Top

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery

Published in:

01-06-2016 | Original Article

Evaluation of the influence of the definition of an isolated hip fracture as an exclusion criterion for trauma system benchmarking: a multicenter cohort study

Authors: J. Tiao, L. Moore, T. V. Porgo, A. Belcaid

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 3/2016

Abstract

Purpose

To assess whether the definition of an IHF used as an exclusion criterion influences the results of trauma center benchmarking.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study with data from an integrated Canadian trauma system. The study population included all patients admitted between 1999 and 2010 to any of the 57 adult trauma centers. Seven definitions of IHF based on diagnostic codes, age, mechanism of injury, and secondary injuries, identified in a systematic review, were used. Trauma centers were benchmarked using risk-adjusted mortality estimates generated using the Trauma Risk Adjustment Model. The agreement between benchmarking results generated under different IHF definitions was evaluated with correlation coefficients on adjusted mortality estimates. Correlation coefficients >0.95 were considered to convey acceptable agreement.

Results

The study population consisted of 172,872 patients before exclusion of IHF and between 128,094 and 139,588 patients after exclusion. Correlation coefficients between risk-adjusted mortality estimates generated in populations including and excluding IHF varied between 0.86 and 0.90. Correlation coefficients of estimates generated under different definitions of IHF varied between 0.97 and 0.99, even when analyses were restricted to patients aged ≥65 years.

Conclusions

Although the exclusion of patients with IHF has an influence on the results of trauma center benchmarking based on mortality, the definition of IHF in terms of diagnostic codes, age, mechanism of injury and secondary injury has no significant impact on benchmarking results. Results suggest that there is no need to obtain formal consensus on the definition of IHF for benchmarking activities.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cost of injury. 2007; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/Cost_of_Injury.htm. Accessed 26 April 2007.

Sunnybrook Research Institute. The enormous human and financial cost of trauma. 2007; Available from: http://sunnybrook.ca/foundation/media/?c=11&page=23129. Accessed 12 April 2011.

Iezzoni L. Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes. 3rd ed. Chicago: Health Administration Press; 2003.

American College of Surgeons, National Trauma Data Bank report. 2005; Available from: http://www.facs.org/trauma/ntdb.html Accessed 27 April 2011.

Tiao J, et al. Establishing consensus on the definition of an isolated hip fracture for trauma system performance evaluation: a systematic review. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2014;7(3):209–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cudnik MT, et al. Level I versus Level II trauma centers: an outcomes-based assessment. J Trauma. 2009;66(5):1321–6.CrossRefPubMed

Cudnik MT, et al. Are all trauma centers created equally? A statewide analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(7):701–8.CrossRefPubMed

American College of Surgeons, Trauma program. Resources for optimal care of the injured patient. 2006; Available from: http://www.facs.org/trauma/. Accessed 16 March 2011.

Association for Advancement of Automotive Medicine. The Abbreviated Injury Scale. 1990 Revision. Des Plaines, IL 60018, USA; 1990.

10.

Moore L, et al. A new method for evaluating trauma centre outcome performance: TRAM-adjusted mortality estimates. Ann Surg. 2010;251(5):952–8.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Moore L, et al. The trauma risk adjustment model: a new model for evaluating trauma care. Ann Surg. 2009;249(6):1040–6.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1996.

13.

Papadimitropoulos EA, et al. Current and projected rates of hip fracture in Canada. CMAJ. 1997;157(10):1357–63.PubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Nathens AB, et al. Relationship between trauma center volume and outcomes. JAMA. 2001;285(9):1164–71.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Parker MJ, Pryor GA. J Myles J. 11-year results in 2846 patients of the Peterborough Hip Fracture Project: reduced morbidity, mortality and hospital stay. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(1):34–8.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Gomez D, et al. Hips can lie: impact of excluding isolated hip fractures on external benchmarking of trauma center performance. J Trauma. 2010;69(5):1037–41.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Bergeron E, et al. Should patients with isolated hip fractures be included in trauma registries? J Trauma. 2005;58(4):793–7.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Kuimi BL, et al. Access to a Canadian provincial integrated trauma system: a population-based cohort study. Injury. 2015;46(4):595–601.

19.

Moore L, et al. Multiple imputation of the Glasgow Coma Score. J Trauma. 2005;59(3):698–704.PubMed

20.

Moore L, et al. Evaluating the validity of multiple imputation for missing physiological data in the national trauma data bank. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2009;2(2):73–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Evaluation of the influence of the definition of an isolated hip fracture as an exclusion criterion for trauma system benchmarking: a multicenter cohort study
Authors: J. Tiao
L. Moore
T. V. Porgo
A. Belcaid
Publication date: 01-06-2016
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-015-0542-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Evaluation of the influence of the definition of an isolated hip fracture as an exclusion criterion for trauma system benchmarking: a multicenter cohort study

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Vitamin D deficiency in adult fracture patients: prevalence and risk factors

Management of prehospital shoulder dislocation: feasibility and need of reduction

Advances made in resuscitation: current status

Response for letter to the editor “Rethinking bicycle helmets as a preventive tool: a 4 year review of bicycle injuries”

35th Meeting of the Pediatric Section of the German Society of Trauma Surgeons (DGU)

Impact of age on the clinical outcomes of major trauma