Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2006

Open Access 01-12-2006 | Research

Evaluation of a 'virtual' approach to commissioning health research

Authors: Christine A McCourt, Philip A Morgan, Penny Youll

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a 'virtual' (computer-mediated) approach to health research commissioning. This had been introduced experimentally in a DOH programme – the 'Health of Londoners Programme' – in order to assess whether is could enhance the accessibility, transparency and effectiveness of commissioning health research. The study described here was commissioned to evaluate this novel approach, addressing these key questions.

Methods

A naturalistic-experimental approach was combined with principles of action research. The different commissioning groups within the programme were randomly allocated to either the traditional face-to-face mode or the novel 'virtual' mode. Mainly qualitative data were gathered including observation of all (virtual and face-to-face) commissioning meetings; semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of participants (n = 32/66); structured questionnaires and interviews with lead researchers of early commissioned projects. All members of the commissioning groups were invited to participate in collaborative enquiry groups which participated actively in the analysis process.

Results

The virtual process functioned as intended, reaching timely and relatively transparent decisions that participants had confidence in. Despite the potential for greater access using a virtual approach, few differences were found in practice. Key advantages included physical access, a more flexible and extended time period for discussion, reflection and information gathering and a more transparent decision-making process. Key challenges were the reduction of social cues available in a computer-mediated medium that require novel ways of ensuring appropriate dialogue, feedback and interaction. However, in both modes, the process was influenced by a range of factors and was not technology driven.

Conclusion

There is potential for using computer-mediated communication within the research commissioning process. This may enhance access, effectiveness and transparency of decision-making but further development is needed for this to be fully realised, including attention to process as well as the computer-mediated medium.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buxton M, Hanney S, Packwood T, Roberts S, Youll P: Assessing Benefits from Department of Health and National Health Service Research and Development. Public Money and Management. 2000, 20 (4): 29-34. 10.1111/1467-9302.00233.CrossRef Buxton M, Hanney S, Packwood T, Roberts S, Youll P: Assessing Benefits from Department of Health and National Health Service Research and Development. Public Money and Management. 2000, 20 (4): 29-34. 10.1111/1467-9302.00233.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rafferty AM, Traynor M, Lewison G: Measuring the Outputs of Nursing R & D. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine: Centre for Policy in Nursing Research. 2000 Rafferty AM, Traynor M, Lewison G: Measuring the Outputs of Nursing R & D. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine: Centre for Policy in Nursing Research. 2000
3.
go back to reference Kuruvilla S, Mays N: Reorientating Health-Research Communication. The Lancet. 2005, 366: 1416-1418. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67580-0.CrossRef Kuruvilla S, Mays N: Reorientating Health-Research Communication. The Lancet. 2005, 366: 1416-1418. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67580-0.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R: Involving Consumers in Research and Development Agenda Setting for the NHS: Developing an Evidence Based Approach. Health Technology Assessment. 2004, 8 (15): Oliver S, Clarke-Jones L, Rees R: Involving Consumers in Research and Development Agenda Setting for the NHS: Developing an Evidence Based Approach. Health Technology Assessment. 2004, 8 (15):
5.
go back to reference Tomlinson D: Social Policy and Epistemology: recapturing the lost world of interpretation in case studies of community care. BSA annual medical sociology conference papers. 1987 Tomlinson D: Social Policy and Epistemology: recapturing the lost world of interpretation in case studies of community care. BSA annual medical sociology conference papers. 1987
6.
go back to reference Sproull L, Kiesler SL: Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication. Management Science. 1986, 32: 1492-1512.CrossRef Sproull L, Kiesler SL: Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication. Management Science. 1986, 32: 1492-1512.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Culnan MJ, Markus ML: Information Technologies, Electronic Media and Intra-organizational Communication. Handbook of Organizational Communication. Edited by: Jablin F, Putnam L, Roberts K, Porter L. 1987, Los Angeles: Sage Culnan MJ, Markus ML: Information Technologies, Electronic Media and Intra-organizational Communication. Handbook of Organizational Communication. Edited by: Jablin F, Putnam L, Roberts K, Porter L. 1987, Los Angeles: Sage
8.
go back to reference Kinney S, Dennis A: Re-evaluating Media Richness Cues, Feedback and Task. Proceedings of the 27th Hawaii International Conference on system Sciences: IV. 1994, 21-30. Kinney S, Dennis A: Re-evaluating Media Richness Cues, Feedback and Task. Proceedings of the 27th Hawaii International Conference on system Sciences: IV. 1994, 21-30.
9.
go back to reference Walther JB: Computer Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal and Hyperpersonal Interaction. Communication Research. 1996, 23 (1): 3-43. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00384.x.CrossRef Walther JB: Computer Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal and Hyperpersonal Interaction. Communication Research. 1996, 23 (1): 3-43. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00384.x.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chidambaram L, Bostram RP, Wynne BE: The impact of GDSSon Group Development. Journal of Management Information Systems. 1991, 7: 3-25.CrossRef Chidambaram L, Bostram RP, Wynne BE: The impact of GDSSon Group Development. Journal of Management Information Systems. 1991, 7: 3-25.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ishaya T, Macaulay L: The Role of Trust in Virtual Teams. Proceedings of the 2nd International Vonet Workshop. 1999 Ishaya T, Macaulay L: The Role of Trust in Virtual Teams. Proceedings of the 2nd International Vonet Workshop. 1999
13.
go back to reference Fahy PJ, Crawford G, Mohamed A: Patterns of Interaction in a Computer Conference Transcript. Interactional Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2001, 2 (1): 1-19. Fahy PJ, Crawford G, Mohamed A: Patterns of Interaction in a Computer Conference Transcript. Interactional Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2001, 2 (1): 1-19.
14.
go back to reference Knoll K, Jarvenpaa SL: Working Together in Global Virtual Teams. The Virtual Workplace. Edited by: Igbaria M, Tan M. 1998, Idea Group: Hershey Knoll K, Jarvenpaa SL: Working Together in Global Virtual Teams. The Virtual Workplace. Edited by: Igbaria M, Tan M. 1998, Idea Group: Hershey
15.
go back to reference McGrath JE: Time, Interaction and Performance (TIP): A Theory of Groups. Small Group Research. 1991, 22: 147-174.CrossRef McGrath JE: Time, Interaction and Performance (TIP): A Theory of Groups. Small Group Research. 1991, 22: 147-174.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gunawardena CN: Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications. 1995, 1 (2/3): 147-166. Gunawardena CN: Social Presence Theory and Implications for Interaction and Collaborative Learning in Computer Conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications. 1995, 1 (2/3): 147-166.
17.
go back to reference Siegel J, Dubrovsky V, Kiesler S, McGuire TW: Group Processes in Computer-Mediated Communication. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes. 1986, 37: 157-187. 10.1016/0749-5978(86)90050-6.CrossRef Siegel J, Dubrovsky V, Kiesler S, McGuire TW: Group Processes in Computer-Mediated Communication. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes. 1986, 37: 157-187. 10.1016/0749-5978(86)90050-6.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Saunders CS, Robey D: The Persistence Of Status Differentials in Computer Conferencing. Human Communication Research. 1994, 20: 443-473. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00331.x.CrossRef Saunders CS, Robey D: The Persistence Of Status Differentials in Computer Conferencing. Human Communication Research. 1994, 20: 443-473. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00331.x.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mantovani G: Is Computer-Mediated Communication Intrinsically apt to Enhance Democracy in Organisations?. Human Relations. 1994, 47 (1): 45-67. 10.1177/001872679404700103.CrossRef Mantovani G: Is Computer-Mediated Communication Intrinsically apt to Enhance Democracy in Organisations?. Human Relations. 1994, 47 (1): 45-67. 10.1177/001872679404700103.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Department of Health: Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care. 2001, London: DoH Publications Department of Health: Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care. 2001, London: DoH Publications
21.
go back to reference Department of Health: Shifting the Balance of Power, The Next Steps. 2001, London: DoH publications Department of Health: Shifting the Balance of Power, The Next Steps. 2001, London: DoH publications
22.
go back to reference Beresford P, Croft S: Citizen Involvement: A Practical Guide. 1993, MacMillan: LondonCrossRef Beresford P, Croft S: Citizen Involvement: A Practical Guide. 1993, MacMillan: LondonCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hanley B, Bradburn J, Gorin S, Barnes M, Evans C, Goodare H, Kelson M, Kent A, Oliver S, Wallcraft J: Involving Consumers in Research and Development in the NHS: Briefing notes for researchers. Consumers in NHS Research Support Unit. 2000 Hanley B, Bradburn J, Gorin S, Barnes M, Evans C, Goodare H, Kelson M, Kent A, Oliver S, Wallcraft J: Involving Consumers in Research and Development in the NHS: Briefing notes for researchers. Consumers in NHS Research Support Unit. 2000
24.
go back to reference Youll P, McCourt-Perring C: Raising Voices: Ensuring Quality in Residential Care. 1993, HMSO Youll P, McCourt-Perring C: Raising Voices: Ensuring Quality in Residential Care. 1993, HMSO
25.
go back to reference Entwistle V, Renfrew C, Yearley S, Forrester J, Lamont T: Lay perspectives: advantages for health research. British Medical Journal. 1998, 316: 462-466.CrossRef Entwistle V, Renfrew C, Yearley S, Forrester J, Lamont T: Lay perspectives: advantages for health research. British Medical Journal. 1998, 316: 462-466.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Townsend M, Braithwaite T: Mental health research: the value of user involvement. Journal of Mental Health. 2002, 11 (2): 117-120. 10.1080/096382301200041524.CrossRef Townsend M, Braithwaite T: Mental health research: the value of user involvement. Journal of Mental Health. 2002, 11 (2): 117-120. 10.1080/096382301200041524.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Simpson E, House A: Involving users in the delivery and evaluation of mental health services. British Medical Journal. 2002, 325: 1265-10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1265.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Simpson E, House A: Involving users in the delivery and evaluation of mental health services. British Medical Journal. 2002, 325: 1265-10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1265.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Telford R, Beverley CA, Cooper CL, Boote JD: Consumer involvement in health research: fact or fiction?. British Journal of Clinical Governance. 2002, 7 (2): 92-103. 10.1108/14664100210427606.CrossRef Telford R, Beverley CA, Cooper CL, Boote JD: Consumer involvement in health research: fact or fiction?. British Journal of Clinical Governance. 2002, 7 (2): 92-103. 10.1108/14664100210427606.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Robert G, McLenahan J: Candidate research priorities for 'Improving London's Health. 1999, London: HERG/Kings Fund Robert G, McLenahan J: Candidate research priorities for 'Improving London's Health. 1999, London: HERG/Kings Fund
30.
go back to reference Acheson D: Independent enquiry into inequalities in health. 1998, The Stationery Office: London Acheson D: Independent enquiry into inequalities in health. 1998, The Stationery Office: London
31.
go back to reference Lowdell C, Bardsley M, Morgan D: Acheson Report. The inquiry into inequalities in health. Implications for London: A discussion paper. Health of Londoners Project: London. 1999 Lowdell C, Bardsley M, Morgan D: Acheson Report. The inquiry into inequalities in health. Implications for London: A discussion paper. Health of Londoners Project: London. 1999
32.
go back to reference McCourt C, Beake S: A 'virtual' approach to commissioning health R&D. A pilot scheme by the NHSE London Programme. Evaluation Report. 2000, Thames Valley University: London McCourt C, Beake S: A 'virtual' approach to commissioning health R&D. A pilot scheme by the NHSE London Programme. Evaluation Report. 2000, Thames Valley University: London
33.
go back to reference Winter R: Learning from Experience. Principles and Practice in Action-Research. 1989, London: The Falmer Press Winter R: Learning from Experience. Principles and Practice in Action-Research. 1989, London: The Falmer Press
34.
go back to reference Pawson R, Tilley M: Realistic Evaluation. 1997, London: Sage Pawson R, Tilley M: Realistic Evaluation. 1997, London: Sage
35.
go back to reference Øvretveit J: Evaluating health interventions: an introduction. 1998, Buckingham: Open University Press Øvretveit J: Evaluating health interventions: an introduction. 1998, Buckingham: Open University Press
36.
go back to reference Glaser B, Strauss A: The Discovery of Grounded Theory. 1967, Aldine: Chicago Glaser B, Strauss A: The Discovery of Grounded Theory. 1967, Aldine: Chicago
37.
go back to reference Miles M, Huberman A: Qualitative Data Analysis. A Source Book of New Methods. 1984, London: Sage Miles M, Huberman A: Qualitative Data Analysis. A Source Book of New Methods. 1984, London: Sage
38.
go back to reference Walther JB, Burgoon JK: Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction. Human Communication Research. 1992, 19: 50-88. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00295.x.CrossRef Walther JB, Burgoon JK: Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction. Human Communication Research. 1992, 19: 50-88. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00295.x.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Montoya-Weiss M, Massey PP, Song M: Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal. 2001, 44 (6): 1251-1262.CrossRef Montoya-Weiss M, Massey PP, Song M: Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal. 2001, 44 (6): 1251-1262.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Atkinson R: Discourses of participation and empowerment in contemporary British urban regeneration. Urban Studies. 1995, 36 (1): Atkinson R: Discourses of participation and empowerment in contemporary British urban regeneration. Urban Studies. 1995, 36 (1):
41.
go back to reference Rice RE: Computer Conferencing. Progress in Communication Sciences. Edited by: Dervin B, Voigt MJ. 1986, Norwood: NJ Ablex, 7: Rice RE: Computer Conferencing. Progress in Communication Sciences. Edited by: Dervin B, Voigt MJ. 1986, Norwood: NJ Ablex, 7:
42.
go back to reference Steinfield CW: Computer-Mediated Communication in Organisational Settings. Communication Yearbook 9. Edited by: McLoughlan ML. 1992, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Steinfield CW: Computer-Mediated Communication in Organisational Settings. Communication Yearbook 9. Edited by: McLoughlan ML. 1992, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
43.
go back to reference Rice RE, Love G: Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer mediated network. Communication research. 1987, 14: 85-108.CrossRef Rice RE, Love G: Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer mediated network. Communication research. 1987, 14: 85-108.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference McLeod PL: An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis. Human Computer Interaction. 1992, 7: 257-280. 10.1207/s15327051hci0703_1.CrossRef McLeod PL: An Assessment of the Experimental Literature on Electronic Support of Group Work: Results of a Meta-Analysis. Human Computer Interaction. 1992, 7: 257-280. 10.1207/s15327051hci0703_1.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference McCourt C, Morgan P, Youll P: A 'virtual' approach to commissioning health R&D: an action research project by the NHS R&D London Programme. Evaluation Report. 2002, TVU, London McCourt C, Morgan P, Youll P: A 'virtual' approach to commissioning health R&D: an action research project by the NHS R&D London Programme. Evaluation Report. 2002, TVU, London
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of a 'virtual' approach to commissioning health research
Authors
Christine A McCourt
Philip A Morgan
Penny Youll
Publication date
01-12-2006
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2006
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-4-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2006 Go to the issue