Top

European Journal of Plastic Surgery

Published in:

01-12-2024 | Review

Evaluating suturing methods for surgical repair of muscle belly lacerations: a scoping review of biomechanical studies

Authors: Avril Stulginski, Medha Vallurupalli, Mikhail Pakvasa, Cathy J. Tang, Eric D. Wang, Amber R. Leis

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 1/2024

Abstract

Background

Surgical repair of muscle lacerations is the standard of care to restore function. Compared to non-surgically repaired lacerations, surgical repairs have been shown to heal faster and have higher strength return and lower incidence of hematomas. Multiple techniques have been reported to repair muscle lacerations. There are many factors to consider in choosing a technique for muscle belly repair including scar tissue formation, length of immobilization, strength of repair, and suture pullout. An ideal repair method has not yet been clearly identified; therefore, the purpose of this review is to evaluate the existing literature on various repair methods and the methods used to test them.

Methods

Using the PRISMA-ScR framework, a scoping review was performed to identify biomechanical studies that examined the strength and efficacy of muscle belly repair techniques. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched to locate relevant studies.

Results

Nine original studies which met inclusion criteria were selected for final review. Six studies evaluated specific suture techniques, while the remaining three studies evaluated, inclusion of epimysium in the repair, repair of the epimysium versus perimysium, and porcine versus bovine skeletal muscle biomechanical properties. While the six studies evaluating suture techniques tested overlapping suture types, they varied in preload and peak load values and the type of suture used, yielding heterogenous data. The compiled data did not support one method being the optimal repair choice.

Conclusions

Existing literature evaluating the mechanics of muscle repair is limited by a lack of standardization. The included studies suggest that using sutures which incorporate the epimysium or using a combination of sutures that anchor the core of the muscle belly and encompass the perimeter may yield more robust repairs than other techniques. However, further research using comparable experimental conditions is necessary to identify an ideal muscle belly repair technique.

Level of evidence: Not gradable.

Available only for authorised users

Oliva F, Via AG, Kiritsi O, Foti C, Maffulli N (2013) Surgical repair of muscle laceration: biomechanical properties at 6 years follow-up. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 3(4):313–317CrossRefPubMed

Castillo AC, Kaltwasser K, Morris R et al (2021) Comparing 3 suture techniques after muscle laceration repair. HAND 16(1):67–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944719837021CrossRefPubMed

Menetrey J, Kasemkijwattana C, Fu FH, Moreland MS, Huard J (1999) Suturing versus immobilization of a muscle laceration. Am J Sports Med 27(2):222–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465990270021801CrossRefPubMed

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W et al (2018) PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 169(7):467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850CrossRefPubMed

Kragh JF, Svoboda SJ, Wenke JC, Ward JA, Walters TJ (2005) Epimysium and perimysium in suturing in skeletal muscle lacerations. J Trauma 59(1):209–212. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000171530.11588.70CrossRefPubMed

Kragh JF, Svoboda SJ, Wenke JC, Brooks DE, Bice TG, Walters TJ (2005) The role of epimysium in suturing skeletal muscle lacerations. J Am Coll Surg 200(1):38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.09.009CrossRefPubMed

Kragh JF, Svoboda SJ, Wenke JC, Ward JA, Walters TJ (2005) Passive biomechanical properties of sutured mammalian muscle lacerations. J Invest Surg 18(1):19–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941930590905170CrossRefPubMed

He M, Sebastin SJ, Gan AWT, Lim AYT, Chong AKS (2014) Biomechanical comparison of different suturing techniques in rabbit medial gastrocnemius muscle laceration repair. Ann Plast Surg 73(3):333–335. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31827ae9b0CrossRefPubMed

Goyal KS, Speeckaert AL, Goitz RJ, Tavana ML (2019) A comparison of barbed suture versus traditional techniques for muscle belly repair. Hand N Y N 14(1):91–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944718798853CrossRef

10.

Chance JR, Krgh JK, Agrawal CM, Basamania CJ (2005) Pullout forces of sutures in muscle lacerations. Orthopedics 28(10):1187–1190. https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-20051001-16CrossRefPubMed

11.

Kragh JF, Svoboda SJ, Wenke JC, Ward JA, Walters TJ. Suturing of lacerations of skeletal muscle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87-B(9):1303–1305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B9.15728

12.

Lionello G, Fognani R, Baleani M, Sudanese A, Toni A (2015) Suturing the myotendinous junction in total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical comparison of different stitching techniques. Clin Biomech 30(10):1077–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.09.003CrossRef

13.

Julien TP, Mudgal CS (2011) Anchor suture technique for muscle belly repair. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 15(4):257–259. https://doi.org/10.1097/BTH.0b013e318220e75aCrossRefPubMed

14.

Green CJ, Wang A, Henderson J, Ebert J, Edwards P (2020) Successful surgical repair of a full-thickness intramuscular muscle belly rupture of pectoralis major. JSES Int 4(1):91–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jses.2019.10.006CrossRefPubMed

15.

Järvinen MJ, Lehto MUK (1993) The effects of early mobilisation and immobilisation on the healing process following muscle injuries. Sports Med 15(2):78–89. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199315020-00002CrossRefPubMed

16.

Kannus P (2000) Immobilization or early mobilization after an acute soft-tissue injury? Phys Sportsmed 28(3):55–63. https://doi.org/10.3810/psm.2000.03.775CrossRefPubMed

17.

Almekinders LC (1991) Results of surgical repair versus splinting of experimentally transected muscle. J Orthop Trauma 5(2):173–176. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-199105020-00009CrossRefPubMed

18.

Maddox GE, Ludwig J, Craig ER et al (2015) Flexor tendon repair with a knotless, bidirectional barbed suture: an in vivo biomechanical analysis. J Hand Surg 40(5):963–968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.01.013CrossRef

19.

Çolak Ö, Kankaya Y, Sungur N et al (2019) Barbed sutures versus conventional tenorrhaphy in flexor tendon repair: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis. Arch Plast Surg 46(03):228–234. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.00962CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Shah A, Rowlands M, Au A (2015) Barbed sutures and tendon repair—a review. HAND 10(1):6–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11552-014-9669-zCrossRefPubMed

21.

Shin JY, Kim JS, Roh SG, Lee NH, Yang KM (2016) Biomechanical analysis of barbed suture in flexor tendon repair versus conventional method: systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 138(4):666e–674e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002573CrossRefPubMed

22.

Huang Y, Cadet ER, King MW, Cole JH (2022) Comparison of the mechanical properties and anchoring performance of polyvinylidene fluoride and polypropylene barbed sutures for tendon repair. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 110(10):2258–2265. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35074CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Miller B, Dodds SD, deMars A, Zagoreas N, Waitayawinyu T, Trumble TE (2007) Flexor tendon repairs: the impact of fiberwire on grasping and locking core sutures. J Hand Surg 32(5):591–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.03.003CrossRef

24.

Kim HM, Nelson G, Thomopoulos S, Silva MJ, Das R, Gelberman RH (2010) Technical and biological modifications for enhanced flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg 35(6):1031–1037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.12.044CrossRef

25.

Rawson S, Cartmell S, Wong J (2013) Suture techniques for tendon repair; a comparative review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J 3(3):220–228CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Gelberman RH, Boyer MI, Brodt MD, Winters SC, Silva MJ. The effect of gap formation at the repair site on the strength and excursion of Intrasynovial flexor tendons. An experimental study on the early stages of tendon-healing in dogs*: J Bone Jt Surg. 1999;81(7):975–982. doi:https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199907000-00010

27.

Terada, Shinichiro Takayama, Harumo N. Muscle repair after a transsection injury with development of a gap: an experimental study in rats. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2001;35(3):233–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/028443101750523131

28.

Gardner T, Kenter K, Li Y (2020) Fibrosis following acute skeletal muscle injury: mitigation and reversal potential in the clinic. J Sports Med 2020:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7059057CrossRef

29.

Maquirriain J (2011) Achilles tendon rupture: avoiding tendon lengthening during surgical repair and rehabilitation. Yale J Biol Med 84(3):289–300PubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Fischer B, Kurz S, Höch A, Schleifenbaum S (2020) The influence of different sample preparation on mechanical properties of human iliotibial tract. Sci Rep 10(1):14836. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71790-5ADSCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Lansdown DA, Riff AJ, Meadows M, Yanke AB, Bach BR (2017) What factors influence the biomechanical properties of allograft tissue for ACL reconstruction? A systematic review Clin Orthop 475(10):2412–2426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5330-9CrossRefPubMed

32.

Hammer N, Lingslebe U, Aust G, Milani TL, Hädrich C, Steinke H (2012) Ultimate stress and age-dependent deformation characteristics of the iliotibial tract. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 16:81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.04.025CrossRefPubMed

33.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLOS Med 18(3):e1003583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Title: Evaluating suturing methods for surgical repair of muscle belly lacerations: a scoping review of biomechanical studies
Authors: Avril Stulginski
Medha Vallurupalli
Mikhail Pakvasa
Cathy J. Tang
Eric D. Wang
Amber R. Leis
Publication date: 01-12-2024
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-024-02161-w

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Evaluating suturing methods for surgical repair of muscle belly lacerations: a scoping review of biomechanical studies

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Abdominal compartment syndrome, not a rare phenomenon in patients with major burn injury

Potential benefits of adipose–derived SVF and MSCs to regenerate damaged tissues from alloplastic synthetic materials

Comparison between breast conserving therapy and oncoplastic reduction mammaplasty: a retrospective study

Do we practice what we teach: assessing trauma-informed breast exams in breast surgery literature

Frostbite injuries to the upper aerodigestive tract sustained from inhaled nitrous oxide

Optimizing gluteal augmentation with hyaluronic acid: a comprehensive anthropometric study