Limited value of sputum culture to guide antibiotic treatment in a Danish emergency department. Dan Med J. 2020;67(11):A11190641.PubMed Cartuliares MB, et al. Limited value of sputum culture to guide antibiotic treatment in a Danish emergency department. Dan Med J. 2020;67(11):A11190641.PubMed
12.
go back to reference The Region of Southern Denmark, t.r.a.w., Den Regionale Antibiotikagruppe. Diagnostik og behandling af akutte infektioner på sygehusene i Region Syddanmark. 2016. The Region of Southern Denmark, t.r.a.w., Den Regionale Antibiotikagruppe. Diagnostik og behandling af akutte infektioner på sygehusene i Region Syddanmark. 2016.
13.
go back to reference Eccles S, et al. Diagnosis and management of community and hospital acquired pneumonia in adults: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2014;349:g6722.CrossRef Eccles S, et al. Diagnosis and management of community and hospital acquired pneumonia in adults: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2014;349:g6722.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pizzichini M, et al. Safety of sputum induction. European Respiratory Journal. 2002;20(37 suppl):9s–18s. Pizzichini M, et al. Safety of sputum induction. European Respiratory Journal. 2002;20(37 suppl):9s–18s.
22.
go back to reference Chanez P, et al. Sputum induction. European Respiratory Journal. 2002;20(37 suppl):3s–8s. Chanez P, et al. Sputum induction. European Respiratory Journal. 2002;20(37 suppl):3s–8s.
31.
go back to reference Fink JB. Forced expiratory technique, directed cough, and autogenic drainage. Respiratory Care. 2007;52(9):1210–23.PubMed Fink JB. Forced expiratory technique, directed cough, and autogenic drainage. Respiratory Care. 2007;52(9):1210–23.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Murray PR, Washington JA. Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975;50(6):339–44.PubMed Murray PR, Washington JA. Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum. Mayo Clin Proc. 1975;50(6):339–44.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Nørgaard B, et al. Diagnostic packages can be assigned accurately in emergency departments. A multi-centre cohort study. Dan Med J. 2016;63(6):A5240.PubMed Nørgaard B, et al. Diagnostic packages can be assigned accurately in emergency departments. A multi-centre cohort study. Dan Med J. 2016;63(6):A5240.PubMed
37.
go back to reference O'Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Davison AG. BTS guideline for emergency oxygen use in adult patients. Thorax. 2008;63(Suppl 6):vi1–68.PubMed O'Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Davison AG. BTS guideline for emergency oxygen use in adult patients. Thorax. 2008;63(Suppl 6):vi1–68.PubMed
41.
go back to reference Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E, et al. Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1--eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health. 2011;14(8):967–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014.CrossRefPubMed Patrick DL, Burke LB, Gwaltney CJ, Leidy NK, Martin ML, Molsen E, et al. Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1--eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health. 2011;14(8):967–77. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2011.​06.​014.CrossRefPubMed
46.
51.
go back to reference Seaman S, et al. What is meant by “missing at random”? Statistical Science. 2013;28:257–68.CrossRef Seaman S, et al. What is meant by “missing at random”? Statistical Science. 2013;28:257–68.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of expiratory technique and induced sputum in obtaining good quality sputum from patients acutely hospitalized with suspected lower respiratory tract infection: a statistical analysis plan for a randomized controlled trial
Authors
Mariana Bichuette Cartuliares
Helene Skjøt-Arkil
Flemming Schønning Rosenvinge
Christian Backer Mogensen
Thor Aage Skovsted
Andreas Kristian Pedersen
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Expectoration
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05639-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Trials 1/2021 Go to the issue