Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Esophagus 2/2023

23-01-2023 | Esophagus Resection | Review Article

The fragility of significant results from randomized controlled trials in esophageal surgeries

Authors: Yung Lee, Yasith Samarasinghe, Arshia Javidan, Umair Tahir, Nadeesha Samarasinghe, Yaron Shargall, Christian Finley, Wael Hanna, John Agzarian

Published in: Esophagus | Issue 2/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are regarded as one of the highest forms of clinical research, the robustness of their P values can be difficult to ascertain. Defined as the minimum number of patients in a study arm that would need to be changed from a non-event to event for the findings to lose significance, the Fragility Index is a method for evaluating results from these trials. This study aims to calculate the Fragility Index for trials evaluating perioperative esophagectomy-related interventions to determine the strength of RCTs in this field. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for RCTs related to esophagectomy that reported a significant dichotomous outcome. Two reviewers independently screened articles and performed the data extractions with risk of bias assessment. The Fragility Index was calculated using a two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. Bivariate correlation was conducted to evaluate associations between the Fragility Index and study characteristics. 41 RCTs were included, and the median sample size was 80 patients [Interquartile range (IQR) 60–161]. Of the included outcomes, 29 (71%) were primary, and 12 (29%) were secondary. The median Fragility Index was 1 (IQR 1–3), meaning that by changing one patient from a non-event to event, the results would become non-significant. Fragility Index was correlated with P value, number of events, and journal impact factor. The RCTs related to esophagectomy did not prove to be robust, as the significance of their results could be changed by altering the outcome status of a handful of patients in one study arm.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
24.
go back to reference Yao R, Zhang T, Zhang J, et al. Effects of postoperative enteral nutrition combined with adjuvant radiotherapy on inflammatory response, nutrition, healing and prognosis in patients receiving radical surgery for esophageal carcinoma. J BUON. 2019;24(4):1673–8.PubMed Yao R, Zhang T, Zhang J, et al. Effects of postoperative enteral nutrition combined with adjuvant radiotherapy on inflammatory response, nutrition, healing and prognosis in patients receiving radical surgery for esophageal carcinoma. J BUON. 2019;24(4):1673–8.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Ohkura Y, Ueno M, Shindoh J, Iizuka T, Udagawa H. Randomized controlled trial on efficacy of oligomeric formula (HINE E-GEL®) versus polymeric formula (MEIN®) enteral nutrition after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with gastric tube reconstruction. Dis Esophagus. 2019;32(5):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy084.CrossRef Ohkura Y, Ueno M, Shindoh J, Iizuka T, Udagawa H. Randomized controlled trial on efficacy of oligomeric formula (HINE E-GEL®) versus polymeric formula (MEIN®) enteral nutrition after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with gastric tube reconstruction. Dis Esophagus. 2019;32(5):1–10. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​dote/​doy084.CrossRef
36.
37.
go back to reference Mahmodlou R, Shateri K, Homayooni F, Hatami S. The effect of disc-shaped gastric resection of anastomosis site on reducing postoperative dysphagia and stricture after esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with esophageal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep. 2017;5(1):52–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/gow002.CrossRef Mahmodlou R, Shateri K, Homayooni F, Hatami S. The effect of disc-shaped gastric resection of anastomosis site on reducing postoperative dysphagia and stricture after esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with esophageal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep. 2017;5(1):52–6. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​gastro/​gow002.CrossRef
40.
55.
go back to reference Karanicolas PJ, Farrokhyar F, Bhandari M. Blinding: who, what, when, why, how? Can J Surg. 2010;53(5):345 (Accessed March 1, 2022. /pmc/articles/PMC2947122/).PubMedPubMedCentral Karanicolas PJ, Farrokhyar F, Bhandari M. Blinding: who, what, when, why, how? Can J Surg. 2010;53(5):345 (Accessed March 1, 2022. /pmc/articles/PMC2947122/).PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
The fragility of significant results from randomized controlled trials in esophageal surgeries
Authors
Yung Lee
Yasith Samarasinghe
Arshia Javidan
Umair Tahir
Nadeesha Samarasinghe
Yaron Shargall
Christian Finley
Wael Hanna
John Agzarian
Publication date
23-01-2023
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Esophagus / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1612-9059
Electronic ISSN: 1612-9067
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-023-00985-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

Esophagus 2/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine