Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 7/2018

01-07-2018 | Otology

Evaluation of a new slim lateral wall electrode for cochlear implantation: an imaging study in human temporal bones

Authors: Aarno Dietz, Matti Iso-Mustajärvi, Sini Sipari, Jyrki Tervaniemi, Dzemal Gazibegovic

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 7/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the insertion characteristics and trauma of a new slim lateral wall electrode (SlimJ) in human temporal bones (TB).

Methods

Pre- and postoperative assessment was performed using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and image fusion in 11 human TB. The position of the array in each cochlea was analyzed and described using a vertical scaling factor, calculated by dividing the distance of the scala tympani floor to the centre of the electrode by the duct height. Insertion trauma was scaled according to the presumed localization of the basilar membrane, which was modeled from histologic sections of 20 TBs. The insertion trauma was described by the adaptation of the Eshragi trauma grading.

Results

A full electrode insertion, via the round window, was achieved in all TBs. Surgical handling was good, with a favorable compromise between high flexibility but sufficient stiffness to facilitate smooth insertions. The median angular insertion depth was 368° (range 330°–430°). Scala tympani placement was achieved in ten out of eleven TBs; in one TB a scala translocation was observed, occurring at approximately 180°.

Conclusions

The SlimJ showed atraumatic insertion characteristics. The CBCT fusion technique provides an accurate and reliable assessment of the electrode position and allows for grading insertion trauma without histology. The SlimJ true potential for structure and hearing preservation needs to be further assessed in vivo.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Blamey P, Artieres F et al (2013) Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiol Neurotol 18(1):36–47CrossRef Blamey P, Artieres F et al (2013) Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiol Neurotol 18(1):36–47CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lazard D, Vincent C, Venail F, Van de Heyning P, Truy E, Sterkers O et al (2012) Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time. PLoS One 7(11):e48739CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lazard D, Vincent C, Venail F, Van de Heyning P, Truy E, Sterkers O et al (2012) Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: a new conceptual model over time. PLoS One 7(11):e48739CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R (2007) Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 28(2 Suppl):75S–79S Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R (2007) Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 28(2 Suppl):75S–79S
4.
go back to reference Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK et al (2008) Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol 29:920–928CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK et al (2008) Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol 29:920–928CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Carlson ML, Driscoll CL, Gifford RH, Service GJ, Tombers NM, Hughes-Borst BJ, Neff BA, Beatty CW (2011) Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 32(6):962–968CrossRef Carlson ML, Driscoll CL, Gifford RH, Service GJ, Tombers NM, Hughes-Borst BJ, Neff BA, Beatty CW (2011) Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 32(6):962–968CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Polak M, Driscoll CL, Roland P, Buchman CA (2013) Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Ear Hear 34(4):413–425CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gifford RH, Dorman MF, Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Polak M, Driscoll CL, Roland P, Buchman CA (2013) Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Ear Hear 34(4):413–425CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Holden L, Finley C, Firszt J, Holden T, Brenner C, Potts L, Gotter B, Vanderhoof S, Mispagel K, Heydebrand G, Skinner M (2013). Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 34(3):342–360CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Holden L, Finley C, Firszt J, Holden T, Brenner C, Potts L, Gotter B, Vanderhoof S, Mispagel K, Heydebrand G, Skinner M (2013). Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 34(3):342–360CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Boyle PJ (2016) The rational for a mid-scala electrode array. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 133(Suppl 1):S61–S62 Boyle PJ (2016) The rational for a mid-scala electrode array. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 133(Suppl 1):S61–S62
