Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Conflict and Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

Excess mortality in refugees, internally displaced persons and resident populations in complex humanitarian emergencies (1998–2012) – insights from operational data

Authors: Peter Heudtlass, Niko Speybroeck, Debarati Guha-Sapir

Published in: Conflict and Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Complex humanitarian emergencies are characterised by a break-down of health systems. All-cause mortality increases and non-violent excess deaths (predominantly due to infectious diseases) have been shown to outnumber violent deaths even in exceptionally brutal conflicts. However, affected populations are very heterogeneous and refugees, internally displaced persons (IDPs) and resident (non-displaced) populations differ substantially in their access to health services. We aim to show how this translates into health outcomes by quantifying excess all-cause mortality in emergencies by displacement status.

Methods

As standard data sources on mortality only poorly represent these populations, we use data from CEDAT, a database established by aid agencies to share operational health data collected for planning, monitoring and evaluation of humanitarian aid. We obtained 1759 Crude Death Rate (CDR) estimates from emergency assessments conducted between 1998 and 2012. We define excess mortality as the ratio of CDR in emergency assessments over ‘baseline CDR’ (as reported in the World Development Indicators). These death rate ratios (DRR) are calculated separately for all emergency assessments and their distribution is analysed by displacement status using non-parametric statistics.

Results

We found significant excess mortality in IDPs (median DRR: 2.5; 95 % CI: [2.2, 2.93]) and residents (median DDR: 1.51; 95 % CI: [1.47, 1.58]). Mortality in refugees however is not significantly different from baseline mortality in the host countries (median DRR: 0.94, 95 % CI: [0.73, 1.1]).

Conclusions

Aid agencies report the highest excess mortality rates among IDPs, followed by resident populations. In absolute terms however, due to their high share in the total number of people at risk, residents are likely to account for most of the excess deaths in today’s emergencies. Further research is needed to clarify whether the low estimates of excess mortality in refugees are the result of successful humanitarian interventions or due to limitations of our methods and data.
Literature
8.
go back to reference Ojeda G, Ordoñez M, Ochoa L. Encuesta nacional de demografía y salud 2010. Bogotá, Colombia: Profamilia, Ministerio de la Protección Social; 2011. Ojeda G, Ordoñez M, Ochoa L. Encuesta nacional de demografía y salud 2010. Bogotá, Colombia: Profamilia, Ministerio de la Protección Social; 2011.
9.
go back to reference Central Statistical Agency [Ethiopia] and ICF International (2011) Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2011. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA: Central Statistical Agency and ICF International. Central Statistical Agency [Ethiopia] and ICF International (2011) Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2011. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia and Calverton, Maryland, USA: Central Statistical Agency and ICF International.
14.
go back to reference Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). CEDAT: The Complex Emergency Database. Brussels: Univ Cathol Louvain; 2013. Available: www.cedat.be. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). CEDAT: The Complex Emergency Database. Brussels: Univ Cathol Louvain; 2013. Available: www.​cedat.​be.
Metadata
Title
Excess mortality in refugees, internally displaced persons and resident populations in complex humanitarian emergencies (1998–2012) – insights from operational data
Authors
Peter Heudtlass
Niko Speybroeck
Debarati Guha-Sapir
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Conflict and Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1752-1505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-016-0082-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Conflict and Health 1/2016 Go to the issue