Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 8/2006

01-08-2006 | Letter to the Editor

Evaluation of imaging-guided fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses

Authors: Tony Geoghegan, Orla Buckley, W. C. Torreggiani

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 8/2006

Login to get access

Excerpt

Sir: We read with great interest the excellent and informative article by Jaff et al. [1] on imaging-guided fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses. While we found their contribution to be well written, interesting and of practical use to many radiologists, we would like to take issue with their title definition. The title refers to ‘fine-needle percutaneous biopsy’; however, their paper describes the use of an 18-gauge automatic core biopsy system. It is our belief that ‘fine needle’ refers to a gauge smaller than 20 in size, and typically is a needle of 22 gauge. We therefore believe that the title may be misleading if read in isolation. A more accurate title would be ‘Evaluation of imaging-guided percutaneous core biopsy of renal masses’. Apart from this small issue, we congratulate the authors on an excellent paper which we thoroughly enjoyed reading. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jaff A et al (2005) Evaluation of imaging-guided fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses. Eur Radiol 15:1721-1726CrossRefPubMed Jaff A et al (2005) Evaluation of imaging-guided fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses. Eur Radiol 15:1721-1726CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of imaging-guided fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses
Authors
Tony Geoghegan
Orla Buckley
W. C. Torreggiani
Publication date
01-08-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 8/2006
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-0122-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2006

European Radiology 8/2006 Go to the issue

Book Reviews

Recent literature