Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Globalization and Health 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

European Union implementation of Article 5.3 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control

Authors: Benjamin Hawkins, Chris Holden

Published in: Globalization and Health | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Article 5.3 of the World Health Organization’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) requires Parties to the agreement to take proactive measures to protect health policy from the vested interests of the tobacco industry. Parties to the FCTC are required to submit periodic reports to the Convention Secretariat on the efforts undertaken to implement it. Previous analyses of national compliance with the FCTC suggest that Article 5.3 implementation is piecemeal and insufficient in many contexts, with governments relying on general transparency and other existing policies for the purpose of Article 5.3 implementation. No in-depth study of Article 5.3 compliance within the European Union (EU) – a signatory to the Convention – has been undertaken. This study seeks to assess the extent of Article 5.3 compliance in European Union institutions, through an analysis of the mechanisms in place in the European Commission and European Parliament. It analyses EU documents relevant to Article 5.3 compliance, as well as semi-structured interviews with policy actors in the EU institutions and the field of tobacco control.

Results

As with many national governments, Article 5.3 compliance within EU institutions is partial and incomplete. Much of the compliance activity cited in EU reports is derived from general codes of conduct for EU staff and the Juncker Commission’s transparency agenda. Interview respondents reveal widespread lack of knowledge about the existence of the FCTC and Article 5.3 amongst key policy actors across the institutions. Within the Commission policies vary greatly between Directorates General, and issues surrounding the conceptualisation of the role of Members of the European Parliament affect implementation in that context. While there is growing awareness of the issue in both the Commission and the Parliament, in large part as a result of the experience of lobbying over the Tobacco Products Directive, there remains considerable resistance in both institutions to further substantive action to implement Article 5.3.

Conclusions

We recommend that a binding and comprehensive policy and code of conduct, specifically designed for the implementation of Article 5.3 and based on the World Health Organization’s guidelines, be created to cover the activities of all employees of all EU institutions. Crucially, such guidelines would need to deal explicitly with third parties acting for the tobacco industry.
Literature
6.
go back to reference Lee S. What hinders implementation of the WHO FCTC article 5.3?–the case of South Korea. Global public health. 2016;11(9):1109–20.CrossRef Lee S. What hinders implementation of the WHO FCTC article 5.3?–the case of South Korea. Global public health. 2016;11(9):1109–20.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Costa H, Gilmore AB, Peeters S, McKee M, Stuckler D. Quantifying the influence of the tobacco industry on EU governance: automated content analysis of the EU tobacco products directive. Tob Control. 2014;23(6):473–8.CrossRef Costa H, Gilmore AB, Peeters S, McKee M, Stuckler D. Quantifying the influence of the tobacco industry on EU governance: automated content analysis of the EU tobacco products directive. Tob Control. 2014;23(6):473–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lewis J. The Council of the European Union and the European Council. In: Magone J, editor. Routledge Handbook of European Politics. Abingdon: Routledge; 2015. Lewis J. The Council of the European Union and the European Council. In: Magone J, editor. Routledge Handbook of European Politics. Abingdon: Routledge; 2015.
17.
go back to reference Hawkins B, Holden C. A corporate veto on health policy? Global constitutionalism and investor–state dispute settlement. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2016;41(5):969–95.CrossRef Hawkins B, Holden C. A corporate veto on health policy? Global constitutionalism and investor–state dispute settlement. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2016;41(5):969–95.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2012. Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2012.
20.
go back to reference Hawkins B, Cassidy R. Interviewing key informants from the corporate sector. In: Lee K, Hawkins B, editors. Researching corporations and Global Health governance: an interdisciplinary guide. London: Rowman and Littlefield; 2016. p. 127–38. Hawkins B, Cassidy R. Interviewing key informants from the corporate sector. In: Lee K, Hawkins B, editors. Researching corporations and Global Health governance: an interdisciplinary guide. London: Rowman and Littlefield; 2016. p. 127–38.
21.
go back to reference Nugent N, Rhinard M. The European Commission. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015.CrossRef Nugent N, Rhinard M. The European Commission. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Nugent N. The government and politics of the European Union. 8th ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2017.CrossRef Nugent N. The government and politics of the European Union. 8th ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2017.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Palmer M. The European Parliament: what it is, what it does, how it works. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 2015. Palmer M. The European Parliament: what it is, what it does, how it works. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 2015.
36.
go back to reference Regulation No 31 (EEC), 11 (EAEC), Laying Down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community. 2017. Regulation No 31 (EEC), 11 (EAEC), Laying Down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community. 2017.
40.
go back to reference Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001). 2001. Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ L 145, 31.5.2001). 2001.
47.
go back to reference Smith KE, Gilmore AB, Fooks G, Collin J, Weishaar H. Tobacco industry attempts to undermine article 5.3 and the “good governance” trap. Tob Control. 2009; Smith KE, Gilmore AB, Fooks G, Collin J, Weishaar H. Tobacco industry attempts to undermine article 5.3 and the “good governance” trap. Tob Control. 2009;
48.
go back to reference Mulcahy S. Lobbying in Europe: hidden influence, privileged access. Berlin: Transparency International; 2015. Mulcahy S. Lobbying in Europe: hidden influence, privileged access. Berlin: Transparency International; 2015.
49.
go back to reference Gornall J. Slaying the dragon: how the tobacco industry refuses to die. BMJ. 2015;350:h2052.CrossRef Gornall J. Slaying the dragon: how the tobacco industry refuses to die. BMJ. 2015;350:h2052.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Holden C, Hawkins B. Health policy, corporate influence and multi-level governance: the case of alcohol policy in the European Union. In: Kenworthy N, MacKenzie R, Lee K, editors. Case studies on corporations and global health governance: impacts, influence and accountability. London: Rowman and Littlefield; 2016. p. 145–58. Holden C, Hawkins B. Health policy, corporate influence and multi-level governance: the case of alcohol policy in the European Union. In: Kenworthy N, MacKenzie R, Lee K, editors. Case studies on corporations and global health governance: impacts, influence and accountability. London: Rowman and Littlefield; 2016. p. 145–58.
51.
go back to reference Lencucha R, Drope J, Chavez JJ. Whole-of-government approaches to NCDs: the case of the Philippines interagency committee—tobacco. Health Policy Plan. 2015;30(7):844–52.CrossRef Lencucha R, Drope J, Chavez JJ. Whole-of-government approaches to NCDs: the case of the Philippines interagency committee—tobacco. Health Policy Plan. 2015;30(7):844–52.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. FCTC article 5.3 toolkit guidance for governments on preventing tobacco industry interference. Edinburgh; 2012. International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. FCTC article 5.3 toolkit guidance for governments on preventing tobacco industry interference. Edinburgh; 2012.
54.
go back to reference McKee M, Hervey T, Gilmore A. Public health policies. In: Mossialos E, Permanand G, Baeten R, Hervey T, editors. Health systems governance in Europe: the role of European Union law and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 231–81.CrossRef McKee M, Hervey T, Gilmore A. Public health policies. In: Mossialos E, Permanand G, Baeten R, Hervey T, editors. Health systems governance in Europe: the role of European Union law and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 231–81.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
European Union implementation of Article 5.3 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
Authors
Benjamin Hawkins
Chris Holden
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Globalization and Health / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1744-8603
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0386-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Globalization and Health 1/2018 Go to the issue