Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2016

01-07-2016

Examining variation in cost based on surgeon choices for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Authors: Heather H. Adkins, Thomas J. Hardacker, Eugene P. Ceppa

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the standard of care for treatment of benign biliary disease. Declining reimbursements and increasing medical costs require physicians to examine closely their choices for equipment to decrease overall costs, particularly looking at key steps of cholecystectomy. The objective of this study was to examine variations between surgeons in equipment and operating room costs for elective LC.

Methods

Elective LC performed at IUH West Hospital in 2013 was analyzed. Patient demographics, preoperative diagnosis, operative time, surgical equipment, and resident participation were tracked. Exclusion criteria included acute cholecystitis and cases with additional procedures. Electronic medical records for clinical data and administrative records for reimbursement data were reviewed. Total supply costs and disposable costs for key portions of the LC were analyzed. Reimbursements were obtained from all payers for LC.

Results

All LC were examined (n = 362) and 272 met inclusion criteria. Demographics and pathology were similar between surgeons. Operative time varied significantly (range 53–98 min) with the lowest cost surgeon taking the longest overall time. Times were significantly affected by resident participation. The total morbidity was 4 %, with no mortalities. Total supply costs by surgeon ranged from $412–$924. The most costeffective technique included the use of plastic locking clips and hook electrocautery. Hospital and surgeon reimbursements were $336–$11,554 and $669–$1500 respectively.

Conclusion

This study highlights effects of surgeon choice as it relates to variable costs for surgical technique during elective LC without compromising safety. With healthcare reform emphasizing reduced healthcare expenditures, it is vital for surgeons to identify areas of unnecessary cost. Operating room time also contributes to cost, thus surgeons should implement techniques to complete procedures in a safe yet efficient fashion. Transparency by surgeons can lead to data that may support standardization of technique across a healthcare system to lower total supply costs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Emanuel E, Tanden J, Altman S, Armstrong S, Berwick D, De Brantes F, Calsyn M, Chernew M, Colmers J, Cutler D, Daschle T, Egerman P, Kocher B, Milstein A, Oshima Lee E, Podesta J, Reinhardt U, Rosental M, Sharfstein J, Shortell S, Stern A, Orszag PR, Spiro T (2012) A systemic approach to containing health care spending. N Engl J Med 367(10):949–954CrossRefPubMed Emanuel E, Tanden J, Altman S, Armstrong S, Berwick D, De Brantes F, Calsyn M, Chernew M, Colmers J, Cutler D, Daschle T, Egerman P, Kocher B, Milstein A, Oshima Lee E, Podesta J, Reinhardt U, Rosental M, Sharfstein J, Shortell S, Stern A, Orszag PR, Spiro T (2012) A systemic approach to containing health care spending. N Engl J Med 367(10):949–954CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Traverso LW (1996) The laparoscopic surgical value package and how surgeons can influence costs. Surg Clin N Am 76:631–639CrossRefPubMed Traverso LW (1996) The laparoscopic surgical value package and how surgeons can influence costs. Surg Clin N Am 76:631–639CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Mason SE, Nicolay CR, Darzi A (2015) The use of lean and six sigma methodologies in surgery: a systematic review. Surgeon 13(2):91–100CrossRefPubMed Mason SE, Nicolay CR, Darzi A (2015) The use of lean and six sigma methodologies in surgery: a systematic review. Surgeon 13(2):91–100CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cima RR, Brown MJ, Hebl JR, Moore R, Rogers JC, Kollengode A, Amstutz GJ, Weisbrod CA, Narr BJ, Deschamps C (2011) Use of lean and six sigma methodology to improve operating room efficiency in high volume tertiary care academic medical center. J Am Surg 213(1):83–92CrossRef Cima RR, Brown MJ, Hebl JR, Moore R, Rogers JC, Kollengode A, Amstutz GJ, Weisbrod CA, Narr BJ, Deschamps C (2011) Use of lean and six sigma methodology to improve operating room efficiency in high volume tertiary care academic medical center. J Am Surg 213(1):83–92CrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Frazee RC, Elliott VG, Larsen W, Lerner S, Minnis KW, Huber C, Nolan J, Papaconstantinou H, Smythe WR (2014) Can laparoscopic cholecystectomy be performed with a positive margin at medicaid reimbursement rates? J Am Coll Surg 218(4):546–551CrossRefPubMed Frazee RC, Elliott VG, Larsen W, Lerner S, Minnis KW, Huber C, Nolan J, Papaconstantinou H, Smythe WR (2014) Can laparoscopic cholecystectomy be performed with a positive margin at medicaid reimbursement rates? J Am Coll Surg 218(4):546–551CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Virk P, Paranjape C (2014) Variation in national DRG payments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Hospital level analysis. In: Poster presentation, SAGES Surgical Spring Week 2014. Salt Lake City, UT Virk P, Paranjape C (2014) Variation in national DRG payments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Hospital level analysis. In: Poster presentation, SAGES Surgical Spring Week 2014. Salt Lake City, UT
14.
go back to reference Vanek VW, Bourguet CC (1995) The cost of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in a community hospital. Surg Endosc 9(3):314–323CrossRefPubMed Vanek VW, Bourguet CC (1995) The cost of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy in a community hospital. Surg Endosc 9(3):314–323CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ure BM, Lefering R, Troidl H (1995) Costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, analysis of potential savings. Surg Endosc 9(4):401–406CrossRefPubMed Ure BM, Lefering R, Troidl H (1995) Costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, analysis of potential savings. Surg Endosc 9(4):401–406CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Troidl H, Spangenberger W, Langen R, Al-Jaziri A, Eypasch E, Neugebauer E, Dietrich J (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: technical performance, safety and patient’s benefit. Endoscopy 24:252–261CrossRefPubMed Troidl H, Spangenberger W, Langen R, Al-Jaziri A, Eypasch E, Neugebauer E, Dietrich J (1992) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: technical performance, safety and patient’s benefit. Endoscopy 24:252–261CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lawson EH, Hall BL, Louis R, Ettner SL, Zingmond DS, Han L, Rapp M, Ko CY (2013) Association between occurrence of postoperative complication and readmission. Ann Surg 258(1):10–18CrossRefPubMed Lawson EH, Hall BL, Louis R, Ettner SL, Zingmond DS, Han L, Rapp M, Ko CY (2013) Association between occurrence of postoperative complication and readmission. Ann Surg 258(1):10–18CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Boltz MM, Hollenbeak CS, Julian KG, Ortenzi G, Dillon PW (2011) Hospital costs associated with surgical site infections in general and vascular surgery patients. Surgery 150(5):934–942CrossRefPubMed Boltz MM, Hollenbeak CS, Julian KG, Ortenzi G, Dillon PW (2011) Hospital costs associated with surgical site infections in general and vascular surgery patients. Surgery 150(5):934–942CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Brunt LM (2010) Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211(1):132–138CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM, Brunt LM (2010) Rationale and use of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 211(1):132–138CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hunter JG (1991) Avoidance of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 162(1):71–76CrossRefPubMed Hunter JG (1991) Avoidance of bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 162(1):71–76CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Strasberg SM (2002) Avoidance of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9(5):543–547CrossRefPubMed Strasberg SM (2002) Avoidance of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9(5):543–547CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Chu T, Chandhoke RA, Smith PC, Schwaitzberg SD (2011) The impact of surgeon choice on cost of performing laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 25(4):1187–1191CrossRefPubMed Chu T, Chandhoke RA, Smith PC, Schwaitzberg SD (2011) The impact of surgeon choice on cost of performing laparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc 25(4):1187–1191CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
go back to reference Wilensky GR, Berwick DM (2014) Reforming the financing and governance of GME. N Engl J Med 371(9):792–793CrossRefPubMed Wilensky GR, Berwick DM (2014) Reforming the financing and governance of GME. N Engl J Med 371(9):792–793CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Examining variation in cost based on surgeon choices for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Authors
Heather H. Adkins
Thomas J. Hardacker
Eugene P. Ceppa
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4553-7

Other articles of this Issue 7/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2016 Go to the issue