Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 5/2016

01-05-2016 | Original Article

Evaluation of renal function in patients with a main renal stone larger than 1 cm and perioperative renal functional change in minimally invasive renal stone surgery: a prospective, observational study

Authors: Songzhe Piao, Juhyun Park, Hwancheol Son, Hyeon Jeong, Sung Yong Cho

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 5/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the perioperative relative renal function and determine predictors of deterioration and recovery of separate renal function in patients with renal stones >10 mm and who underwent mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy or retrograde intra-renal surgery.

Patients and methods

A main stone >10 mm or stones growing, high-risk stone formers and extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy-resistant stones were prospectively included in 148 patients. Patients with bilateral renal stones and anatomical deformities were excluded. Renal function was evaluated by estimated glomerular filtration rate, 99m-technetium dimercaptosuccinic acid and 99m-technetium diethylenetriamine pentaacetate prior to intervention and at postoperative 3 months. Logistic regression analyses were performed to find predictors of functional deterioration and recovery.

Results

The overall stone-free rate was 85.1 %. A third of patients (53/148, 35.8 %) with renal stones >10 mm showed deterioration of separate renal function. Mean renal function of operative sites showed 58.2 % (36.8 %/63.2 %) of that of contralateral sites in these patients. Abnormal separate renal function showed postoperative recovery in 31 patients (58.5 %). Three cases (5.7 %) showed deterioration of separate renal function despite no presence of remnant stones. Improvement rates of the abnormal separate renal function did not differ according to the type of surgery. The presence of hydronephrosis and three or more stones were significant predictors for renal function deterioration. Female gender and three or more stones were significantly correlated with postoperative recovery.

Conclusions

Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy or retrograde intra-renal surgery was effective and safe for renal function preservation. Patients with multiple large stones should be considered for candidates of active surgical removal.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Indridason OS, Birgisson S, Edvardsson VO et al (2006) Epidemiology of kidney stones in Iceland: a population-based study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 40:215–220CrossRefPubMed Indridason OS, Birgisson S, Edvardsson VO et al (2006) Epidemiology of kidney stones in Iceland: a population-based study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 40:215–220CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Marchini GS, Vicentini FC, Mazzucchi E et al (2012) Silent ureteral stones: impact on kidney function–can treatment of silent ureteral stones preserve kidney function? Urology 79:304–308CrossRefPubMed Marchini GS, Vicentini FC, Mazzucchi E et al (2012) Silent ureteral stones: impact on kidney function–can treatment of silent ureteral stones preserve kidney function? Urology 79:304–308CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Alexander RT, Hemmelgarn BR, Wiebe N et al (2012) Kidney stones and kidney function loss: a cohort study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 345:e5287 Alexander RT, Hemmelgarn BR, Wiebe N et al (2012) Kidney stones and kidney function loss: a cohort study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 345:e5287
5.
go back to reference Inci K, Sahin A, Islamoglu E et al (2007) Prospective long-term followup of patients with asymptomatic lower pole caliceal stones. J Urol 177:2189–2192CrossRefPubMed Inci K, Sahin A, Islamoglu E et al (2007) Prospective long-term followup of patients with asymptomatic lower pole caliceal stones. J Urol 177:2189–2192CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Keeley FX Jr, Tilling K, Elves A et al (2001) Preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial of prophylactic shock wave lithotripsy for small asymptomatic renal calyceal stones. BJU Int 87:1–8CrossRefPubMed Keeley FX Jr, Tilling K, Elves A et al (2001) Preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial of prophylactic shock wave lithotripsy for small asymptomatic renal calyceal stones. BJU Int 87:1–8CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Fayad AS, Elsheikh MG, Mosharafa A et al (2014) Effect of multiple access tracts during percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal function: evaluation of risk factors for renal function deterioration. J Endourol 28:775–779CrossRefPubMed Fayad AS, Elsheikh MG, Mosharafa A et al (2014) Effect of multiple access tracts during percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal function: evaluation of risk factors for renal function deterioration. J Endourol 28:775–779CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Perez-Fentes D, Cortes J, Gude F et al (2014) Does percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its outcomes have an impact on renal function? Quantitative analysis using SPECT-CT DMSA. Urolithiasis 42:461–467CrossRefPubMed Perez-Fentes D, Cortes J, Gude F et al (2014) Does percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its outcomes have an impact on renal function? Quantitative analysis using SPECT-CT DMSA. Urolithiasis 42:461–467CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chou YH, Li CC, Hsu H et al (2011) Renal function in patients with urinary stones of varying compositions. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 27:264–267CrossRefPubMed Chou YH, Li CC, Hsu H et al (2011) Renal function in patients with urinary stones of varying compositions. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 27:264–267CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kirac M, Bozkurt OF, Tunc L et al (2013) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis 41:241–246CrossRefPubMed Kirac M, Bozkurt OF, Tunc L et al (2013) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm. Urolithiasis 41:241–246CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jeong CW, Jung JW, Cha WH et al (2013) Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity Score for predicting stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. PLoS ONE 8:e65888CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jeong CW, Jung JW, Cha WH et al (2013) Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity Score for predicting stone-free rate after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. PLoS ONE 8:e65888CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Cho SY, Choo MS, Jung JH et al (2014) Cumulative sum analysis for experiences of a single-session retrograde intrarenal stone surgery and analysis of predictors for stone-free status. PLoS ONE 9:e84878CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cho SY, Choo MS, Jung JH et al (2014) Cumulative sum analysis for experiences of a single-session retrograde intrarenal stone surgery and analysis of predictors for stone-free status. PLoS ONE 9:e84878CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Resorlu B, Oguz U, Resorlu EB et al (2012) The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomy on the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with lower pole renal stones. Urology 79:61–66CrossRefPubMed Resorlu B, Oguz U, Resorlu EB et al (2012) The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomy on the success of retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with lower pole renal stones. Urology 79:61–66CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cho SY, Kim IS, Lee SB et al (2013) Nature and fate of supranormal differential renal function: lessons from long-term follow-up after pyeloplasty. Urology 81:163–167CrossRefPubMed Cho SY, Kim IS, Lee SB et al (2013) Nature and fate of supranormal differential renal function: lessons from long-term follow-up after pyeloplasty. Urology 81:163–167CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Elkoushy MA, Hassan JA, Morehouse DD et al (2011) Factors determining stone-free rate in shock wave lithotripsy using standard focus of Storz Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter. Urology 78:759–763CrossRefPubMed Elkoushy MA, Hassan JA, Morehouse DD et al (2011) Factors determining stone-free rate in shock wave lithotripsy using standard focus of Storz Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter. Urology 78:759–763CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Keddis MT, Rule AD (2013) Recent evidence has shown a consistent relationship between nephrolithiasis history and an increased risk of CKD and ESRD: understanding the characteristics that predispose to CKD may better inform how to optimally manage patients with nephrolithiasis and prevent this complication. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 22:390–396CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Keddis MT, Rule AD (2013) Recent evidence has shown a consistent relationship between nephrolithiasis history and an increased risk of CKD and ESRD: understanding the characteristics that predispose to CKD may better inform how to optimally manage patients with nephrolithiasis and prevent this complication. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 22:390–396CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Ozden E, Mercimek MN, Bostanci Y et al (2012) Long-term outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with chronic kidney disease: a single-center experience. Urology 79:990–994CrossRefPubMed Ozden E, Mercimek MN, Bostanci Y et al (2012) Long-term outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with chronic kidney disease: a single-center experience. Urology 79:990–994CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kuzgunbay B, Gul U, Turunc T et al (2010) Long-term renal function and stone recurrence after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal insufficiency. J Endourol 24:305–308CrossRefPubMed Kuzgunbay B, Gul U, Turunc T et al (2010) Long-term renal function and stone recurrence after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal insufficiency. J Endourol 24:305–308CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Canes D, Hegarty NJ, Kamoi K et al (2009) Functional outcomes following percutaneous surgery in the solitary kidney. J Urol 181:154–160CrossRefPubMed Canes D, Hegarty NJ, Kamoi K et al (2009) Functional outcomes following percutaneous surgery in the solitary kidney. J Urol 181:154–160CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Metcalfe PD, Meldrum KK (2006) Sex differences and the role of sex steroids in renal injury. J Urol 176:15–21CrossRefPubMed Metcalfe PD, Meldrum KK (2006) Sex differences and the role of sex steroids in renal injury. J Urol 176:15–21CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sandberg K (2008) Mechanisms underlying sex differences in progressive renal disease. Gend Med 5:10–23CrossRefPubMed Sandberg K (2008) Mechanisms underlying sex differences in progressive renal disease. Gend Med 5:10–23CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wang M, Tsai BM, Kher A et al (2005) Role of endogenous testosterone in myocardial proinflammatory and proapoptotic signaling after acute ischemia-reperfusion. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288:H221–H226CrossRefPubMed Wang M, Tsai BM, Kher A et al (2005) Role of endogenous testosterone in myocardial proinflammatory and proapoptotic signaling after acute ischemia-reperfusion. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288:H221–H226CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Jung GH, Jung JH, Ahn TS et al (2015) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus a single-session percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole stones with a diameter of 15 to 30 mm: a propensity score-matching study. Korean J Urol 56:525–532CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jung GH, Jung JH, Ahn TS et al (2015) Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus a single-session percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole stones with a diameter of 15 to 30 mm: a propensity score-matching study. Korean J Urol 56:525–532CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of renal function in patients with a main renal stone larger than 1 cm and perioperative renal functional change in minimally invasive renal stone surgery: a prospective, observational study
Authors
Songzhe Piao
Juhyun Park
Hwancheol Son
Hyeon Jeong
Sung Yong Cho
Publication date
01-05-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 5/2016
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1653-x

Other articles of this Issue 5/2016

World Journal of Urology 5/2016 Go to the issue