Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Study protocol

Evaluation of primary care midwifery in the Netherlands: design and rationale of a dynamic cohort study (DELIVER)

Authors: Judith Manniën, Trudy Klomp, Therese Wiegers, Monique Pereboom, Johannes Brug, Ank de Jonge, Margreeth van der Meijde, Eileen Hutton, Francois Schellevis, Evelien Spelten

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In the Netherlands, midwives are autonomous medical practitioners and 78% of pregnant women start their maternity care with a primary care midwife. Scientific research to support evidence-based practice in primary care midwifery in the Netherlands has been sparse. This paper describes the research design and methodology of the multicenter multidisciplinary prospective DELIVER study which is the first large-scale study evaluating the quality and provision of primary midwifery care.

Methods/Design

Between September 2009 and April 2011, data were collected from clients and their partners, midwives and other healthcare professionals across the Netherlands. Clients from twenty midwifery practices received up to three questionnaires to assess the expectations and experiences of clients (e.g. quality of care, prenatal screening, emotions, health, and lifestyle). These client data were linked to data from the Netherlands Perinatal Register and electronic client records kept by midwives. Midwives and practice assistants from the twenty participating practices recorded work-related activities in a diary for one week, to assess workload. Besides, the midwives were asked to complete a questionnaire, to gain insight into collaboration of midwives with other care providers, their tasks and attitude towards their job, and the quality of the care they provide. Another questionnaire was sent to all Dutch midwifery practices which reveals information regarding the organisation of midwifery practices, provision of preconception care, collaboration with other care providers, and provision of care to ethnic minorities. Data at client, midwife and practice level can be linked. Additionally, partners of pregnant women and other care providers were asked about their expectations and experiences regarding the care delivered by midwives and in six practices client consults were videotaped to objectively assess daily practice.

Discussion

In total, 7685 clients completed at least one questionnaire, 136 midwives and assistants completed a diary with work-related activities (response 100%), 99 midwives completed a questionnaire (92%), and 319 practices across the country completed a questionnaire (61%), 30 partners of clients participated in focus groups, 21 other care providers were interviewed and 305 consults at six midwifery practices were videotaped.
The multicenter DELIVER study provides an extensive database with national representative data on the quality of primary care midwifery in the Netherlands. This study will support evidence-based practice in primary care midwifery in the Netherlands and contribute to a better understanding of the maternity care system.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Hingstman L, Kenens RJ: Cijfers uit de registratie van verloskundigen. Peiling 2009. 2009 Hingstman L, Kenens RJ: Cijfers uit de registratie van verloskundigen. Peiling 2009. 2009
4.
go back to reference Westert GP, Schellevis FG, de Bakker DH, Groenewegen PP, Bensing JM, van der Zee J: Monitoring health inequalities through general practice: the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice. Eur J Public Health. 2005, 15: 59-65.CrossRefPubMed Westert GP, Schellevis FG, de Bakker DH, Groenewegen PP, Bensing JM, van der Zee J: Monitoring health inequalities through general practice: the Second Dutch National Survey of General Practice. Eur J Public Health. 2005, 15: 59-65.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wiegers TA: Workload of primary-care midwives. Midwifery. 2007, 23: 425-432. 10.1016/j.midw.2006.06.007.CrossRefPubMed Wiegers TA: Workload of primary-care midwives. Midwifery. 2007, 23: 425-432. 10.1016/j.midw.2006.06.007.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wiegers T, Janssen BM: Monitor verloskundige zorgverlening. 2006 Wiegers T, Janssen BM: Monitor verloskundige zorgverlening. 2006
8.
go back to reference Sandin-Bojo AK, Kvist LJ: Care in labor: a Swedish survey using the Bologna Score. Birth. 2008, 35: 321-328. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00259.x.CrossRefPubMed Sandin-Bojo AK, Kvist LJ: Care in labor: a Swedish survey using the Bologna Score. Birth. 2008, 35: 321-328. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00259.x.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hodnett ED, Simmons-Tropea DA: The Labour Agentry Scale: psychometric properties of an instrument measuring control during childbirth. Res Nurs Health. 1987, 10: 301-310. 10.1002/nur.4770100503.CrossRefPubMed Hodnett ED, Simmons-Tropea DA: The Labour Agentry Scale: psychometric properties of an instrument measuring control during childbirth. Res Nurs Health. 1987, 10: 301-310. 10.1002/nur.4770100503.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference The EuroQol group: EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990, 16: 208. The EuroQol group: EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990, 16: 208.
12.
go back to reference Seymour RA, Simpson JM, Charlton JE, Phillips ME: An evaluation of length and end-phrase of visual analogue scales in dental pain. Pain. 1985, 21: 177-185. 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90287-8.CrossRefPubMed Seymour RA, Simpson JM, Charlton JE, Phillips ME: An evaluation of length and end-phrase of visual analogue scales in dental pain. Pain. 1985, 21: 177-185. 10.1016/0304-3959(85)90287-8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference van Wagtendonk I, van der Hoek L, Wiegers T: Ontwikkeling van een CQ-index voor de kraamzorg. 2010 van Wagtendonk I, van der Hoek L, Wiegers T: Ontwikkeling van een CQ-index voor de kraamzorg. 2010
14.
go back to reference Roter D: The ROTER method of interaction process analysis. 2006, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Roter D: The ROTER method of interaction process analysis. 2006, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University
15.
go back to reference Lucassen P, Olde Hartman T: Kwalitatief onderzoek. Praktische methoden voor de medische praktijk. 2007, Houten: Bohn, Stafleu en van LoghumCrossRef Lucassen P, Olde Hartman T: Kwalitatief onderzoek. Praktische methoden voor de medische praktijk. 2007, Houten: Bohn, Stafleu en van LoghumCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Krueger RA, Casey MA: Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research. 2000, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publisher, 3 Krueger RA, Casey MA: Focus groups. A practical guide for applied research. 2000, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publisher, 3
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of primary care midwifery in the Netherlands: design and rationale of a dynamic cohort study (DELIVER)
Authors
Judith Manniën
Trudy Klomp
Therese Wiegers
Monique Pereboom
Johannes Brug
Ank de Jonge
Margreeth van der Meijde
Eileen Hutton
Francois Schellevis
Evelien Spelten
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-69

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012 Go to the issue