Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 6/2011

01-12-2011 | Cardiac Computed Tomography (Stephan Achenbach, Section Editor)

Evaluation of In-Stent Restenosis by High Spatial Resolution CT

Authors: Masahiro Jinzaki, Minoru Yamada, Yutaka Tanami, Sachio Kuribayashi

Published in: Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Multidetector row CT has been established as a noninvasive method for the detection of coronary artery disease. In previous studies, the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT for the detection of in-stent restenosis usually displayed high sensitivity and negative predictive value, while specificity and positive predictive values were too low to allow its utilization in clinical practice. Especially in small stents—with a diameter below 3.0 mm—the accuracy of CT angiography to detect in stent stenosis has been low. Recently, CT systems with improved in-plane spatial resolution (high-definition CT, HDCT) have become commercially available. Furthermore, an experimental CT (fine-cell detector CT, FDCT) has been developed using half pitch dimension detector cells in both X and Z directions compared with 64-slice CT. Compared with that in conventional 64-slice CT, the spatial resolution was 30% improved in HDCT and 60% improved in FDCT, and the lumen visibility was 1.3 times improved in HDCT and 1.5 times improved in FDCT. The diagnostic accuracy of in-stent restenosis with HDCT was higher than 90% in both sensitivity and specificity, moderate (77%) in positive predictive value, and very high (98%) in negative predictive value. FDCT is not yet applicable to patients, however, further improvement of diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of in-stent restenosis is expected in FDCT. In the near future, cardiac CT could reach the diagnostic performance to replace invasive catheter angiography, and would be the appropriate noninvasive technique for diagnosis of in-stent restenosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, for the Stent Restenosis Study Investigators, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:496–501.PubMedCrossRef Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, for the Stent Restenosis Study Investigators, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:496–501.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kiemeneij F, Serruys PW, Macaya C, et al. Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: five-year clinical follow-up of Benestent-I trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1598–603.PubMedCrossRef Kiemeneij F, Serruys PW, Macaya C, et al. Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: five-year clinical follow-up of Benestent-I trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1598–603.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, for the BENESTENT group, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489–95.PubMedCrossRef Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, for the BENESTENT group, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:489–95.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Holmes Jr DR, Leon MB, Moses JW, et al. Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis. Circulation. 2004;109:634–40.PubMedCrossRef Holmes Jr DR, Leon MB, Moses JW, et al. Analysis of 1-year clinical outcomes in the SIRIUS trial: a randomized trial of a sirolimus-eluting stent versus a standard stent in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis. Circulation. 2004;109:634–40.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Morice MC, Colombo A, Meire B, et al. Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295:895–904.PubMedCrossRef Morice MC, Colombo A, Meire B, et al. Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295:895–904.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Grech ED. ABC of interventional cardiology: percutaneous coronary intervention. II: the procedure. BMJ. 2003;326:1137–40.PubMedCrossRef Grech ED. ABC of interventional cardiology: percutaneous coronary intervention. II: the procedure. BMJ. 2003;326:1137–40.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kruger S, Mahnken AH, Sinha AM, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol. 2003;89:167–72.PubMed Kruger S, Mahnken AH, Sinha AM, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol. 2003;89:167–72.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Maintz D, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, Heindel W, Fischbach R. Assessment of coronary arterial stents by multislice-CT angiography. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:597–603.PubMed Maintz D, Grude M, Fallenberg EM, Heindel W, Fischbach R. Assessment of coronary arterial stents by multislice-CT angiography. Acta Radiol. 2003;44:597–603.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:427–30.PubMedCrossRef Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:427–30.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cardemartiri F, Marano R, Runza G, et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery stent patency with multislice CT: preliminary experience. Radio Med. 2005;109:500–7. Cardemartiri F, Marano R, Runza G, et al. Non-invasive assessment of coronary artery stent patency with multislice CT: preliminary experience. Radio Med. 2005;109:500–7.
11.
go back to reference Mahnken AH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T, et al. Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:8–13.PubMed Mahnken AH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T, et al. Flat-panel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:8–13.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Sun Z, Lin CH, Davidson R. Multi-detector rowCT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review. Eur J R. 2009;69:489–95.CrossRef Sun Z, Lin CH, Davidson R. Multi-detector rowCT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic review. Eur J R. 2009;69:489–95.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference • Sun Z, Almutairi AM. Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multislice CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2010;73:266–73. This study showed the current status of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT for the evaluation of in-stent restenosis. PubMedCrossRef • Sun Z, Almutairi AM. Diagnostic accuracy of 64 multislice CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2010;73:266–73. This study showed the current status of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT for the evaluation of in-stent restenosis. PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference •• Kumbhani DJ, Ingelmo CP, Schoenhagen P et al. Meta-analysis of diagnostic efficacy of 64-slice computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:1675–81. This study also showed the current status of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT for the evaluation of in-stent restenosis. PubMedCrossRef •• Kumbhani DJ, Ingelmo CP, Schoenhagen P et al. Meta-analysis of diagnostic efficacy of 64-slice computed tomography in the evaluation of coronary in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:1675–81. This study also showed the current status of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT for the evaluation of in-stent restenosis. PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gaspar T, Halon DA, Lewis BS, et al. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1573–9.PubMedCrossRef Gaspar T, Halon DA, Lewis BS, et al. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1573–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography. Heart. 2006;92:58–61.PubMedCrossRef Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY, et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography. Heart. 2006;92:58–61.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pugliese F, Weustink A, Van Mieghem C, et al. Dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis. Heart. 2008;94:848–54.PubMedCrossRef Pugliese F, Weustink A, Van Mieghem C, et al. Dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis. Heart. 2008;94:848–54.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A, Tamci B. Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:56–63.CrossRef Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A, Tamci B. Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:56–63.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sheth T, Dodd JD, Hoffman U, et al. Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69:933–8.PubMedCrossRef Sheth T, Dodd JD, Hoffman U, et al. Coronary stent assessability by 64 slice multi-detector computed tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69:933–8.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. CARDIAC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY WRITING GROUP, Journal of the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1864–94.PubMedCrossRef Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. CARDIAC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY WRITING GROUP, Journal of the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1864–94.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ong AT, van Domburg RT, Aoki J, Sonnenschein K, Lemos PA, Serruys PW. Sirolimus-eluting stents remain superior to bare-metal stents at two years: medium-term results from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1356–60.PubMedCrossRef Ong AT, van Domburg RT, Aoki J, Sonnenschein K, Lemos PA, Serruys PW. Sirolimus-eluting stents remain superior to bare-metal stents at two years: medium-term results from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1356–60.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fan J, Dong F, Sainath P, et al. Image quality evaluation of a LightSpeed CT750 HD ComputedTomography system. Proc. SPIE. 2009;7258:72584S-72584S-8 Fan J, Dong F, Sainath P, et al. Image quality evaluation of a LightSpeed CT750 HD ComputedTomography system. Proc. SPIE. 2009;7258:72584S-72584S-8
23.
go back to reference Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R, et al. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:818–26.PubMedCrossRef Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R, et al. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:818–26.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tanami Y, Jinzaki M, Yamada M, Imai Y, Segawa K, Kuribayashi S. Improvement of in-stent lumen measurement accuracy with new High-Definition CT in a phantom model: comparison with conventional 64-detector row CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (in press). Tanami Y, Jinzaki M, Yamada M, Imai Y, Segawa K, Kuribayashi S. Improvement of in-stent lumen measurement accuracy with new High-Definition CT in a phantom model: comparison with conventional 64-detector row CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging (in press).
25.
go back to reference Min JK, Swaminathan RV, Vass M, et al. High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:246–51.PubMedCrossRef Min JK, Swaminathan RV, Vass M, et al. High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2009;3:246–51.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Pugliese F, Weustink AC, Van Mieghem C, Alberghina F, Otsuka M, Meijboom WB, et al. Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis. Heart. 2008;94:848–54.PubMedCrossRef Pugliese F, Weustink AC, Van Mieghem C, Alberghina F, Otsuka M, Meijboom WB, et al. Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis. Heart. 2008;94:848–54.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Imai Y, Nukui M, Ishihara Y, et al. Development and performance evaluation of an experimental fine pitch detector multislice CT scanner. Med Phys. 2009;36:1120–7.PubMedCrossRef Imai Y, Nukui M, Ishihara Y, et al. Development and performance evaluation of an experimental fine pitch detector multislice CT scanner. Med Phys. 2009;36:1120–7.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Yamada M, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y. Detection of a coronary artery vessel wall: performance of 0.3 mm fine-cell detector computed tomography-a phantom study. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:5235–47.PubMedCrossRef Yamada M, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y. Detection of a coronary artery vessel wall: performance of 0.3 mm fine-cell detector computed tomography-a phantom study. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:5235–47.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gosling O, Loader R, Venables P, et al. A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography. Heart. 2010;96:922–6.PubMedCrossRef Gosling O, Loader R, Venables P, et al. A comparison of radiation doses between state-of-the-art multislice CT coronary angiography with iterative reconstruction, multislice CT coronary angiography with standard filtered back-projection and invasive diagnostic coronary angiography. Heart. 2010;96:922–6.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study.
31.
go back to reference Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, Min JK, Mancini GB, Lin FY, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(3):655–60.PubMedCrossRef Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, Min JK, Mancini GB, Lin FY, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(3):655–60.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Yu Z, Thibault JB, Bouman CA, Sauer KD, Hsieh J. Fast model-based X-ray CT reconstruction using spatially nonhomogeneous ICD optimization. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2011;20:161–75.PubMedCrossRef Yu Z, Thibault JB, Bouman CA, Sauer KD, Hsieh J. Fast model-based X-ray CT reconstruction using spatially nonhomogeneous ICD optimization. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2011;20:161–75.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of In-Stent Restenosis by High Spatial Resolution CT
Authors
Masahiro Jinzaki
Minoru Yamada
Yutaka Tanami
Sachio Kuribayashi
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Current Science Inc.
Published in
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 1941-9066
Electronic ISSN: 1941-9074
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-011-9113-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 6/2011 Go to the issue

Cardiac Computed Tomography (Stephan Achenbach, Section Editor)

The Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography

Cardiac Computed Tomography (Stephan Achenbach, Section Editor)

Imaging of Cardiac Function by Computed Tomography

Cardiac Computed Tomography (Stephan Achenbach, Section Editor)

CT Imaging of Pulmonary Embolism: Current Status

Cardiac Computed Tomography (Stephan Achenbach, Section Editor)

Multidetector Computed Tomography to Facilitate Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation