Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 3/2004

01-06-2004 | Original Paper

Excision margin for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: is it standardised?

Authors: J. J. Staiano, A. Juma, S. K. Dhital, D. D. McGeorge

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 3/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

In January 2002, the Multiprofessional Skin Cancer Committee published guidelines on the management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). We have undertaken a survey amongst plastic surgeons in the UK in order to establish the current standards for excision margins of SCC. There was no consensus on the excision margin to be taken for an SCC, nor was there any agreement as to whether a completely excised SCC ever warranted further excision. Furthermore, the majority of surgeons would take a wider margin for SCC on the limbs, but not for those on the head and neck. This is in contrast to the guidelines, which recommend a larger margin for the high-risk sites of the ear, lip, scalp, eyelids and nose. In addition, most pathology reports comment on completeness of excision margins but only few mention the depth of the tumour. We discuss the evidence behind the current guidelines and look at areas for improvement in the standardisation of the management of SCC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Strom SS, Yamamura Y (1997) Epidemiology of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Clin Plast Surg 24:627–636PubMed Strom SS, Yamamura Y (1997) Epidemiology of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Clin Plast Surg 24:627–636PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kwa RE, Campana K, Moy RL (1992) Biology of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 26:1–26PubMed Kwa RE, Campana K, Moy RL (1992) Biology of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 26:1–26PubMed
3.
go back to reference Motley R, Kersey P and Lawrence C (2002) Multiprofessional guidelines for the management of the patient with primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol 146:18–25CrossRefPubMed Motley R, Kersey P and Lawrence C (2002) Multiprofessional guidelines for the management of the patient with primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol 146:18–25CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Royal College of Pathologists (2002) Standards and minimum datasets for reporting cancers. Minimum dataset for the histopathological reporting of common skin cancers. London, Royal College of Pathologists. http://www.rcpath.org/resources/pdf/skincancers2802.pdf Royal College of Pathologists (2002) Standards and minimum datasets for reporting cancers. Minimum dataset for the histopathological reporting of common skin cancers. London, Royal College of Pathologists. http://​www.​rcpath.​org/​resources/​pdf/​skincancers2802.​pdf
5.
go back to reference Drake LA, Ceilley RI, Cornelison RL et al. (1993) Guidelines of care for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 28:628–631PubMed Drake LA, Ceilley RI, Cornelison RL et al. (1993) Guidelines of care for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 28:628–631PubMed
6.
go back to reference Broadland DG, Zitelli JA (1992) Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 27:241–248PubMed Broadland DG, Zitelli JA (1992) Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 27:241–248PubMed
7.
go back to reference Lohmann CM, Solomon AR (2001) Clinicopathological variants of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Adv Anat Pathol 8:27–36PubMed Lohmann CM, Solomon AR (2001) Clinicopathological variants of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Adv Anat Pathol 8:27–36PubMed
8.
go back to reference Johnson TM, Rowe DE, Nelson BR, Swanson NA (1992) Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (excluding lip and oral mucosa). J Am Acad Dermatol 26:467–484PubMed Johnson TM, Rowe DE, Nelson BR, Swanson NA (1992) Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (excluding lip and oral mucosa). J Am Acad Dermatol 26:467–484PubMed
9.
go back to reference Abide JM, Nahai F, Bennett RG (1984) The meaning of surgical margins. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:492–496PubMed Abide JM, Nahai F, Bennett RG (1984) The meaning of surgical margins. Plast Reconstr Surg 73:492–496PubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL (1992) Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, ear and lip: implications for treatment modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol 26:976–990PubMed Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL (1992) Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, ear and lip: implications for treatment modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol 26:976–990PubMed
12.
go back to reference Looser KG, Shah JP, Strong EW (1978) The significance of “positive” margins in surgically resected epidermoid carcinomas. Head Neck Surg 1:107–111PubMed Looser KG, Shah JP, Strong EW (1978) The significance of “positive” margins in surgically resected epidermoid carcinomas. Head Neck Surg 1:107–111PubMed
13.
go back to reference Chang WHJ (1980) Wound Management. In: WHJ Chang (ed) Fundamentals of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Williams, Baltimore, p 50 Chang WHJ (1980) Wound Management. In: WHJ Chang (ed) Fundamentals of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Williams, Baltimore, p 50
14.
go back to reference Alam M, Ratner D (2001) Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 344:975–983 Alam M, Ratner D (2001) Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 344:975–983
15.
go back to reference Griffiths RW, Feeley K, Suvarna SK (2002) Audit of clinical and histological prognostic factors in primary invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: assessment in a minimum 5 year follow-up study after conventional excisional surgery. Br J Plast Surg 55:287–292CrossRefPubMed Griffiths RW, Feeley K, Suvarna SK (2002) Audit of clinical and histological prognostic factors in primary invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: assessment in a minimum 5 year follow-up study after conventional excisional surgery. Br J Plast Surg 55:287–292CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Roberts DLL, Anstey AV, Barlow RJ et al. (2002) UK guidelines for the management of cutaneous melanoma. Br J Dermatol 146:7–17CrossRef Roberts DLL, Anstey AV, Barlow RJ et al. (2002) UK guidelines for the management of cutaneous melanoma. Br J Dermatol 146:7–17CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Balch CM, Urist MM, Karakousis CP et al. (1993) Efficacy of 2 cm surgical margins for intermediate-thickness melanomas (1–4mm): results of a multi-institutional randomised surgical trial. Ann Surg 218:262–267PubMed Balch CM, Urist MM, Karakousis CP et al. (1993) Efficacy of 2 cm surgical margins for intermediate-thickness melanomas (1–4mm): results of a multi-institutional randomised surgical trial. Ann Surg 218:262–267PubMed
18.
go back to reference Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Adamus J et al. (1988) Thin stage 1 primary cutaneous malignant melanoma. Comparison of excision with margins of 1 or 3 cm. N Engl J Med 318:1159–1162PubMed Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Adamus J et al. (1988) Thin stage 1 primary cutaneous malignant melanoma. Comparison of excision with margins of 1 or 3 cm. N Engl J Med 318:1159–1162PubMed
Metadata
Title
Excision margin for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: is it standardised?
Authors
J. J. Staiano
A. Juma
S. K. Dhital
D. D. McGeorge
Publication date
01-06-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 3/2004
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-004-0634-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2004

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 3/2004 Go to the issue

Forthcoming Meetings & Events

Announcements