Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2011

01-04-2011

Evaluation of Current Devices in Single-Incision Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Preliminary Experience in 32 Consecutive Cases

Authors: Min-Hoe Chew, Mark Te-Ching Wong, Bernard Yon-Kuei Lim, Kheng-Hong Ng, Kong-Weng Eu

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery (SILS) suggests a promising alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery. In this report we describe our initial experience with SILS for both right hemicolectomies and anterior resections.

Methods

Between June 2009 and May 2010, SILS was performed for 32 consecutive cases with benign and malignant pathology. Demographic data, intraoperative parameters, postoperative data, and pathologic data were assessed.

Results

Twenty-one SILS right hemicolectomies, ten ARs, and one abdominal perineal resection (APR) were performed. For SILS right hemicolectomies, one case required full “conversion” to a laparoscopic procedure. The median operating time was 85 min (range 45–150 min) and the median wound length was 5.0 cm (range 3.0–10.0 cm). Median number of lymph nodes extracted in malignant cases was 17(range 10–30) and the overall median length of stay was 6 days (range 5–11). For left-sided lesions, ten cases of ARs (7 high ARs, 2 low ARs, 1 ultralow AR) and one APR were performed. Three cases were completed successfully via the SILS procedure, four cases required one additional port, and four cases required full “conversion” to a laparoscopic procedure. The median operating time was 120 min (range 65–235 min) and the median wound length was 5.0 cm (range 3.0–7.0 cm). Overall median length of stay was also 6 days (range 5–21). There was one case of anastomotic leak and one case of postoperative bleeding.

Conclusion

In our experience, SILS for right hemicolectomies is safe and effective with reproducible oncologic results. SILS AR, however, requires greater modifications in current devices and techniques. SILS AR can be performed for both malignant and benign diseases but additional ports may be necessary for the safe completion of the procedure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068PubMedCrossRef Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10(1):44–52PubMedCrossRef Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10(1):44–52PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124PubMedCrossRef Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111–1124PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kuhry E, Schwenk WF, Gaupset R et al (2008) Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(2):CD003432 Kuhry E, Schwenk WF, Gaupset R et al (2008) Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(2):CD003432
7.
go back to reference Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single-port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1013–1016PubMedCrossRef Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single-port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1013–1016PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Remzi FH, Kirat HT, JH Kaouk et al (2008) Single port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10:823–826PubMedCrossRef Remzi FH, Kirat HT, JH Kaouk et al (2008) Single port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10:823–826PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Leroy J, Cahill RA, M Asakuma et al (2009) Single-access laparoscopic sigmoidectomy as definitive surgical management of prior diverticulitis in a human patient. Arch Surg 144:173–179PubMedCrossRef Leroy J, Cahill RA, M Asakuma et al (2009) Single-access laparoscopic sigmoidectomy as definitive surgical management of prior diverticulitis in a human patient. Arch Surg 144:173–179PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ramos-Valadez DI, Patel CB, Ragupathi M et al (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: safety and feasibility in a series of consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 24(10):2613–2616PubMedCrossRef Ramos-Valadez DI, Patel CB, Ragupathi M et al (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: safety and feasibility in a series of consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 24(10):2613–2616PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Boni L, Dionigi G, E Cassinotti et al (2010) Single incision laparoscopic right colectomy. Surg Endosc 24(12):3233–3236PubMedCrossRef Boni L, Dionigi G, E Cassinotti et al (2010) Single incision laparoscopic right colectomy. Surg Endosc 24(12):3233–3236PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Vestweber B, Alfes A, Paul C et al (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a promising approach to sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. Surg Endosc 24(12):3225–3228PubMedCrossRef Vestweber B, Alfes A, Paul C et al (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a promising approach to sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. Surg Endosc 24(12):3225–3228PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chambers W, Bicsak M, Lamparelli M et al (2011) Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in complex colorectal surgery: a technique offering potential and not just cosmesis. Colorectal Dis (Epub) Chambers W, Bicsak M, Lamparelli M et al (2011) Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) in complex colorectal surgery: a technique offering potential and not just cosmesis. Colorectal Dis (Epub)
14.
go back to reference Law WL, Fan JK, Poon JT (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: early experience. Dis Colon Rectum 53(3):284–288PubMed Law WL, Fan JK, Poon JT (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: early experience. Dis Colon Rectum 53(3):284–288PubMed
15.
go back to reference Merchant AM, Cook MW, BC White et al (2009) Transumbilical Gelport access technique for performing single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). J Gastrointest Surg 13(1):159–162PubMedCrossRef Merchant AM, Cook MW, BC White et al (2009) Transumbilical Gelport access technique for performing single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). J Gastrointest Surg 13(1):159–162PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rieger NA, Lam FF (2010) Single-incision laparoscopically assisted colectomy using standard laparoscopic instrumentation. Surg Endosc 24(4):888–890PubMedCrossRef Rieger NA, Lam FF (2010) Single-incision laparoscopically assisted colectomy using standard laparoscopic instrumentation. Surg Endosc 24(4):888–890PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S et al (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695PubMedCrossRef Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S et al (1997) One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84:695PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Eposito C (1998) One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Surg Endosc 12:177–178CrossRef Eposito C (1998) One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Surg Endosc 12:177–178CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Romanelli JR, Earle DB (2009) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 23(7):1419–1427PubMedCrossRef Romanelli JR, Earle DB (2009) Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 23(7):1419–1427PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tan WS, Chew MH, Ooi BS et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(11):1333–1339PubMedCrossRef Tan WS, Chew MH, Ooi BS et al (2009) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(11):1333–1339PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wong MT, Ng KH, Ho KS et al (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right hemicolectomy: our initial experience with 10 cases. Tech Coloproctol 14(3):225–228PubMedCrossRef Wong MT, Ng KH, Ho KS et al (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right hemicolectomy: our initial experience with 10 cases. Tech Coloproctol 14(3):225–228PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chew MH, Ng KH, Fook-Chong MC et al (2011) Redefining conversion in laparoscopic colectomy and its influence on outcomes: analysis of 418 cases from a single institution. World J Surg 35(1):178–185PubMedCrossRef Chew MH, Ng KH, Fook-Chong MC et al (2011) Redefining conversion in laparoscopic colectomy and its influence on outcomes: analysis of 418 cases from a single institution. World J Surg 35(1):178–185PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of Current Devices in Single-Incision Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Preliminary Experience in 32 Consecutive Cases
Authors
Min-Hoe Chew
Mark Te-Ching Wong
Bernard Yon-Kuei Lim
Kheng-Hong Ng
Kong-Weng Eu
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-0989-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

World Journal of Surgery 4/2011 Go to the issue