Top

Published in:

01-02-2012

Evaluating the Impact of a Substance Use Intervention Program on the Peer Status and Influence of Adolescent Peer Leaders

Authors: Christopher S. Sheppard, Megan Golonka, Philip R. Costanzo

Published in: Prevention Science | Issue 1/2012

Abstract

The current study involved an examination of the impact of a peer-led substance use intervention program on the peer leaders beyond the substance use-related goals of the intervention. Specifically, unintended consequences of an adult-sanctioned intervention on the targeted peer leader change agents were investigated, including whether their participation affected their peer status, social influence, or self perceptions. Twenty-two 7th grade peer-identified intervention leaders were compared to 22 control leaders (who did not experience the intervention) and 146 cohort peers. Three groups of measures were employed: sociometric and behavioral nominations, social cognitive mapping, and leadership self-perceptions. Results indicated that unintended consequences appear to be a legitimate concern for females. Female intervention leaders declined in perceived popularity and liked most nominations over time, whereas males increased in total leader nominations. Explanations for these results are discussed and further directions suggested.

Bagwell, C. L., Coie, J. D., Terry, R. A., & Lochman, J. E. (2000). Peer clique participation and social status in preadolescence. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 45, 280–305.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.

Bot, S. M., Engels, R. C. M. E., Knibbe, R. A., & Meeus, W. (2005). Friends’ drinking and adolescent alcohol consumption: The moderating role of friendship characteristics. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 929–947. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.09.012.PubMedCrossRef

Cairns, R. B., Cairns, B. D., Neckerman, H. J., Gest, S., & Gariepy, J.-L. (1988). Social networks and aggressive behavior: Peer support or peer rejection? Developmental Psychology, 24, 815–823. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.815.CrossRef

Cairns, R. B., Gariepy, J.-L., & Kindermann, T. (1991). Identifying natural clusters in natural settings. Unpublished manuscript. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.

Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, 5th edition, Volume 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 779–861). New York: Wiley.

Costanzo, P., & Shaw, M. (1966). Conformity as a function of age level. Child Development, 37, 967–975. Retrieved from: http://www.srcd.org/

DeRosier, M. E., & Thomas, J. M. (2003). Strengthening sociometric prediction: Scientific advances in assessment of children’s peer relations. Child Development, 74, 1379–1392. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00613.PubMedCrossRef

Donaldson, S. I., Sussman, S., MacKinnon, D. P., Severson, H. H., Glynn, T., Murray, D. M., et al. (1996). Drug abuse prevention programming: Do we know what content works? American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 868–883. doi:10.1177/0002764296039007008.CrossRef

Engels, R., Scholte, R., van Lieshout, C., Kemp, R., & Overbeek, G. (2006). Peer group reputation and smoking and alcohol consumption in early adolescence. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 440–449. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.026.PubMedCrossRef

Farmer, T. W., & Rodkin, P. C. (1996). Antisocial and prosocial correlates of classroom social positions: The social network centrality perspective. Social Development, 5, 174–188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.1996.tb00079.x.CrossRef

Farmer, T. W., Rodkin, P. C., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (1999). Teacher-assessed behavioral configurations, peer-assessments, and self-concepts of elementary students with mild disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 33, 66–80. doi:10.1177/002246699903300201.CrossRef

Flom, P. L., Friedman, S. R., Jose, B., & Curtis, R. (2001). Peer norms regarding drug use and drug selling among household youth in a low-income ‘drug supermarket’ urban neighborhood. Drugs: Education, Policy, and Prevention., 8, 219–232. doi:10.1080/09687630124478.CrossRef

Gaughan, M. (2006). The gender structure of adolescent peer influence on drinking. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 47, 47–61. doi:10.1177/002214650604700104.PubMedCrossRef

Golonka, M., Peairs, K., Grimes, C. L., & Costanzo, P. R. (2007). Using natural peer leaders as substance use prevention agents: A preliminary trial. Paper presented at the 15th annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Washington, D.C.

