Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Spine Journal 1/2010

01-01-2010 | Original Article

Evaluation of anatomic landmarks and safe zones for screw placement in the atlas via the posterior arch

Authors: Matthias Gebauer, Florian Barvencik, Daniel Briem, Jan P. Kolb, Sebastian Seitz, Johannes M. Rueger, Klaus Püschel, Michael Amling

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Several studies have evaluated quantitative anatomic data for direct lateral mass screw fixation. To analyze anatomic landmarks and safe zones for optimal screw placement through the posterior arc of the human atlas, morphometric parameters of 41 adult native human atlas specimens were quantitatively measured. Internal dimensions of the atlas (lateral mass, maximum and minimum intraosseous screw length), minimum height and width of the posterior arc and optimal screw insertion angles were defined on pQCT scans. By this, an optimal posterior screw insertion point (OIP) and a preferable screw direction (PSD) through the posterior arch into the lateral mass of C1 were defined. External dimensions (transverse and sagittal diameter) as well as the width of the mid-portion of C1 lateral mass were significantly higher in male specimens. The mean height of the posterior arch at the vertebral artery groove was 4.1 ± 0.8 mm in female and 4.6 ± 0.9 mm in male specimens. The optimal screw insertion point was located 21.6 ± 1.7 mm in female and 23.6 ± 2.3 mm in male lateral from the posterior tubercle of C1 (P < 0.01). The preferable screw direction was a mean medial inclination of 7.9 ± 1.9° in female and 7.3 ± 2.7° in male specimens and a mean rostral direction of 2.4 ± 1.8° in female and 3.1 ± 1.7° in male specimens. In conclusion, the presented study provides information for the use and design of upper cervical spine instrumentation techniques, such as screw placement to C1 via the posterior arch. The characterization of working areas and safe zones (OIP, PSD) might contribute to a minimization of screw malposition in this highly demanding instrumentation technique.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Christensen DM, Eastlack RK, Lynch JJ, Yaszemski MJ, Currier BL (2007) C1 anatomy and dimensions relative to lateral mass screw placement. Spine 32:844–848CrossRefPubMed Christensen DM, Eastlack RK, Lynch JJ, Yaszemski MJ, Currier BL (2007) C1 anatomy and dimensions relative to lateral mass screw placement. Spine 32:844–848CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Currier BL, Maus TP, Eck JC, Larson DR, Yaszemski MJ (2008) Relationship of the internal carotid artery to the anterior aspect of the C1 vertebra: implications for C1–C2 transarticular and C1 lateral mass fixation. Spine 33:635–639CrossRefPubMed Currier BL, Maus TP, Eck JC, Larson DR, Yaszemski MJ (2008) Relationship of the internal carotid artery to the anterior aspect of the C1 vertebra: implications for C1–C2 transarticular and C1 lateral mass fixation. Spine 33:635–639CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Dong Y, Xia Hong M, Jianyi L, Yuan Lin M (2003) Quantitative anatomy of the lateral mass of the atlas. Spine 28:860–863CrossRefPubMed Dong Y, Xia Hong M, Jianyi L, Yuan Lin M (2003) Quantitative anatomy of the lateral mass of the atlas. Spine 28:860–863CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M, Heck B (1998) The quantitative anatomy of the vertebral artery groove of the atlas and its relation to the posterior atlantoaxial approach. Spine 23:320–323CrossRefPubMed Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Ahmad M, Heck B (1998) The quantitative anatomy of the vertebral artery groove of the atlas and its relation to the posterior atlantoaxial approach. Spine 23:320–323CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Eck JC, Walker MP, Currier BL, Chen Q, Yaszemski MJ, An KN (2007) Biomechanical comparison of unicortical versus bicortical C1 lateral mass screw fixation. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:505–508CrossRefPubMed Eck JC, Walker MP, Currier BL, Chen Q, Yaszemski MJ, An KN (2007) Biomechanical comparison of unicortical versus bicortical C1 lateral mass screw fixation. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:505–508CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Goel A, Desai KI, Muzumdar DP (2002) Atlantoaxial fixation using plate and screw method: a report of 160 treated patients. Neurosurgery 51:1351–1357CrossRefPubMed Goel A, Desai KI, Muzumdar DP (2002) Atlantoaxial fixation using plate and screw method: a report of 160 treated patients. Neurosurgery 51:1351–1357CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Harms J, Melcher RP (2001) Posterior C1–C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine 26:2467–2471CrossRefPubMed Harms J, Melcher RP (2001) Posterior C1–C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine 26:2467–2471CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hong X, Dong Y, Yunbing C, Qingshui Y, Shizheng Z, Jingfa L (2004) Posterior screw placement on the lateral mass of atlas: an anatomic study. Spine 29:500–503CrossRefPubMed Hong X, Dong Y, Yunbing C, Qingshui Y, Shizheng Z, Jingfa L (2004) Posterior screw placement on the lateral mass of atlas: an anatomic study. Spine 29:500–503CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lee MJ, Cassinelli E, Riew KD (2006) The feasibility of inserting atlas lateral mass screws via the posterior arch. Spine 31:2798–2801CrossRefPubMed Lee MJ, Cassinelli E, Riew KD (2006) The feasibility of inserting atlas lateral mass screws via the posterior arch. Spine 31:2798–2801CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Levine AM, Edwards CC (1991) Fractures of the atlas. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:630–691 Levine AM, Edwards CC (1991) Fractures of the atlas. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:630–691
12.
go back to reference Li L, Wang H, Cui S (2007) Application of atlas pedicle screw system fixation and fusion for treatment of upper cervical disease. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 21:461–464PubMed Li L, Wang H, Cui S (2007) Application of atlas pedicle screw system fixation and fusion for treatment of upper cervical disease. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 21:461–464PubMed
13.
go back to reference Ma XY, Yin QS, Wu ZH, Xia H, Liu JF, Zhong SZ (2005) Anatomic considerations for the pedicle screw placement in the first cervical vertebra. Spine 30:1519–1523CrossRefPubMed Ma XY, Yin QS, Wu ZH, Xia H, Liu JF, Zhong SZ (2005) Anatomic considerations for the pedicle screw placement in the first cervical vertebra. Spine 30:1519–1523CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ma XY, Yin QS, Wu ZH, Xia H, Liu JF, Xiang M, Zhao WD, Zhong SZ (2009) C1 pedicle screws versus C1 lateral mass screws: comparisons of pullout strengths and biomechanical stabilities. Spine 34:371–377CrossRefPubMed Ma XY, Yin QS, Wu ZH, Xia H, Liu JF, Xiang M, Zhao WD, Zhong SZ (2009) C1 pedicle screws versus C1 lateral mass screws: comparisons of pullout strengths and biomechanical stabilities. Spine 34:371–377CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Melcher RP, Puttlitz CM, Kleinstueck FS, Lotz JC, Harms J, Bradford DS (2002) Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques. Spine 27:2435–2440CrossRefPubMed Melcher RP, Puttlitz CM, Kleinstueck FS, Lotz JC, Harms J, Bradford DS (2002) Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques. Spine 27:2435–2440CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Oda I, Abumi K, Sell LC, Haggerty CJ, Cunningham BW, McAfee PC (1999) Biomechanical evaluation of five different occipito-atlanto-axial fixation techniques. Spine 24:2377–2382CrossRefPubMed Oda I, Abumi K, Sell LC, Haggerty CJ, Cunningham BW, McAfee PC (1999) Biomechanical evaluation of five different occipito-atlanto-axial fixation techniques. Spine 24:2377–2382CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Resnick DK, Lapsiwala S, Trost GR (2002) Anatomic suitability of the C1–C2 complex for pedicle screw fixation. Spine 27:1494–1498CrossRefPubMed Resnick DK, Lapsiwala S, Trost GR (2002) Anatomic suitability of the C1–C2 complex for pedicle screw fixation. Spine 27:1494–1498CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Richter M, Schmidt R, Claes L, Puhl W, Wilke HJ (2002) Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: biomechanical in vitro comparison of six different techniques. Spine 27:1724–1732CrossRefPubMed Richter M, Schmidt R, Claes L, Puhl W, Wilke HJ (2002) Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: biomechanical in vitro comparison of six different techniques. Spine 27:1724–1732CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Rocha R, Safavi-Abbasi S, Reis C, Theodore N, Bambakidis N, de Oliveira E, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR (2007) Working area, safety zones, and angles of approach for posterior C-1 lateral mass screw placement: a quantitative anatomical and morphometric evaluation. J Neurosurg Spine 6:247–254CrossRefPubMed Rocha R, Safavi-Abbasi S, Reis C, Theodore N, Bambakidis N, de Oliveira E, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR (2007) Working area, safety zones, and angles of approach for posterior C-1 lateral mass screw placement: a quantitative anatomical and morphometric evaluation. J Neurosurg Spine 6:247–254CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Tan M, Wang H, Wang Y, Zhang G, Yi P, Li Z, Wei H, Yang F (2003) Morphometric evaluation of screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass. Spine 28:888–895CrossRefPubMed Tan M, Wang H, Wang Y, Zhang G, Yi P, Li Z, Wei H, Yang F (2003) Morphometric evaluation of screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass. Spine 28:888–895CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wang MY, Samudrala S (2004) Cadaveric morphometric analysis for atlantal lateral mass screw placement. Neurosurgery 54:1436–1440CrossRefPubMed Wang MY, Samudrala S (2004) Cadaveric morphometric analysis for atlantal lateral mass screw placement. Neurosurgery 54:1436–1440CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of anatomic landmarks and safe zones for screw placement in the atlas via the posterior arch
Authors
Matthias Gebauer
Florian Barvencik
Daniel Briem
Jan P. Kolb
Sebastian Seitz
Johannes M. Rueger
Klaus Püschel
Michael Amling
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1181-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

European Spine Journal 1/2010 Go to the issue