Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2008

01-08-2008 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Evaluating the Impact of a Single-Day Multidisciplinary Clinic on the Management of Pancreatic Cancer

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 8/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary clinic on the clinical care recommendations of patients with pancreatic cancer compared with the recommendations the patients received prior to review by the multidisciplinary tumor board.

Methods

The records of 203 consecutive patients referred to the Johns Hopkins pancreatic multidisciplinary clinic were prospectively collected from November 2006 to October 2007. Cross-sectional imaging, pathology, and medical history were evaluated by a panel of medical/radiation oncologists, surgical oncologists, pathologists, diagnostic radiologists, and geneticists. Alterations in treatment recommendations between the outside institution and the multidisciplinary clinic were recorded and compared.

Results

On presentation, the outside computed tomography (CT) report described locally advanced/unresectable disease (34.9%), metastatic disease (17.7%), and locally advanced disease with metastasis (1.1%). On review of submitted imaging and imaging performed at Hopkins, 38 out of 203 (18.7%) patients had a change in the status of their clinical stage. Review of the histological slides by dedicated pancreatic pathologists resulted in changes in the interpretation for 7 of 203 patients (3.4%). Overall, 48 out of 203 (23.6%) patients had a change in their recommended management based on clinical review of their case by the multidisciplinary tumor board. Enrollment into the National Familial Pancreas Tumor Registry increased from 52 out of 106 (49.2%) patients in 2005 to 158 out of 203 (77.8%) with initiation of the multidisciplinary clinic.

