Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Article

Examining Cesarean Delivery Rates Using the Robson’s Ten-group Classification

Authors: Rayshang G. Yadav, Nandita Maitra

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Special Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To examine Cesarean delivery rates based on the Robson’s Ten-group classification system (TGCS), over a 10-year period.

Methods

All Vaginal Deliveries and cesarean sections (CSs) performed over a 10-year period from 2004 to 2013 were included in the analysis. The data were compiled according to Robson’s TGCS of cesarean section for every year. Risk Ratios (crude RRs) with 95 % confidence intervals for delivery by cesarean section were calculated for each Robson’s group.

Results

The TGCS was easily applied in this large dataset of 40,086 deliveries. The 10-year overall cesarean section rate (CSR) was 25.17 %. Groups 1 and 3 represented 60 % of the total obstetric population. The largest contributions to the total CSR are group 1 (37.62 %) and group 5 (17.06 %). Group 3 which was the second largest group contributed 15 % to the overall CSR. Group 2 and group 4 had high group CSRs of 47.28 and 34.74 % respectively, although the total group size was small (n = 1375;3.43 %). Maternal age and presentation were found to have an independent association with mode of delivery on logistic regression.

Conclusion

The Ten-group classification helped to identify the main groups of subjects who contribute most to the overall CSR. It also helped to identify subgroups requiring closer monitoring for more in-depth analyses of the indications for caesarean section. It is important to focus on the first four TGCS groups which constitute about 75 % of all deliveries. It is in the low-risk groups that one is likely to find the highest and most inappropriate indications for cesarean sections.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1386–97.CrossRef National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1386–97.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2:436–7. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2:436–7.
3.
go back to reference Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Health Statistics. Healthy People 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives: Full report, with commentary (DHHS publication no. (PHS) 91–50212). Washington: Government Printing Office; 1990:378. Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Health Statistics. Healthy People 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives: Full report, with commentary (DHHS publication no. (PHS) 91–50212). Washington: Government Printing Office; 1990:378.
4.
go back to reference Robson MS. Can we reduce the cesarean section rate? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;15:179–94.CrossRefPubMed Robson MS. Can we reduce the cesarean section rate? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;15:179–94.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Perinatal Services BC (2011). Examining caesarean delivery rates in British Columbia using the Robson Ten Classification. Part 1: Understanding the Ten Groups. Vancouver. Perinatal Services BC (2011). Examining caesarean delivery rates in British Columbia using the Robson Ten Classification. Part 1: Understanding the Ten Groups. Vancouver.
7.
go back to reference Sachs BP, Kobelin C, Castro MA, et al. The risk of lowering the caesarean delivery rate. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(1):54–7.CrossRefPubMed Sachs BP, Kobelin C, Castro MA, et al. The risk of lowering the caesarean delivery rate. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(1):54–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Denk CE, Kruse LK, Jain NJ. Surveillance of caesarean section deliveries, New Jersey 1999–2004 New Jersey Department of health and SeniorServices; 2005. Denk CE, Kruse LK, Jain NJ. Surveillance of caesarean section deliveries, New Jersey 1999–2004 New Jersey Department of health and SeniorServices; 2005.
10.
go back to reference Litorp H, Kidanto HL, Nystrom L, et al. Increasing caesarean section rates among low-risk groups: a panel study classifying deliveries according to Robson at a university hospital in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013;13:107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Litorp H, Kidanto HL, Nystrom L, et al. Increasing caesarean section rates among low-risk groups: a panel study classifying deliveries according to Robson at a university hospital in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013;13:107.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Howell S, Johnston T, Macleod S-L. Trends and determinants of caesarean sections births in Queensland, 1997–2006. ANZJOG. 2009;49(6):606–11.PubMed Howell S, Johnston T, Macleod S-L. Trends and determinants of caesarean sections births in Queensland, 1997–2006. ANZJOG. 2009;49(6):606–11.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Brennan DJ, Robson MS, Murphy M, et al. Comparative analysis of international caesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:308.e1–8.CrossRef Brennan DJ, Robson MS, Murphy M, et al. Comparative analysis of international caesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:308.e1–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gao Y, Xue Q, Chen G, et al. An analysis of the trends in caesarean section in a teaching hospital in China. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(2):414–8.CrossRefPubMed Gao Y, Xue Q, Chen G, et al. An analysis of the trends in caesarean section in a teaching hospital in China. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(2):414–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Aminu M, Utz B, Halim A, et al. Reasons for performing a caesarean section in public hospitals in rural Bangladesh. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):130. Aminu M, Utz B, Halim A, et al. Reasons for performing a caesarean section in public hospitals in rural Bangladesh. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):130.
16.
go back to reference Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Bann CM. The relationship of intrapartum and antepartum stillbirth rates to measures of obstetric care in developed and developing countries. ActaObstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:1303–9. doi:10.1080/00016340701644876.CrossRef Goldenberg RL, McClure EM, Bann CM. The relationship of intrapartum and antepartum stillbirth rates to measures of obstetric care in developed and developing countries. ActaObstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:1303–9. doi:10.​1080/​0001634070164487​6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Examining Cesarean Delivery Rates Using the Robson’s Ten-group Classification
Authors
Rayshang G. Yadav
Nandita Maitra
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue Special Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-015-0738-1

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2016

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 1/2016 Go to the issue