Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2023

23-03-2023 | KNEE

Establishing minimal detectable change thresholds for the international knee documentation committee and Kujala scores at one and two years after patellofemoral joint arthroplasty

Authors: Kyle N. Kunze, Guilherme Palhares, Tyler J. Uppstrom, Paige Hinkley, Morgan Rizy, Andreas H. Gomoll, Beth E. Shubin Stein, Sabrina M. Strickland

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 8/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To define the minimal detectable change (MDC) for the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) and Kujala scores one and two years after patellofemoral joint arthroplasty (PFA).

Methods

A distribution-based method (one-half the standard deviation of the mean difference between postoperative and preoperative outcome scores) was applied to establish MDC thresholds among 225 patients undergoing primary PFA at a single high-volume musculoskeletal-care center. Stability of change in MDC achievement was explored by quantifying the proportion of achievement at one- and two-year postoperative timepoints. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the association between sociodemographic and operative features on MDC achievement.

Results

MDC thresholds for the Kujala score were 10.3 (71.1% achievement) and 10.6 (70.4% achievement) at one- and two years, respectively. The MDC thresholds for the IKDC score were 11.2 (78.1% achievement) and 12.3 (69.0% achievement) at one- and two years, respectively. Predictors of achieving the MDC for the Kujala and IKDC scores at both time points were lower preoperative Kujala and IKDC scores, respectively. Preoperative thresholds of ≤ 24.1 and 7.6 for the Kujala and IKDC scores, respectively, were associated with a 90% MDC achievement probability. When preoperative thresholds approached 64.3 and 48.3 for the Kujala and IKDC, respectively, MDC achievement probability reduced to 50%.

Conclusion

The MDC thresholds for the Kujala and IKDC scores two years after PFA were 10.6 and 12.3, respectively. Clinically significant health status changes were maintained overall, with a slight decrease in achievement rates between one and two years. MDC achievement was associated with disability at presentation, and several probability-based preoperative thresholds were defined. These findings may assist knee surgeons with patient selection and the decision to proceed with PFA by better understanding the patient-specific propensity for MDC achievement.