Conclusion

The single-day pancreatic multidisciplinary clinic provided a comprehensive and coordinated evaluation of patients that led to changes in therapeutic recommendations in close to one-quarter of patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Back MF, Ang EL, Ng WH, et al. Improvements in quality of care resulting from a formal multidisciplinary tumour clinic in the management of high-grade glioma. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2007;36:347–51PubMed Back MF, Ang EL, Ng WH, et al. Improvements in quality of care resulting from a formal multidisciplinary tumour clinic in the management of high-grade glioma. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2007;36:347–51PubMed
2.
go back to reference Gabel M, Hilton NE, Nathanson SD. Multidisciplinary breast cancer clinics. Do they work? Cancer 1997;79:2380–4PubMedCrossRef Gabel M, Hilton NE, Nathanson SD. Multidisciplinary breast cancer clinics. Do they work? Cancer 1997;79:2380–4PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Petty JK, Vetto JT. Beyond doughnuts: tumor board recommendations influence patient care. J Cancer Educ 2002;17:97–100PubMed Petty JK, Vetto JT. Beyond doughnuts: tumor board recommendations influence patient care. J Cancer Educ 2002;17:97–100PubMed
4.
go back to reference Nyquist JG, Radecki SE, Gates JD, et al. An educational intervention to improve hospital tumor conferences. J Cancer Educ 1995;10:71–7PubMed Nyquist JG, Radecki SE, Gates JD, et al. An educational intervention to improve hospital tumor conferences. J Cancer Educ 1995;10:71–7PubMed
5.
go back to reference Radecki SE, Nyquist JG, Gates JD, et al. Educational characteristics of tumor conferences in teaching and non-teaching hospitals. J Cancer Educ 1995;9:204–16PubMed Radecki SE, Nyquist JG, Gates JD, et al. Educational characteristics of tumor conferences in teaching and non-teaching hospitals. J Cancer Educ 1995;9:204–16PubMed
6.
go back to reference Wright FC, De Vito C, Langer B, et al. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:1002–10PubMedCrossRef Wright FC, De Vito C, Langer B, et al. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: a systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:1002–10PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Newman EA, Guest AB, Helvie MA, et al. Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer 2006;107:2346–51PubMedCrossRef Newman EA, Guest AB, Helvie MA, et al. Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer 2006;107:2346–51PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H, et al. The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer 2001;91:1231–7PubMedCrossRef Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H, et al. The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: the University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer 2001;91:1231–7PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ujiki MB, Talamonti MS. Guidelines for the surgical management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Semin Oncol 2007;34:311–20PubMedCrossRef Ujiki MB, Talamonti MS. Guidelines for the surgical management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Semin Oncol 2007;34:311–20PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:1035–46PubMedCrossRef Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Abbruzzese JL, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: definitions, management, and role of preoperative therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:1035–46PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Crane CH, Varadhachary G, Wolff RA, et al. The argument for pre-operative chemoradiation for localized, radiographically resectable pancreatic cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006;20:365–82PubMedCrossRef Crane CH, Varadhachary G, Wolff RA, et al. The argument for pre-operative chemoradiation for localized, radiographically resectable pancreatic cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006;20:365–82PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Crane C, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2005;8:377–84PubMedCrossRef Varadhachary GR, Tamm EP, Crane C, et al. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2005;8:377–84PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Novick SL, Fishman EK. Three-dimensional CT angiography of pancreatic carcinoma: role in staging extent of disease. Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:139–43 Novick SL, Fishman EK. Three-dimensional CT angiography of pancreatic carcinoma: role in staging extent of disease. Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:139–43
14.
go back to reference House MG, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. Predicting resectability of periampullary cancer with three-dimensional computed tomography. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8:280–8PubMedCrossRef House MG, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, et al. Predicting resectability of periampullary cancer with three-dimensional computed tomography. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8:280–8PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Klein AP, Brune KA, Petersen GM, et al. Prospective risk of pancreatic cancer in familial pancreatic cancer kindreds. Cancer Res 2004;64:2634–8PubMedCrossRef Klein AP, Brune KA, Petersen GM, et al. Prospective risk of pancreatic cancer in familial pancreatic cancer kindreds. Cancer Res 2004;64:2634–8PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tseng JF, Raut CP, Lee JE, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8:935–49; discussion 949–50PubMedCrossRef Tseng JF, Raut CP, Lee JE, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection: margin status and survival duration. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8:935–49; discussion 949–50PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with en bloc portal vein resection for pancreatic carcinoma with suspected portal vein involvement. World J Surg 2004;28:602–8PubMedCrossRef Poon RT, Fan ST, Lo CM, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with en bloc portal vein resection for pancreatic carcinoma with suspected portal vein involvement. World J Surg 2004;28:602–8PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Harrison LE, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF. Isolated portal vein involvement in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A contraindication for resection? Ann Surg 1996;224:342–7; discussion 347–9PubMedCrossRef Harrison LE, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF. Isolated portal vein involvement in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A contraindication for resection? Ann Surg 1996;224:342–7; discussion 347–9PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bluemke DA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, et al. Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1995;197:381–5PubMed Bluemke DA, Cameron JL, Hruban RH, et al. Potentially resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: spiral CT assessment with surgical and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1995;197:381–5PubMed
20.