Harrison, P. A., Fulkerson, J. A., & Park, E. (2000). The relative importance of social versus commercial sources in youth access to tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs. Preventive Medicine, 31, 39–48. doi:10.1006/pmed.2000.0691.PubMedCrossRef

Haynie, D. L. (2003). Contexts of risk? Explaining the link between girls’ pubertal development and their delinquency involvement. Social Forces, 82, 355–397.CrossRef

Hollingshead, A. B. (1979). Four-factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript, New Haven, CT.

Kandel, D. B., & Adler, I. (1982). Socialization into marijuana use among French adolescents: A cross-cultural comparison with the United States. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 23, 295–309. Retrieved from: http://www.asanet.org/journals/jhsb/index.cfm

Killeya-Jones, L. A., Nakajima, R., & Costanzo, P. R. (2007). Peer standing and substance use in early-adolescent grade-level networks: A short-term longitiudinal study. Prevention Science, 8, 11–23. doi:10.1007/s11121-006-0053-2.PubMedCrossRef

Lansford, J. E., Miller, S., Malone, P. S., Costanzo, P. R., Grimes, C., & Putallaz, M. (2009). Social network centrality and leadership status: Links with problem behaviors and tests of gender differences. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55, 1–25.PubMedCrossRef

Miller-Johnson, S., & Costanzo, P. R. (2004). If you can’t beat ‘em…have them join you: Peer-based interventions during adolescence. In J. B. Kupersmidt & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Children’s peer relations: From development to intervention to policy: A festschrift in honor of John D. Coie (pp. 209–222). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef

Miller-Johnson, S., Costanzo, P. R., Coie, J. D., Rose, M. R., Browne, D. C., & Johnson, C. (2003). Peer social structure and risk-taking behaviors among African American early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 375–384. doi:10.1023/A:1024926132419.CrossRef

Olds, R. S., & Thombs, D. L. (2001). The relationship of adolescents’ perceptions of peer norms and parent involvement to cigarette and alcohol use. Journal of School Health, 71, 223–228. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2001.tb01322.x.PubMedCrossRef

Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14–24. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.36.1.14.PubMedCrossRef

Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1531–1543. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531.PubMedCrossRef

Sumter, S. R., Bokhorst, C. L., Steinberg, L., & Westenberg, P. M. (2009). The developmental pattern of resistance to peer influence in adolescence: Will the teenager ever be able to resist? Journal of Adolescence, 32, 1009–1021. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.08.010.PubMedCrossRef

Urberg, K. A., Degirmencioglu, S. M., & Pilgrim, C. (1997). Close friend and group influence on adolescent cigarette smoking and alcohol use. Developmental Psychology, 33, 834–844. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.5.834.PubMedCrossRef

Valente, T. W., Ritt-Olsen, A., Stacy, A., Unger, J. B., Okamato, J., & Sussman, S. (2007). Peer acceleration: Effects of a social network tailored substance abuse prevention program among high risk adolescents. Addiction, 102, 1804–1815. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01992.x.PubMedCrossRef

Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Siebenbruner, J., & Collins, W. A. (2003). A prospective study of intraindividual and peer influences on adolescents’ heterosexual romantic and sexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 381–394. doi:0004-0002/04/0800-0381/0.CrossRef

Title: Evaluating the Impact of a Substance Use Intervention Program on the Peer Status and Influence of Adolescent Peer Leaders
Authors: Christopher S. Sheppard
Megan Golonka
Philip R. Costanzo
Publication date: 01-02-2012
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Prevention Science / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0248-z

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Evaluating the Impact of a Substance Use Intervention Program on the Peer Status and Influence of Adolescent Peer Leaders

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Recruitment and Retention of Latino Immigrant Families in Prevention Research

Psychoactive Substance Use and the Risk of Motor Vehicle Crash Injuries in Southern Taiwan

The Effect of the PROSPER Partnership Model on Cultivating Local Stakeholder Knowledge of Evidence-Based Programs: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study of 28 Communities

Improving Participation Rates for Women of Color in Health Research: The Role of Group Cohesion

Mediators of Effects of a Selective Family-Focused Violence Prevention Approach for Middle School Students

Component Analysis of a School-Based Substance Use Prevention Program in Spain: Contributions of Problem Solving and Social Skills Training Content