Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia 3/2016

01-06-2016 | Short Communication

Evaluation of a smartphone camera system to enable visualization and image transmission to aid tracheal intubation with the Airtraq® laryngoscope

Authors: Delice Weishan Lee, Swapna Thampi, Eric Peng Huat Yap, Eugene Hern Choon Liu

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Using three-dimensional printing, we produced adaptors to attach a smartphone with camera to the eyepiece of the Airtraq® laryngoscope. This low-cost system enabled a team to simultaneously view the laryngoscopy process on the smartphone screen, and also enabled image transmission. We compared the Airtraq® with the smartphone Airtraq® system in a crossover study of trainee anesthesiologists performing tracheal intubation in a manikin. We also evaluated the smartphone Airtraq® system for laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in 30 patients, including image transmission to and communication with a remote instructor. In the manikin study, the smartphone Airtraq® system enabled instruction where both trainee and instructor could view the larynx simultaneously, and did not substantially increase the time required for intubation. In the patient study, we were able to view the larynx in all 30 patients, and the remote instructor was able to receive the images and to respond on correctness of laryngoscopy and tracheal tube placement. Tracheal intubation was successful within 90s in 19 (63 %) patients. In conclusion, use of a smartphone with the Airtraq® may facilitate instruction and communication of laryngoscopy with the Airtraq®, overcoming some of its limitations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lu Y, Jiang H, Zhu YS. Airtraq laryngoscope versus conventional Macintosh laryngoscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:1160–7.CrossRefPubMed Lu Y, Jiang H, Zhu YS. Airtraq laryngoscope versus conventional Macintosh laryngoscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:1160–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Arslan ZI, Alparslan V, Ozdal P, Toker K, Solak M. Face-to-face tracheal intubation in adult patients: a comparison of the Airtraq™,Glidescope™ and Fastrach™ devices. J Anesth (epub ahead of print). Arslan ZI, Alparslan V, Ozdal P, Toker K, Solak M. Face-to-face tracheal intubation in adult patients: a comparison of the Airtraq™,Glidescope™ and Fastrach™ devices. J Anesth (epub ahead of print).
3.
go back to reference de Oliveira GS, Fitzgerald PC, Beckerly R, McCarthy RJ. A randomized comparison of the use of an optical compared with a rigid laryngoscope on the success rate of novices performing tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:615–8.CrossRefPubMed de Oliveira GS, Fitzgerald PC, Beckerly R, McCarthy RJ. A randomized comparison of the use of an optical compared with a rigid laryngoscope on the success rate of novices performing tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 2011;112:615–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ndoko SK, Amathieu R, Tual L, Polliand C, Kamoun W, El Housseini L, Champault G, Dhonneur G. Tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial comparing performance of Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:263–8.CrossRefPubMed Ndoko SK, Amathieu R, Tual L, Polliand C, Kamoun W, El Housseini L, Champault G, Dhonneur G. Tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial comparing performance of Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:263–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference McElwain J, Laffey JG. Comparison of the C-MAC®, Airtraq®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients undergoing tracheal intubation with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:258–64.CrossRefPubMed McElwain J, Laffey JG. Comparison of the C-MAC®, Airtraq®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients undergoing tracheal intubation with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107:258–64.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference White MC, Marsh CJ, Beringer RM, Nolan JA, Choi AY, Medlock KE, Mason DG. A randomised, controlled trial comparing the Airtraq ™ optical laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscopy in infants and children. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:226–31.CrossRefPubMed White MC, Marsh CJ, Beringer RM, Nolan JA, Choi AY, Medlock KE, Mason DG. A randomised, controlled trial comparing the Airtraq ™ optical laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscopy in infants and children. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:226–31.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Baciarello M, Zasa M, Manferdini ME, Tosi M, Berti M, Fanelli G. The learning curve for laryngoscopy: Airtraq versus Macintosh laryngoscopes. J Anesth. 2012;26:516–24.CrossRefPubMed Baciarello M, Zasa M, Manferdini ME, Tosi M, Berti M, Fanelli G. The learning curve for laryngoscopy: Airtraq versus Macintosh laryngoscopes. J Anesth. 2012;26:516–24.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hindman BJ, Santoni BG, Puttlitz CM, From RP, Todd MM. Intubation biomechanics: laryngoscope force and cervical spine motion during intubation with Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes. Anesthesiology. 2014;21:260–71.CrossRef Hindman BJ, Santoni BG, Puttlitz CM, From RP, Todd MM. Intubation biomechanics: laryngoscope force and cervical spine motion during intubation with Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes. Anesthesiology. 2014;21:260–71.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of a smartphone camera system to enable visualization and image transmission to aid tracheal intubation with the Airtraq® laryngoscope
Authors
Delice Weishan Lee
Swapna Thampi
Eric Peng Huat Yap
Eugene Hern Choon Liu
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Electronic ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-016-2141-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Journal of Anesthesia 3/2016 Go to the issue