Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2014

01-04-2014

Evaluation of transabdominal ultrasound after oral administration of an echoic cellulose-based gastric ultrasound contrast agent for demonstrating small gastric subepithelial masses

Authors: Zhijun Liu, Jintao Guo, Siyu Sun, Weidong Ren, Shaoshan Tang, Limei Xie, Liping Huang

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the role of transabdominal ultrasound after oral administration of an echoic cellulose-based gastric contrast agent (TUS-OCCA) for detection and characterization of small gastric subepithelial masses (≤3 cm) by comparison with endosonography (EUS).

Methods

Ninety-five patients with small gastric subepithelial masses detected by gastroscopy examination were enrolled. For each patient, TUS-OCCA was performed prior to EUS by a skilled examiner. TUS-OCCA diagnoses were compared with those of EUS.

Results

TUS-OCCA had a detection rate of 94% (89 of 95) in visualizing small gastric subepithelial masses previously detected by gastroscopy. The sizes of 6 undetected masses ranged from 7 to 12 mm (4 located at the fundus, 2 at the cardia). All of six patients whose lesions were undetected by TUS-OCCA were obese. The findings of gastric subepithelial masses demonstrated by TUS-OCCA were similar to that shown on EUS.

Conclusions

TUS-OCCA can provide useful information about small gastric subepithelial masses, especially for the patients who are not obese. It can be used to follow gastric submucosal tumors that are not excised.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Gastroenterological Association Institute (2006) American Gastroenterological Association Institute medical position statement on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology 130:2215–2216CrossRef American Gastroenterological Association Institute (2006) American Gastroenterological Association Institute medical position statement on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology 130:2215–2216CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kim MY, Jung HY, Choi KD, et al. (2011) Natural history of asymptomatic small gastric subepithelial tumors. J Clin Gastroenterol 45(4):330–336PubMedCrossRef Kim MY, Jung HY, Choi KD, et al. (2011) Natural history of asymptomatic small gastric subepithelial tumors. J Clin Gastroenterol 45(4):330–336PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Zheng Z, Yu Y, Lu M, et al. (2011) Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer: a comparison to endoscopic ultrasonography with respect to histopathology. Am J Surg 202(5):605–611PubMedCrossRef Zheng Z, Yu Y, Lu M, et al. (2011) Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer: a comparison to endoscopic ultrasonography with respect to histopathology. Am J Surg 202(5):605–611PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Xue N, Huang P, Aronow WS, et al. (2011) Predicting lymph node status in patients with early gastric carcinoma using double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Arch Med Sci 7(3):457–464PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Xue N, Huang P, Aronow WS, et al. (2011) Predicting lymph node status in patients with early gastric carcinoma using double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Arch Med Sci 7(3):457–464PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Huang P, Li S, Aronow WS, et al. (2011) Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography evaluation of preoperative Lauren classification of advanced gastric carcinoma. Arch Med Sci 7(2):287–293PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Huang P, Li S, Aronow WS, et al. (2011) Double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography evaluation of preoperative Lauren classification of advanced gastric carcinoma. Arch Med Sci 7(2):287–293PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Shi H, Yu XH, Guo XZ, et al. (2012) Double contrast-enhanced two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography for evaluation of gastric lesions. World J Gastroenterol 18(31):4136–4144PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Shi H, Yu XH, Guo XZ, et al. (2012) Double contrast-enhanced two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasonography for evaluation of gastric lesions. World J Gastroenterol 18(31):4136–4144PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Li S, Huang P, Wang Z, et al. (2012) Preoperative T Staging of Advanced Gastric Cancer using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound. Ultraschall Med 33(7):E218–E224PubMedCrossRef Li S, Huang P, Wang Z, et al. (2012) Preoperative T Staging of Advanced Gastric Cancer using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound. Ultraschall Med 33(7):E218–E224PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Liu Z, Guo J, Ren W, et al. (2013) A gastric calcifying fibrous pseudotumor detected by transabdominal ultrasound after oral administration of an echoic cellulose-based gastrointestinal ultrasound contrast agent. Ultraschall Med 34:1–3. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1350396 CrossRef Liu Z, Guo J, Ren W, et al. (2013) A gastric calcifying fibrous pseudotumor detected by transabdominal ultrasound after oral administration of an echoic cellulose-based gastrointestinal ultrasound contrast agent. Ultraschall Med 34:1–3. doi:10.​1055/​s-0033-1350396 CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Park SH, Kim GH, Park do Y, et al. (2011) Endosonographic findings of gastric ectopic pancreas: a single center experience. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26(9):1441–1446PubMed Park SH, Kim GH, Park do Y, et al. (2011) Endosonographic findings of gastric ectopic pancreas: a single center experience. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26(9):1441–1446PubMed
