Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Conflict and Health 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Ethical considerations for children’s participation in data collection activities during humanitarian emergencies: A Delphi review

Authors: Cyril Bennouna, Hani Mansourian, Lindsay Stark

Published in: Conflict and Health | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Children’s right to participate in data collection during emergencies has been widely recognized by humanitarian actors. However, participation in such activities can expose children to risk. Tensions have been noted between the right to participate and other principles, such as the imperative to ‘do no harm.’ With little evidence to inform guidance on addressing this tension, our study sought to identify expert consensus on whether and how children participate in emergency-related data collection activities.

Methods

We employed a three-round Delphi technique with a purposive sample of 52 child protection specialists. Respondents answered two open-ended questions in round one. A thematic analysis of responses generated a set of unique statements addressing the study questions. In the second round, respondents rated each statement on a five-point scale. In the final round, respondents reviewed the group’s average ratings for each statement with the option to revise their own ratings. A statement was said to have reached clear consensus when at least 90% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed with the statement.

Results

A total of 124 statements and 14 themes emerged from the thematic analysis, with 46.0% of statements reaching clear consensus in the third round. Respondents strongly supported children’s right to participate in data collection in humanitarian settings, while also recognizing that protecting children from harm may “over-ride” the participation principle in some contexts. Respondents identified capacity and contextual considerations as important factors influencing participation decisions, though they sometimes disagreed about how these factors should determine participation. Respondents also considered the role of individual child factors and the presence of caregivers in selecting child participants, and proposed best practice approaches for securing children’s safe and meaningful participation.

Conclusions

With almost half of statements reaching clear consensus, these findings reflect broad agreement within the sector about engaging children in data collection in emergencies. At the same time, points of ongoing debate around how to factor different risks into child participation decisions may indicate discordant practice. Further reflection is needed around how factors such as the phase of emergency, the existence of basic services, and cultural beliefs should influence whether and how children participate.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC). Convention on the rights of the child. General comment no. 12: The right of the child to be heard; 2009. Committee on the Rights of the Child (CRC). Convention on the rights of the child. General comment no. 12: The right of the child to be heard; 2009.
2.
go back to reference Beazley H, Bessell S, Ennew J, Waterson R. The right to be properly researched: Research with children in a messy, real world. Child Geographies. 2009;7(4):365–78.CrossRef Beazley H, Bessell S, Ennew J, Waterson R. The right to be properly researched: Research with children in a messy, real world. Child Geographies. 2009;7(4):365–78.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Boyden, J, Ennew, J. Children in focus: a manual for participatory research with children. Stockholm: Save the Children Sweden; 1997. Boyden, J, Ennew, J. Children in focus: a manual for participatory research with children. Stockholm: Save the Children Sweden; 1997.
4.
go back to reference Cahill, H, Beadle, S, Mitch, J, Coffey, J, Crofts, J. Adolescents in emergencies. Parkville: University of Melbourne; 2010. Cahill, H, Beadle, S, Mitch, J, Coffey, J, Crofts, J. Adolescents in emergencies. Parkville: University of Melbourne; 2010.
5.
go back to reference Dyregrov K, Dyregrov A, Raundalen M. Refugee families’ experience of research participation. J Trauma Stress. 2010;13(3):413–26.CrossRef Dyregrov K, Dyregrov A, Raundalen M. Refugee families’ experience of research participation. J Trauma Stress. 2010;13(3):413–26.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gibbs L, Mutch C, O’Connor P, MacDougall C. Research with, by, for and about children: Lessons from disaster contexts. Global Studies Child. 2013;3(2):129–41.CrossRef Gibbs L, Mutch C, O’Connor P, MacDougall C. Research with, by, for and about children: Lessons from disaster contexts. Global Studies Child. 2013;3(2):129–41.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Graham A, Powell M, Taylor N, Anderson D, Fitzgerald R. Ethical research involving children. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research–Innocenti; 2013. Graham A, Powell M, Taylor N, Anderson D, Fitzgerald R. Ethical research involving children. Florence: UNICEF Office of Research–Innocenti; 2013.
8.
go back to reference Thomas S, Byford S. Research with unaccompanied children seeking asylum. Br Med J. 2003;327(7428):1400.CrossRef Thomas S, Byford S. Research with unaccompanied children seeking asylum. Br Med J. 2003;327(7428):1400.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vervliet, M, Rousseau, C, Broekaert, E, Derluyn, I. Multilayered Ethics in Research Involving Unaccompanied Refugee Minors. J Refugee Studies. 2015; doi: 10.1093/jrs/feu039. Vervliet, M, Rousseau, C, Broekaert, E, Derluyn, I. Multilayered Ethics in Research Involving Unaccompanied Refugee Minors. J Refugee Studies. 2015; doi: 10.​1093/​jrs/​feu039.
10.
go back to reference Berman G, Hart J, O’Mathúna D, Mattellone E, Potts A, O’Kane C, et al. What we know about ethical research involving children in humanitarian settings: an overview of principles, the literature and case studies (Innocenti Working Paper, No. 2016-18). Florence: UNICEF Office of Research; 2016. Berman G, Hart J, O’Mathúna D, Mattellone E, Potts A, O’Kane C, et al. What we know about ethical research involving children in humanitarian settings: an overview of principles, the literature and case studies (Innocenti Working Paper, No. 2016-18). Florence: UNICEF Office of Research; 2016.
11.
go back to reference Feinstein C, O’Kane C. A kit of tools for participatory research and evaluation with children, young people and adults: A compilation of tools used during a thematic evaluation and documentation on children’s participation in armed conflict, post conflict and peace building. Oslo: Save the Children Norway; 2008. Feinstein C, O’Kane C. A kit of tools for participatory research and evaluation with children, young people and adults: A compilation of tools used during a thematic evaluation and documentation on children’s participation in armed conflict, post conflict and peace building. Oslo: Save the Children Norway; 2008.
12.
go back to reference Feinstein C, O’Kane C. Ethical guidelines for ethical, meaningful and inclusive children’s participation practice. Oslo: Save the Children Norway; 2008. Feinstein C, O’Kane C. Ethical guidelines for ethical, meaningful and inclusive children’s participation practice. Oslo: Save the Children Norway; 2008.
13.
go back to reference International Rescue Committee (IRC). Caring for child survivors of sexual abuse: Guidelines for health and psychosocial service providers in humanitarian settings. New York: IRC; 2012. International Rescue Committee (IRC). Caring for child survivors of sexual abuse: Guidelines for health and psychosocial service providers in humanitarian settings. New York: IRC; 2012.
14.
go back to reference Lansdown G, O’Kane C. A toolkit for monitoring and evaluating children’s participation. London: Save the Children; 2014. Lansdown G, O’Kane C. A toolkit for monitoring and evaluating children’s participation. London: Save the Children; 2014.
15.
go back to reference Mann, G, Tolfree, D. Children’s participation in research: Reflections from the care and protection of separated children in emergencies project. Stockholm: Save the Children Sweden; 2003. Mann, G, Tolfree, D. Children’s participation in research: Reflections from the care and protection of separated children in emergencies project. Stockholm: Save the Children Sweden; 2003.
16.
go back to reference O’Kane, C. Guidelines for children’s participation in humanitarian programming. London: Save the Children; 2013. O’Kane, C. Guidelines for children’s participation in humanitarian programming. London: Save the Children; 2013.
18.
go back to reference Toms, C, MacLeod, H. Children in emergencies manual. Monrovia, CA: World Vision International; 2006. Toms, C, MacLeod, H. Children in emergencies manual. Monrovia, CA: World Vision International; 2006.
19.
go back to reference UNICEF. The participation of children and young people in emergencies: A guide for relief agencies, based largely on experiences in the Asian tsunami response. Bangkok: UNICEF East Asia and Pacific Regional Office; 2007. UNICEF. The participation of children and young people in emergencies: A guide for relief agencies, based largely on experiences in the Asian tsunami response. Bangkok: UNICEF East Asia and Pacific Regional Office; 2007.
20.
go back to reference World Health Organization (WHO). WHO ethical and safety recommendations for researching, documenting and monitoring sexual violence in emergencies. Geneva: WHO; 2007. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO ethical and safety recommendations for researching, documenting and monitoring sexual violence in emergencies. Geneva: WHO; 2007.
21.
go back to reference Hart J, Tyrer B. Research with children living in situations of armed conflict: Concepts, ethics and methods. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2006. Hart J, Tyrer B. Research with children living in situations of armed conflict: Concepts, ethics and methods. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2006.
22.
go back to reference Jacobsen K, Landau L. B. The dual imperative in refugee research: some methodological and ethical considerations in social science research on forced migration. Disasters. 2003;27(3):185–206.CrossRefPubMed Jacobsen K, Landau L. B. The dual imperative in refugee research: some methodological and ethical considerations in social science research on forced migration. Disasters. 2003;27(3):185–206.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Inter-Agency Standing Committee. (IASC). Multi-cluster/sector initial rapid assessment (MIRA): Provisional version March 2012. Geneva: Inter-Agency Standing Committee; 2012. Inter-Agency Standing Committee. (IASC). Multi-cluster/sector initial rapid assessment (MIRA): Provisional version March 2012. Geneva: Inter-Agency Standing Committee; 2012.
24.
go back to reference Child Protection Working Group (CPWG). Child protection rapid assessment toolkit. Global Protection Cluster; 2012. Child Protection Working Group (CPWG). Child protection rapid assessment toolkit. Global Protection Cluster; 2012.
25.
go back to reference Landis D, Stark L, Mansourian H, Ager A. Examining Child Protection Rapid Assessment: A structured review of field learning from the Child Protection Rapid Assessment (CPRA) toolkit. New York: Child Protection in Crisis (CPC) Network; 2013. Landis D, Stark L, Mansourian H, Ager A. Examining Child Protection Rapid Assessment: A structured review of field learning from the Child Protection Rapid Assessment (CPRA) toolkit. New York: Child Protection in Crisis (CPC) Network; 2013.
27.
go back to reference Dalkey NC, Brown BB, Cochran S. The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion (Vol. 3). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation; 1969. Dalkey NC, Brown BB, Cochran S. The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion (Vol. 3). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation; 1969.
28.
go back to reference Ager A, Stark L, Akesson B, Boothby N. Defining best practice in care and protection of children in crisis affected settings: A delphi study. Child Dev. 2010;81(4):1271–86.CrossRefPubMed Ager A, Stark L, Akesson B, Boothby N. Defining best practice in care and protection of children in crisis affected settings: A delphi study. Child Dev. 2010;81(4):1271–86.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Brown N, Crawford I, Carley S, Mackway-Jones K. A Delphi-based consensus study into planning for biological incidents. J Public Health. 2006;28(3):238–41.CrossRef Brown N, Crawford I, Carley S, Mackway-Jones K. A Delphi-based consensus study into planning for biological incidents. J Public Health. 2006;28(3):238–41.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Crawford IWF, Mackway-Jones K, Russell DR, Carley SD. Planning for chemical incidents by implementing a Delphi based consensus study. Em Med J. 2004;21(1):20–3.CrossRef Crawford IWF, Mackway-Jones K, Russell DR, Carley SD. Planning for chemical incidents by implementing a Delphi based consensus study. Em Med J. 2004;21(1):20–3.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Walker AM, Selfe J. The Delphi method: a useful tool for the allied health researcher. Int J Ther Rehabil. 1996;3(12):677–81.CrossRef Walker AM, Selfe J. The Delphi method: a useful tool for the allied health researcher. Int J Ther Rehabil. 1996;3(12):677–81.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):1008–15.PubMed Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):1008–15.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Hasson F, Keeney S. Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2011;78(9):1695–704.CrossRef Hasson F, Keeney S. Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technol Forecast Soc Chang. 2011;78(9):1695–704.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assessment Res Eval. 2007;12(10):1–8. Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Pract Assessment Res Eval. 2007;12(10):1–8.
37.
go back to reference Braun V, Clarke V, Terry G. Thematic analysis. Qual Res Clin Health Psychol. 2014;24:95–114. Braun V, Clarke V, Terry G. Thematic analysis. Qual Res Clin Health Psychol. 2014;24:95–114.
39.
40.
go back to reference Powell, M A, Graham, A, Taylor, N J, Newell, S, Fitzgerald, R. Building capacity for ethical research with children and young people: An international research project to examine the ethical issues and challenges in undertaking research with and for children in different majority and minority world contexts (Research Report for the Childwatch International Research Network). Dunedin: University of Otago Centre for Research on Children and Families/Lismore: Centre for Children and Young People; 2011. Powell, M A, Graham, A, Taylor, N J, Newell, S, Fitzgerald, R. Building capacity for ethical research with children and young people: An international research project to examine the ethical issues and challenges in undertaking research with and for children in different majority and minority world contexts (Research Report for the Childwatch International Research Network). Dunedin: University of Otago Centre for Research on Children and Families/Lismore: Centre for Children and Young People; 2011.
41.
go back to reference Schenk K, Williamson J. Ethical approaches to gathering information from children and adolescents in international settings: Guidelines and resources. Washington, DC: Population Council; 2005. Schenk K, Williamson J. Ethical approaches to gathering information from children and adolescents in international settings: Guidelines and resources. Washington, DC: Population Council; 2005.
Metadata
Title
Ethical considerations for children’s participation in data collection activities during humanitarian emergencies: A Delphi review
Authors
Cyril Bennouna
Hani Mansourian
Lindsay Stark
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Conflict and Health / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1752-1505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-017-0108-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Conflict and Health 1/2017 Go to the issue