Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 3/2008

Open Access 01-05-2008 | Clinical Investigation

Evaluation of the Occupational Doses of Interventional Radiologists

Authors: Gerritjan Kuipers, Xandra L. Velders, Robbert J. de Winter, Jim A. Reekers, Jan J. Piek

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine whether there is a linear relation between the doses measured above and those measured under the lead apron of the radiologists performing interventional procedures. To monitor radiation exposure the International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommends the use of a single dosimeter under the protective apron. To determine the exposure more accurately an additional dosimeter is recommended above the protective apron. The exposure of eight radiologists was monitored with two personal dosimeters during 3 consecutive years. To measure the doses uniformly the two dosimeters were worn in a special holder attached to the lead apron. The two personal dosimeters were replaced every 4 weeks on the same day. The doses above and under the protective aprons of seven radiologists did not differ significantly. A significant lower dose above and under the protective apron was measured for one of the radiologists. During a 4-week period the average dose measured above the lead apron was 3.44 mSv (median, 3.05 mSv), while that under the 0.25-mm lead apron was 0.12 mSv (median, 0.1 mSv). The coefficients of the regression line result in the equation Y = 0.036X − 0.004, with Y as the dose under the lead apron and X as the dose above the lead apron. The statistical analysis of the data established a linear relation between the doses above and those under the lead apron (R 2 = 0.59). Before the special holder was introduced it was not possible to derive a relation between the doses above and those under the lead apron, as the doses were measured at varying places above and under the lead apron. There is no evidence that the effective dose can be estimated more accurately when an additional dosimeter is used. The present study revealed a threshold before doses under the lead apron were measured. Due to the threshold it can be concluded that the doses under the lead apron will not be underestimated easily when doses above the lead apron are used to calculate them. This is not the case when the doses above the lead apron are calculated for the doses under the lead apron.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hidajat N, Wust P, Felix R, Schröder RJ (2006) Radiation exposure to patient and staff in hepathic chemoembolization: risk estimation of cancer and deterministic effects. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 29:297–796CrossRef Hidajat N, Wust P, Felix R, Schröder RJ (2006) Radiation exposure to patient and staff in hepathic chemoembolization: risk estimation of cancer and deterministic effects. CardioVasc Interv Radiol 29:297–796CrossRef
2.
go back to reference ICRP (2000) Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. ICRP Publication 85. Pergamon Press, Oxford ICRP (2000) Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. ICRP Publication 85. Pergamon Press, Oxford
3.
go back to reference Dijk JWE, Julius HW (1996) Dose thresholds and quality assessment by statistical analysis of routine individual monitoring TLD data. Radiat Prot Dosim 66:17–22 Dijk JWE, Julius HW (1996) Dose thresholds and quality assessment by statistical analysis of routine individual monitoring TLD data. Radiat Prot Dosim 66:17–22
4.
go back to reference Renaud L (1992) A 5-y follow-up of the radiation exposure to in-room personnel during cardiac catheterization. Health Phys 62(1):10–15PubMed Renaud L (1992) A 5-y follow-up of the radiation exposure to in-room personnel during cardiac catheterization. Health Phys 62(1):10–15PubMed
5.
go back to reference Vañó E, González L, Guibelalde E, Fernández JM, Alfonso F, Macaya C (2006) Occupational radiation doses in interventional cardiology: a 15-years follow-up. Br J Radiol 79:383–388PubMedCrossRef Vañó E, González L, Guibelalde E, Fernández JM, Alfonso F, Macaya C (2006) Occupational radiation doses in interventional cardiology: a 15-years follow-up. Br J Radiol 79:383–388PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Williams JR (1997) The interdependence of staff patient doses in interventional radiology. Br J Radiol 70:498–503PubMed Williams JR (1997) The interdependence of staff patient doses in interventional radiology. Br J Radiol 70:498–503PubMed
7.
go back to reference Niklason L, Marx M, Chan H (1994) The estimation of occupational effective dose in diagnostic radiology with two dosimeters. Health Phys 67(6):611–615PubMedCrossRef Niklason L, Marx M, Chan H (1994) The estimation of occupational effective dose in diagnostic radiology with two dosimeters. Health Phys 67(6):611–615PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kharrati H, Agrebi A, Karaoui M (2007) Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray buildup factors of lead its applications in shielding of diagnostic x-ray facilities. Med Phys 34(4):1398–1404PubMedCrossRef Kharrati H, Agrebi A, Karaoui M (2007) Monte Carlo simulation of x-ray buildup factors of lead its applications in shielding of diagnostic x-ray facilities. Med Phys 34(4):1398–1404PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Murphy PH, Wu Y, Glaze SA (1993) Attenuation properties of lead composite aprons. Radiology 186:269–272PubMed Murphy PH, Wu Y, Glaze SA (1993) Attenuation properties of lead composite aprons. Radiology 186:269–272PubMed
10.
go back to reference Christodoulou EG, Goodsitt MM, Larson SC, Darner KL, Satti JS, Chan H (2003) Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons used in a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter. Med Phys 30(6):1033–1038PubMedCrossRef Christodoulou EG, Goodsitt MM, Larson SC, Darner KL, Satti JS, Chan H (2003) Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons used in a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter. Med Phys 30(6):1033–1038PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference IAEA (2004) Personal protective equipment. IAEA-PRTM-5. IAEA, Vienna IAEA (2004) Personal protective equipment. IAEA-PRTM-5. IAEA, Vienna
12.
go back to reference Schultz FW, Zoetelief J (2006) Estimation effective dose for a cardiac catheterisation procedure with single or double personal dosimetrie. Radiat Prot Dosim 118(2):196–204 CrossRef Schultz FW, Zoetelief J (2006) Estimation effective dose for a cardiac catheterisation procedure with single or double personal dosimetrie. Radiat Prot Dosim 118(2):196–204 CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of the Occupational Doses of Interventional Radiologists
Authors
Gerritjan Kuipers
Xandra L. Velders
Robbert J. de Winter
Jim A. Reekers
Jan J. Piek
Publication date
01-05-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-008-9307-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 3/2008 Go to the issue