Level of evidence

IV, retrospective case series.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baker JF, Caborn DN, Schlierf TJ, Fain TB, Smith LS, Malkani AL (2020) Isolated patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: can preoperative bone scans predict survivorship? J Arthroplasty 35:57–60CrossRefPubMed Baker JF, Caborn DN, Schlierf TJ, Fain TB, Smith LS, Malkani AL (2020) Isolated patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: can preoperative bone scans predict survivorship? J Arthroplasty 35:57–60CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bernard CD, Pareek A, Sabbag CM, Parkes CW, Krych AJ, Cummings NM et al (2021) Pre-operative patella alta does not affect midterm clinical outcomes and survivorship of patellofemoral arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29:1670–1677CrossRefPubMed Bernard CD, Pareek A, Sabbag CM, Parkes CW, Krych AJ, Cummings NM et al (2021) Pre-operative patella alta does not affect midterm clinical outcomes and survivorship of patellofemoral arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29:1670–1677CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bozic K, Yu H, Zywiel MG, Li L, Lin Z, Simoes JL et al (2020) Quality measure public reporting is associated with improved outcomes following hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102:1799–1806CrossRefPubMed Bozic K, Yu H, Zywiel MG, Li L, Lin Z, Simoes JL et al (2020) Quality measure public reporting is associated with improved outcomes following hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 102:1799–1806CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Bunyoz KI, Lustig S, Troelsen A (2019) Similar postoperative patient-reported outcome in both second generation patellofemoral arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for treatment of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:2226–2237CrossRefPubMed Bunyoz KI, Lustig S, Troelsen A (2019) Similar postoperative patient-reported outcome in both second generation patellofemoral arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for treatment of isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:2226–2237CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Clement ND, Howard TA, Immelman RJ, MacDonald D, Patton JT, Lawson GM et al (2019) Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty for patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis: equal function and satisfaction but higher revision rate for partial arthroplasty at a minimum eight years’ follow-up. Bone Joint J. 101-B:41–46CrossRefPubMed Clement ND, Howard TA, Immelman RJ, MacDonald D, Patton JT, Lawson GM et al (2019) Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty for patients with patellofemoral osteoarthritis: equal function and satisfaction but higher revision rate for partial arthroplasty at a minimum eight years’ follow-up. Bone Joint J. 101-B:41–46CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Copay AG, Eyberg B, Chung AS, Zurcher KS, Chutkan N, Spangehl MJ (2018) Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the orthopaedic literature, part II: lower extremity: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 6:e2CrossRefPubMed Copay AG, Eyberg B, Chung AS, Zurcher KS, Chutkan N, Spangehl MJ (2018) Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the orthopaedic literature, part II: lower extremity: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 6:e2CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Crossley KM, Bennell KL, Cowan SM, Green S (2004) Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:815–822CrossRefPubMed Crossley KM, Bennell KL, Cowan SM, Green S (2004) Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:815–822CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Dahm DL, Kalisvaart MM, Stuart MJ, Slettedahl SW (2014) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: outcomes and factors associated with early progression of tibiofemoral arthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2554–2559CrossRefPubMed Dahm DL, Kalisvaart MM, Stuart MJ, Slettedahl SW (2014) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: outcomes and factors associated with early progression of tibiofemoral arthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2554–2559CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference deDeugd CM, Pareek A, Krych AJ, Cummings NM, Dahm DL (2017) Outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty based on radiographic severity. J Arthroplasty 32:1137–1142CrossRefPubMed deDeugd CM, Pareek A, Krych AJ, Cummings NM, Dahm DL (2017) Outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty based on radiographic severity. J Arthroplasty 32:1137–1142CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Dejour D, Saffarini M, Malemo Y, Pungitore M, Valluy J, Nover L et al (2019) Early outcomes of an anatomic trochlear-cutting patellofemoral arthroplasty: patient selection is key. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:2297–2302CrossRefPubMed Dejour D, Saffarini M, Malemo Y, Pungitore M, Valluy J, Nover L et al (2019) Early outcomes of an anatomic trochlear-cutting patellofemoral arthroplasty: patient selection is key. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:2297–2302CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Delanois RE, McGrath MS, Ulrich SD, Marker DR, Seyler TM, Bonutti PM et al (2008) Results of total knee replacement for isolated patellofemoral arthritis: when not to perform a patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 39:381-388 viiCrossRefPubMed Delanois RE, McGrath MS, Ulrich SD, Marker DR, Seyler TM, Bonutti PM et al (2008) Results of total knee replacement for isolated patellofemoral arthritis: when not to perform a patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 39:381-388 viiCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gagnier JJ, Mullins M, Huang H, Marinac-Dabic D, Ghambaryan A, Eloff B et al (2017) A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:1688-1697 e1687CrossRefPubMed Gagnier JJ, Mullins M, Huang H, Marinac-Dabic D, Ghambaryan A, Eloff B et al (2017) A systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:1688-1697 e1687CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Grevnerts HT, Terwee CB, Kvist J (2015) The measurement properties of the IKDC-subjective knee form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:3698–3706CrossRefPubMed Grevnerts HT, Terwee CB, Kvist J (2015) The measurement properties of the IKDC-subjective knee form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:3698–3706CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Imhoff AB, Feucht MJ, Bartsch E, Cotic M, Pogorzelski J (2019) High patient satisfaction with significant improvement in knee function and pain relief after mid-term follow-up in patients with isolated patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:2251–2258CrossRefPubMed Imhoff AB, Feucht MJ, Bartsch E, Cotic M, Pogorzelski J (2019) High patient satisfaction with significant improvement in knee function and pain relief after mid-term follow-up in patients with isolated patellofemoral inlay arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:2251–2258CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P et al (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29:600–613CrossRefPubMed Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P et al (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29:600–613CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH (1989) Measurement of health status. ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10:407–415CrossRefPubMed Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH (1989) Measurement of health status. ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10:407–415CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Joseph MN, Achten J, Parsons NR, Costa ML, Collaborators PATT (2020) The PAT randomized clinical trial. Bone Joint J 102-B:310–318CrossRefPubMed Joseph MN, Achten J, Parsons NR, Costa ML, Collaborators PATT (2020) The PAT randomized clinical trial. Bone Joint J 102-B:310–318CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kamikovski I, Dobransky J, Dervin GF (2019) The clinical outcome of patellofemoral arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years. J Arthroplasty 34:2914–2917CrossRefPubMed Kamikovski I, Dobransky J, Dervin GF (2019) The clinical outcome of patellofemoral arthroplasty vs total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years. J Arthroplasty 34:2914–2917CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Karhade AV, Bono CM, Schwab JH, Tobert DG (2021) Minimum clinically important difference: a metric that matters in the age of patient-reported outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 103:2331–2337CrossRefPubMed Karhade AV, Bono CM, Schwab JH, Tobert DG (2021) Minimum clinically important difference: a metric that matters in the age of patient-reported outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 103:2331–2337CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Konan S, Haddad FS (2016) Midterm outcome of avon patellofemoral arthroplasty for posttraumatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 31:2657–2659CrossRefPubMed Konan S, Haddad FS (2016) Midterm outcome of avon patellofemoral arthroplasty for posttraumatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 31:2657–2659CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Hurme M, Nelimarkka O (1993) Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy 9:159–163CrossRefPubMed Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Hurme M, Nelimarkka O (1993) Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy 9:159–163CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kunze KN, Bart JA, Ahmad M, Nho SJ, Chahla J (2021) Large heterogeneity among minimal clinically important differences for hip arthroscopy outcomes: a systematic review of reporting trends and quantification methods. Arthroscopy 37:1028-1037 e1026CrossRefPubMed Kunze KN, Bart JA, Ahmad M, Nho SJ, Chahla J (2021) Large heterogeneity among minimal clinically important differences for hip arthroscopy outcomes: a systematic review of reporting trends and quantification methods. Arthroscopy 37:1028-1037 e1026CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kvien TK, Heiberg T, Hagen KB (2007) Minimal clinically important improvement/difference (MCII/MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): what do these concepts mean? Ann Rheum Dis 66(Suppl 3):iii40-41PubMedPubMedCentral Kvien TK, Heiberg T, Hagen KB (2007) Minimal clinically important improvement/difference (MCII/MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS): what do these concepts mean? Ann Rheum Dis 66(Suppl 3):iii40-41PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Makhni EC, Baumhauer JF, Ayers D, Bozic KJ (2019) Patient-reported outcome measures: how and why they are collected. Instr Course Lect 68:675–680PubMed Makhni EC, Baumhauer JF, Ayers D, Bozic KJ (2019) Patient-reported outcome measures: how and why they are collected. Instr Course Lect 68:675–680PubMed
25.
go back to reference Metcalfe AJ, Ahearn N, Hassaballa MA, Parsons N, Ackroyd CE, Murray JR et al (2018) The Avon patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: two- to 18-year results of a large single-centre cohort. Bone Joint J 100-B:1162–1167CrossRefPubMed Metcalfe AJ, Ahearn N, Hassaballa MA, Parsons N, Ackroyd CE, Murray JR et al (2018) The Avon patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: two- to 18-year results of a large single-centre cohort. Bone Joint J 100-B:1162–1167CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Nwachukwu BU, Chang B, Fields K, Rebolledo BJ, Nawabi DH, Kelly BT et al (2017) Defining the “substantial clinical benefit” after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med 45:1297–1303CrossRefPubMed Nwachukwu BU, Chang B, Fields K, Rebolledo BJ, Nawabi DH, Kelly BT et al (2017) Defining the “substantial clinical benefit” after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med 45:1297–1303CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Odgaard A, Kappel A, Madsen F, Kristensen PW, Stephensen S, Attarzadeh AP (2022) Patellofemoral arthroplasty results in better time-weighted patient-reported outcomes after 6 years than TKA: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 480:1707–1718CrossRefPubMed Odgaard A, Kappel A, Madsen F, Kristensen PW, Stephensen S, Attarzadeh AP (2022) Patellofemoral arthroplasty results in better time-weighted patient-reported outcomes after 6 years than TKA: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 480:1707–1718CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ruzbarsky JJ, Marom N, Marx RG (2018) Measuring quality and outcomes in sports medicine. Clin Sports Med 37:463–482CrossRefPubMed Ruzbarsky JJ, Marom N, Marx RG (2018) Measuring quality and outcomes in sports medicine. Clin Sports Med 37:463–482CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Shubin Stein BE, Brady JM, Grawe B, Tuakli-Wosornu Y, Nguyen JT, Wolfe E et al (2017) Return to activities after patellofemoral arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 46:E353–E357PubMed Shubin Stein BE, Brady JM, Grawe B, Tuakli-Wosornu Y, Nguyen JT, Wolfe E et al (2017) Return to activities after patellofemoral arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 46:E353–E357PubMed
30.
31.
go back to reference Tishelman JC, Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, Gruskay J, Strickland SM (2019) Patient satisfaction reporting for patellofemoral arthroplasty is significantly lacking: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed 47:270–274CrossRefPubMed Tishelman JC, Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, Gruskay J, Strickland SM (2019) Patient satisfaction reporting for patellofemoral arthroplasty is significantly lacking: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed 47:270–274CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Villa JC, Paoli AR, Nelson-Williams HW, Badr RN, Harper KD (2021) Onlay patellofemoral arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral arthritis: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty 36:2642–2649CrossRefPubMed Villa JC, Paoli AR, Nelson-Williams HW, Badr RN, Harper KD (2021) Onlay patellofemoral arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral arthritis: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty 36:2642–2649CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Walker T, Perkinson B, Mihalko WM (2012) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the other unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1712–1720CrossRefPubMed Walker T, Perkinson B, Mihalko WM (2012) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the other unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1712–1720CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Wei DH, Hawker GA, Jevsevar DS, Bozic KJ (2015) Improving value in musculoskeletal care delivery: AOA critical issues. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:769–774CrossRefPubMed Wei DH, Hawker GA, Jevsevar DS, Bozic KJ (2015) Improving value in musculoskeletal care delivery: AOA critical issues. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:769–774CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Willekens P, Victor J, Verbruggen D, Vande Kerckhove M, Van Der Straeten C (2015) Outcome of patellofemoral arthroplasty, determinants for success. Acta Orthop Belg 81:759–767PubMed Willekens P, Victor J, Verbruggen D, Vande Kerckhove M, Van Der Straeten C (2015) Outcome of patellofemoral arthroplasty, determinants for success. Acta Orthop Belg 81:759–767PubMed
Metadata
Title
Establishing minimal detectable change thresholds for the international knee documentation committee and Kujala scores at one and two years after patellofemoral joint arthroplasty
Authors
Kyle N. Kunze
Guilherme Palhares
Tyler J. Uppstrom
Paige Hinkley
Morgan Rizy
Andreas H. Gomoll
Beth E. Shubin Stein
Sabrina M. Strickland
Publication date
23-03-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 8/2023
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07341-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2023

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2023 Go to the issue