Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Economics Review 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

Evaluating the administration costs of biologic drugs: development of a cost algorithm

Authors: Ebenezer K Tetteh, Stephen Morris

Published in: Health Economics Review | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Biologic drugs, as with all other medical technologies, are subject to a number of regulatory, marketing, reimbursement (financing) and other demand-restricting hurdles applied by healthcare payers. One example is the routine use of cost-effectiveness analyses or health technology assessments to determine which medical technologies offer value-for-money. The manner in which these assessments are conducted suggests that, holding all else equal, the economic value of biologic drugs may be determined by how much is spent on administering these drugs or trade-offs between drug acquisition and administration costs. Yet, on the supply-side, it seems very little attention is given to how manufacturing and formulation choices affect healthcare delivery costs. This paper evaluates variations in the administration costs of biologic drugs, taking care to ensure consistent inclusion of all relevant cost resources. From this, it develops a regression-based algorithm with which manufacturers could possibly predict, during process development, how their manufacturing and formulation choices may impact on the healthcare delivery costs of their products.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Danzon PM, Wang YR, Wang L: The impact of price regulation on the launch delay of new drug - evidence from twenty-five major markets in the 1990s. Health Econ 2005, 14(3):269–292. 10.1002/hec.931CrossRefPubMed Danzon PM, Wang YR, Wang L: The impact of price regulation on the launch delay of new drug - evidence from twenty-five major markets in the 1990s. Health Econ 2005, 14(3):269–292. 10.1002/hec.931CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cheng MM, Alfonso R, Best JH, Garrison LP, Bruhn D, Veenstra DL: The economic value of reducing medication dosing frequency with drug delivery technologies: an evidence assessment. J Med Econ 2010, 13(2):193–202. 10.3111/13696991003757500CrossRefPubMed Cheng MM, Alfonso R, Best JH, Garrison LP, Bruhn D, Veenstra DL: The economic value of reducing medication dosing frequency with drug delivery technologies: an evidence assessment. J Med Econ 2010, 13(2):193–202. 10.3111/13696991003757500CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Tetteh E, Morris S: Systematic review of drug administration costs and implications for biopharmaceutical manufacturing. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2013, 1–12. Tetteh E, Morris S: Systematic review of drug administration costs and implications for biopharmaceutical manufacturing. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2013, 1–12.
4.
go back to reference Dranove D: Measuring costs. In Valuing health care: Costs, benefits, and effectiveness of pharmaceuticals and other medical technologies. Edited by: Sloan FA. Cambridge University Press, New York; 1995:61–75. 10.1017/CBO9780511625817.004CrossRef Dranove D: Measuring costs. In Valuing health care: Costs, benefits, and effectiveness of pharmaceuticals and other medical technologies. Edited by: Sloan FA. Cambridge University Press, New York; 1995:61–75. 10.1017/CBO9780511625817.004CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Arrow KJ: Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev 1963, 53(5):941–973. Arrow KJ: Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. Am Econ Rev 1963, 53(5):941–973.
6.
go back to reference Dardanoni V, Wagstaff A: Uncertainty and the demand for medical care. J Health Econ 1990, 9(1):23. 10.1016/0167-6296(90)90039-6CrossRefPubMed Dardanoni V, Wagstaff A: Uncertainty and the demand for medical care. J Health Econ 1990, 9(1):23. 10.1016/0167-6296(90)90039-6CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nixon RM, Thompson SG: Parametric modelling of cost data in medical studies. Statist Med 2004, 23(8):1311–1331. 10.1002/sim.1744CrossRef Nixon RM, Thompson SG: Parametric modelling of cost data in medical studies. Statist Med 2004, 23(8):1311–1331. 10.1002/sim.1744CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Briggs AH, Claxton K, Sculpher MJ: Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York; 2006. Briggs AH, Claxton K, Sculpher MJ: Decision modelling for health economic evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York; 2006.
9.
go back to reference Duan N: Smearing estimate: a nonparametric retransformation method. J Am Stat Assoc 1983, 78(383):605–610. 10.1080/01621459.1983.10478017CrossRef Duan N: Smearing estimate: a nonparametric retransformation method. J Am Stat Assoc 1983, 78(383):605–610. 10.1080/01621459.1983.10478017CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Manning W: The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problem. J Health Econ 1998, 17(3):283–295. 10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00025-3CrossRefPubMed Manning W: The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problem. J Health Econ 1998, 17(3):283–295. 10.1016/S0167-6296(98)00025-3CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Manning WG, Mullahy J: Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? J Health Econ 2001, 20(4):461–494. 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00086-8CrossRefPubMed Manning WG, Mullahy J: Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? J Health Econ 2001, 20(4):461–494. 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00086-8CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wooldridge JM: Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. Cengage Learning, Michigan; 2012. Wooldridge JM: Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. Cengage Learning, Michigan; 2012.
13.
go back to reference Barber J, Thompson S: Multiple regression of cost data: use of generalised linear models. J Health Serv Res Policy 2004, 9(4):197–204. 10.1258/1355819042250249CrossRefPubMed Barber J, Thompson S: Multiple regression of cost data: use of generalised linear models. J Health Serv Res Policy 2004, 9(4):197–204. 10.1258/1355819042250249CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Moran JL, Solomon PJ, Peisach AR, Martin J: New models for old questions: generalized linear models for cost prediction. J Eval Clin Pract 2007, 13(3):381–389. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00711.xCrossRefPubMed Moran JL, Solomon PJ, Peisach AR, Martin J: New models for old questions: generalized linear models for cost prediction. J Eval Clin Pract 2007, 13(3):381–389. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00711.xCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Manning WG, Basu A, Mullahy J: Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data. J Health Econ 2005, 24(3):465–488. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.011CrossRefPubMed Manning WG, Basu A, Mullahy J: Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data. J Health Econ 2005, 24(3):465–488. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.011CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Basu A, Rathouz PJ: Estimating marginal and incremental effects on health outcomes using flexible link and variance function models. Biostatistics 2005, 6(1):93–109. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxh020CrossRefPubMed Basu A, Rathouz PJ: Estimating marginal and incremental effects on health outcomes using flexible link and variance function models. Biostatistics 2005, 6(1):93–109. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxh020CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Basu A: Extended generalized linear models: simultaneous estimation of flexible link and variance functions. Stata J 2005, 5(4):501. Basu A: Extended generalized linear models: simultaneous estimation of flexible link and variance functions. Stata J 2005, 5(4):501.
18.
go back to reference Kennedy PE: Estimation with correctly interpreted dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Am Econ Rev 1981, 71(4):801. Kennedy PE: Estimation with correctly interpreted dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Am Econ Rev 1981, 71(4):801.
19.
go back to reference Jan Van Garderen K, Shah C: Exact interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Econometr J 2002, 5(1):149–159. 10.1111/1368-423X.00078CrossRef Jan Van Garderen K, Shah C: Exact interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Econometr J 2002, 5(1):149–159. 10.1111/1368-423X.00078CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bittner B, Richter W, Hourcade-Potelleret F, McIntyre C, Herting F, Zepeda M, Schmidt J: Development of a subcutaneous formulation for trastuzumab - nonclinical and clinical bridging approach to the approved intravenous dosing regimen. Arzneimittelforschung 2012, 62(09):401–409. 10.1055/s-0032-1321831CrossRefPubMed Bittner B, Richter W, Hourcade-Potelleret F, McIntyre C, Herting F, Zepeda M, Schmidt J: Development of a subcutaneous formulation for trastuzumab - nonclinical and clinical bridging approach to the approved intravenous dosing regimen. Arzneimittelforschung 2012, 62(09):401–409. 10.1055/s-0032-1321831CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wynne C, Harvey V, Schwabe C, Waaka D, McIntyre C, Bittner B: Comparison of subcutaneous and intravenous administration of trastuzumab: a phase i/ib trial in healthy male volunteers and patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Pharmacol 2013, 53(2):192–201. 10.1177/0091270012436560CrossRefPubMed Wynne C, Harvey V, Schwabe C, Waaka D, McIntyre C, Bittner B: Comparison of subcutaneous and intravenous administration of trastuzumab: a phase i/ib trial in healthy male volunteers and patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Pharmacol 2013, 53(2):192–201. 10.1177/0091270012436560CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Samanta K, Moore L, Jones G, Evason J, Owen G: PCN39 Potential time and cost savings with herceptin (Trastuzumab) subcutaneous (SC) injection versus herceptin intravenous (IV) infusion: results from three different english patient settings. Value Health 2012, 15(7):A415. 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.1232CrossRef Samanta K, Moore L, Jones G, Evason J, Owen G: PCN39 Potential time and cost savings with herceptin (Trastuzumab) subcutaneous (SC) injection versus herceptin intravenous (IV) infusion: results from three different english patient settings. Value Health 2012, 15(7):A415. 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.1232CrossRef
23.
go back to reference De Cock E, Tao S, Urspruch A, Knoop A: RU2 Potential time savings with trastuzumab subcutaneous (SC) injection versus trastuzumab intravenous (IV) infusion: results from interviews conducted as part of a time-and-motion Study (T&M) across 17 sites. Value Health 2012, 15(7):A280. 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.489CrossRef De Cock E, Tao S, Urspruch A, Knoop A: RU2 Potential time savings with trastuzumab subcutaneous (SC) injection versus trastuzumab intravenous (IV) infusion: results from interviews conducted as part of a time-and-motion Study (T&M) across 17 sites. Value Health 2012, 15(7):A280. 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.489CrossRef
24.
go back to reference De La Horrie GF: Making biologic drugs more affordable. Drug discovery and development magazine. 8–10–2013. 8–10–2013. Ref Type: Online Source. De La Horrie GF: Making biologic drugs more affordable. Drug discovery and development magazine. 8–10–2013. 8–10–2013. Ref Type: Online Source.
25.
26.
go back to reference Parker SE: Pharmacoeconomics of intravenous drug administration. Pharmacoeconomics 1992, 1(2):103–115. 10.2165/00019053-199201020-00007CrossRefPubMed Parker SE: Pharmacoeconomics of intravenous drug administration. Pharmacoeconomics 1992, 1(2):103–115. 10.2165/00019053-199201020-00007CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Dychter SS: Subcutaneous drug delivery: a route to increased safety, patient satisfaction, and reduced costs. Infus Nurs 2012, 35(3):154. 10.1097/NAN.0b013e31824d2271CrossRef Dychter SS: Subcutaneous drug delivery: a route to increased safety, patient satisfaction, and reduced costs. Infus Nurs 2012, 35(3):154. 10.1097/NAN.0b013e31824d2271CrossRef
28.
Metadata
Title
Evaluating the administration costs of biologic drugs: development of a cost algorithm
Authors
Ebenezer K Tetteh
Stephen Morris
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Health Economics Review / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 2191-1991
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-014-0026-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Health Economics Review 1/2014 Go to the issue