go back to reference Fishman EK, Horton KM. Imaging pancreatic cancer: the role of multidetector CT with three-dimensional CT angiography. Pancreatology 2001;1:610–24PubMedCrossRef Fishman EK, Horton KM. Imaging pancreatic cancer: the role of multidetector CT with three-dimensional CT angiography. Pancreatology 2001;1:610–24PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Schima W, Ba-Ssalamah A, Kolblinger C, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 2007;17:638–49PubMedCrossRef Schima W, Ba-Ssalamah A, Kolblinger C, et al. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 2007;17:638–49PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bartolozzi C, Donati F, Cioni D, et al. Detection of colorectal liver metastases: a prospective multicenter trial comparing unenhanced MRI, MnDPDP-enhanced MRI, and spiral CT. Eur Radiol 2004;14:14–20PubMedCrossRef Bartolozzi C, Donati F, Cioni D, et al. Detection of colorectal liver metastases: a prospective multicenter trial comparing unenhanced MRI, MnDPDP-enhanced MRI, and spiral CT. Eur Radiol 2004;14:14–20PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Balci NC, Semelka RC. Radiologic diagnosis and staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Radiol 2001;38:105–12PubMedCrossRef Balci NC, Semelka RC. Radiologic diagnosis and staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Radiol 2001;38:105–12PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Weg N, Scheer MR, Gabor MP. Liver lesions: improved detection with dual-detector-array CT and routine 2.5-mm thin collimation. Radiology 1998;209:417–26PubMed Weg N, Scheer MR, Gabor MP. Liver lesions: improved detection with dual-detector-array CT and routine 2.5-mm thin collimation. Radiology 1998;209:417–26PubMed
25.
go back to reference Kopka L, Grabbe E. Biphasic liver diagnosis with multiplanar-detector spiral CT. Radiologe 1999;39:971–8PubMedCrossRef Kopka L, Grabbe E. Biphasic liver diagnosis with multiplanar-detector spiral CT. Radiologe 1999;39:971–8PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kopp AF, Heuschmid M, Claussen CD. Multidetector helical CT of the liver for tumor detection and characterization. Eur Radiol 2002;12:745–752PubMedCrossRef Kopp AF, Heuschmid M, Claussen CD. Multidetector helical CT of the liver for tumor detection and characterization. Eur Radiol 2002;12:745–752PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Graf O, Boland GW, Warshaw AL, et al. Arterial versus portal venous helical CT for revealing pancreatic adenocarcinoma: conspicuity of tumor and critical vascular anatomy. Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:119–23 Graf O, Boland GW, Warshaw AL, et al. Arterial versus portal venous helical CT for revealing pancreatic adenocarcinoma: conspicuity of tumor and critical vascular anatomy. Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:119–23
28.
go back to reference McCarthy MJ, Evans J, Sagar G, et al. Prediction of resectability of pancreatic malignancy by computed tomography. Br J Surg 1998;85:320–5PubMedCrossRef McCarthy MJ, Evans J, Sagar G, et al. Prediction of resectability of pancreatic malignancy by computed tomography. Br J Surg 1998;85:320–5PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Fishman EK, Wyatt SH, Ney DR, et al. Spiral CT of the pancreas with multiplanar display. Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:1209–15 Fishman EK, Wyatt SH, Ney DR, et al. Spiral CT of the pancreas with multiplanar display. Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:1209–15
30.
go back to reference Nakagohri T, Kinoshita T, Konishi M, et al. Survival benefits of portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 2003;186:149–53PubMedCrossRef Nakagohri T, Kinoshita T, Konishi M, et al. Survival benefits of portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg 2003;186:149–53PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Weitz J, Kienle P, Schmidt J, et al. Portal vein resection for advanced pancreatic head cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:712–6PubMedCrossRef Weitz J, Kienle P, Schmidt J, et al. Portal vein resection for advanced pancreatic head cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:712–6PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Metz DC. Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Semin Gastrointest Dis 1995;6:67–78PubMed Metz DC. Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Semin Gastrointest Dis 1995;6:67–78PubMed
33.
34.
go back to reference Teh SH, Deveney C, Sheppard BC. Aggressive pancreatic resection for primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: is it justifiable? Am J Surg 2007;193:610–3; discussion 613PubMedCrossRef Teh SH, Deveney C, Sheppard BC. Aggressive pancreatic resection for primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: is it justifiable? Am J Surg 2007;193:610–3; discussion 613PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Norton JA, Kivlen M, Li M, et al. Morbidity and mortality of aggressive resection in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors. Arch Surg 2003;138:859–66PubMedCrossRef Norton JA, Kivlen M, Li M, et al. Morbidity and mortality of aggressive resection in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors. Arch Surg 2003;138:859–66PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Kronz JD, Westra WH, Epstein JI. Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital. Cancer 1999;86:2426–35PubMedCrossRef Kronz JD, Westra WH, Epstein JI. Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital. Cancer 1999;86:2426–35PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Tomaszewski JE, LiVolsi VA. Mandatory second opinion of pathologic slides: is it necessary? Cancer 1999;86:2198–200PubMedCrossRef Tomaszewski JE, LiVolsi VA. Mandatory second opinion of pathologic slides: is it necessary? Cancer 1999;86:2198–200PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA 2004;291:2720–6PubMedCrossRef Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities. JAMA 2004;291:2720–6PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Ford BM, Evans JS, Stoffel EM, et al. Factors associated with enrollment in cancer genetics research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:1355–9PubMedCrossRef Ford BM, Evans JS, Stoffel EM, et al. Factors associated with enrollment in cancer genetics research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:1355–9PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Townsley CA, Selby R, Siu LL. Systematic review of barriers to the recruitment of older patients with cancer onto clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3112–24PubMedCrossRef Townsley CA, Selby R, Siu LL. Systematic review of barriers to the recruitment of older patients with cancer onto clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3112–24PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluating the Impact of a Single-Day Multidisciplinary Clinic on the Management of Pancreatic Cancer
Publication date
01-08-2008
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 8/2008
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-9929-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2008

Annals of Surgical Oncology 8/2008 Go to the issue