Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Protocol

Evacuation solutions for individuals with functional limitations in the built environment: a scoping review protocol

Authors: Brad W. R. Roberts, Abdulrahman Al Bochi, Mark Weiler, Yashoda Sharma, Cesar Marquez-Chin, Steven Pong, Jessica Babineau, Waqas Sajid, Tilak Dutta, Albert H. Vette

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Whether due to aging, disability, injury, or other circumstances, an increasing number of Canadians experience functional limitations that reduce their ability to participate in activities of daily life. While the built environment has become increasingly accessible, existing Canadian evacuation guidelines lack comprehensive strategies for evacuating individuals with functional limitations from buildings during emergencies. To inform guideline revisions, a map of existing solutions for evacuating such individuals is required. Therefore, this scoping review aims to provide an account of solutions that have been reported to safely evacuate individuals with functional limitations from the built environment.

Methods

We will conduct a scoping review using the Arksey and O’Malley methodological framework. To identify potentially relevant studies, comprehensive searches (from January 2002 onwards) of the CINAHL, Ei Compendex, Inspec, Embase, MEDLINE, KCI, RSCI, SciELO CI, Web of Science Collection, and Scopus databases will be performed. Using a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria, two reviewers will independently (1) classify identified studies as relevant, irrelevant, or maybe relevant by evaluating their titles and abstracts and (2) classify the relevant and maybe relevant studies as included or excluded by evaluating their full-text. From each included study, data on publication information, study purpose, methodological details, evacuation information, and outcomes will be extracted using a set of data extraction items. We will present a numerical summary of the key characteristics of the included studies. For each evacuation activity, reported evacuation solutions will be summarized, and citations provided for functional limitations that are targeted by a given evacuation solution. To inform Canadian evacuation guideline revisions, we will tabulate evacuation activities common to different types of buildings and emergencies.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this will be the first scoping review to identify the state and use of solutions for evacuating individuals with functional limitations from the built environment. Identifying solutions that enable all individuals to safely evacuate from different types of buildings will allow us to inform recommendations for the revision of evacuation guidelines in Canada and other jurisdictions. The findings of this scoping review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, presented at relevant conferences, and made publicly available on the internet.

Systematic review registration

Open Science Framework: osf.io/jefgy
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Morris S, Fawcett G, Brisebois L, Hughes J. A demographic, employment and income profile of Canadians with disabilities aged 15 years and over, 2017. Statistics Canada; 2018. Morris S, Fawcett G, Brisebois L, Hughes J. A demographic, employment and income profile of Canadians with disabilities aged 15 years and over, 2017. Statistics Canada; 2018.
2.
go back to reference Disability in Canada: A 2006 Profile. Human Resources and Skills Development Canada. 2006. Disability in Canada: A 2006 Profile. Human Resources and Skills Development Canada. 2006.
3.
go back to reference Canadian Survey on Disability, 2017. Statistics Canada. 2018. Canadian Survey on Disability, 2017. Statistics Canada. 2018.
4.
go back to reference Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1–14.CrossRef Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1–14.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Draft CCBFC policy position paper on accessibility in buildings. Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes. 2018. Draft CCBFC policy position paper on accessibility in buildings. Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes. 2018.
6.
go back to reference The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. United Nations. 2020. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. United Nations. 2020.
7.
go back to reference Proulx G, Pineau J. Internal Report (National Research Council of Canada. Institute for Research in Construction); no. IRC-IR-712. National Research Council Canada. 1996. Proulx G, Pineau J. Internal Report (National Research Council of Canada. Institute for Research in Construction); no. IRC-IR-712. National Research Council Canada. 1996.
9.
go back to reference Braun J, Gertz SD, Furer A, Bader T, Frenkel H, Chen J, et al. The promising future of drones in prehospital medical care and its application to battlefield medicine. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;87:28–34.CrossRef Braun J, Gertz SD, Furer A, Bader T, Frenkel H, Chen J, et al. The promising future of drones in prehospital medical care and its application to battlefield medicine. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;87:28–34.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Feng Z, González VA, Amor R, Lovreglio R, Cabrera-Guerrero G. Immersive virtual reality serious games for evacuation training and research: a systematic literature review. Comput Educ. 2018;127:252–66.CrossRef Feng Z, González VA, Amor R, Lovreglio R, Cabrera-Guerrero G. Immersive virtual reality serious games for evacuation training and research: a systematic literature review. Comput Educ. 2018;127:252–66.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:1–25.CrossRef Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:1–25.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.CrossRef Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien K. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:1–9.CrossRef Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien K. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:1–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:1291–4.CrossRef Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O’Brien KK, Straus S, Tricco AC, Perrier L, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:1291–4.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual 2015: Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews. The Joanna Briggs Institute. 2015. The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual 2015: Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews. The Joanna Briggs Institute. 2015.
16.
go back to reference Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–73.CrossRef Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–73.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:1–10.CrossRef Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien K, Colquhoun H, Kastner M, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:1–10.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference A Practical Manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization. 2013. A Practical Manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). World Health Organization. 2013.
Metadata
Title
Evacuation solutions for individuals with functional limitations in the built environment: a scoping review protocol
Authors
Brad W. R. Roberts
Abdulrahman Al Bochi
Mark Weiler
Yashoda Sharma
Cesar Marquez-Chin
Steven Pong
Jessica Babineau
Waqas Sajid
Tilak Dutta
Albert H. Vette
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01844-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Systematic Reviews 1/2021 Go to the issue