9.
go back to reference O’Connell BP1, Hunter JB, Gifford RH, Rivas A, Haynes DS, Noble JH, Wanna GB (2016) Electrode location and audiologic performance after cochlear implantation: a comparative study between nucleus CI422 and CI512 electrode arrays. Otol Neurotol 37(8):1032–1035PubMed O’Connell BP1, Hunter JB, Gifford RH, Rivas A, Haynes DS, Noble JH, Wanna GB (2016) Electrode location and audiologic performance after cochlear implantation: a comparative study between nucleus CI422 and CI512 electrode arrays. Otol Neurotol 37(8):1032–1035PubMed
10.
go back to reference Svrakic M, Roland JT Jr, McMenomey SO, Svirsky MA (2016) initial operative experience and short-term hearing preservation results with a mid-scala cochlear implant electrode array. Otol Neurotol 37(10):1549–1554CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Svrakic M, Roland JT Jr, McMenomey SO, Svirsky MA (2016) initial operative experience and short-term hearing preservation results with a mid-scala cochlear implant electrode array. Otol Neurotol 37(10):1549–1554CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Cohen LT, Saunders E, Knight MR, Cowan RS (2006). Psychophysical measures in patients fitted with Contour and straight Nucleus electrode arrays. Hear Res 212(1–2):160–175CrossRefPubMed Cohen LT, Saunders E, Knight MR, Cowan RS (2006). Psychophysical measures in patients fitted with Contour and straight Nucleus electrode arrays. Hear Res 212(1–2):160–175CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lim YS, Park SI, Kim YH, Oh SH, Kim SJ (2005) Three-dimensional analysis of electrode behavior in a human cochlear model. Med Eng Phys 27(8):695–703CrossRefPubMed Lim YS, Park SI, Kim YH, Oh SH, Kim SJ (2005) Three-dimensional analysis of electrode behavior in a human cochlear model. Med Eng Phys 27(8):695–703CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Drouillard M, Torres R, Mamelle E, De Seta D, Sterkers O, Ferrary E, Nguyen Y (2017). Influence of electrode array stiffness and diameter on hearing in cochlear implanted guinea pig PLoS One 12(8):e0183674CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Drouillard M, Torres R, Mamelle E, De Seta D, Sterkers O, Ferrary E, Nguyen Y (2017). Influence of electrode array stiffness and diameter on hearing in cochlear implanted guinea pig PLoS One 12(8):e0183674CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Todt I, Mittmann M, Ernst A, Mittmann P (2017) Comparison of the effects of four different cochlear implant electrodes on intra-cochlear pressure in a model. Acta Otolaryngol 137(3):235–241CrossRef Todt I, Mittmann M, Ernst A, Mittmann P (2017) Comparison of the effects of four different cochlear implant electrodes on intra-cochlear pressure in a model. Acta Otolaryngol 137(3):235–241CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Saunders E, Hellier W, Dahm M, Pyman B, Clark GM (2001). Surgical implications of perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode design: avoiding intracochlear damage and scala vestibuli insertion. Cochlear Implants Int 2(2):135–149CrossRefPubMed Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Saunders E, Hellier W, Dahm M, Pyman B, Clark GM (2001). Surgical implications of perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode design: avoiding intracochlear damage and scala vestibuli insertion. Cochlear Implants Int 2(2):135–149CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Boyer E, Karkas A, Attye A, Lefournier V, Escude B, Schmerber S (2015) Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and perimodiolar precurved electrode arrays. Otol Neurotol 36(3):422–429CrossRef Boyer E, Karkas A, Attye A, Lefournier V, Escude B, Schmerber S (2015) Scalar localization by cone-beam computed tomography of cochlear implant carriers: a comparative study between straight and perimodiolar precurved electrode arrays. Otol Neurotol 36(3):422–429CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Connor SE, Holland NJ, Agger A, Leong AC, Varghese RA, Jiang D, Fitzgerald O’Connor A (2012) Round window electrode insertion potentiates retention in the scala tympani. Acta Otolaryngol 132(9):932–937CrossRefPubMed Connor SE, Holland NJ, Agger A, Leong AC, Varghese RA, Jiang D, Fitzgerald O’Connor A (2012) Round window electrode insertion potentiates retention in the scala tympani. Acta Otolaryngol 132(9):932–937CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wanna GB, Noble JH, Carlson ML, Gifford RH, Dietrich MS, Haynes DS, Dawant BM. Labadie RF (2014). Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes. Laryngoscope 124(Suppl 6):S1–S7 Wanna GB, Noble JH, Carlson ML, Gifford RH, Dietrich MS, Haynes DS, Dawant BM. Labadie RF (2014). Impact of electrode design and surgical approach on scalar location and cochlear implant outcomes. Laryngoscope 124(Suppl 6):S1–S7
19.
go back to reference Jeyakumar A, Peña SF, Brickman TM (2014) Round window insertion of precurved electrodes is traumatic. Otol Neurotol 35(1):52–57CrossRefPubMed Jeyakumar A, Peña SF, Brickman TM (2014) Round window insertion of precurved electrodes is traumatic. Otol Neurotol 35(1):52–57CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Cushing SL, Daly MJ, Treaba CG, Chan H, Irish JC, Blaser S, Gordon KA, Papsin BC (2012) High-resolution cone-beam computed tomography: a potential tool to improve atraumatic electrode design and position. Acta Otolaryngol 132(4):361–368CrossRef Cushing SL, Daly MJ, Treaba CG, Chan H, Irish JC, Blaser S, Gordon KA, Papsin BC (2012) High-resolution cone-beam computed tomography: a potential tool to improve atraumatic electrode design and position. Acta Otolaryngol 132(4):361–368CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Saeed SR, Selvadurai D, Beale T, Biggs N, Murray B, Gibson P, Risi F, Boyd P (2014) The use of cone-beam computed tomography to determine cochlear implant electrode position in human temporal bones. Otol Neurotol 35(8):1338–44CrossRef Saeed SR, Selvadurai D, Beale T, Biggs N, Murray B, Gibson P, Risi F, Boyd P (2014) The use of cone-beam computed tomography to determine cochlear implant electrode position in human temporal bones. Otol Neurotol 35(8):1338–44CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Marx M, Risi F, Escudé B, Durmo I, James C, Lauwers F, Deguine O, Fraysse B (2014) Reliability of cone beam computed tomography in scalar localization of the electrode array: a radio histological study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271(4):673–679CrossRef Marx M, Risi F, Escudé B, Durmo I, James C, Lauwers F, Deguine O, Fraysse B (2014) Reliability of cone beam computed tomography in scalar localization of the electrode array: a radio histological study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271(4):673–679CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Güldner C, Wiegand S, Weiss R, Bien S, Sesterhenn A, Teymoortash A, Diogo I.(2012). Artifacts of the electrode in cochlea implantation and limits in analysis of deep insertion in cone beam tomography (CBT). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(3):767–772CrossRefPubMed Güldner C, Wiegand S, Weiss R, Bien S, Sesterhenn A, Teymoortash A, Diogo I.(2012). Artifacts of the electrode in cochlea implantation and limits in analysis of deep insertion in cone beam tomography (CBT). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(3):767–772CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Husstedt HW, Aschendorff A, Richter B, Laszig R, Schumacher M (2002) Nondestructive three-dimensional analysis of electrode to modiolus proximity. Otol Neurotol 23(1):49–52CrossRef Husstedt HW, Aschendorff A, Richter B, Laszig R, Schumacher M (2002) Nondestructive three-dimensional analysis of electrode to modiolus proximity. Otol Neurotol 23(1):49–52CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kurzweg T, Dalchow CV, Bremke M, Majdani O, Kureck I, Knecht R, Werner JA, Teymoortash A (2010) The value of digital volume tomography in assessing the position of cochlear implant arrays in temporal bone specimens. Ear Hear 31(3):413–419CrossRef Kurzweg T, Dalchow CV, Bremke M, Majdani O, Kureck I, Knecht R, Werner JA, Teymoortash A (2010) The value of digital volume tomography in assessing the position of cochlear implant arrays in temporal bone specimens. Ear Hear 31(3):413–419CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Iso-Mustajärvi M, Matikka H, Risi F, Sipari S, Koski T, Willberg T, Lehtimäki A, Tervaniemi J, Löppönen H, Dietz AA (2017) New slim modiolar electrode array for cochlear implantation: a radiological and histological study. Otol Neurotol 38(9):e327–e334CrossRef Iso-Mustajärvi M, Matikka H, Risi F, Sipari S, Koski T, Willberg T, Lehtimäki A, Tervaniemi J, Löppönen H, Dietz AA (2017) New slim modiolar electrode array for cochlear implantation: a radiological and histological study. Otol Neurotol 38(9):e327–e334CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J-C, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward SR, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R (2012) 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging 30(9):1323–1341CrossRef Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J-C, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward SR, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R (2012) 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging 30(9):1323–1341CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Johnson HJ, Harris G, Williams K (2007) BRAINSFit: mutual information registrations of whole-brain 3D images, using the insight toolkit. Insight J Johnson HJ, Harris G, Williams K (2007) BRAINSFit: mutual information registrations of whole-brain 3D images, using the insight toolkit. Insight J
29.
go back to reference Xu J, Xu SA, Cohen LT, Clark GM (2000) Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 21(1):49–56CrossRefPubMed Xu J, Xu SA, Cohen LT, Clark GM (2000) Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 21(1):49–56CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Eshraghi AA, Yang NW, Balkany TJ (2003) Comparative study of cochlear damage with three perimodiolar electrode designs. Laryngoscope 113:415–419CrossRefPubMed Eshraghi AA, Yang NW, Balkany TJ (2003) Comparative study of cochlear damage with three perimodiolar electrode designs. Laryngoscope 113:415–419CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Dietz A, Gazibegovic D, Tervaniemi J, Vartiainen VM, Löppönen H (2016) Insertion characteristics and placement of the Mid-Scala electrode array in human temporal bones using detailed cone beam computed tomography. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(12):4135–4143CrossRefPubMed Dietz A, Gazibegovic D, Tervaniemi J, Vartiainen VM, Löppönen H (2016) Insertion characteristics and placement of the Mid-Scala electrode array in human temporal bones using detailed cone beam computed tomography. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(12):4135–4143CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Skarzynski H, Podskarbi-Fayette R (2010) A new cochlear implant electrode design for preservation of residual hearing: a temporal bone study. Acta Otolaryngol 130(4):435–442CrossRefPubMed Skarzynski H, Podskarbi-Fayette R (2010) A new cochlear implant electrode design for preservation of residual hearing: a temporal bone study. Acta Otolaryngol 130(4):435–442CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Helbig S, Settevendemie C, Mack M, Baumann U, Helbig M, Stöver T.(2011). Evaluation of an electrode prototype for atraumatic cochlear implantation in hearing preservation candidates: preliminary results from a temporal bone study. Otol Neurotol 32(3):419–423CrossRefPubMed Helbig S, Settevendemie C, Mack M, Baumann U, Helbig M, Stöver T.(2011). Evaluation of an electrode prototype for atraumatic cochlear implantation in hearing preservation candidates: preliminary results from a temporal bone study. Otol Neurotol 32(3):419–423CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Rebscher SJ, Hetherington A, Bonham B, Wardrop P, Whinney D, Leake PA (2008) Considerations for design of future cochlear implant electrode arrays: electrode array stiffness, size, and depth of insertion. J Rehab Res Dev 45(5):731–748CrossRef Rebscher SJ, Hetherington A, Bonham B, Wardrop P, Whinney D, Leake PA (2008) Considerations for design of future cochlear implant electrode arrays: electrode array stiffness, size, and depth of insertion. J Rehab Res Dev 45(5):731–748CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Avci E, Nauwelaers T, Lenarz T, Hamacher V, Kral A (2014). Variations in microanatomy of the human cochlea. J Comp Neurol 522(14):3245–3261CrossRef Avci E, Nauwelaers T, Lenarz T, Hamacher V, Kral A (2014). Variations in microanatomy of the human cochlea. J Comp Neurol 522(14):3245–3261CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Aschendorff A, Kubalek R, Turowski B, Zanella F, Hochmuth A, Schumacher M, Klenzner T, Laszig R (2005) Quality control after cochlear implant surgery by means of rotational tomography. Otol Neurotol 26(1):34–37CrossRefPubMed Aschendorff A, Kubalek R, Turowski B, Zanella F, Hochmuth A, Schumacher M, Klenzner T, Laszig R (2005) Quality control after cochlear implant surgery by means of rotational tomography. Otol Neurotol 26(1):34–37CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Diogo I, Franke N, Steinbach-Hundt S, Mandapathil M, Weiss R, Werner JA, Güldner C (2014) Differences of radiological artefacts in cochlear implantation in temporal bone and complete head. Cochlear Implants Int 15(2):112–117CrossRefPubMed Diogo I, Franke N, Steinbach-Hundt S, Mandapathil M, Weiss R, Werner JA, Güldner C (2014) Differences of radiological artefacts in cochlear implantation in temporal bone and complete head. Cochlear Implants Int 15(2):112–117CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of a new slim lateral wall electrode for cochlear implantation: an imaging study in human temporal bones
Authors
Aarno Dietz
Matti Iso-Mustajärvi
Sini Sipari
Jyrki Tervaniemi
Dzemal Gazibegovic
Publication date
01-07-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5004-6

Other articles of this Issue 7/2018

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 7/2018 Go to the issue