Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 3/2022

13-02-2021 | Esophagoscopy | Original Article

The Efficacy of Transnasal Esophagoscopy in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients at HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center (MSMC), Thailand

Authors: Parkkapus Shoowit, Pisit Wanichakorntrakul, Panuwat Wongwattana

Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Special Issue 3/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

To evaluate the positive pathological findings, patient satisfaction, pain, and complications of transnasal esophagoscopy (TNE) in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients at HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center (MSMC), Thailand. A descriptive cross-sectional study. Forty adult LPR patients who had failed 3-months proton-pump inhibitor therapy were recruited to undergo TNE at Otolaryngology department, MSMC from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. Data including demographics, Reflux Finding Score, Reflux Symptom Index, Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) scores, and endoscopic findings were recorded and compared between patients who had positive pathological findings and those who had negative findings. Sixteen patients (40%) had positive findings, which led to the changes in management of their conditions. Most positive findings included multiple esophageal and gastric ulcers (4/16), gastric ulcer (3/16), esophagitis (2/16), and esophageal candidiasis (2/16). There was no statistically significant difference in the baseline data between patients in the TNE positive and the TNE negative groups. The average patient satisfaction on VAS was 8.60 ± 1.43. Most patients were in the mild pain score group (18/40). Complications were not encountered. TNE is an efficient tool for evaluating LPR in Thai patients. The procedure was proven to be safe, well tolerated, and highly satisfied.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R (2006) The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 101(8):1900–1920CrossRef Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R (2006) The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 101(8):1900–1920CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Koufman JA, Aviv JE, Casiano RR, Shaw GY (2002) Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127(1):32–35CrossRef Koufman JA, Aviv JE, Casiano RR, Shaw GY (2002) Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127(1):32–35CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Book DT, Rhee JS, Toohill RJ, Smith TL (2002) Perspectives in laryngopharyngeal reflux: an international survey. Laryngoscope 112(8 Pt 1):1399–1406CrossRef Book DT, Rhee JS, Toohill RJ, Smith TL (2002) Perspectives in laryngopharyngeal reflux: an international survey. Laryngoscope 112(8 Pt 1):1399–1406CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA (2002) Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice 16(2):274–277CrossRef Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA (2002) Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice 16(2):274–277CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA (2001) The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope 111(8):1313–1317CrossRef Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA (2001) The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope 111(8):1313–1317CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ford CN (2005) Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux. JAMA 294(12):1534–1540CrossRef Ford CN (2005) Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux. JAMA 294(12):1534–1540CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chan MF (1996) Complications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. GastrointestEndoscClin N Am 6(2):287–303 Chan MF (1996) Complications of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. GastrointestEndoscClin N Am 6(2):287–303
8.
go back to reference Shaker R (1994) Unsedated trans-nasal pharyngoesophagogastroduodenoscopy (T-EGD): technique. GastrointestEndosc 40(3):346–348 Shaker R (1994) Unsedated trans-nasal pharyngoesophagogastroduodenoscopy (T-EGD): technique. GastrointestEndosc 40(3):346–348
9.
go back to reference Postma GN, Cohen JT, Belafsky PC, Halum SL, Gupta SK, Bach KK et al (2005) Transnasalesophagoscopy: revisited (over 700 consecutive cases). Laryngoscope 115(2):321–323CrossRef Postma GN, Cohen JT, Belafsky PC, Halum SL, Gupta SK, Bach KK et al (2005) Transnasalesophagoscopy: revisited (over 700 consecutive cases). Laryngoscope 115(2):321–323CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Howell RJ, Pate MB, Ishman SL, Isseroff TF, Rubin AD, Soliman AM et al (2016) Prospective multi-institutional transnasalesophagoscopy: predictors of a change in management. Laryngoscope 126(12):2667–2671CrossRef Howell RJ, Pate MB, Ishman SL, Isseroff TF, Rubin AD, Soliman AM et al (2016) Prospective multi-institutional transnasalesophagoscopy: predictors of a change in management. Laryngoscope 126(12):2667–2671CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chung EJ, Rho YS, Jung KY, Kim JW, Lee SW (2014) The role of transnasalesophagoscopy in ENT office: a prospective, multicenter study in Korea. ClinExpOtorhinolaryngol 7(2):123–125 Chung EJ, Rho YS, Jung KY, Kim JW, Lee SW (2014) The role of transnasalesophagoscopy in ENT office: a prospective, multicenter study in Korea. ClinExpOtorhinolaryngol 7(2):123–125
12.
go back to reference Dean R, Dua K, Massey B, Berger W, Hogan WJ, Shaker R (1996) A comparative study of unsedatedtransnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and conventional EGD. GastrointestEndosc 44(4):422–424 Dean R, Dua K, Massey B, Berger W, Hogan WJ, Shaker R (1996) A comparative study of unsedatedtransnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and conventional EGD. GastrointestEndosc 44(4):422–424
13.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ, Shaheen NJ, Vaezi MF, Hiltz SW, Black E, Modlin IM et al (2008) American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol 135(s4):1383–1391CrossRef Kahrilas PJ, Shaheen NJ, Vaezi MF, Hiltz SW, Black E, Modlin IM et al (2008) American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol 135(s4):1383–1391CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Aviv JE, Takoudes TG, Ma G, Close LG (2001) Office-based esophagoscopy: a preliminary report. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125(3):170–175CrossRef Aviv JE, Takoudes TG, Ma G, Close LG (2001) Office-based esophagoscopy: a preliminary report. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125(3):170–175CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Efficacy of Transnasal Esophagoscopy in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients at HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Medical Center (MSMC), Thailand
Authors
Parkkapus Shoowit
Pisit Wanichakorntrakul
Panuwat Wongwattana
Publication date
13-02-2021
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Issue Special Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02425-y

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2022

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 3/2022 Go to the issue