Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Study protocol

Evaluation of a disability-inclusive ultra-poor graduation programme in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial with process evaluation

Authors: Elijah Kipchumba, Calum Davey, Sarah Marks, Anthony Mugeere, Shanquan Chen, Lena Morgon Banks, Kazi Eliza Islam, Tom Shakespeare, Hannah Kuper, Munshi Sulaiman

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is little evidence on how to support ultra-poor people with disabilities to adopt sustainable livelihoods. The Disability-Inclusive Graduation (DIG) programme targets ultra-poor people with disabilities and/or women living in rural Uganda. The programme is an adaptation of an ultra-poor graduation model that has been shown to be effective in many contexts but not evaluated for people with disabilities.

Methods

The DIG programme works with project participants over a period of 18 months. Participants receive unconditional cash transfers for 6 months, training, access to savings-and-loans groups, and a capital asset that forms the basis of their new livelihood. The programme is also adapted to address specific barriers that people with disabilities face. Eligible households are clustered by geographical proximity in order to deliver the intervention. Eligibility is based on household screening to identify the ‘ultra-poor’ based on proxy means testing—both households with and without people with disabilities are included in the programme. Clusters are randomly selected prior to implementation, resulting in 96 intervention and 89 control clusters. The primary outcome of the trial is per-capita household consumption. Before the start of the intervention, a baseline household survey is conducted (November 2020) among project participants and those not offered the programme, a similar endline survey is conducted with participants with disabilities at the end of programme implementation in July 2022, and a second endline survey for all participants in October 2023. These activities are complemented by a process evaluation to understand DIG programme implementation, mechanisms, and context using complementary qualitative and quantitative methods. Ethical approval for the research has been received from Mildmay Uganda Research Ethics Committee and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Discussion

DIG is a promising intervention to evaluate for people with disabilities, adapted to be disability inclusive across programme components through extensive consultations and collaboration, and has proven efficacy at reducing poverty in other marginalised groups. However, evaluating a well-evidenced intervention among a new target group poses ethical considerations.

Trial registration

Registry for International Development Impact Evaluations, RIDIE-STUDY-ID-626008898983a (20/04/22). ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN78592382. Retrospectively registered on 17/08/2023.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Loro (320), Lacor (350), Kigumba (360), Gulu (370), Kamdini (380), Anaka (380), Goma (420) and Minakulu (420).
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Banerjee A, Duflo E, Goldberg N, Karlan D, Osei R, Parienté W, et al. A multifaceted program causes lasting progress for the very poor: Evidence from six countries. Science. 2015;348(6236):1260799.CrossRefPubMed Banerjee A, Duflo E, Goldberg N, Karlan D, Osei R, Parienté W, et al. A multifaceted program causes lasting progress for the very poor: Evidence from six countries. Science. 2015;348(6236):1260799.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Matin I, Sulaiman M, Rabbani M. Crafting a graduation pathway for the ultra poor: lessons and evidence from a BRAC Programme in Bangladesh. In: Cook S, Kabeer N, editors. Social protection as development policy. London: Routledge India; 2010. Matin I, Sulaiman M, Rabbani M. Crafting a graduation pathway for the ultra poor: lessons and evidence from a BRAC Programme in Bangladesh. In: Cook S, Kabeer N, editors. Social protection as development policy. London: Routledge India; 2010.
4.
go back to reference Banks LM, Davey C, Shakespeare T, Kuper H. Disability-inclusive responses to COVID-19: Lessons learnt from research on social protection in low- and middle-income countries. World Dev. 2021;137:105178.CrossRefPubMed Banks LM, Davey C, Shakespeare T, Kuper H. Disability-inclusive responses to COVID-19: Lessons learnt from research on social protection in low- and middle-income countries. World Dev. 2021;137:105178.CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
go back to reference Banks LM, Mearkle R, Mactaggart I, Walsham M, Kuper H, Blanchet K. Disability and social protection programmes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Oxf Dev Stud. 2017;45(3):223–39.CrossRef Banks LM, Mearkle R, Mactaggart I, Walsham M, Kuper H, Blanchet K. Disability and social protection programmes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Oxf Dev Stud. 2017;45(3):223–39.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bates MA, Glennerster R. The generalizability puzzle. Stanf Soc Innov Rev. 2017;15(3):50–4. Bates MA, Glennerster R. The generalizability puzzle. Stanf Soc Innov Rev. 2017;15(3):50–4.
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of a disability-inclusive ultra-poor graduation programme in Uganda: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial with process evaluation
Authors
Elijah Kipchumba
Calum Davey
Sarah Marks
Anthony Mugeere
Shanquan Chen
Lena Morgon Banks
Kazi Eliza Islam
Tom Shakespeare
Hannah Kuper
Munshi Sulaiman
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08040-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Trials 1/2024 Go to the issue