Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting 2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Keep up to date with all the top stories and latest evidence with our hub page, including official congress videos and expert takeaways.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Perspectives on Medical Education
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 5/2015

Open Access 01-10-2015 | PhD Report

Evaluating clinicians’ teaching performance

Author: Benjamin C.M. Boerebach

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Evaluations of clinicians’ teaching performance are usually a preliminary, although essential, activity in quality management and improvement activities. This PhD project focused on testing the validity, reliability and impact of a performance evaluation system named the System of Evaluation of Teaching Qualities (SETQ) across specialities and centres in the Netherlands. The results of this project show that the SETQ questionnaires can provide clinicians with valid and reliable performance feedback that can enhance their teaching performance. Also, we tried to investigate the predictive validity of the SETQ. In conclusion, the SETQ appears to be a helpful tool for improving clinicians’ teaching performance.
Literature
1.
Sargeant J, Eva KW, Armson H, et al. Features of assessment learners use to make informed self-assessments of clinical performance. Med Educ. 2011;45:636–47.CrossRef
2.
Sargeant J, Armson H, Chesluk B, et al. The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: a conceptual model. Acad Med. 2010;85:1212–20.CrossRef
3.
Lombarts KM, Bucx MJ, Arah OA. Development of a system for the evaluation of the teaching qualities of anesthesiology faculty. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:709–16.CrossRef
4.
Lombarts MJ, Bucx MJ, Rupp I, Keijzers PJ, Kokke SI, Schlack W. [An instrument for the assessment of the training qualities of clinician-educators]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007;151:2004–8.
5.
van der Leeuw R, Slootweg IA, Heineman MJ, Lombarts K. Explaining how faculty act upon residentsʼ feedback to improve their teaching performance. Med Educ. 2013;47:1089–98.CrossRef
6.
van der Leeuw RM, Overeem K, Arah OA, Heineman MJ, Lombarts KM. Frequency and determinants of residentsʼ narrative feedback on the teaching performance of faculty: narratives in numbers. Acad Med. 2013;88(9):1324–31.CrossRef
7.
Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Eva K, et al. Tensions in informed self-assessment: how the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Acad Med. 2011;86:1120–7.CrossRef
8.
Boerebach BC, Lombarts KM, Keijzer C, Heineman MJ, Arah OA. The teacher, the physician and the person: how facultyʼs teaching performance influences their role modelling. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32089.CrossRef
9.
Benbassat J. Role modeling in medical education: the importance of a reflective imitation. Acad Med. 2014;89:550–4.CrossRef
10.
Cruess SR, Cruess RL, Steinert Y. Role modelling–making the most of a powerful teaching strategy. BMJ. 2008;336:718–21.CrossRef
11.
Boerebach BC, Lombarts KM, Scherpbier AJ, Arah OA. The teacher, the physician and the person: exploring causal connections between teaching performance and role model types using directed acyclic graphs. PLoS One. 2013;8:e69449.CrossRef
12.
Fluit CR, Bolhuis S, Grol R, Laan R, Wensing M. Assessing the quality of clinical teachers: a systematic review of content and quality of questionnaires for assessing clinical teachers. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:1337–45.CrossRef
13.
Ivers NM, Grimshaw JM, Jamtvedt G, et al. Growing literature, stagnant science? Systematic review, meta-regression and cumulative analysis of audit and feedback interventions in health care. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29:1534–41.CrossRef
14.
Ostroff C, Atwater LE, Feinberg BJ. Understanding self-other agreement: a look at rater and ratee characteristics, context, and outcomes. Personnel Psychology. 2004;57:333–75.CrossRef
15.
Sargeant J, McNaughton E, Mercer S, Murphy D, Sullivan P, Bruce DA. Providing feedback: exploring a model (emotion, content, outcomes) for facilitating multisource feedback. Med Teach. 2011;33:744–9.CrossRef
16.
Donnon T, Al Ansari A, Al Alawi S, Violato C. The reliability, validity, and feasibility of multisource feedback physician assessment: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2014;89:511–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluating clinicians’ teaching performance
Author
Benjamin C.M. Boerebach
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0215-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Perspectives on Medical Education 5/2015 Go to the issue

Commentary

Commentary on competency-based medical education and scholarship: creating an active academic culture during residency

Commentary

Discussing dissection in anatomy education

Original Article

The Impact of item flaws, testing at low cognitive level, and low distractor functioning on multiple-choice question quality

Show and Tell

Developing students’ teaching through peer observation and feedback

Eye-Opener

Competency-based medical education and scholarship: Creating an active academic culture during residency

Original Article

Educational outcomes of Helping Babies Breathe training at a community hospital in Honduras