Top

Published in:

01-12-2018

Expectations for Return to Work After Workplace Injuries: The Relationship Between Estimated Time to Return to Work and Estimate Accuracy

Authors: Amanda Ellen Young, Elyssa Besen, Joanna Willetts

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 4/2018

Abstract

Purpose Worker’s expectations for return to working have been found to relate to return-to-work (RTW) outcomes; however, it is unclear if this varies depending upon the expected time to RTW. To advance the understanding of the relationship between expectations and RTW, we set out to answer the following research questions: Are shorter estimated times to RTW more accurate than estimates that are longer of duration? In addition, we sought to determine if there was a point in time that coincides with RTW estimates no longer being reliably related to time to RTW. Methods We utilized workers’ compensation data from a large, United States-based insurance company. Injured workers’ (N = 15,221) expectations for returning to work were compared with the termination of their total temporary indemnity payments. A linear regression model was used to determine if shorter lengths of expected time to RTW were more accurate. Quantile regression modelling was used to determine if there was point at which the expected time to RTW no longer reliably relates to the actual time to RTW. Results Findings indicated a positive relationship such that as the number of expected days to RTW increased, the number of days of difference (estimate error) between the actual time to RTW and the expected time to RTW also increased (β = 0.34, P < .001). The results of the quantile regression modelling indicated that for all quantiles estimated, with the exception of the quantile for estimates of 360 days, the relationship between the actual time to RTW and the expected time to RTW were statistically significant (P < .05). However, for RTW estimates of more than 14 days the relationship began decreasing in strength. Conclusion Results indicate that injured workers’ expectations for RTW can be used for RTW forecasting purposes. However, it is the case that RTW events in the near future can be forecasted with higher accuracy than those that are more distant, and that in general, injured workers will underestimate how long it will take them to RTW.

Auer CJ, Glombiewski JA, Doering BK, Winkler A, Laferton JA, Broadbent E, et al. Patients’ expectations predict surgery outcomes: a meta-analysis. Int J Behav Med. 2016;23(1):49–62.CrossRef

Cormier S, Lavigne GL, Choinière M, Rainville P. Expectations predict chronic pain treatment outcomes. Pain. 2016;157(2):329–338.CrossRef

MÆland JG, Havik OE. Psychological predictors for return to work after a myocardial infarction. J Psychosom Res. 1987;31(4):471–481.CrossRef

Mondloch MV, Cole DC, Frank JW. Does how you do depend on how you think you’ll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients’ recovery expectations and health outcomes. Can Med Assoc J. 2001;165(2):174–179.

Hallegraeff JM, Krijnen WP, van der Schans CP, de Greef MH. Expectations about recovery from acute non-specific low back pain predict absence from usual work due to chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2012;58(3):165–172.CrossRef

Iles RA, Davidson M, Taylor NF, O’Halloran P. Systematic review of the ability of recovery expectations to predict outcomes in non-chronic non-specific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):25–40.CrossRef

Young AE, Besen E, Choi Y. The importance, measurement and practical implications of worker’s expectations for return to work. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(20):1808–1816.CrossRef

Opsahl J, Eriksen HR, Tveito TH. Do expectancies of return to work and job satisfaction predict actual return to work in workers with long lasting LBP? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1314-2.

Young AE, Besen E, Willetts J. The relationship between work-disability duration and claimant’s expected time to return to work as recorded by workers’ compensation claims managers. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;27(2):284–295.CrossRef

10.

Reid RD, Sanders NR. Operations management: an integrated approach. 4th ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2010.

11.

Hill AV. The encyclopedia of operations management: a field manual and glossary of operations management terms and concepts. Upper Saddle River: FT Press; 2012.CrossRef

12.

Armstrong JS. Principles of forecasting: a handbook for researchers and practitioners. New York: Springer; 2001.CrossRef

13.

Willmott CJ, Matsuura K. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Clim Res. 2005;30(1):79–82.CrossRef

14.

Occupational Safety & Health Administration. SIC manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor; 2014.

15.

Ferraz MB, Quaresma MR, Aquino LR, Atra E, Tugwell P, Goldsmith CH. Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1990;17(8):1022–1024.PubMed

16.

Wilson TD, Gilbert DT. Affective forecasting knowing what to want. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2005;14(3):131–134.CrossRef

17.

Carstens JK, Shaw WS, Boersma K, Reme SE, Pransky G, Linton SJ. When the wind goes out of the sail - declining recovery expectations in the first weeks of back pain. Eur J Pain. 2014;18(2):269–278.CrossRef

18.

Boersma K, Linton SJ. Expectancy, fear and pain in the prediction of chronic pain and disability: a prospective analysis. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(6):551–557.CrossRef

19.

Iles RA, Taylor NF, Davidson M, O’Halloran PD. Patient recovery expectations in non-chronic non-specific low back pain: a qualitative investigation. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(9):781–787.CrossRef

20.

Løvvik C, Øverland S, Hysing M, Broadbent E, Reme SE. Association between illness perceptions and return-to-work expectations in workers with common mental health symptoms. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(1):15–26.CrossRef

21.

Shaw WS, Reme SE, Linton SJ, Huang YH, Pransky G. 3rd place, PREMUS best paper competition: development of the return-to-work self-efficacy (RTWSE-19) questionnaire–psychometric properties and predictive validity. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37(2):109–119.CrossRef

Title: Expectations for Return to Work After Workplace Injuries: The Relationship Between Estimated Time to Return to Work and Estimate Accuracy
Authors: Amanda Ellen Young
Elyssa Besen
Joanna Willetts
Publication date: 01-12-2018
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9754-1

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Expectations for Return to Work After Workplace Injuries: The Relationship Between Estimated Time to Return to Work and Estimate Accuracy

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Analysis of Time in Rehabilitation and Incidence of Successful Rehabilitation Within Individuals with Disabilities Receiving Occupational/Vocational Training

Trajectories of Return to Work Among People on Sick Leave with Mood or Anxiety Disorders: Secondary Analysis from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Patterns and Predictors of Failed and Sustained Return-to-Work in Transport Injury Insurance Claimants

Strengthened General Self-Efficacy with Multidisciplinary Vocational Rehabilitation in Women on Long-Term Sick Leave: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Work Disability Trajectories Among Individuals with a Sick-Leave Spell Due to Depressive Episode ≥ 21 Days: A Prospective Cohort Study with 13-Month Follow Up

Benefit Duration and Return to Work Outcomes in Short Term Disability Insurance Programs: Evidence from Temporary Disability Insurance Program