10.
go back to reference Guo J, Liu Z, Sun S, et al. (2013) Endosonography-assisted diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endosc Ultrasound 2(3):125–133CrossRef Guo J, Liu Z, Sun S, et al. (2013) Endosonography-assisted diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endosc Ultrasound 2(3):125–133CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Goto O, Kambe H, Niimi K, et al. (2012) Discrepancy in diagnosis of gastric submucosal tumor among esophagogastroduodenoscopy, CT, and endoscopic ultrasonography: a retrospective analysis of 93 consecutive cases. Abdom Imaging 37(6):1074–1078PubMedCrossRef Goto O, Kambe H, Niimi K, et al. (2012) Discrepancy in diagnosis of gastric submucosal tumor among esophagogastroduodenoscopy, CT, and endoscopic ultrasonography: a retrospective analysis of 93 consecutive cases. Abdom Imaging 37(6):1074–1078PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Okten RS, Kacar S, Kucukay F, et al. (2012) Gastric subepithelial masses: evaluation of multidetector CT (multiplanar reconstruction and virtual gastroscopy) versus endoscopic ultrasonography. Abdom Imaging 37(4):519–530PubMedCrossRef Okten RS, Kacar S, Kucukay F, et al. (2012) Gastric subepithelial masses: evaluation of multidetector CT (multiplanar reconstruction and virtual gastroscopy) versus endoscopic ultrasonography. Abdom Imaging 37(4):519–530PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kongkam P, Devereaux BM, Ponnudurai R, et al. (2013) Endoscopic ultrasound forum summary from the Asian Pacific Digestive Week 2012. Endosc Ultrasound 2:43–60CrossRef Kongkam P, Devereaux BM, Ponnudurai R, et al. (2013) Endoscopic ultrasound forum summary from the Asian Pacific Digestive Week 2012. Endosc Ultrasound 2:43–60CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Giovannini M (2012) Report of EUS presentations during the 20th UEGW Meeting in Amsterdam. Endosc Ultrasound 1:169–172 Giovannini M (2012) Report of EUS presentations during the 20th UEGW Meeting in Amsterdam. Endosc Ultrasound 1:169–172
15.
go back to reference Maconi G, Bianchi Porro G (2006) Ultrasound of the gastrointestinal tract: examination procedures and new technical developments. Berlin: Springer Maconi G, Bianchi Porro G (2006) Ultrasound of the gastrointestinal tract: examination procedures and new technical developments. Berlin: Springer
16.
go back to reference Polkowski M, Palucki J, Butruk E (2002) Transabdominal ultrasound for visualizing gastric submucosal tumors diagnosed by endosonography: can surveillance be simplified? Endoscopy 34:979–983PubMedCrossRef Polkowski M, Palucki J, Butruk E (2002) Transabdominal ultrasound for visualizing gastric submucosal tumors diagnosed by endosonography: can surveillance be simplified? Endoscopy 34:979–983PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Futagami K, Hata J, Haruma K, et al. (2001) Extracorporeal ultrasound is an effective diagnostic alternative to endoscopic ultrasound for gastric submucosal tumours. Scand J Gastroenterol 36:1222–1226PubMedCrossRef Futagami K, Hata J, Haruma K, et al. (2001) Extracorporeal ultrasound is an effective diagnostic alternative to endoscopic ultrasound for gastric submucosal tumours. Scand J Gastroenterol 36:1222–1226PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Maconi G, Radice E, Bareggi E, et al. (2009) Hydrosonography of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Roentgenol 193(3):700–708CrossRef Maconi G, Radice E, Bareggi E, et al. (2009) Hydrosonography of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Roentgenol 193(3):700–708CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lund PJ, Fritz TA, Unger EC, et al. (1992) Cellulose as a gastrointestinal US contrast agent. Radiology 185:783–788PubMed Lund PJ, Fritz TA, Unger EC, et al. (1992) Cellulose as a gastrointestinal US contrast agent. Radiology 185:783–788PubMed
20.
go back to reference Leung WK, Wu MS, Kakugawa Y, et al. (2008) Screening for gastric cancer in Asia: current evidence and practice. Lancet Oncol 9(3):279–287PubMedCrossRef Leung WK, Wu MS, Kakugawa Y, et al. (2008) Screening for gastric cancer in Asia: current evidence and practice. Lancet Oncol 9(3):279–287PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nakajima S (2012) Gastric cancer screening in Japan, now and tomorrow. Nihon Rinsho 70(10):1686–1693PubMed Nakajima S (2012) Gastric cancer screening in Japan, now and tomorrow. Nihon Rinsho 70(10):1686–1693PubMed
22.
go back to reference Lee KS, Oh DK, Han MA, et al. (2011) Gastric cancer screening in Korea: report on the national cancer screening program in 2008. Cancer Res Treat 43(2):83–88PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lee KS, Oh DK, Han MA, et al. (2011) Gastric cancer screening in Korea: report on the national cancer screening program in 2008. Cancer Res Treat 43(2):83–88PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jeong ID, Jung SW, Bang SJ, et al. (2011) Endoscopic enucleation for gastric subepithelial tumors originating in the muscularis propria layer. Surg Endosc 25(2):468–474PubMedCrossRef Jeong ID, Jung SW, Bang SJ, et al. (2011) Endoscopic enucleation for gastric subepithelial tumors originating in the muscularis propria layer. Surg Endosc 25(2):468–474PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of transabdominal ultrasound after oral administration of an echoic cellulose-based gastric ultrasound contrast agent for demonstrating small gastric subepithelial masses
Authors
Zhijun Liu
Jintao Guo
Siyu Sun
Weidong Ren
Shaoshan Tang
Limei Xie
Liping Huang
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-013-0059-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Abdominal Radiology 2/2014 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine