Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Radiation Oncology 4/2015

01-12-2015 | Original Research

Evaluation of low-dose fractionated radiation therapy as a chemopotentiator of gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: results from an international multi-institutional phase II trial

Authors: Navesh K. Sharma, Naimish B. Pandya, Raimond K. Wong, Joseph M. Herman, Nader N. Hanna, Daniel A. Laheru, Pierre P. Major, H. Richard Alexander, Nancy L. Kennedy, William F. Regine

Published in: Journal of Radiation Oncology | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Potentiation of systemic dosing of gemcitabine using very low-dose fractionated radiotherapy may improve its effect in advanced pancreatic cancer without additional toxicity as suggested by the results of our multi-institutional phase II study. Future regimens combining low-dose fractionated radiotherapy (RT) with systemic chemotherapy should be assessed for improving the chemotherapeutic benefit.

Objective

Until recently, gemcitabine was considered the standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer despite low response rates. Efforts to improve response rates by combination therapies have had limited success and have involved using sub-systemic dosing of gemcitabine as a sensitizer for radiation. A novel paradigm, utilizing low-dose fractionated radiotherapy (LDFRT) as a potentiator of full-dose gemcitabine instead, was explored to assess safety and efficacy in treating advanced pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer were treated with 4 cycles of gemcitabine and LDFRT in a multi-institutional phase II study. Gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2 over 2 h) was administered on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. LDFRT fields included the upper abdomen from the diaphragm to the iliac crest and were administered at 60 cGy per fraction twice daily on days 1, 2, 8, and 9, with the morning fraction being delivered prior to gemcitabine infusion on days 1 and 8. Primary endpoint was objective response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST).

Results

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in the trial, of which 23 had metastatic disease at time of enrollment. Objective response rate (CR + PR) was 8 %, and 61 % had at least stable disease. Overall median survival was 13 months and 1-year survival was 37 %. Patients with non-metastatic disease had a 1-year survival of 60 %. The most significant toxicity was hematologic, and only 3 patients were withdrawn from protocol due to toxicity. There was no reported febrile neutropenia.

Conclusion

The use of LDFRT with systemic gemcitabine is safe, tolerable, and potentially effective. In advanced pancreatic cancer, where response rates with single-agent gemcitabine have been low, this chemopotentiation paradigm may improve survival among a poor prognostic patient cohort.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A, et al. (2014) Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64(1):9–29CrossRefPubMed Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A, et al. (2014) Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64(1):9–29CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. (2011) Randomized phase III trial comparing FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 364(19):1817–1825CrossRefPubMed Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, et al. (2011) Randomized phase III trial comparing FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 364(19):1817–1825CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fabian C, Giri S, Estes N, et al. (1995) Adjuvant continuous infusion 5-FU, whole-abdominal radiation, and tumor bed boost in the high-risk stage III colon carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group pilot study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32(2):457–464CrossRefPubMed Fabian C, Giri S, Estes N, et al. (1995) Adjuvant continuous infusion 5-FU, whole-abdominal radiation, and tumor bed boost in the high-risk stage III colon carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group pilot study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32(2):457–464CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Reddy S, Lee M, Yordan E, et al. (1993) Salvage whole abdomen radiation therapy: its role in ovarian cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27:879–884CrossRefPubMed Reddy S, Lee M, Yordan E, et al. (1993) Salvage whole abdomen radiation therapy: its role in ovarian cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27:879–884CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Eifel P, Gershenson D, Delclos L, et al. (1991) Twice-daily, split-course abdominopelvic radiation therapy after chemotherapy and positive second-look laparotomy for epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:1013–1018CrossRefPubMed Eifel P, Gershenson D, Delclos L, et al. (1991) Twice-daily, split-course abdominopelvic radiation therapy after chemotherapy and positive second-look laparotomy for epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:1013–1018CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Corn B, Lanciano R, Boente M, et al. (1994) Recurrent ovarian cancer. Effective radiotherapeutic palliation after chemotherapy failure. Cancer 74:2979–2983CrossRefPubMed Corn B, Lanciano R, Boente M, et al. (1994) Recurrent ovarian cancer. Effective radiotherapeutic palliation after chemotherapy failure. Cancer 74:2979–2983CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kunos CA, Sill MW, Buekers TE, et al. (2011) Low-dose abdominal radiation as a docetaxel chemosensitizer for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 120(2):224–228CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Kunos CA, Sill MW, Buekers TE, et al. (2011) Low-dose abdominal radiation as a docetaxel chemosensitizer for recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 120(2):224–228CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
8.
go back to reference Evans DB, Varadhachary GR, Crane CH, et al. (2008) Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol 26(21):3492–3502CrossRef Evans DB, Varadhachary GR, Crane CH, et al. (2008) Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol 26(21):3492–3502CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Magnino A, Gatti M, Massucco P, et al. (2005) Phase II trial of primary radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology 68:493–499CrossRefPubMed Magnino A, Gatti M, Massucco P, et al. (2005) Phase II trial of primary radiation therapy and concurrent chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology 68:493–499CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Blackstock AW, Tepper JE, Niedwiecki D, et al. (2003) Cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) 89805: phase II chemoradiation trial using gemcitabine in patients with locoregional adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 34:107–116CrossRefPubMed Blackstock AW, Tepper JE, Niedwiecki D, et al. (2003) Cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) 89805: phase II chemoradiation trial using gemcitabine in patients with locoregional adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 34:107–116CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Loehrer PJ Sr, Powell ME, Cardenes HR, et al., A randomized phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with radiation therapy versus gemcitabine alone in patients with localized, unresectable pancreatic cancer: E4201. J Clin Oncol 26: 2008 (abstract 4506). Loehrer PJ Sr, Powell ME, Cardenes HR, et al., A randomized phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with radiation therapy versus gemcitabine alone in patients with localized, unresectable pancreatic cancer: E4201. J Clin Oncol 26: 2008 (abstract 4506).
12.
go back to reference Chauffert B, Mornex F, Bonnetain F, et al. (2008) Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 cGy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000–01 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol 19(9):1592–1599CrossRefPubMed Chauffert B, Mornex F, Bonnetain F, et al. (2008) Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 cGy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. Definitive results of the 2000–01 FFCD/SFRO study. Ann Oncol 19(9):1592–1599CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ben-Josef E, Griffith K, Francis IR, et al. (2009) (Abstract 4602) Phase I radiation dose-escalation trial of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent fixed dose-rate gemcitabine (FDR-G) for unresectable pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:15sCrossRef Ben-Josef E, Griffith K, Francis IR, et al. (2009) (Abstract 4602) Phase I radiation dose-escalation trial of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent fixed dose-rate gemcitabine (FDR-G) for unresectable pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:15sCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Grunewald R, Kantarjian H, Keating MJ, et al. (1990) Pharmacologically directed design of the dose rate and schedule of 2′, 2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) administration in leukemia. Cancer Res 50(21):6823–6826PubMed Grunewald R, Kantarjian H, Keating MJ, et al. (1990) Pharmacologically directed design of the dose rate and schedule of 2′, 2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) administration in leukemia. Cancer Res 50(21):6823–6826PubMed
15.
go back to reference Casper ES, Green MR, Kelsen DP, et al. (1994) Phase II trial of gemcitabine (2′, 2′-difluorodeoxycytidine) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Investig New Drugs 12(1):29–34CrossRef Casper ES, Green MR, Kelsen DP, et al. (1994) Phase II trial of gemcitabine (2′, 2′-difluorodeoxycytidine) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Investig New Drugs 12(1):29–34CrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Burris III HA, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. (1997) Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15(6):2403–2413PubMed Burris III HA, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. (1997) Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15(6):2403–2413PubMed
18.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken DD, et al. (2009) Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 27(33):5513–5518CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Chau I, Stocken DD, et al. (2009) Phase III randomized comparison of gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus capecitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 27(33):5513–5518CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Colucci G, Labianca R, DiCostanzo F, et al. (2010) Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared to single-agent gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: the GIP-1 study. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1645–1651CrossRefPubMed Colucci G, Labianca R, DiCostanzo F, et al. (2010) Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared to single-agent gemcitabine as first-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: the GIP-1 study. J Clin Oncol 28(10):1645–1651CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Gemcitabine versus cisplatin, epirubicin, fluorouracil, and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 6(6): 369–376, 2005. Gemcitabine versus cisplatin, epirubicin, fluorouracil, and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 6(6): 369–376, 2005.
21.
go back to reference Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P, et al. (2005) Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 23(15):3509–3516CrossRefPubMed Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P, et al. (2005) Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 23(15):3509–3516CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, et al. (2007) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 25(15):1960–1966CrossRefPubMed Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J, et al. (2007) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 25(15):1960–1966CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Arnold SM, Regine WF, Ahmed MM, et al. (2004) Low-dose fractionated radiation as a chemopotentiator of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of a new treatment paradigm. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58(5):1411–1417CrossRefPubMed Arnold SM, Regine WF, Ahmed MM, et al. (2004) Low-dose fractionated radiation as a chemopotentiator of neoadjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of a new treatment paradigm. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58(5):1411–1417CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Chendil D, Oakes R, Alcock R, et al. (2000) Low dose fractionated radiation enhances the radiosensitization effect of paclitaxel in colorectal tumor cells with mutant p53. Cancer 89:1893–1900CrossRefPubMed Chendil D, Oakes R, Alcock R, et al. (2000) Low dose fractionated radiation enhances the radiosensitization effect of paclitaxel in colorectal tumor cells with mutant p53. Cancer 89:1893–1900CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Jahraus CD, Friedman AH (2010) Chemopotentiation by ultrafractionated radiotherapy in glioblastoma resistant to conventional therapy. Tumori 96:771–775PubMed Jahraus CD, Friedman AH (2010) Chemopotentiation by ultrafractionated radiotherapy in glioblastoma resistant to conventional therapy. Tumori 96:771–775PubMed
26.
go back to reference Joiner MC, Marples B, Labmin P, et al. (2001) Low-dose hypersensitivity: current status and possible mechanisms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49(2):379–388CrossRefPubMed Joiner MC, Marples B, Labmin P, et al. (2001) Low-dose hypersensitivity: current status and possible mechanisms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49(2):379–388CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Short SC, Joiner MC (1998) Cellular response to low-dose radiation. Clin Oncol 10(2):73–77CrossRef Short SC, Joiner MC (1998) Cellular response to low-dose radiation. Clin Oncol 10(2):73–77CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Smith LG, Miller RC, Richards M, et al. (1999) Investigation of hypersensitivity to fractionated low-dose radiation exposure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45(1):187–191CrossRefPubMed Smith LG, Miller RC, Richards M, et al. (1999) Investigation of hypersensitivity to fractionated low-dose radiation exposure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 45(1):187–191CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Regine WF, Hanna N, Garofalo MC, et al. (2007) Low-dose radiotherapy as a chemopotentiator of gemcitabine in tumors of the pancreas or small bowel: a phase I study exploring a new treatment paradigm. Int J Radiat Biol Phys 68(1):172–177CrossRef Regine WF, Hanna N, Garofalo MC, et al. (2007) Low-dose radiotherapy as a chemopotentiator of gemcitabine in tumors of the pancreas or small bowel: a phase I study exploring a new treatment paradigm. Int J Radiat Biol Phys 68(1):172–177CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Braakhuis BJ, van Dongen GA, Vermorken JB, et al. (1991) Preclinical in vivo activity of 2′, 2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) against human head and neck cancer. Cancer Res 51(1):211–214PubMed Braakhuis BJ, van Dongen GA, Vermorken JB, et al. (1991) Preclinical in vivo activity of 2′, 2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) against human head and neck cancer. Cancer Res 51(1):211–214PubMed
31.
go back to reference Boven E, Schipper H, Erkelens CA, et al. (1993) The influence of the schedule and the dose of gemcitabine on the anti-tumor efficacy in experimental human cancer. Br J Cancer 68(3):52–56CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Boven E, Schipper H, Erkelens CA, et al. (1993) The influence of the schedule and the dose of gemcitabine on the anti-tumor efficacy in experimental human cancer. Br J Cancer 68(3):52–56CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
32.
go back to reference Grunewald R, Abbruzzese JL, Tarassoff P, et al. (1991) Saturation of 2′, 2′-difluorodeoxycytidine 5′-triphosphate accumulation by mononuclear cells during a phase I trial of gemcitabine. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 27(4):258–262CrossRefPubMed Grunewald R, Abbruzzese JL, Tarassoff P, et al. (1991) Saturation of 2′, 2′-difluorodeoxycytidine 5′-triphosphate accumulation by mononuclear cells during a phase I trial of gemcitabine. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 27(4):258–262CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Touroutoglou N, Gravel D, Raber MN, et al. (1998) Clinical results of a pharmacodynamically-based strategy for higher dosing of gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors. Ann Oncol 9(9):1003–1008CrossRefPubMed Touroutoglou N, Gravel D, Raber MN, et al. (1998) Clinical results of a pharmacodynamically-based strategy for higher dosing of gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors. Ann Oncol 9(9):1003–1008CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Tempero M, Plunkett W, Ruiz van Haperen V, et al. (2003) Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3401–3408CrossRef Tempero M, Plunkett W, Ruiz van Haperen V, et al. (2003) Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3401–3408CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Poplin E, Feng Y, Berlin J, et al. (2009) Phase III, randomized study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose rate infusion) compared with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) in patients with pancreatic carcinoma E6201: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 27(23):3778–3785CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Poplin E, Feng Y, Berlin J, et al. (2009) Phase III, randomized study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose rate infusion) compared with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) in patients with pancreatic carcinoma E6201: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 27(23):3778–3785CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
36.
go back to reference Harney J, Short SC, Shah N, Joiner M, Saunders MI (2004) Low dose hyperradiosensitivity in metastatic tumors. Int J Radiat Biol Phys 59(4):1190–1195CrossRef Harney J, Short SC, Shah N, Joiner M, Saunders MI (2004) Low dose hyperradiosensitivity in metastatic tumors. Int J Radiat Biol Phys 59(4):1190–1195CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Marples B, Wouters BG, Collis SJ, Chalmers AJ, Joiner MC (2004) Low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity: a consequence of ineffective cell cycle arrest of radiation-damaged G2-phase cells. Radiat Res 161:247–255CrossRefPubMed Marples B, Wouters BG, Collis SJ, Chalmers AJ, Joiner MC (2004) Low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity: a consequence of ineffective cell cycle arrest of radiation-damaged G2-phase cells. Radiat Res 161:247–255CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Hall E, Garcia A (2006) Time, dose, and fractionation in radiotherapy. Radiobiology for the radiologist, 6th edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp. 378–397. Hall E, Garcia A (2006) Time, dose, and fractionation in radiotherapy. Radiobiology for the radiologist, 6th edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp. 378–397.
39.
go back to reference Maemura K, Shinchi H, Noma H, et al. (2008) Comparison of hyper-fractionated accelerated and standard fractionated radiotherapy with concomitant low-dose gemcitabine for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res. 28(4C):2369–2372PubMed Maemura K, Shinchi H, Noma H, et al. (2008) Comparison of hyper-fractionated accelerated and standard fractionated radiotherapy with concomitant low-dose gemcitabine for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res. 28(4C):2369–2372PubMed
40.
go back to reference Reiss KA, Herman JM, Zahurak M, Brade A, Dawson LA, Scardina A, et al. (2015) A phase I study of veliparib (ABT-888) in combination with low-dose fractionated whole abdominal radiation therapy in patients with advanced solid malignancies and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Clin Cancer Res. 21:68–76CrossRefPubMed Reiss KA, Herman JM, Zahurak M, Brade A, Dawson LA, Scardina A, et al. (2015) A phase I study of veliparib (ABT-888) in combination with low-dose fractionated whole abdominal radiation therapy in patients with advanced solid malignancies and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Clin Cancer Res. 21:68–76CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of low-dose fractionated radiation therapy as a chemopotentiator of gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: results from an international multi-institutional phase II trial
Authors
Navesh K. Sharma
Naimish B. Pandya
Raimond K. Wong
Joseph M. Herman
Nader N. Hanna
Daniel A. Laheru
Pierre P. Major
H. Richard Alexander
Nancy L. Kennedy
William F. Regine
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Journal of Radiation Oncology / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1948-7894
Electronic ISSN: 1948-7908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13566-015-0213-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Journal of Radiation Oncology 4/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine