Top

Published in:

01-02-2018

Examining the Highs and Lows of the Collaborative Relationship Between Technical Assistance Providers and Prevention Implementers

Authors: Sarah M. Chilenski, Janet Welsh, Jonathan Olson, Lesa Hoffman, Daniel F. Perkins, Mark E. Feinberg

Published in: Prevention Science | Issue 2/2018

Abstract

The PROSPER model uses a three-tiered community partnership, university researcher, and Cooperative Extension-based technical assistance system to support the delivery of evidence-based interventions in communities. This study examines the trajectory and predictors of the collaborative relationship between technical assistance providers and community teams across the three phases of organization, implementation, and sustainability. Members of 14 PROmoting School-university-community Partnerships to Enhance Resilience (PROSPER) community teams and directors of local agencies rated communities’ levels of readiness and adolescent substance use norms. Technical assistance providers rated their collaborative relationship with their teams at 14 occasions across 4.5 years. Results from mixed models show that levels of collaboration were stable until the sustainability phase, when they increased significantly. Team differences in change were significant during the implementation phase. Community readiness predicted levels of the collaborative relationship over time: high community readiness was associated with a high level of collaboration during organization, but a decline in collaboration during implementation. These results provide a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between technical assistance provision and community prevention teams and lead to recommendations to improve dissemination models to achieve a greater public health impact.

Available only for authorised users

August, G. J., Bloomquist, M. L., Lee, S. S., Realmuto, G. M., & Hektner, J. M. (2006). Can evidence-based prevention programs be sustained in community practice settings? The Early Risers’ advanced-stage effectiveness trial. Prevention Science, 7, 151–165. doi:10.1007/s11121-005-0024-z.CrossRefPubMed

Becker, K. D., Bradshaw, C. P., Domitrovich, C., & Ialongo, N. S. (2013). Coaching teachers to improve implementation of the Good Behavior Game. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 40(6), 482–493. doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0482-8.CrossRefPubMed

Brown, L. D., Feinberg, M. E., & Greenberg, M. T. (2010). Determinants of community coalition ability to support evidence-based programs. Prevention Science, 11, 287–297. doi:10.1007/s11121-010-0173-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Butterfoss, F. D., & Kegler, M. C. (2002). Toward a comprehensive understanding of community coalitions: Moving from practice to theory. In R. DiClemente, R. Crosby, & M. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research (pp. 157–193). Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

Butterfoss, F. D., Goodman, R. M., & Wandersman, A. (1996). Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: Factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning. Health Education Quarterly, 23, 65–79.CrossRefPubMed

Cheadle, A., Cromp, D., Krieger, J. W., Chan, N., McNees, M., Ross-Viles, S., et al. (2016). Promoting policy, systems, and environment change to prevent chronic disease: Lessons learned from the King County Communities Putting Prevention to Work Initiative. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 22, 348–359. doi:10.1097/phh.0000000000000313.CrossRefPubMed

Chilenski, S. M., Greenberg, M. T., & Feinberg, M. E. (2007). Community readiness as a multidimensional construct. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 347–365. doi:10.1002/jcop.20152.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Chilenski, S., Ang, P., Greenberg, M., Feinberg, M., & Spoth, R. (2014). The impact of a prevention delivery system on perceived social capital: The PROSPER project. Prevention Science, 15, 125–137. doi:10.1007/s11121-012-0347-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Chilenski, S. M., Perkins, D. F., Olson, J., Hoffman, L., Feinberg, M. E., Greenberg, M., et al. (2016). The power of a collaborative relationship between technical assistance providers and community prevention teams: A correlational and longitudinal study. Evaluation and Program Planning, 54, 19–29. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2015.10.002.CrossRefPubMed

Chinman, M., Hunter, S. B., Ebener, P., Paddock, S. M., Stillman, L., Imm, P., & Wandersman, A. (2008). The getting to outcomes demonstration and evaluation: An illustration of the prevention support system. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 206–224. doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9163-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Clark, N. M., Lachance, L., Doctor, L. J., Gilmore, L., Kelly, C., Krieger, J., et al. (2014). Policy and system change and community coalitions: Outcomes from allies against asthma. Health Education & Behavior, 41, 528–538. doi:10.1177/1090198114547507.CrossRef

Domitrovich, C., Pas, E., Bradshaw, C., Becker, K., Keperling, J., Embry, D., & Ialongo, N. (2015). Individual and school organizational factors that influence implementation of the PAX Good Behavior Game Intervention. Prevention Science, 1–11. doi:10.1007/s11121-015-0557-8.

Durlak, J., & DuPre, E. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350. doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.CrossRefPubMed

Feinberg, M. E., Greenberg, M. T., & Osgood, D. W. (2004). Readiness, functioning, and perceived effectiveness in community prevention coalitions: A study of communities that care. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33, 163–176.CrossRefPubMed

Feinberg, M. E., Chilenski, S. M., Greenberg, M. T., Spoth, R. L., & Redmond, C. (2007). Community and team member factors that influence the operations phase of local prevention teams: The PROSPER project. Prevention Science, 8, 214–226. doi:10.1007/s11121-007-0069-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Feinberg, M. E., Ridenour, T. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2008). The longitudinal effect of technical assistance dosage on the functioning of Communities That Care prevention boards in Pennsylvania. Journal of Primary Prevention, 29, 145–165.CrossRefPubMed

Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.

Forman, S., Olin, S., Hoagwood, K., Crowe, M., & Saka, N. (2009). Evidence-based interventions in schools: Developers’ views of implementation barriers and facilitators. School Mental Health, 1, 26–36. doi:10.1007/s12310-008-9002-5.CrossRef

Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1261–1267. doi:10.2105/ajph.93.8.1261.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Greenberg, M. T., Feinberg, M. E., Meyer-Chilenski, S., Spoth, R. L., & Redmond, C. (2007). Community and team member factors that influence the early phase functioning of community prevention teams: The PROSPER project. Journal of Primary Prevention, 28, 485–504. doi:10.1007/s10935-007-0116-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hawkins, J., Oesterle, S., Brown, E. C., Abbott, R. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2014). Youth problem behaviors 8 years after implementing the communities that care prevention system: A community-randomized trial. JAMA Pediatrics, 168, 122–129. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.4009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hoffman, L. (2015). Longitudinal analysis: modeling within-person fluctuation and change. New York: Taylor & Francis.

Johnson, S. R., Pas, E. T., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2016). Understanding and measuring coach-teacher alliance: A glimpse inside the ‘Black Box’. Prevention Science, 17(4), 439–449. doi:10.1007/s11121-016-0633-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Katz, J., & Wandersman, A. (2016). Technical assistance to enhance prevention capacity: A research synthesis of the evidence base. Prevention Science, 17, 417–428. doi:10.1007/s11121-016-0636-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kelly, J. A., Somlai, A. M., DiFranceisco, W. J., Otto-Salaj, L. L., McAuliffe, T. L., Hackl, K. L., et al. (2000). Bridging the gap between the science and service of HIV prevention: Transferring effective research-based HIV prevention interventions to community AIDS service providers. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1082–1088.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kilburg, R. R. (1996). Toward a conceptual understanding and definition of executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 48, 134–144. doi:10.1037/1061-4087.48.2.134.CrossRef

Le, L. T., Anthony, B. J., Bronheim, S. M., Holland, C. M., & Perry, D. F. (2016). A technical assistance model for guiding service and systems change. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 43, 380–395. doi:10.1007/s11414-014-9439-2.CrossRef

Livet, M., & Wandersman, A. (2005). Organizational functioning: Facilitating effective interventions and increasing the odds of programming success. In D. M. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (Vol. viii, pp. 123–154). NY, US: Guilford Press.

Mincemoyer, C. C., Perkins, D. F., & Santiago, A. (2008). Exploring the effectiveness of learning communities as a source of technical assistance and professional development among Extension educators. The Forum for Family and Consumer Issues, 13.

Mitchell, R. E., Stone-Wiggins, B., Stevenson, J. F., & Florin, P. (2004). Cultivating capacity: Outcomes of a statewide support system for prevention coalitions. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 27, 67-67-87. doi:10.1300/J005v27n02_05.CrossRef

National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Common core of data., 2003, 2005 from http://www.nces.ed.gov/surveys/sdds/c2000.asp.

Spoth, R., Greenberg, M., Bierman, K., & Redmond, C. (2004). PROSPER community-university partnership model for public education systems: Capacity-building for evidence-based, competence-building prevention. Prevention Science, 5, 31–39. doi:10.1023/B:PREV.0000013979.52796.8b.CrossRefPubMed

Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., Greenberg, M., Feinberg, M., & Schainker, L. (2014). PROSPER community-university partnership delivery system effects on substance misuse through 6 1/2 years past baseline from a cluster randomized controlled intervention trial. Preventive Medicine, 69, 36–36. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.011.CrossRef

US Census. (2000). United States Census Bureau: Census 2000 Gateway. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html

Wehby, J. H., Maggin, D. M., Moore Partin, T. C., & Robertson, R. (2012). The impact of working alliance, social validity, and teacher burnout on implementation fidelity of the Good Behavior Game. School Mental Health, 4, 22–33. doi:10.1007/s12310-011-9067-4.CrossRef

Welsh, J. A., Chilenski, S. M., Johnson, L., Greenberg, M. T., & Spoth, R. L. (2016). Pathways to sustainability: 8-year follow-up from the PROSPER project. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 37, 263–286. doi:10.1007/s10935-016-0421-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wolff, T. (2001). A practitioner’s guide to successful coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 173–191.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Examining the Highs and Lows of the Collaborative Relationship Between Technical Assistance Providers and Prevention Implementers
Authors: Sarah M. Chilenski
Janet Welsh
Jonathan Olson
Lesa Hoffman
Daniel F. Perkins
Mark E. Feinberg
Publication date: 01-02-2018
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Prevention Science / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0812-2

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Examining the Highs and Lows of the Collaborative Relationship Between Technical Assistance Providers and Prevention Implementers

Abstract

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Translating Prevention Research for Evidence-Based Policymaking: Results from the Research-to-Policy Collaboration Pilot

Promoting Afterschool Quality and Positive Youth Development: Cluster Randomized Trial of the Pax Good Behavior Game

A Brief Smoking Cessation Advice by Youth Counselors for the Smokers in the Hong Kong Quit to Win Contest 2010: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

School, Friends, and Substance Use: Gender Differences on the Influence of Attitudes Toward School and Close Friend Networks on Cannabis Involvement

Quality Matters: Implementation Moderates Student Outcomes in the PATHS Curriculum

Predictors of Adult Marijuana Use Among Parents and Nonparents